CNN Puts Negative Spin on Withdrawal of Brigade from Iraq

Photo of Matthew Balan.

Instead of the progress that has been made in lowering violence in the country, CNN decided to focus on the "significant price" of the troop surge in Iraq. Tuesday’s "American Morning" reported that the Defense Department had decided to pull an entire brigade out of Iraq. Co-host John Roberts asked Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr "what’s this really mean for the war?" Starr only mentioned the decrease in violence in passing as she reported that the troop surge is "now officially in reverse gear." She did not include figures of this recent downturn in violence, something that only CBS Evening News did among the "Big Three" evening news broadcasts on Monday.

Starr’s report aired at the beginning of the 7 am Eastern hour of "American Morning." After she reported which units were sending troops home, Roberts asked her about the "price" of progress in Iraq. "Barbara, a lot of people are talking about progress here in Iraq, but progress comes at a price." In response, Starr highlighted the Bush administration’s lack of pressure on the Iraqi government to work on reconciliation, the shift to working with local groups that may become "armed militias" when the U.S. leaves Iraq, and how "ethnic cleansing" has divided Baghdad.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The lack of figures on the downturn in violence, together with the speculation that the local groups might become "armed militia" shows CNN’s agenda in their reporting on the Iraq war.

The full transcript of the segment from Tuesday’s "American Morning:"

JOHN ROBERTS: We begin this morning with big news in the Iraq war. A homecoming in the making for hundreds of military families. The Pentagon is pulling a brigade out of the country. It could be the first of many to follow. So what's this really mean for the war? CNN's Barbara Starr working the story from the Pentagon. She joins us now live. Good morning, Barbara.

BARBARA STARR, PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Good morning to you, John. Well, with attacks down across the board in Iraq, of course, the troop surge that we've been talking about for so long, now officially is in reverse gear. They are bringing some of the troops home. They're trying to bring it down from about a troop level of 169,000 to 140,000, 145,000 by July. In the latest move, members of the 1st Cavalry Division are going to be headed back home to Fort Hood, Texas. That announcement has been made. Some very happy families there. We have already seen some members of the 10th Mountain Division of the 82nd Airborne on their way home. The troops are very happy, obviously, about this, John.

ROBERTS: Barbara, a lot of people are talking about progress here in Iraq, but progress comes at a price.

STARR: Well, it really does. There has been a price paid, certainly by U.S. troops and by Iraqi civilians, of course. I think that people are focusing on two issues here when they talk about the price paid for success. The Maliki government. You're not hearing the Bush administration talk very much lately about pressuring the Maliki government to work on that reconciliation. That is because the U.S. has really shifted policy. It's putting its chips now with local citizens, with local groups. You're hearing an awful lot about that. The question, of course, will be when they have all these local groups really armed, when they're working as security forces in their areas, will they be armed militias once the U.S. leaves?

And, of course, sectarian violence is down. That's another thing that's talked about as a measure of success. But you and I have talked a lot about the fact that the price for that is ethnic cleansing. Baghdad now a divided city, one side Shia, one side Sunni. And, of course, so many Iraqi refugees now living outside their own country. So, all of this really does come at a very significant price, John.

ROBERTS: Yeah, still some huge problems there. Barbara Starr at the Pentagon for us this morning. Barbara, thanks.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

man looks are not deceiving

I try rarely to speak of people's looks, but the pics you guys put up of Roberts and Starr look like Bevis and Thughead for lack of brains.

Great headline though from a liberal, Winning is a bad thing.

Apparently he is having a George Bush twice victory flashback.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

AM I ALONE?

On the subject of looks, did Barbara Starr steal Ashleigh Banfield's eyeware? I can't be the only one thinking this...

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

Okay ... Wait ... 

Okay ... Wait ...  <quickly erasing blackboard> oops shoul- lea--  I-aq

All right ... Ready ... So, now the neoPRAVDA thinks the troops should stay in Iraq ... Okay  <scribbling on blackboard>  got it ...

The MSM playbook for the

The MSM playbook for the remainder of the Bush presidency is simple:

Find out what Bush supports/proposes/does and promote the opposite.

What is a surge reversal?

I am not usually surprised at the MSM, but the recent headlines saying "Surge Reversal" have me stunned.

See http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071113/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/iraq_security_gains

I may have to start believing in alternate universes, because I seem to have somehow slipped into one after seeing this.

 

"Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away" New York Times Nov 2006

WTF do these friggin'

WTF do these friggin' MORONS actually want? First we didn't have enough troops in Iraq. Then putting more in was bad. Then the surge wasn't going to work. Then it was working. We need to get out of Iraq. Then pulling troops out is bad. This LSM tripe makes my hair hurt!

And why is no one calling these IDIOTS out on their goldfish flopping? Why are LSM competitors not slamming CNN into a wall with this? Is their hypocrisy invisible to so many people?

Much more of this, and I'll be seeing my lunch for the second time today... 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Yeah, still some huge

Yeah, still some huge problems there

Victory is a huge problem for the left.  This kind of spin would be silly if these folks didn't have a straight face when they are talking about it.  This reminds me of when people who think they can sing, but really can't, believe they really can because they can't hear how out of tune they really are.  Interviews like this are like bad American Idol auditions.  Look forward to more "bad" news regarding victory in Iraq. 

The price of nothing

But you and I have talked a lot about the fact that the price for that (sectarian violence being down) is ethnic cleansing.

But neither of you have uttered one syllable about Saddam being the root cause of ethnic cleansing.  If only the short-sighted UN and other leftists in the world had the true compassion to act when we still had coalition troops on the ground during the Gulf War there would have been much less cause for retaliation. But still Roberts and Starr seem to think history began when Dubya took office.  Thank God Dubya had the wisdom to ignore his critics and the fortitude to step up and do something about the Saddam hell-hole of Iraq.   

A refresher video about the true price paid by innocent Iraqi's for Roberts, Starr and the world's other do-nothings about Saddam's ongoing "ethnic cleansing" even as Iraqis pleaded for help on the closed ears of the bring-the-troops-home crowd.