Now that Congress has recessed, and since the conventions aren’t for a couple of weeks, Thursday’s The Situation Room turned back to the "hot" issue of what many liberals are calling on congressional Democrats to do: arrest and lock-up Karl Rove for his failure to testify on the issue of the firing of U.S. attorneys in late 2006.
CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, as part of a report on this possible move by the Democrats, conducted a search for the supposed jail inside the U.S. Capitol. He also addressed the little-used power of the legislature to arrest and try government officials for contempt of Congress.
Acosta began by describing the liberals’ fantasy: "Just think, some on the Left say: Karl Rove and the Capitol slammer." During the segment, he interviewed George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley (who links to Daily Kos and ProgressiveDem.com on his personal website and is lead counsel for convicted terror financier Sami al-Arian) and Associate Senate Historian Don Ritchie for the segment. When asked about contempt of Congress charges, Turley quipped, "The defendant is brought forth by the Sergeant-of-Arms, and in the case of Mr. Rove, it shouldn't be difficult. He's a consultant of Fox News a block away from the House floor."
Ritchie brought Acosta to the bottom level of the Capitol to a tomb chamber originally built to hold the body of George Washington. He told of how "[a] lot of people who have seen it assumed, well, this must be the Capitol jail," due to the metal bars protecting the entrance of the chamber. The historian also told Acosta about the last time a member of a President’s administration was arrested for contempt of Congress, which was in 1934, when a former member of the Hoover administration was arrested and detained temporarily in Washington’s famous Willard Hotel. There isn’t actually a jail inside the Capitol building, but as Acosta reported, "Congress has a holding cell over at the Capitol police department" nearby.
The full transcript of Acosta’s report, which began 48 minutes into the 5 pm Eastern hour of Thursday’s The Situation Room:
WOLF BLITZER: A reluctant witness and a Congress that wants answers. We're talking about Karl Rove and questions about the firing of those federal prosecutors. Some say he should go to the Capitol jail if he doesn't talk. Is there really such a thing? Our Jim Acosta has been looking into this. Jim?
JIM ACOSTA: Wolf, with the President refusing to allow certain members of his administration to testify on Capitol Hill, some in Congress have threatened to turn back the clock and bring back the legislative branch's arrest powers. Just think, some on the Left say: Karl Rove and the Capitol slammer.
ACOSTA (voice-over): When Karl Rove refused to testify before a House committee last month, Democrats in Congress started thinking creatively.
UNIDENTIFIED CONGRESSWOMAN: The claim of executive privilege is really not a valid one.
UNIDENTIFIED ANCHOR FROM MSNBC: Congressman, I just want to clarify, there is a jail in the U.S. Capitol. You want Karl Rove in that jail?
ACOSTA: A jail in the U.S. Capitol? Has the Congress ever done that?
JONATHAN TURLEY: It would actually arrest people, try them, and even jail them in the Capitol.
ACOSTA: Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley says the House has the little-known authority to put administration officials on trial when they fail to testify. The charge? Contempt of Congress.
TURLY: The defendant is brought forth by the Sergeant-of-Arms, and in the case of Mr. Rove, it shouldn't be difficult. He's a consultant of Fox News a block away from the House floor.
ACOSTA: As for that jail --
DON RITCHIE, ASSOCIATE SENATE HISTORIAN: The great of majority people who tour the Capitol building never see this area.
ACOSTA: We went deep into the bowels of the Capitol with Senate historian Don Ritchie. The closest thing to a jail -- Washington's tomb, an area once considered and then rejected as a final resting spot for the first President.
RITCHIE: A lot of people who have seen it assumed, well, this must be the Capitol jail.
ACOSTA: But it's not the Capitol jail?
RITCHIE: No, it's never been used as the Capitol jail.
ACOSTA: The last time Congress detained an administration official -- 1934, when a member of the Hoover administration was temporarily held in the Willard Hotel.
RITCHIE: When he refused to cooperate then, he was turned over to the District courts. He was convicted of contempt of Congress and he was sentenced to ten days in a real prison.
ACOSTA: He was convicted?
RITCHIE: Yes.
ACOSTA: Technically, Congress has a holding cell over at the Capitol police department. Jonathan Turley wonders whether it will ever get that far.
TURLY: What you have is a game of constitutional chicken.
ACOSTA (on-camera): With Congress off on its August recess, there's still time for both sides to end to their showdown, but if that doesn't happen, don't be surprised if some Democrats don't start calling for high noon -- Capitol Hill style. Wolf?
BLITZER: All right, Jim. Thank you. Interesting stuff.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
August 7, 2008 - 21:41 ET by MidAmericaSometimes........ reports on CNN are as wacky as it's founder. Blitzer should be embarrassed to do stuff like this.
The Aplomb of a Propagandist
August 8, 2008 - 07:08 ET by allanfBlitzer is far more rational and sane than Olbermann. Make no mistake about it though, he is a leftist. He once wrote for a newspaper Al Ha-Mishmar affiliated with a left-wing Israeli political party.
Blitzer's constant repetition of he "themes" on the melodramatic situation room just wreaks of propaganda.
allanf... What a great
August 9, 2008 - 20:48 ET by bigtimerallanf...
What a great word to describe Wolfie in my opinion...
Melodramatic indeed...he drives me nuts with his monotone voice repeating the same words in repetition that are suppose to have some kind of an affect on us....
Do you understand...understand what I am trying to say...lol.
Propaganda goes with out saying...you know I agree totally...totally with you!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Rove
August 7, 2008 - 21:47 ET by serfer62I like the guy and the more I hear him the more I like him
He'd make a great radio talk host
Oh yes, let's frog-march
August 7, 2008 - 21:47 ET by bigtimerOh yes, let's frog-march him down to the dundgeon.
Gawd the msm leftists are desperate...talk about running on empty.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
"some say ya
August 8, 2008 - 11:31 ET by TruthMonger"some say" ya know
yeeeaaaah, ok...
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Rove
August 7, 2008 - 21:47 ET by serfer62I like the guy and the more I hear him the more I like him
He'd make a great radio talk host
wow
August 7, 2008 - 21:50 ET by candanceAnd the MSM is wondering why their ratings keep going down? How on earth is this serious news? When someone comes home and wants to catch up on the news, they don't want to sit through something like this for ten minutes.
Rove's Pardon
August 7, 2008 - 21:50 ET by DoktorFrankenI know that Karl didn't kill anyone or sell any cocaine or plan any Puerto Rican terrorists acts, but don't you think he might be due for a pardon? Just to pickle-off the Dems, you understand.
too, too funny
August 8, 2008 - 13:50 ET by wizardjrA preemptive pardon blitz, what an idea!
A propos of pardons...
August 7, 2008 - 22:40 ET by trak65I think it would be even more amusing for Bush to pardon prominent Democrats, like the NYT reporters who disclosed government secrets, John Kerry for lying to Congress, Bill Clinton, Elliot Spitzer, John Edwards -- the list could go on and on! Doing it before the election would highlight their sins while looking magnanimous.
Blitzer embar assed....
August 7, 2008 - 23:06 ET by ScrapironBlitzer has proven himself so stupid there is no way to embarass him. I love the way the democrats and left wing media types are setting up the next president(s) with they're clear violations of the constitution. With the current stupid congress and the media the presidents office will be about as important as the bus boy in a McDonalds. The people who should be locked up are in congress and the media and they don't need a jail, an insane Asylum is the place for them.
It's time for Bush to follow the democrats 8 years of wishes and dreams and call out the military, shut down congress (declare them all insane) until 'all new' members can be seated. No current members need apply.
Old, Retired and glad of it.
Just curious
August 8, 2008 - 00:22 ET by SouthernRootsHe also addressed the little-used power of the legislature to arrest and try government officials for contempt of Congress.
What part of the Constitution, or what law, allows Congress to arrest anyone?
I thought the Executive branch was charged with enforcement of the laws, and I have wondered if Congress have any arrest authority.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. - J.B. Books (John Wayne)
It's in the US Code
August 8, 2008 - 08:03 ET by Prester JohnCongress has the authority to hold a person in contempt if the person's conduct or action obstructs the proceedings of Congress or, more usually, an inquiry by a committee of Congress.
Contempt of Congress is defined in statute, 2 U.S.C.A. § 192, enacted in 1938, which states that any person who is summoned before Congress who "willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry" shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a maximum $1,000 fine and 12 month imprisonment.
Before a Congressional witness may be convicted of contempt, it must be established that the matter under investigation is a subject which Congress has constitutional power to legislate.
Generally, the same Constitutional rights against self-incrimination that apply in a judicial setting apply when one is testifying before Congress.
http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Contempt_of_Congress
Thanks
August 8, 2008 - 08:32 ET by SouthernRootsOk. There is a law to charge someone with contempt, but does it allow Congress authority to order a US Marshall, Sherrif, Policeman, CIA Agent, Boy Scout, etc. to actually arrest someone?
Does Congress have the same power as a court to issue a "bench warrant"?
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. - J.B. Books (John Wayne)
Per CSPAN...
August 8, 2008 - 08:47 ET by Prester John"If the relevant chamber adopts the contempt resolution recommended by one of its committees, the matter is referred to a U.S. Attorney for prosecution. The U.S. Attorney may call in a grand jury to decide whether or not to indict and prosecute. If prosecuted by the courts and found guilty of contempt, the punishment is presently set at up to one year in prison and/or up to $1,000 in fines."
http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly9.htm
Since it goes to the US Attorney I would assume that offic has the authority to send federal marshals to apprehend the offending person. Another article says it would be the Sergeant at Arms of the House or Senate that would apprehend the offending person. Of course I would prefer that the marshals/Sergeants at Arms apprehend the idiot members of Congress for being in contempt of the American people, but I digress.
Alice in Wonderland
August 8, 2008 - 02:20 ET by Lakewood BobI think that Woof Blister is much like the "Big Bad Wolf" in the "Three Little Pigs" and "Little Red Riding Hood" drooling all over himself at the thought of Karl Rove in jail. But something else is more important here, and that is the other Democrats involved in this wishful dream.
I am reminded of "Alice in Wonderland" with the evil and violent Queen of Hearts (Nancy Pelosi) and the wimpy King of Hearts (Harry Reid). It has all the necessary ingredients for a good analogy: it is a fantasy and it employs literary nonsense and peculiar anthropomorphic creatures. I will work on identifing the other characters, but for now please use your own imagination. By the way Karl Rove could be the falsely accused Knave of Hearts.
...some say...
August 8, 2008 - 06:29 ET by SickofLibsSo it is not and never was a jail. What an idiotic segment. Acosta certainly is in the 'bowels'...
Stay tuned for Part II: the search for Al Capone's treasure vault under the Capitol.
A great idea
August 8, 2008 - 06:54 ET by WingletDriverMaybe Congress should employ it's little-used power of passing meaningful laws.
Really, wouldn't Congress have to be in session to do anything? You'd have thought that in Acosta's search for this fictional jail he would have come across the Republican's on the floor.
I hope CNN stocked up on
August 8, 2008 - 08:30 ET by fitzfongI hope CNN stocked up on Kleenex for this little fantasy. Otherwise Turley and Blitzer are going to make quite a mess.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
"free" press
August 8, 2008 - 11:03 ET by iveseenitallSince we no longer have a "free" press in America, we might as well go all the way and lock up the likes of Blitzer, Olberman, and their pals for corruption of the Constitution.*
* Amendment IX of the Constitution of the U.S. :
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Olberman, Blitzer, et.al. "disparage " other's rights every day of the week.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
CNN Hires Dem Advisors
August 8, 2008 - 22:39 ET by deerjerkydaveWhen its an advisor to a Republican politician CNN wants them jailed. When its an advisor to a Democratic politician CNN want to hire them.