CNN’s Amanpour ‘Surprised’ by Lack of ‘Euphoria’ After Obama Speech

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

Christiane Amanpour, CNN Chief International Correspondent | NewsBusters.orgCNN’s chief international correspondent Christiane Amanpour, reporting on Barack Obama’s speech in Berlin on Thursday’s “The Situation Room,” expressed her shock that the European crowd didn’t seem to have the same mania for the Democrat that the media has: “I did ask some people as they were leaving what they thought. Everybody said good, good. But I was surprised that there wasn't this sort of euphoria afterwards, given how many people had come to listen and how much it had been anticipated.” She later stated in the segment that one unnamed political analyst talked about how “people [in Europe] want a political redeemer -- I mean, that's very specific language, and he said it's not really based on facts, the -- what they think about Obama, because they don't really know. It's based on expectations.”

During the segment, which began just after the top of the 5 pm Eastern hour of the CNN program, host Wolf Blitzer asked Amanpour, “why do they apparently like him so much, not only in Germany, but throughout Western Europe?” She gave the standard media talking point about Obama in general: “They like him, some people say, because he is something new, he is a new generation, he's promising change, and people here are desperate for change.” Amanpour then reported on how Europeans apparently like Obama because “he is not President Bush, and they're slightly traumatized still from the last seven years of this ‘go-it-alone’ policy, which has seen so much war and has created so much division.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

They’re traumatized by a non-existent reality? Of course, the U.S. did not “go it alone” against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan, and despite the opposition from Western European counties like Germany and France, it did not “go it alone” into Iraq.

Earlier in the day, Amanpour appeared on “American Morning” at the beginning of the 6 am Eastern hour and used the same “go-it alone” term: “Would he return America to multilateral diplomacy, for instance, rather than the go-it-alone approach of the eight years of the President Bush administration?” She also compared the expected large turnout to a popular German festivity: “[Y]ou've heard of Oktoberfest in Germany. Well, this you might call ‘Obamafest.’ There's a great deal of excitement.”

The full transcript of Amanpour’s report from Thursday’s “The Situation Room:”

WOLF BLITZER: And let's go to Berlin right now. Our chief international correspondent Christiane Amanpour has been watching all of this unfold all day today. Christiane, why do they apparently like him so much, not only in Germany, but throughout Western Europe?

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: Well, they like him to the tune of some 200,000 people who came out here, according to police estimates now, which is a massive crowd. They like him, some people say, because he is something new, he is a new generation, he's promising change, and people here are desperate for change. They like him because he is not President Bush, and they're slightly traumatized still from the last seven years of this 'go-it-alone' policy, which has seen so much war and has created so much division. So, for all those reasons, they find him wildly attractive, but they also want to know about his policies, Wolf.

WOLF BLITZER: Did you get a sense, Christiane, that he actually delivered with his presentation, with his speech, his appearance in Berlin? Did people walk away seemingly satisfied or disappointed?

AMANPOUR: Well, I don't think they were disappointed, and I'm not sure that they were thoroughly satisfied. I did ask some people as they were leaving what they thought. Everybody said good, good. But I was surprised that there wasn't this sort of euphoria afterwards, given how many people had come to listen and how much it had been anticipated. To be sure, there were spikes during the speech which drew large cheers and applause, at least from the crowds immediately around him -- when he talked about removing the walls between various religions and ethnicities and other groups; when he talked about working together for new cooperation. By the way, you can hear now the sounds of people dismantling everything that was put up for this event. But, when he talked about a common destiny; when he talked about a partnership; when he talked, for instance, about a battle of ideas, referring to how the United States and its allies won the battle of idea over communism and saw the end of communism; surely, that we can win the battle of ideas and support the -- as he said, the vast majority of Muslims who are committed to peace and isolate them from the extremists. So, things like that drew big cheers.

BLITZER: It's clear they like Obama in Europe. What about John McCain? What do they think about the Republican candidate?

AMANPOUR: Well, you know, if you look at the polls, they speak very loudly, not that the people here are voting in the presidential election in the United States. But the poll numbers for Barack Obama are vastly higher than those for John McCain. I think it's because to them, he represents something totally new and they want something totally new. What -- what one political analyst here said to me is people want a political redeemer -- I mean, that's very specific language, and he said it's not really based on facts, the -- what they think about Obama, because they don't really know. It's based on expectations.

BLITZER: Christiane Amanpour in Berlin for us. Christiane, thanks.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well well

for christiane, that is saying something!

She is so left if she'd thought he had wowed them all she would have said so.

Glad to hear she was disappointed!

And sorry she did not report what Noel reported much earlier which is, they were ALL THERE BECAUSE OF A ROCK CONCERT!

SOBama was secondary to the muzack

Well, Delsa, you have to

Well, Delsa, you have to understand, if they were less than ecstatic about Obama, it's only because for 7 years Bush has bludgeoned them into numbness. It's going to take Obama at least 2 or 3 speeches to get them euphoric.

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Blame Bush

She has found a way to blame Bush because Obama didn't get the praise the media thinks he deserves.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

FACE IT -- IT WAS A DUD!

"SOBama was secondary to the muzack" -- tha's pretty good.

THIS IS THE MOMENT ... when the Germans shrugged. Geez, if you can't get the Germans fired up ...

Maybe what's going on here

Maybe what's going on here is the incredible inertia of socialism.  The Euros want the US to become like them, instead of them having to cast off their socialist chains and become free like us.  This is why they adore a socialist like Obama.  They liked Clinton a lot, too.  Hopefully, this will be a big turnoff to Americans, most of whom don't like Europe all that much, anyway.

 I would think that CNN

 I would think that CNN would have enough euphoria over Obami's speech for the entire country! Maybe, just maybe, the American people are starting to see though the smokescreen provide for Obami by the MSM. Maybe

I'm trying to imagine the

I'm trying to imagine the very strange Amenpour as Obama's press secretary: "And after the Mighty Obama has made his words known to you, you will applaude for 4 minutes and then STOP. And then you will rise from your chairs and bend slightly as his Majesty leaves the room. That will be all."

Oh yea.

 

The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?

Obama was naked, and gave no sense of political armament

Allow me to further my comments from the Matthews story:

The truth is, the speech was a DISAPPOINTMENT. It was bland,
uninspiring and WHOLLY predictable. Frankly, I think The Obamanation is
going to take a hit from this.

The fact that the best MSNBC's Chris Matthew's could muster was that
"it had its thrill factor" is the kind of faint praise that admits
failure.

And this is one of the very crippling flaws of The Obamanation, his
imagination. While it might fuel his rhetoric, he wrongly imagines
rhetoric is sufficient and that specifically dealing with matters of
both domestic and international concern can wait until he is able to be
in the midst of them, so that he may see which way the wind is blowing
and attempt to set sail. He is prone to the populace and not truly
given to ideas and convictions. And this shows in spectacular moments
as in this speech when he fails to deliver beyond his misplaced
confidence in his declamations.

The Obamanation is quite unlike those he wishes to imitate; leaders
who had convictions which edified their speeches and the hearers to
whom they spoke. With truly great leaders there are specifics and
certainties, characteristics sorely missing with Obama's attempted
oration.

The Obamanation spoke with generalizations that any cheap
politician, left or right, could have made. When Reagan spoke and for
that matter, Kennedy, at least you knew who the man was, what he
believed and where he wanted to lead a nation and the world. Any child
knows that talking about holding hands and that getting along is
expected, Obama never went beyond such juvenile charges.

The Obamanation's stage play expected to billow strong visions of a
man in charge and ideas that merited acquiescence by its hearers.
Instead, it was a flatlined speech, the course of which could have been
prophesied with a yardstick. Obama was naked, and gave no sense of
political armament. His only saving grace were the eager disciples in
attendance who are lead about by their naivety, those interested in the
novelty and those nice enough not to walk away when they realized this
was just a shadow of a true leader.

Next Please! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

You nailed it

Besides the points you made, I'd like to point out that BHO tried to rewrite history by completely ignoring Germany's role in WWII and the Holocaust.  Of course he couldn't bring these up, but his weird historical reminiscence seemed to assume that Germany didn't exist prior to 1948.  Furthermore, he pretended that EAST Germans were somehow on the side of freedom in the Cold War.  This was greeted very tepidly by even this crowd who seemed confused when he was talking about communism and the Berlin Airlift.  I don't know if they were upset that he didn't understand the evil of communism or didn't appreciate the wonder of it.

All in all, he sounded like a an arrogant college professor who doesn't need the facts to know the truth. 

To me the crowd almost gave

To me the crowd almost gave off this sense of embarrassment the way The Obamanation frame his WW2/German comments.

Next Please! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.

Because of his Marxist

Because of his Marxist roots, both from Saul Alinsky and black liberation theology, it's not surprising that he gave a pass to "the evils of communism"; he probably doesn't regard communism as evil.  Maybe that's the "change" he has in mind for the US.

Agreed

Nice job, GAT. Interesting, pointed, and thoughtful. Thank you.

"... To be sure, there were

"... To be sure, there were spikes during the speech which drew large cheers and applause, at least from the crowds immediately around him -- when he talked about removing the walls between various religions and ethnicities and other groups; when he talked about working together for new cooperation. By the way, you can hear now the sounds of people dismantling everything that was put up for this event. But, when he talked about a common destiny; when he talked about a partnership..."

"...one unnamed political analyst talked about how “people [in Europe] want a political redeemer... "

I don't know who will win this race in the US.  But eventually the Europeans will probably get their would be "redeemer", except he will be the "son of perdition" over a Mediteranian Empire of "Clay and Iron", most likely. And they will fall for his charm....sad.

 

 

AMANPOUR,BLITZER,OBAMA

Three blind mice.  Lets wait until November when Blitzer cries again after BO's concession speech (of no more hope).  These news groups will continue to fail as the very old TV model will die.

→ Three blid mice

At work the News sation in our cafeteria is alternated weekly between FOX & CNN.

Wouldn't you know it?  CNN ran "Black In America" all night. 

I actually got away with saying with considerable agreement)  "Couldn't you make a color neutral version of he same report ad call it Personal Choices In America"?

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Inflated expectations lead to disappointment

Amanpour:  But I was surprised that there wasn't this sort of euphoria afterwards, given how many people had come to listen and how much it had been anticipated.

Having raised expectations so high, a letdown was nearly inevitable.

She later stated in the segment that one unnamed political analyst talked about how “people [in Europe] want a political redeemer -- I mean, that's very specific language..."

That's the messianic theme surfacing in another form.  Unfortunately, all they've got is a candidate spouting platitudes that sound a lot like the hippies in 1968.

By the way, you can hear now the sounds of people dismantling everything that was put up for this event.

Including the speech and the candidate. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Silly question...

Does anyone know if there were screens set up that translated Obamas words for the crowd? 

45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm

To CNN, "going it alone"

To CNN, "going it alone" means without Germany and France. 

Does anyone at CNN know what happened to the leaders of those two countries who forced the U.S. to "go it alone?" 

 

So what if we went it alone?

In addition to the premise being wrong, so what if it were correct?  Really, are Germans any worse off because we toppled Sadam Hussein?

Germans and French are

Germans and French are better off because the cowardly liberals, Schroder and Chirac, are selling beer and croissants by the side of the autobahn instead of leading their countries from behind.

All the posts here

regarding SOBama's glaring lack of learned History are so right on point.

If the crowd was not confused, I was. 

All his attempt at poetry with the Berlin airlift and total ignoring of the ovens full of jews in the camps was astounding to me.

I thought I had misunderstood what he was trying to say. He made it sound as if Germany was our ally in WWII

It actually freeked me out thinking I was crazy.

Just think. Germany is trying to be more democratic and SOBama wants us to be Socialists or worse.

What is going on?

The media covering this guy's butt should be brought up on charges of treason and compicit in perpetrating a fraud on the American public.

 

 Marxism...Obami can not

 Marxism...Obami can not possibly think his brand of re-distribution of wealth will play in our country. Americans are more freely giving then any other country on the planet. When he talks of "distributing more wealth, from countries that have much, to countries that have little" is Neo-Lenninism at it's finest. He means our government re-distributing more of our wealth to poorer countries. I just wonder what his cut will be, he is after all, from Chicago. There is no other explanation.

We have to keep this sorry SOB away from the White House. Or we sure will be distributing more of wealth, forcibly.

Maybe because Germans are

Maybe because Germans are tired of white guilt?

Or that there were two rock bands that played before Obama

Or maybe he was speaking ENGLISH in GERMANY.

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

people [in Europe] want a political redeemer --

The media is always so taken with Europeans, and what they want...... Europeans (and the media) have always wanted a political redeemer, and they've gotten them with regularity: Hitler, il Duce, Stalin, just to name a few.

If Europe was so wonderful,

If Europe was so wonderful, the US would not be a nation of immigrants from there!

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

"it's not really based on

"it's not really based on facts, the -- what they think about Obama, because they don't really know. It's based on expectations.”

That about sums it up. Obama can not be elected if the facts about him are widely known. That's why the facts have to be hidden, and they have to roll out something else. They call it "expectations". I call it bulls**t.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

So much war? Less now than in the 90's

Amanpour then reported on how Europeans apparently like Obama because “he is not President Bush, and they're slightly traumatized still from the last seven years of this ‘go-it-alone’ policy, which has seen so much war and has created so much division.”

Oh, come on - there's less war in the world today than there was when Clinton was president. And -  fewer people are dying from war, genocide and civil conflict now, than then. And - fewer people are dying from famine than then. And - fewer people are living in dire poverty in the world than then. And - we've finally actually addressed, and the corner has finally been turned (according to UNICEF) in the global war on HIV/Aids in Africa (and mainly because of President George Bush's courageous leadership.)

Christiane Amanpour,  there is no ethical euphoria, in your world. 

Amanpour, very pour

As usual CNN lies about Bush's "go-it-alone" policy. First he had the backing of Congress (he could have been impeached for not going to war, as a matter of fact). Second, 45 countries particpated one way or the other in the war with Iraq, and still many country continue to lend support to this day, both in troops and other assistance. Also, the conclusion of experts is becoming more and more that it was the right thing to do all along, whether we had support from other countries or not.

Amanpour is so blinded by her bias, she cannot tell the truth if it sat in her lap and called her "mama."

 

 

>>>he had the backing of

>>>he had the backing of Congress (he could have been impeached for not going to war, as a matter of fact). 

Now, we all know that had President Bush not gone into Iraq, we would have been spending the last seven blessed years with Democrat accusations, and charges, and investigations into why the the Bush administration failed to protect this country in the aftermath of 9/11, and why we didn't go into Iraq to break up the partnership between Saddam and bin Laden. 

sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com

Democrat demonism

You are so right. The old saying is "damned if you do and damned if you don't."

Many lefties have been yelling for his impeachment for going to war (ignoring Constitutional law in the process) and you are so right, had he keep on month after month and year after year trying it the UN way, with inspections after inspections after inspections, Democrats would be screaming how Bush was a failure as a president and also yelling for his impeachment.

Just another thought ...

Worse than this though is that in order to make Bush or other Republicans look bad they have to behave like traitors, be haters of the military, lower their IQ to dunce and otherwise become totally unpatriotic to be on the attack over Iraq policy, and then all the while claiming that they are "just as patriotic" for having an opinion against the war.

So I have just one questions for all morons (all Democrats), and especially Cindy Sheehan. How can one be against a war that clearly removed an active enemy of the United States from power and call yourself patriotic? I call you undeserving of this country and you should be deported, if not tried and executed.

There is now overwhelming evidence, including the David McKay report, that Saddam only had to give the order to start chemical weapons production again in "dual use" facilities (after the "green light" from the UN inspections), who clearly has been shown to be willing to give al Qaida a training camp and other assistance, who clearly fired missiles at and/or "lit up" our fighters with targeting radar in the "no fly zone" several hundred times (grounds to go to war without another approval from Congress), who clearly violated the 1990 truce agreements countless times, who showed the willingness to eventually get atomic weapons, who had 550 metric tons of "yellow cake" in his arsenal (to a Democrat this is not WMD), and who continuously blocked IAEA inspectors from even routine inspections of this yellow cake (and so yellow cake from Africa was a moot point Democrats were making). And the 550 metric tons could have produced 142 nuclear weapons in just a year or two, depending on how many centrifuges you can get going at the same time. And Bush never said he had nuclear weapons, only the propensity and eventually the means to make them one day, and eventually he would have acquired more yellow cake from some where, say like the Russian black market (not the official Russian government).

Bottom line, Bush haters have to act like traitors in order to be critial of the war. That makes Obama a traitor of sorts, by the way. This is because if you are against a war that defends your country against its proven enemy, then it can only be concluded you have the motive, at least, to commit treasonous acts. And it is a treasoness act to want a war stopped that defends your country against its declared enemy (and now conclusively proven to have been able to and having once had the motive to be our enemy).

And as far as NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN, the AP and other lefty media, including the NYT, at the very least, they sound to me to be anti-American for their anti-war rhetoric in a war that was highly justified. (It is fair to ask questions, of course. But it is not "fair" to make be anti-war or to phrase questions as if they were anti-war in a highly justified war, especially one in which 2/3rds of the House and 3/4ths of the Senate gave their approval based on CIA, DIA, NSA and other intel sources.)

The Germans probably walked out wondering what he Said ?

Talking about non-existent Walls across the Atlantic ? ?  As usual, Obama talks and the people not overcome with "This is the Moment" Rhetoric are wondering "What did he really Say ?"

Anyone get a Policy Statement out of  this Speech...?  

Even Katie Couric couldn't get a Straight answer from Obama on the Surge.

Cool hand Luke..."what we have here, is a Failure to be Germane"

Someone run out and check the Atlantic Sea Coast...Once Again Obama claims the Sea Levels are RISING....quick, go check..!!!

The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

That's easy Christiane,, you ignorant slut.

“why do they apparently like him so much, not only in Germany, but throughout Western Europe?” Because he's a wussy socialist liberal.... like most of Europa these days... Thank goodness for the Polish.

NOBAMA 08 !!!

I love the Polish.... the

I love the Polish.... and the Polish girls. I've dated my share. A bit nutty, but never dull and hardly wussy.

:) 

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

They have excellent

men and women in the Army from my understanding And they support us...

NOBAMA 08 !!!

All we are saying is "merci beucoup".

Why didn't he give the entire speech in German? Condi can!

If I may borrow from the

If I may borrow from the (milder) words of Archie Bunker:

Geez.  If you put Christiane Amanpour's brains in a bird, it would fly backwards!

sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com

Watching the speech, I was

Watching the speech, I was struck by how tepid most of the applause was. Sure, most of the speech was standard campaign pap, and though many Germans speak good English, I imagine some of the speech got lost in the translation.  Even so, I assumed the crowd came to cheer, but the response was surprisingly muted.

Rock On

Wasn't there like a 3 hr rock concert before his speech. Could that be why most of the people were there? Who does Amanpour and the rest of the liberal media think they're fooling? Germans don't care about who leads America, just like I don't care who leads Germany. At least one reporter had the guts to report that people were heckling BHO in Isreal.

 If one replaces

 If one replaces "euphoria" with nausea, then I'm sure there was plenty of that afterwards.

 BLLEEEEEEECCCK !!!!!!!

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

                               " The Cake is a lie."   

What the heck is Obama

What the heck is Obama trying to say really? He's being apologetic to germany for our misteps? Correct me if I am wrong but didn't germany terrorize all of europe for about 150 years? When the brits needed hardened merceneries didn't they go to Hesse? Napoleon went to Prussia for mercs. If you were a latin student and had to read Bellum Gaulica from Caesar you know that the history of german war for war's sake reaches back more than 2000 years. Now don't flame me for saying this- my family is all prussian- the part that isn't prussian is bohemian; all of the branches of my family spoke german in the home until WW2 despite being in the states from 90-120 years prior. What did all of these families: Jetmar, Wagner, Heidrik, Leininger, Meinzen, have in common- they all fled war; german waged war, whether it was forced conscription or war raging in their back yard. Ironically they by and large immediately served in the military to defend their new home. I know that my grandfathers and my great-grandfathers couldn't muster enough spit to waste on someone as worthless, small, and foolish as Obama.

The reason Christiane is that

 

They were all worn out from the free rock concert that they really came to see. If they want to hear a stale rerun of a campaign speech, they can get it from youtube!

  

 

     “Two things only the people anxiously desire - bread and circuses”- Roman satirist Juvenal

i think "some people say"...

is the most pathetic way of getting your own personal views, or ones that you agree with, in front of the camera without admitting to it.

except for our fine providers of newsbusters, there is no such thing as journalist integrity anymore.

Christiane Amanpour surprized she is out of touch

Even in Germany she has no clue. The crowds were there for the free concert and most simply stayed to politiely hear what this over-hyped political newcomer from America had to say. 

When they were completely unimpressed, Amanpour finds it remarkable because she herself is so enamoured of Obama.

Amanpour could be a charicature for the media in general.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

AMANPOUR

sweetheart......do you really think they came to see this black fellow...I think not...they came for the "free" rock concert, beer and food....how stupid does this Owama boob think we really are?

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.