The mainstream media’s long march against the Iraq War continues unabated. On October 27, the Washington Post ran a front-page story with an attention-grabbing headline taken from a quote by an American soldier serving in Iraq: "I don’t think this place is worth another soldier’s life." Two days later on October 29, CNN’s Jack Cafferty on "The Situation Room" used the same quote in his "Question of the Hour:" "What does it say about the conflict in Iraq when troops there are saying things like, 'I don't think this place is worth another soldier's life.' Our soldiers are saying that stuff."
The Post story, written by Joshua Partlow, detailed the experience of American soldiers in a neighborhood of Baghdad called Sadiyah, which is known for its slide into sectarian violence over the past 14 months. The piece seemed to be tailored to put a negative spin on the recent drop in violence across Iraq. For example: "While top U.S. commanders say the statistics of violence have registered a steep drop in Baghdad and elsewhere, the soldiers' experience in Sadiyah shows that numbers alone do not describe the sense of aborted normalcy -- the fear, the disrupted lives -- that still hangs over the city."
At the end of the article, the sentiment was reenforced by another quote from a soldier patrolling Sadiyah:
Those who patrol the neighborhood every day say the fight has left them tired, bitter, wounded and confused.... The American people don't fully realize what's going on, said Staff Sgt. Richard McClary, 27, a section leader from Buffalo. "They just know back there what the higher-ups here tell them. But the higher-ups don't go anywhere, and actually they only go to the safe places, places with a little bit of gunfire," he said. ‘They don't ever [expletive] see what we see on the ground."
The context of the "money quote" that was used in the Post’s headline doesn’t make it clear whether the soldier - Sgt. Victor Alarcon - was referring to the neighborhood of Sadiyah or to the entire country of Iraq.
Next month, the U.S. soldiers will complete their tour in Iraq. Their experience in Sadiyah has left many of them deeply discouraged, by both the unabated hatred between rival sectarian fighters and the questionable will of the Iraqi government to work toward peaceful solutions.
Asked if the American endeavor here was worth their sacrifice -- 20 soldiers from the battalion have been killed in Baghdad -- Alarcon said no: "I don't think this place is worth another soldier's life."
Yet, Cafferty, in his "Cafferty File" segment, which came nine minutes into the 5 pm Eastern hour, made it clear that he thought the soldier meant the entire country.
CAFFERTY: To say that our troops have performed heroically is an understatement. But we'd better begin listening to what some of them are starting to say. The 'Washington Post' had a terrific piece over the weekend about a battalion of soldiers serving in a southwestern part of Baghdad. They had been deployed for 14 months in a district torn apart by increasing levels of sectarian violence, and some of them are downright tired, weary, bitter, and skeptical. When one of them was asked if the U.S. effort in Iraq was worth their sacrifice, he said this: 'I don't think this place is worth another soldier's life.' That's a quote. Twenty soldiers from that kid's battalion have been killed in Baghdad.
So here's the question: what does it say about the conflict in Iraq when troops there are saying things like, 'I don't think this place is worth another soldier's life.' Our soldiers are saying that stuff. E-mail caffertyfile@CNN.com or go to CNN.com/caffertyfile.
The "tired, weary, bitter, and skeptical" line is a parphrase of the subtitle of Partlow’s article: "After 14 months in a Baghdad district torn by mounting sectarian violence, members of one U.S. unit are tired, bitter and skeptical."
Note that the original Post article uses the phrase "many of them [the soldiers]" and Cafferty uses the phrase "some of them." While there is no doubt that service in Iraq takes its toll on soldiers’ physical, mental, and emotional well-being, you’ll rarely find either the Post or CNN focusing attention on those who are less "bitter and skeptical" about their service in Iraq. It would only take away from the impact of their negative spin.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
You can find any opinion if you look HARD ENOUGH
October 30, 2007 - 13:34 ET by Six String SpiffHow about this opinion:
I think the MSM is defrauding the citizens of the United States. Let's have a discussion about THAT, Jack. Yeah I didn't think so.
These A-HOLES think one soldiers opinion overrides all others? Sickening. Ahhh 'Journalism' where would America be with out you? I don't know, but I'm sure we be exponentially better off.
"I don't give DAMN what you think you're entitled too."
what does it say? it says
October 30, 2007 - 13:44 ET by TruthMongerwhat does it say? it says the MSM is dragging down morale - get the message yet CNN? thought not...
I used to call this guy Jackass Cafferty - trying not to anymore - it is very difficult tho
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
Cafferty?
October 30, 2007 - 14:41 ET by heldmywOhhhh!
I thought he was Jack Offerty...
My bad.
Two Hundred Fifty Thousand
October 30, 2007 - 16:17 ET by allanfJust think, Jack and the Washington Post had to go through about 250,000 soldiers before he found one with the right opinion.
Soldiers B*tch
October 30, 2007 - 13:39 ET by KillgraveI've heard that there is a truth as real as the sun rising in the morning.. that soldiers b*tch. But they should only do so with each other, and not to outsiders.
I am amazed of the lack of discipline in these units, that these men feel free to give their names and then spew a bunch of crap that will only embolden the enemy (both here and abroad) and demoralize their fellow comrads.
The only thing worse are the people who look under every rock to find material that will fit their agenda. I personally spoke to a veteran from Iraq who saw, first hand, members of the MSM asking loaded questions and only writing down the negatives.
"Traitor" is an extremely harsh term to use, but I can't think of a more appropriate label for these so-called "journalists".
Interviewed or overheard?
October 30, 2007 - 14:19 ET by CPT_ClawI agree that if these soldiers were sitting down and airing their views to the reporters in question, there is a question regarding judgment and discipline. But it could also be that the soldiers were in fact just griping with their buddies and the complaints were overheard by the press. The journalist then slides up, asks a few questions about some unrelated stuff, gets the SSG's name, age and hometown and then runs with what he heard them talking about earlier.
Far fetched? Perhaps. But unfortunately not unheard of. We had a situation just like I described occur in Desert Storm ... by a Stars and Stripes report, no less. The SGT whos comments were printed was devastated.
But nonetheless, you are correct, Operation Security (OPSEC) discipline is lacking ... regardless of the scenario for the comments being given/overheard by the media.
Concur: An need to ask,
October 30, 2007 - 17:57 ET by BDConcur:
An need to ask, "What is new?" I am sure if you asked a soldier of the 101's airborne shivering outside of Bastogne Belgium on Christmas Eve of 1944, he would tell you that Belgium was not worth one more of his comrades lives either.
Or the kids from the 36th Infantry as they shivered beside the Rapido River in Italy would probably have voiced similar concerns.
Marines storming Iwo Jima, well they probably concluded that such an inhospitable sulphur belching island was not worth any of their lives as well.
So somehow Cafferty thinks this is news?
Not surprised
October 30, 2007 - 13:55 ET by CPT_ClawThe soldiers' comments do not surprise me, but neither do they distress me.
There are few constants in life, but one in military life is that soldiers will vent and complain. I was a young company grade officer in Desert Shield and Desert Storm and kept a journal thoughout the entire build-up to my deployment, my time in the desert before, during and after the hostilities, and then the first few weeks upon my return to the states.
Reading that journal now, if didn't know better, at any given point you would think I was schizophrenic. One entry I am gung-ho; the next a malcontent; the next a rabid right-winger; a couple pages later I am a screaming lib. It's not the result of what I thought, it was the result of the stressful feelings I had at the moment.
If indivudal pages were taken out of the journal, I could have been painted as a disgruntled, angry and questioning wretch; but when read in its entirety you would see me and my time there for what it truly was - one of the defining moments of my life and a time of which I am extremely proud.
These soldiers' comments reflect their feelings, emotions and thoughts at the moment. And I am convinced every soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan has had moments when they share these exact same thoughts. But overall I believe the vast majority also know the real reason they are there and are proud of their service and accomplishments.
The shame in this article is in the fact that the reporters only seem to be listening (or at least reporting) when the gripes are aired ... not when the pride in their service is shared.
Rhetoric at work
October 30, 2007 - 13:59 ET by KC MulvilleIf I told you that the troops in Iraq support the mission, and you said, 'not all of them' ... have you actually rebutted my original statement? No. When I said 'the troops,' in normal conversation, it didn't mean each and every one of them. Cafferty's rhetoric is the reverse of the same tactic. It plays on the assumption that things are getting better, according to various statistics and military spokesmen. Highlighting the experience of any selected group does not rebut the overall assumption. Cafferty needs to learn the difference between the particular and the general.
What worries me most about Iraq right now is that the media is now trying to create a false sense of success. Two months of good reports doesn't mean the game is over. We have a long way to go. Besides, frankly, I think we can all expect an al-Qaeda "Battle of the Bulge" scenario, where they lay low for awhile and then launch a large offensive. The media will then present that counter-Surge as final proof that Iraq will never change.
"the sense of aborted normalcy"
October 30, 2007 - 14:03 ET by Chris NormanHow about the sense of distorted reality brought by CNN and the rest of the MSM?
i can think of a few other
October 30, 2007 - 15:59 ET by pmohbucki can think of a few other places in which soldiers would say the same, but the media conveniently forgets these lovely places:
kasserine pass
anzio
cisterna
normandy
groesbeek
eindhoven
hurtgen forest
bastogne
guadalcanal
pelelieu
saipan
iwo jima
tarawa
okinawa
chosin resevoir
what foreign land, if any, is worth a soldier seeing his buddies die for ... regardless of how popular a war is or isn't at home, i'll guarantee the majority of the people doing the fighting would rather be at home ... after they've sucessfully completed the mission.
USING dead US servicemen/women for politcal gain ... just another grisly tactic of desperate liberals trying to change people's minds ... as if we need them to tell us how to think. the left HAS to use tricks and illusions, rather than the truth, to get people to see things their way ... that's why its so easy to understand how such a large number of idiots seem to side with them.
Was there a point during
October 30, 2007 - 16:16 ET by Hero SquadWas there a point during WWII where we could've said it was not worth the sacrifice of American soldiers to liberate the people of France?
At what point do you abandon your efforts and tell people who need your help that, "Sorry, I can help you, but you're on your own now."
**My Daughter at the WWII Memorial
Sometimes I wonder if it
October 30, 2007 - 16:39 ET by Dan The Man 2Sometimes I wonder if it was worth liberating much if any of Europe the way they tend to denigrate us. But then I remember we do it not for teh thanks we recieve, we do it because it is the right thing to do.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Would they quote this soldier?
October 30, 2007 - 16:59 ET by mattmSgt. John Kriesel said many things in a speech back in May. The following is part that the local media skipped over:
"....Good things are happening everyday in iraq. You only hear the bad things about when somebody dies or - or therre's a suicide bomb or something. You dont hear about the kids in those schools...(APPLAUSE)...I can honestly tell you, we are winning and my two friends that died in the vehicle with me, Sgts Corey Rystad and Bryan McDonough, and later Ssgt James Wosika who died - they didn't give their life for no reason OK, it was for a good cause and it is going well. I would go back and I would do it again in a minute cuz it is worth it!"
I dare you to quote that Cafferty, you low-life...
Cricket sounds from the embedded
October 30, 2007 - 17:45 ET by woolIt's safe to say that the soldiers have generally good morale and still believe in the mission based on the fact the the embedded reporters are not daily printing otherwise. My nephew returned last year after 13 months in Iraq and he really tells a different tale than what we hear from the msm-an old story I know.
If these two soldiers were at all indicative of the attitudes over there, we would certainly be hearing it daily.
this is touching to say the least
October 30, 2007 - 18:08 ET by bigtimerIt would be nice if CNN would pay tribute and do stories on real patriots and heros for a change during this war...touching real stories that you can feel in your heart, we know they won't it do, it doesn't fit the agenda.
This would be a great one!