During Thursday night’s Democratic presidential debate on CNN, Senators Clinton and Obama actually face two question that reflected a conservative agenda. CNN’s John King asked the candidates about the border fence and the surge in Iraq, topics that are not usually highlighted by the mainstream media.
King, during a portion of the debate concerning illegal immigration about a half hour into the 8 pm Eastern hour, asked Hillary Clinton about her vote in 2006 to support the construction of a border fence.
JOHN KING: To many Americans, it [the border fence] is a simple question of sovereignty and security. America should be able to keep people out that it doesn't want in.... Senator, back in 2006, you voted for the construction of that fence. As you know, progress has been slow. As President of the United States, would you commit tonight, that you would finish the fence and speed up the construction, or do you think it's time for a President of the United States to raise his or her hand and say, ‘You know what? Wait a minute. Let's think about this again. Do we really want to do this?’"
About forty-five minutes later, King asked about the success of the surge in Iraq, and, in directing the question to Senator Clinton, included her past criticism of the surge and specifically, General Petraeus.
JOHN KING: You both had to make a judgment, a short time ago, in your job in the United States Senate, about whether to support the surge. And as that was going on, Senator Clinton, you had the commanding general in Iraq before you. And you said, 'I think that the reports you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief' -- your words to General Petraeus. I want you to look at Iraq now and listen to those who say the security situation is better. Ideal, no, but better -- some say significantly, in recent days, even some steps toward the political reconciliation. Is Iraq today better off than it was six months or a year ago because of the surge?
Clinton immediately took issue with the way King asked his question. "Well, John, I think you forget a very important premise of the surge. The rationale of the surge was to create the space and time for the Iraqi government to make the decisions that only it can make. Now, there is no doubt, given the skill and the commitment of our young men and women in uniform that putting more of them in will give us a tactical advantage and will provide security in some places, and that has occurred. But the fact is that the purpose of it has not been fulfilled."
After Clinton finished her answer, Campbell Brown, who moderated the debate, then put the question to Senator Obama in the following manner. "Senator Obama, in the same vein, you were also opposed to the surge from the beginning. Were you wrong?"
It will be interesting to see if such substantive questions from the conservative side will be asked at the upcoming NBC News debate on February 26, moderated by Tim Russert and Brian Williams.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
As a kid ...
February 22, 2008 - 12:53 ET by drillanwr... our home was along a thick woods. I had a fascination for spiders (and we had lots of them ... and BIG), although creeped-out by them, and I used to spend hours watching them spin their webs ...
This spider's web(s) just ain't holding up.
The other spider doesn't even have any [silk] to spin a web.
I am not sure when, but I suspect this spider will make one last venomous strike at the silk-less spider before she topples from her tangled webs.
I can only hope in the general campaign cycle the Praying Mantis finds it very easy to patiently and tactically devour this webless spider, who will have nowhere to run and hide ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEkaZLXz-7c
When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks
Is he conservative?
February 22, 2008 - 12:55 ET by coffee260CNN’s John King might be a closeted conservative. I've observed him while filling in for Wolf Blitzer and have always perceived him as other than liberal. Maybe he's a closeted conservative. What do you think?
John King
February 22, 2008 - 13:47 ET by KC MulvilleI don't think he's a conservative. But he was certainly a professional journalist at the debate, and that's good enough for me. I don't care about them being liberal, so long as they do their job. King did a good job.
Of course, if tomorrow he screws up, we'll go after him (for what that's worth). But when he does things properly, we should praise him. He deserves praise for the debate performance.
I was also shocked that Campbell Brown called Obama
February 22, 2008 - 13:00 ET by Dee BunkOn his change about normalizing relations with Cuba. Still they didn't really do much follow up. I only saw the first hour but it still seemed like a fluff debate for the most part. It was nowhere like any of the Republican ones where candidates were actually challenged.
Border fence? I wonder....
February 22, 2008 - 13:05 ET by mattmBorder fence? I wonder....
It always amazes me that
February 22, 2008 - 13:06 ET by jdhawkIt always amazes me that blogs like NB go agog when one of the drive bys actually asks a question of a liberal beyond, "Mrs. Clinton, which do you like - diamonds or pearls?"
Kings asked a couple of questions in this debate that someone might actually want to hear the answers to. The shame of it is, he had no penetrating follow up questions to the party line answers that the candidates answered with.
Meanwhile, pages and pages of the newspapers and hours upon hours of the drive bys' TV time are filled with inane, stupid, crap that tells nothing, on purpose in my opinion, of the candidates stands on important issues and their likely impact on the American people if carried out while in office.
I don't get what amazes
February 22, 2008 - 13:22 ET by mattmI don't get what amazes you. For the Drive-bys to ask a serious, issue-oriented question of a Dem is a rarity. Why shouldn't NB "go agog"?
I guess I don't see your point.
I was surprised by the
February 22, 2008 - 13:11 ET by bigtimerI was surprised by the questions quite frankly...
I wasn't by the answers...although I was infuriated with the twisted answers nonetheless.
Either one of these leftists as President will undo all the progress that has been made by this administration if they have the ability to do so, it is the goal especially of Hillary...they cannot have any kudos going to President Bush and all involved, history will, but these critters want a different outcome.
I too will be curious to the questions asked in the final debate before the 4th.
"You know what? Wait a
February 22, 2008 - 14:40 ET by Chris Norman"You know what? Wait a minute. Let's think about this again. Do we really want to do this?’"
This last line kind of took away from the conservative oriented thrust of the question. It's like King was giving them an out that sounded "thoughtful and moderate".
Conservative issues?
February 22, 2008 - 17:16 ET by jay_1975I thought these issues impacted all Americans, not just Conservatives. It's about damn time that someone started to find out where these politicians stand on all issues, not just health care.