CNN’s Costello: ‘Tell-All’ Books on Bush Point to ‘Suppressed Dissent’

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterCNN correspondent Carol Costello, covering the reaction to McClellan’s new "tell-all" book about the Bush administration on Thursday’s "American Morning," added some liberal-leaning psychoanalysis to the obligatory quotes from current and former administration officials and a clip from Rush Limbaugh. "Unflattering kiss and tells about the Bush administration are a dime a dozen. Spilling the beans: former Treasury secretary Paul O'Neill, former Iraq Envoy Paul Bremer, and former Senior Economic Adviser Larry Lindsay. From a psychological standpoint, that's not surprising. Analysts say the Bush administration demanded loyalty and suppressed dissent -- a perfect recipe for rebellion."

Costello included a clip of Dr. Gail Saltz, a psychiatrist, who noted that McClellan’s book "appears to be an act of revenge" done "in a potentially very self-destructive way." Because of this, she concluded that "you have to wonder about the guilt that they feel," because "they're asking for punishment, in a sense."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The CNN correspondent threw in an additional component, that of "ethics." For this, Costello brought in another "analyst," Business Week’s Bruce Weinstein, who noted that "[t]here's no statute of limitations on telling the truth. And he may be alienating people. But he may very well feel that, and perhaps justifiably so, that it's more important to be truthful and to let the American people know what was actually happening."

Besides Limbaugh, Costello included the reactions of Dana Perino, Ari Fleischer, Fran Townsend, and the conservative blog Red State, who said of McClellan, "what a scumbag."

The full transcript of Carol Costello’s report, which began near the bottom of the 6 am Eastern hour of Thursday’s "American Morning:"

JOHN ROBERTS: ‘Sad,’ ‘sour grapes,’ ‘total crap.’ That's what some of Scott McClellan's former colleagues are saying about his new book bashing the White House that he once served as Press Secretary. He claims the Bush administration used, ‘propaganda,’ to sell the war in Iraq.

KYRA PHILLIPS: And as you can see those accusations are pretty stunning, given -- and the feedback, as you heard from John -- given McClellan's long-time relationship with President Bush, but he's not the first former insider to tell-all about the Bush White House. CNN's Carol Costello has more.

CAROL COSTELLO, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): It appeared to be beautiful, as beautiful as a relationship made in the world of politics can be. That's Scott McClellan on his last day as White House spokesman.

SCOTT MCCLELLAN, FORMER WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Mr. President, it has been an extraordinary honor and privilege to have served you for more than seven years now.

COSTELLO: Now it's safe to say McClellan has burned that bridge and incinerated many more. His book, ‘What Happened,’ is a scathing account of the Bush administration's policies, so negative the President's new spokesperson, Dana Perino, says, ‘We are puzzled.’ Ari Fleischer, who was McClellan's boss at the White House, says passages in the book ‘don't sound like Scott.’ Others weren't so kind. Former Bush homeland security adviser Fran Townsend says McClellan's book is, well, ill-timed.

FRAN TOWNSEND, FORMER HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISER: For him to do this now, frankly, strikes me as self-serving, disingenuous, and unprofessional.

COSTELLO: The conservative blog Red State said ‘what a scum bag.’ And Rush Limbaugh called him another Republican turncoat.

RUSH LIMBAUGH, TALK SHOW HOST: They'll throw anybody under the bus, even their own grandmothers to have a seat of power with the liberals -- get their approval. Not just Scott McClellan. He's the worst example of it lately.

COSTELLO: Unflattering kiss and tells about the Bush administration are a dime a dozen. Spilling the beans: former Treasury secretary Paul O'Neill, former Iraq Envoy Paul Bremer, and former Senior Economic Adviser Larry Lindsay.

From a psychological standpoint, that's not surprising. Analysts say the Bush administration demanded loyalty and suppressed dissent -- a perfect recipe for rebellion.

DR. GAIL SALTZ, PSYCHIATRIST: When you see someone commit what appears to be an act of revenge and do it in a potentially very self-destructive way, you have to wonder about the guilt that they feel, all right? Because they're asking for punishment, in a sense.

COSTELLO: And Scott McClellan is certainly feeling a backlash. But ethicists look at it another way.

BRUCE WEINSTEIN, BUSINESSWEEK.COM: There's no statute of limitations on telling the truth. And he may be alienating people. But he may very well feel that, and perhaps justifiably so, that it's more important to be truthful and to let the American people know what was actually happening.

COSTELLO (on camera): Of course, only Scott McClellan can explain why he wrote this book and we should have an answer soon. He's about to hit the interview circuit to promote his book. Kyra, John?

ROBERTS: All right. Carol Costello for us this morning. Carol, thanks.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Damn Liars!

McClellan says Plame Leak was the reason for the book.

Then, why isn't the book about Richard Armitage?

Not Even Liberals Like Scott

The reason for McCellan's book lie deep in the recesses of his brain. It could be as simple as money and lifetime financial independence. From the coverage, it is clear that not even liberals like Scott. 

On this morning's Today Show Matt Lauer remarked that it would have been heroic had McClellan done this earlier.

 

Investigations?

Werent there multiple investigations that found there was none of that?

The whole thing was an

The whole thing was an anti-Bush smear campaign.  The only conviction was for procedural issues involving the trial itself, and not about anything that was being asserted by Wilson and Plame.

Sham trial.  Sham

Sham trial.  Sham "victim".  Sham prosecutor.  At least one witness who perjured himself (Tim Russert) in furtherance of the sham prosecution.  Corrupt judge who denied the defense the opportunity to defend...then made a spectacle of the sentencing.  At least one juror who should have been disqualified (I believe it was the foreman).  The whole thing was a stupid joke.  Judicial tyranny at its worst.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

American mental condition.

McClellan is suffering from the most basic mental condition in America. Get the 'dollar' no matter who you hurt or kill. McClellan will become a millionaire but will be 'the man without honor' the rest of his life and will not be trusted by anyone, even his family.

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Seems you lot were never

Seems you lot were never satisfied with his answers while he was employed by the White House.  But why do I get the sense you'll be more than satisfied with his "explanations" now?

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

The left where warning the

The left where warning the Republicans would be pulling some nasty “Swiftboating” attacks, “Swiftboating” meaning a smear campaign (The liberal definition, separated from what the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth where really about.) But these self righteous hypocrites are in a campaign of subterfuge. This is a cover up that is significant, a frightening one at, that because it involves our press.

Swiftboating is

the term that liberals use when referring to the truth.

people of

people of newsbusters...... 

I Need some help..... I am currently in a leadership class in my Master's degree program.  We have to write a research paper, 3 to 5 pages long about someone that we consider a leader. 

I want to write it about President George W. Bush.  Does anyone know where I can get accurate, academic accepted sources about his domestic plans, foreign plans....any good books written about Bush....I was reading that Ari Fletcher wrote a book about President Bush.....does anyone know if this book is any good? 

As I said, any help would be greatly, greatly appriciated.

Good luck, Fut!

Fut,

Leadership? As in failed leadership, what not to do, the peter principle? Yeah, Bush is a good one for each. (sarc on).

Sorry, Fut, couldn't resist...

Syrius

No, that's a better

No, that's a better description of the current Democractic Congress, they couldn't lead a fish into the water.

6 full years of GOP control of Congress..

zf,

...got us into...I'm looking for the list of accomplishments...Gosh...anyone?

How about a successful campaign in getting the GOP to stay in power of the Congress? How about a successful campaign in getting people to believe in the GOP and the wonderful things they've done? It's hard to get a dead fish to swim. What's that smell? Oh, it's the rotting fiscal policies of an over-spending GOP. Who would have thought they would be such wonderful spenders of taxpayer dollars? Can't afford it? Might as well finance it! Credit anyone? Let's spend our way out of this mess..."Go shopping" as the President used to say.

Gas prices and the current state of affairs are to be blamed on the Democrats?!? ROTFFLMFAO!!!

Syrius

"Self-destructive" my ass,

"Self-destructive" my ass, McFelon will make tons of cash, be all over the news, fawned over by the liberal media, Hollywood and other cultural elites and retire with fame, fortune and a self-satisfied "see how brave I am, I'm a hero" indulgent mentality. Give me a break. He would have been forgotten if not for this book, and what timing, right at election time too!

And the pop psychoanalysis is disgusting. People write tell-all books about about everyone and everything including Mother Teresa, it's an easy way to make cash in most instances. There's nothing more behind it than money and fame. "Demand loyalty" what horrors! If someone claims to be for your cause and and is disloyal they are nothing more than unprincipled hypocrites and should be dumped anyway. We demanded loyalty of out citizens in the fight aginst the Axis and "supressed dissent" when fellow citizens supported Hitler, Mussolini et al. I guess that means they would have been justified to "rebel" and blow people up in the name of facism as a "psychological responce", huh Ms. Saltz?

They also completely ignore that several former Bush staffers such as Rumsfield, Ari Fleisher and Ashcroft wrote of their time in the Bush adminstration postively.

Not to mention a certain ex-President whose name starts with C had even more nasty tell-all books written about him, but the media had no time for them at all.