CNN’s Hypersensitive Reaction to Bush ‘Appeasement’ Comments

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

NewsBusters.org - Media Research CenterMinutes after President Bush began his speech to the Israeli Knesset, CNN quickly channeled outraged Democratic reaction to his "false comfort of appeasement" remark. "American Morning" co-host John Roberts, in a brief on the speech, claimed the President was "suggesting that Senator Barack Obama and other Democrats are in favor of appeasing terrorists in the same way that U.S. leaders appeased the Nazis in the run-up to World War II," though the President did not mention any Democratic official or the Democratic Party.

The graphic on the screen also reflected this belief that Democrats were being unfairly smeared: "Pres. Says Obama, Other Dems Want ‘Appeasement of Terrorists" and "Pres. Bush Compares Dems’ Stance on War to Appeasement of Nazis."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Ten minutes later, Roberts again read a brief on the President’s remark, but this time gave a bit more detail. "President Bush, speaking before the Knesset in Israel... saying that Barack Obama, without mentioning him by name, but saying basically that Barack Obama and other Democrats favor a policy of appeasement of terrorists, in much the same way that U.S. leaders did prior to World War II.... Our Ed Henry is on the story. He's just getting some of his ducks in a row here, and will be joining us in a couple of minutes with more on that."

After a short interview of a newly-elected mayor in Oklahoma, CNN correspondent Ed Henry gave a live report from Jerusalem on the President’s speech. After a playing a clip of the relevant portion of the speech, Henry again clarified that "President Bush never uttered the words Barack Obama. But White House aides are acknowledging that this was a reference to the fact that Senator Obama and other Democrats have publicly said that it would be okay for the U.S. President to meet with leaders like the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad." Henry’s comment about the White House aides contradicts what the New York Times itself initially reported, that "the White House said his remarks were not aimed at the senator."

Henry then continued about John McCain’s recent remarks about Obama being the favorite presidential candidate of Hamas. "...[L]ast week, Senator McCain suggested that Obama was the favorite candidate of Hamas, the terror group. Last week, Obama called that a smear." Henry thus continued CNN’s omission of the fact that the political advisor to Hamas’ political leader had communicated the terror group’s endorsement of the Illinois Senator.

"American Morning" continued to cover the supposed attack on Obama for the next ten minutes, asking correspondents Suzanne Malveaux and Dana Bash for the Obama and McCain camps reaction to the remark. After the commercial break, Roberts interviewed Robert Gibbs, the communication director of the Obama campaign. Roberts did bring up Obama’s past comment that the Senator "would sit down with the leaders of these countries without precondition," and how that was "fairly controversial." He continued by making a fair point in his question: "So for President Bush to say that leaping immediately to the leader level might not be a policy the United States wants to follow -- does he have a point there?" By asking this, Roberts continued this reading into the President’s remarks. He also didn’t follow-up to any of the points that Gibbs made during the interview.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

the DNC ought to have a

the DNC ought to have a coronary over this unprecidented "Bush hate speech and fear-mongering, yada, yada, yada:)"...

should be fun...

Libs squirm like salted

Libs squirm like salted leeches when the truth is told about them!

They can do it, you just

They can do it, you just can't say it.

I like the analogy. Nuke

I like the analogy.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

"other Democrats are in

"other Democrats are in favor of appeasing terrorists in the same way that U.S. leaders appeased the Nazis in the run-up to World War II,"

Oh, you mean like Joe Kennedy? Teddy Kennedy's old nazi admirin' dad?

Who, as US Ambassador to Great Britain before the war, counseled back home that Hitler was the future. Britain was finished as a world power, and that the US should make an accommodation with Adolf.

That type of leader?

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Many, Many, Many

There were many Americans back in the '30s who were very supportive of the Nazis -- German Bunds were everywhere and the great American aviator Charles Lindberg was about as close to being a Nazi as you can get.

Obama and his ilk may be "Americans" but that doesn't mean they are not Islamic jihad supporters too.

This is one of the few times Bush actually got it right.

Too bad he didn't call them what they really are.

Traitors.

a shot truly on target

Listen to them holler! Nobody said "Democrat" but they immediately jump up and act outraged. Zing! Right on target and they know it.

hmmm, feeling a bit guilty

hmmm, feeling a bit guilty are they:)?

very telling - hee-hee-hee...

most appropriate - history will not be kind to Hussein lovers 

and no one is better at

and no one is better at feigning outrage than Democrats. They have had years to practice it.

Exactly Chris and it works for them

They can call Bush by name a murderer, Hitler, war monger, liar say he hates black people, and on and on but if he says that a certain behavior or ideology is wrong and he doesn't agree with it, they take it as a personal attack.

"...they take it as a

"...they take it as a personal attack."

Well, at least they pretend they do. Personally, I don't think they're all that offended and outraged. It's just they have learned that a good defense is to act offended.

I agree Chris - for the most part

They also pretend people said things they never said and never implied. For example, they are always screaming and yelling about Bush saying it's unpatriotic to disagree with the war even though he's never said it or implied it in any way. In fact he has said the opposite and said people had every right to protest. Regular people like us have said that people are acting anti-American and things, but no one in the leadership has. Still, so many people think that Bush has said that and other things that he has never said or implied.

Dee, Oh, yeah, that is the

Dee,

Oh, yeah, that is the "I'm outraged by what I claim you said even though you didn't actually say it" strategy - it's one of the sub-items in their "We're Outraged! Play Book".

lol - you put that well Chris

that is exactly it.

The truth is hard to take,

The truth is hard to take, isn't it Roberts? Peace at all costs is foolish. Sticking to the ideal world where their is no war is just plain denial of the real world where we sometimes must go to war. And I thought that America was in a isolationist state of mind before WW2 and Great Brit’s Chamberlin was busy appeasing Hitler before WW2.

McCain - flower power?

And John McCain thinks he'll run a campaign of peace, love and mutual respect?

BTW: He just announced he'll appoint some dems to his cabinet.

It's over, folks!

Let's get used to facing Washington and bowing for our next bowl of gruel.

mica -- BTW: He just

mica --

BTW: He just announced he'll appoint some dems to his cabinet.

Did he mention whether he'd appoint any conservatives?

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Conservatives?  I once

Conservatives? 

I once heard McCain ask... "What's a Conservative? 

"Abstain from McCain"

Michelle Malkin really

Michelle Malkin really savages McCain's speech.

A couple of excerpts:

McCain’s problem is that he has allied himself, for the unprincipled, empty cause of mindless “bipartisanship,” with people and causes that move our country in the wrong direction.

....as McCain’s ample legislative record demonstrates, “reaching across the political aisle” never entails pulling opponents to the right. It always entails selling out the right.

Read the whole thing.

mb

Is McCain lying to us or the liberals?

I am hoping he is BS ing the independants and moderates who nominated him.

just sayin

Dee

Dee, I don't think he's lying to anyone. What he said is what he intends to do.   

 

mb... Exactly! Btw...I

mb...

Exactly!

Btw...I think you meant Delsa above didn't ya? LOL!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Yeah, Delsa, that's

Yeah, Delsa, that's right....I was just calling her by her first initial.....NOT!

Sorry Delsa..."lost my bearings" for a moment...LOL

mb... First person I

mb...

First person I thought of this morning was Malkin, wondering what she would post concerning McCain's bed-time story of a pitiful speech.

thanks for the link.

Going to be curious what Coulter thinks too...

I don't have much time here today...so I really thank you...she is exactly right.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Hamas was elected because

Hamas was elected because Bush was pushing for "free and fair" elections throughout the Middle East.  He was warned about an Hamas win but Bush argued that it would be good for Hamas to govern and be held accountable to the people.

Wow! That Bush! Hail the

Wow! That Bush! Hail the all-powerful BUSH! So powerful he can rig elections in a foreign land.

Yeah, he called for free elections, what's wrong with that? Could he have changed the outcome? Please.

The Palestinians got what they asked for. That's all there is to it.

You're so right. The

You're so right.

The President of the United States should NEVER take a stance on that truly controversial subject of advocating "elections." and that even more contentious issue of "one person, one vote."

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

From the Brookings

From the Brookings Institute--

"The notion that governing forces radicals to become more reasonable—is, ironically, none other than George W. Bush. It was that conviction that led Bush to insist in December 2005 that the Palestinians go ahead with elections, though Palestinians and Israelis warned him Hamas could win."

Yeah, the whole idea of

Yeah, the whole idea of freedom and being able to decide your country's fate is so over rated. The idea should be promoted exclusively for the USA. The rest of the world can go to h*ll. 

"Abstain from McCain"

clear -- freedom is so

clear -- freedom is so yesterday!

All hail Obama... he da messiah!  The Liberal Rapture is upon us as we speak! 

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Jack... "The Liberal

Jack...

"The Liberal Rapture is upon us as we speak!"

We can expect a huge spike in pornography sales. 

"Abstain from McCain"

We should always allow a

We should always allow a free people to make their own choices goldie, its part of teh democracy thing.  Sometimes the choices they make are not always good, but if they people are good they will make better choices next time.  So that is what happened with Palestine.  They will either live with their bad choices or die, simple as that.  Its called being resposible for oneself and ones choices.  Do you understand?  

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

I understand that Bush has

I understand that Bush has screwed up the republican party to an extent that there are record numbers of voters leaving the party and registering as democrats who will vote for Obama despite what your leader Rush Limbaugh is preaching to you.

BTW,  looks like McCain has stolen the democrats mantra of change and is now calling to bring the troops home.  The republican party is a pathetic bunch of flip-floppers who will say and do anything to get elected, even if it goes against what their constituents believe. 

goldbar

speak for yourself. Most people I know who say the cannot vote for McCain have absolutly no intension of voting for Obama.

It will never happen.

And Pathetic is belolnging to a party so balkanized it is at war with itself. YOU belong to which group?

The knife is in and Hillary

The knife is in and Hillary is bleeding out.  It will be over soon and Obama will be directly confronting McCain's on his inablity to unite the republicans.  Good to hear you and your ilk won't vote for McCain.  You're making the right decision.

GO BARR IN '08!

Oh, you're so provocative.

Oh, you and your provocative assertions. Ruff!

Chris ... Ida thunk instead

Chris ... Ida thunk instead of

Obama.... directly confronting McCain's on his inablity to unite the republicans.

He'd be too busy trying to directly confront the 20 plus per cent of Hillary Democrats who've said they rather vote McCain than Obama.

It's a funny year all right. I'd much prefer John McLane than John McCain!

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Once the Hillbots get over

Once the Hillbots get over the shock, they'll vote for Obama.  McCain will be hit so hard with democratic shock and awe in the general, he'll need a defib to get him going again.

YO Red Bar

No one here will vote for Obama except you and "your ilk"

Yeah, but my ilk is a

Yeah, but my ilk is a helluva lot bigger than your ilk.

RedBar

We shall see.

Yeah, his ilk has 57 states.

Yeah, his ilk has 57 states. ;-)

Ouch! Nice jab.

Ouch!  Nice jab.

Jer

 Goldie you need to

 Goldie you need to look at this because it is you

 

"In their case the prophecy of Isaiah is being fulfilled, which says, `YOU WILL KEEP ON HEARING, BUT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND;
YOU WILL KEEP ON SEEING, BUT WILL NOT PERCEIVE;

15. 
FOR THE HEART OF THIS PEOPLE HAS BECOME DULL,
WITH THEIR EARS THEY SCARCELY HEAR,
AND THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES,
OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SEE WITH THEIR EYES,
HEAR WITH THEIR EARS,
AND UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART AND RETURN,
AND I WOULD HEAL THEM.

 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

More like this.

More like this.

Goldbar Nuke em til they

Goldbar

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Obama: "It's not like I'm

Obama: "It's not like I'm Carter, talking directly to the terrorists themselves"!

Nawwww, he'd rather talk to the terroists' bosses; you know -- the ones ordering the hits and supplying the arms.

"Nations of the region hate this criminal fabricated regime (Israel) and will uproot this fabricated regime if the smallest and shortest opportunity is given to them," Ahmadinejad said Wednesday in an address broadcast live on state television. McCain had it right this morning -- just exactly what does Obama want to talk to them about?

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

The Dems got caught...

...in another blatant lie and they don't like it one bit. Obama, whether President Bush was directing the "appeasement" comments to him or not, has IN FACT made statements which would lead anyone who has a pulse and no political agenda to believe he would "talk first".

http://wizbangblog.com/content/2008/05/11/lets-give-em-something-to-talk-about.php

Then, if the polls show that there is enough radical left wing support, he MIGHT allow the US Military to defend the citizens of the US, in a reactive, counter-strike....

I wonder where the terrorists that Obama would "talk to and negotiate" with are going to attack us next time; East Coast? West Coast? Key targets in the south since it would be a very short trip once they've crossed our wide open southern border?

Barack Chamberlain

Barack Chamberlain. I’ve often thought that would make a good last name for Mr. Obama. Especially since he's so anxious to spend time with our enemies.

Since my guy, Thompson, is

Since my guy, Thompson, is long gone, I've been trying to keep a more objective mind to all these matters, and I can see where both sides are right and wrong.  Yes, there were US leaders who appeased the Nazis in order to protect their own wealth or trade with Europe, and that was a bad move.  On the other side of the debate, after Clinton's SECSTATE Warren Christopher got chased out of the Middle East and came back to tell Billary that peace would never happen, two Norwegian diplomats went out to the Israelis and Palestinians and just asked what was the minimum it would take to get both sides to the negotiating table?  Instead of asking "what do you want?" and getting volumns of impossible demands, they went in and talked and were able to find grounds for agreement.  Unfortuantely, Billary hijacked the process after that and ruined it, but that did not make the process of reasonable discussions a failure... just letting Billary get involved.

So I agree that there is no guarantee that talking to leaders in Iran, Syria, and other countries will be successful, there is also evidence to show that such talks could be successful.  We just need to make sure we don't go in there and give them carte blanche like the Dems in the 1930s did with Hitler.

Do these idiots even pay

Do these idiots even pay attention?  Sorry, that was a rhetorical question.

Any supposed slight towards Obama outrages the MSM instead of actually delving into the question or statement.  If they had looked closely at Bush's comments I don't think he was talking about Obama at all.  Obama has said he would talk to other Governments of these nations, but to my knowledge not talk to terrorists.  It is Jimma Carter that has been actively pursuing known terrorist organizations and wanting to talk to them.

Of course we can't have even the slightest hint of an accusation against the Lamb of Chicago!

"suggesting that Senator

"suggesting that Senator Barack Obama and other Democrats are in favor of appeasing terrorists in the same way that U.S. leaders appeased the Nazis in the run-up to World War II,"

Truth hurts, doesn't it Johnny Boy?  Now back to your blow dryer, lightweight.

MSM is EVIL.. Thank you for doing your part

Destroying America, one chunk at a time.

Al-jaherra still has much to learn from your ILK.

BTW THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!

Keep up the good work,

NOTHING TO LOSE NOW GO FOR IT!!

The POPE says, GOD BLESS AMERICA!! Liberals/are/crazy/IranianUranium/is/good

 

Obama Slap

Anyone as old as me surely remembers the phrase,"If the shoe fits, wear it!"

This is such crap

President did not name a single person. Carter came to my mind first along with every other democrat.

And yep...If the shoe fits.....and it obviously does!

The golden slipper of appeasement is on the foot of ALL the democrats and especially the MSM

 

Yes, and the crocodile awaits ...

Yes, and the crocodile awaits them. Thanks to msm and the other appeasers, the crocodile waits for all of us.

How ironic seeing as the

How ironic seeing as the Bush family are Nazi appeasers.

I would ask you to clarify

I would ask you to clarify but that is like asking a pig to bark.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Yeah, he's just seeking

Yeah, he's just seeking attention.  No point indulging him.

Exactly fitz.... He's

Exactly fitz....

He's just trolling as usual...I saw his comment earlier...I could not agree more gb should be ignored...although I know it is hard to do at times...I'm as guilty as others at times...lol. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

I think he's referring to Prescott Bush

I think he's referring to Prescott Bush who's being falsely redefined by the liberals as a Nazi sympathizer even though he fought AGAINST the Germans in WWI. I highly doubt that Prescott had any sympathy at all for the Germans after having to live through that nightmare.