Surprisingly, CNN, during its Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas, asked a numbers of questions that conservatives might propose on Thursday night. During the first hour of the debate, moderators Wolf Blitzer, Campbell Brown, and John Roberts asked a total of 13 questions (not counting follow-up questions) on a number of issues. Of these, five could be considered to be "conservative."
Campbell Brown directed the first such question to Barack Obama. "Senator Obama, I want to ask you about immigration....What do you say to those Americans who say they are losing out because you would give benefits to people who broke the laws of this country, who came here illegally. And then more generally, as president, where do you draw the line when it comes to benefits for illegal immigrants?"
Even after a similar question in the last debate "tripped up" Hillary Clinton, Obama avoided answering the question with a direct yes-or-no, which prompted two follow-up questions from Blitzer. "I take it, Senator Obama, you support giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Is that right?" and "Well, let's go through everybody because I want to be precise.... Do you support or oppose driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?"
After all of the candidates had a chance to comment on the benefits for illegal immigrants issue, John Roberts brought up the issue of merit pay for teachers. "In workplaces across America, it's [a] pretty common practice to reward high-performing employees with pay raises and to terminate bad employees. However, in our education system across the country, by and large, in our nation's public schools, teachers' unions make it difficult to do that. Question is, what is wrong with rewarding a teacher who excels at the job that they're doing by paying them more than an average teacher would make?
Roberts first directed the question to Senator Christopher Dodd, who thought there should be "merit pay" for teachers who mentor poor or rural children after school. Blitzer then directed a follow-up question to Dennis Kucinich, a "strong supporter of the unions." "Are there any issues with unions -- teachers unions or other unions, for that matter -- with which you disagree?" After a long non-answer, which prompted a point of clarification from Blitzer, Kucinich said he’s not a "slam dunk" on every issue the unions support.
Richardson, Clinton, and Biden then weighed in on the issue. The way that Blitzer worded a follow-up question to Clinton on the issue was interesting. "But what if there's an excellent teacher in that team and a crummy teacher in that team, a teacher who's simply riding along and not really working very hard, not really educating those young kids? Do you give just everybody the merit pay, or do you give it to individual teachers?"
After Campbell Brown directed a question to Biden on Pakistan, Blitzer asked Bill Richardson about the same issue. In answering, Richardson proposed that if he became president, "democracy and human rights" concerns would become more important than national security concerns.
RICHARDSON: Well, of course I'm worried, but what happened with our Pakistan policy, we got our principles wrong. We forgot our principles, our principles that we said to Musharraf: You know, Musharraf, security is more important than human rights. If I'm president, it's the other way around -- democracy and human rights. What I would do is, yes, I would condition the assistance to Musharraf. We give him $10 billion. Sixty percent of that is to his military.... So, if we're on the side of democracy and human rights, and we're on the side of Musharraf having elections, then U.S. interests are preserved, and the Pakistani people have a democracy.
Following-up, Blitzer responded, "Let me just be precise because I want to make sure we all -- I heard you correctly. What you're saying, Governor, is that human rights, at times, are more important than American national security?" Richardson answered in the affirmative.
Bltizer then asked John Edwards, Obama, Dodd, and Clinton to weigh in on his question. Edwards didn’t really answer the question, and instead focused on what he would do with Pakistan. Obama answered that the concepts of human rights and national security are "complementary," and also gave his policy suggestions with Pakistan. After using part of his answer to bash the Bush administration’s policy with Turkey and Pakistan, Dodd answered that national security was more important. Clinton then agreed with Dodd.
The next "conservative" question dealt with the Iraq War. John Roberts asked Bill Richardson, "Is General Petraeus correct when he says that the troop increase is bringing security to Iraq?" Richardson disagreed with Petraeus, and said that the "surge is not working." Blitzer then directed the question to Kucinich, who made his usual "bring them home now" rant, and to Obama, who claimed "the overall strategy is failed because we have not seen any change in behavior among Iraq's political leaders."
After the candidates debated the issue of trade with China and if NAFTA was a mistake, Roberts asked Obama about nuclear energy, due to the controversy of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste storage site in the debate’s host state of Nevada.
ROBERTS: Senator Obama, the price of oil is flirting with $100-a-barrel mark right now, making all the more urgent the need for alternate fuel sources. You support nuclear energy as a part of the plan for the future, but there is an issue of what to do with the waste. You are opposed to the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository about 90 miles from here. Your state uses about -- gets about 48 percent of its power from nuclear, compared to 20 percent for most other states, yet you are opposed to bringing nuclear waste from other states and keeping it in Illinois. The question is, if not in your backyard, whose?
Obama then gave a long answer about how nuclear energy "isn’t necessarily our best option," but "it has to be part of our energy mix." He also focused on the "genuine crisis" of global warming and the need to "cap greenhouse gases" and increase renewable energy sources.
Blitzer then asked Richardson about what to do with nuclear waste. Richardson replied simply that "you don’t put it in Yucca Mountain," and then focused almost entirely on renewable sources.
The moderators’ inclusion of some "conservative" questions contrasts with the second hour of the debate, in which the candidates fielded questions from "undecided" voters. These questions dealt, for the most part, with partisan liberal issues, from how to stop "the rush to war" with Iran to how the passage of the PATRIOT Act has supposedly lead to racial profiling.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
RICHARDSON:We forgot our
November 16, 2007 - 15:15 ET by MidAmericaRICHARDSON:We forgot our principles, our principles that we said to Musharraf: You know, Musharraf, security is more important than human rights. If I'm president, it's the other way around -- democracy and human rights.
This statement is right out of jimmie carter's suicide manual. Carter transformed Iran, an ally of the west, into a terrorist state that threatens the whole world, all in the name of 'human rights'. Check with ordinary Iranians and see how much they have benefitted from carter's 'high moral standards'. Now we have many like Richardson who seem to want to take the chance of duplicating the Iranian experience with Pakistan, a country with nukes!
Spin
November 16, 2007 - 15:47 ET by well99The problem is that the questions werent answer in a straight forward manner.They just put out the same rhetoric.Biden seemed to me to be the best of the group.There were some sparks but no substance.The debate was the same as the others boring.
Gas Prices
November 16, 2007 - 15:48 ET by Jerry MackI watched the debate because I wanted to hear their solution to our dependency on imported oil and high gas prices. The answer was to build more windmills and sun collectors.
Anytime any of them is asked anywhere about high gas prices they say that we have an energy crisis and then give the alternative fuels, wind mills, drive less, buy a solar powered golf cart sized car, ect speech.
Reality check
November 16, 2007 - 16:11 ET by IluvfredumIf you go to Huffpo or any of the other leftist sites you soon learn that Iran is where the Smurfs live and bin Laden is akin to Santa Claus.
Time to Cut the Apron Strings, Mommies
November 16, 2007 - 16:52 ET by WoodyMWell, CNN picked a couple of left-wing questions from the audience about our military missions and was careful to include a soldier just back from Iraq with his mom to divert criticism. Well, victim politics doesn't work for me, and I'll tell them what I think.
One mommy wanted promises that her son wouldn't have to go to Iran and another mommy said that it was unfair that others made more money than her son. Of course, the pandering politicians obliged them with predictable answers and promised that we wouldn't need the military with Iran--nuclear or not.
I think it's time that these military men start acting like men again and quit letting mommy complain to the principal's office for them. They can speak for themselves. And, they made the decision to enter the military knowing full well the risks and rewards. We support the military, and these so-called victims in the military should remember to keep their commitments to us.
At least, it's clear that the Democrats and mommies cannot be trusted to fight our battles for us. But, the left-wing press can always be trusted to pull out more victims against the war and our future security to help the Democrats.
Woody... I could not
November 16, 2007 - 17:01 ET by bigtimerWoody...
I could not agree more...it was embarrassing, they do not know how they look to others.
It disgusts me.
woody, Comcast network did something
November 16, 2007 - 17:05 ET by exLibI was VERY surprised this morning when the local (at least I think it's local) Comcast network news did a special interview with a Marine who just got back from Iraq.
Despite the interviewers grilling him and asking leading questions that to'ed the MSM party-line on the Iraq war. The marine held his ground and told about the good news and how we were winning the war and how disheartening it was to come back to the US and find out we were "losing" the war.
I just wanted to add that
November 16, 2007 - 17:17 ET by bigtimerI just wanted to add that that one mother is regular leftist activist that was with her son who served in Iraq....according to Rush today.
I figured as such anyway...like all of the obvious Shrillary audience.
The whole thing was disgusting which makes it good for our side as far as I am concerned.
Merit Pay?????
November 16, 2007 - 17:03 ET by exLibSo the only way to get more money as a teacher is do work OUTSIDE of your regular job?????
So, my boss says to me, we all work the same hours for the same pay raises every year regardless of the quality of the work. But if you go out and do EXTRA work, AFTER hours we'll give you a bonus?
And this idiot think Corporations are bad???
How many "teachers" are going to be going into "poor" neighborhoods "Making a Difference" and who gets to decide what a "poor" neighborhood is and what "making a difference" means?
So now you are going to have start a whole division in the school system assigned to tracking and measuring extra-cirricular performance.
THE KLINTONS: GUARANTEED ANSWER LIST
November 16, 2007 - 20:57 ET by reelman46THE KLINTONS: GUARANTEED ANSWER LIST*
01… I was not aware
02… Its old news
03… That is negative
04… Its very complicated
05… The problem was inherited
06… Its a common problem
07… We have responded to that
08… The Republicans made it up
09… Bush policies caused it
10.. We are working hard on that
* If those 9 do not work then the catch-all will be >>>
platitudes, distortions and factless assertations unchallenged by the
libmedia…
==========
Note: The Klintons will say anything because they will change 180 degrees after assuming power (aka middle class tax cut 1992)
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)