CNN congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin, during a segment on Wednesday’s "Anderson Cooper 360," accused her former bosses -- presumably those at MSNBC, where she worked prior to joining ABC in July 2003 -- of pressuring her to run positive stories about the Bush administration before the invasion of Iraq: "When the lead-up to the war began, the press corps was under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war that was presented in a way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation... and my own experience at the White House was that, the higher the president's approval ratings... the more pressure I had from news executives to put on positive stories about the President."
[Yellin repeated her "patriotic fever" line in a clarification posted Thursday at CNN's AC360 blog.]
Her statement on the post-9/11 "patriotic fever in the nation" mirrored that of her former colleague at NBC News, Brian Williams, who said on "The Early Show" on Wednesday that "people have to remember the post-9/11 era and how that felt and what the President felt he was empowered to do" Yellin also repeated the typical left-wing spin on the pre-Iraq invasion period, that "the press corps dropped the ball at the beginning."
Host Anderson Cooper seemed stunned at Yellin’s statement: "Really? You had pressure from news executives to put on positive stories about the President?" Yellin answered, "Not in that exact -- they wouldn't say it in that way, but they would edit my pieces. They would push me in different directions. They would turn down stories that were more critical and try to put on pieces that were more positive, yes. That was my experience."
Yellin made the comments 23 minutes into the 10 pm hour of the CNN program, as part of a panel discussion which included CNN’s John Roberts and Ed Henry. The three have at some point in their careers covered the White House, and Cooper asked them about Scott McClellan’s upcoming book, in which the former White House spokesman accused the media of not living up to its liberal reputation in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.
Given this reputation, one wonders what Yellin had initially submitted to her editors that caused them to edit her pieces and "turn down stories that were more critical."
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Given this reputation, one
May 29, 2008 - 13:21 ET by NewsbusterbrownGiven this reputation, one wonders what Yellin had initially submitted to her editors that caused them to edit her pieces and "turn down stories that were more critical."
That was my take, Matt. She must have been dabbling in Democratic Underground territory.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
But you know ...
May 29, 2008 - 14:46 ET by 10ksnookerIt really is hard to get past the Congressional and UN approvals of the Iraq war isn't it ... And all the flowery speeches that were made by Democrats -- Who takes credit for those?
I assume all the pressure was coming from the Democrat Socialists in Congress, since they were so eager to show their support they demanded another vote right before the elections.
Well, who the heck are they
May 29, 2008 - 15:31 ET by mattmWell, who the heck are they under pressure from now - the DNC?
What duplicitous slime bags these people are!
Me believes........
May 29, 2008 - 18:48 ET by zoro7957..............that Ms. Yellin dosth not speak the truth..........
...Yellin's not
May 29, 2008 - 18:54 ET by bigtimer...Yellin's not Jellin'....
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
More Importantly, Jessica...
May 30, 2008 - 13:14 ET by Wildcatter1980...why did you not speak up then, the serious journalist you want us to believe you are? A true journalist would have the backbone to tell his/her readers/listeners/watchers that he/she was being pressured to change his/her reporting. Otherwise, how can we trust his/her reporting?
Could the real issue be that the various network news media personnel are being paid too well and fear the loss of their lavish pay and associated prestige if they let proper journalistic principles supersede management pressures?