CNN apparently wants to milk all it can out of the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s strike on the Gulf Coast for the benefit of the Democrats. On Monday’s "The Situation Room," CNN special correspondent Soledad O’Brien’s report juxtaposed a clip of a recent speech by Barack Obama with stock footage of the hurricane’s aftermath. On Tuesday’s "The Situation Room," O’Brien upped the ante in another segment. This time, more footage of damage from Hurricane Katrina ran at the same time an audio clip from President Bush’s first post-Katrina speech in New Orleans began. The video then cut to the President speaking in Jackson Square, and as the clip ended, the picture froze and went to black-and-white, as you might expect in an election campaign commercial.
O’Brien, on-location in New Orleans, appeared during the 5 pm hour of "The Situation Room." Host Wolf Blitzer asked her what people along the Gulf Coast were saying about the rebuilding effort. O’Brien’s reply: "You know, Wolf, if you had to pick on a single word, then I think that word would be they're very, very frustrated." She went on to say that people there also "feel let down by their local leaders, the state leaders, and the federal government, too." O’Brien mentioned the local and state leaders first, but they were not to be mentioned in her report. It focused entirely on the response of the Bush administration, and Democrats’ criticism. In addition to this "frustration" she cited, O’Brien would go on to talk about a conspiracy theory about why the federal aid to the region has been so slow.
Video (0:57): Real (1.55 MB) or Windows (1.76 MB), plus MP3 audio (193 kB).
The first part of Soledad O’Brien’s report:
GEORGE BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes. We will stay as long as it takes to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives. And all who question the future of the Crescent City need to know -- there is no way to imagine America without New Orleans. And this great city will rise again.
O'BRIEN (voice-over): President Bush in New Orleans two weeks after Hurricane Katrina devastated the city.
But in a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 55 percent of Americans we questioned don't think the Crescent City will ever completely recover from the storm. While Washington's committed more than $110 billion in grants and loans to the region, the money has been slow in getting to the people who need it the most.
BUSH: We want the people down there to understand that it's going to take a while to recover. This is a huge storm.
There is a bit of the disconnect between the President saying New Orleans will "rise again" and asking whether the city will ever completely recover from Katrina in a poll question.
After the report concluded, O’Brien commented further on what she had gathered from people in the area on why they think the federal government aid has been slow, and she seemed to agree with the conspiracy theory that is apparently common among some of the residents along the Gulf Coast.
O'BRIEN: You know, one of the things we heard, Wolf, a lot, was the sense that there's this policy of benign neglect. In other words, maybe there's a sense that the help is slow in coming because America doesn't want people to really come back and repopulate the Gulf Coast, New Orleans specifically, in the way that it once was.
You hear that, whether you're talking about the Lower Ninth Ward or you're talking about the middle class communities in the Lake View District. All across, I've heard that so many times, not only over the last couple of weeks, but the last several months, as well. And I think people feel that maybe the government is not funding the money fast enough because they don't want people to really come back -- Wolf.
Earlier, during the actual report, O’Brien included the apparently obligatory sound bites from two of the Democrat frontrunners:
O'BRIEN: The White House says it's living up to its responsibility. But the government's response to Katrina damaged Mr. Bush politically, giving Democrats running for president plenty of ammunition.
JOHN EDWARDS, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: And you go to these parts of New Orleans, and the work is not getting done. The money is not getting to the ground.
SEN. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON (D), NEW YORK: And I will pledge to you this -- if we don't get done what you deserve to have done by the time I'm president, then when I'm president, this will be one of my highest priorities.
O'BRIEN: More than half of those we questioned say Washington's rebuilding efforts are not enough.
The report concluded with sound bites from three residents of the heavily-damaged Ninth Ward of the city, all of whom reenforced the sense that the aid to the area has been slow.
Now that the two-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s hit on the Gulf Coast has arrived, it will be interesting to see if this trend continues on Wednesday’s "The Situation Room." It won’t be a surprise if it does.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Democrats with Money
August 29, 2007 - 12:00 ET by allanfWell John, that's what happens when you give Democrats a lot of money to spend with very little accountability.
**YAWWNNN**
August 29, 2007 - 12:08 ET by ksimm81Isn't there a massive flood in the midwest right now as I type this? Will we still be talking about said flood two years from now wondering why Bush didn't turn off his Magical Flood Machine?
The fact of the matter is
1. New Orleans sits BELOW sea level.
2. The hardest hit ones were hit hard LONG before Katrina came around. Most of those people were on welfare and were content in surviving off of government assistance. And it is quite sad that the out-of-wedlock birthrate for New Orleans is at 60%.
3. $1.3 billion has been spent on welfare since the start of Bush-43's presidency which doesn't even include 3 billion in food stamps!
These stats should make any tax paying American extremely angry and for idiotic Democratics to insist that more money is the answer is just plain ludicrous.
I would say more, but I am getting nauseous just thinking about how wacky liberals really are and just how far from reality they seem to be.
New ORleans/Katrina
August 29, 2007 - 15:47 ET by merlin61Today, Pres. Bush said that the Feds have given
$114.billion in aid but the local and state governments are not doing their part to
do what they are supposed to with the money.
Its called corruption!!!! Again, its not the
current administration in Washington, but in
Louisiana itself. Let the media do some
investigating on the locals and find out what
they are doing to aid their own people wiht the
money they were given.
Who's Frustrated?
August 29, 2007 - 12:23 ET by acumen"You know, Wolf, if you had to pick on a single word, then I think that word would be they're very, very frustrated."
After two years, still with the Katrina is Bush's fault? It would appear the demediacrats at CNN are "very, very frustrated" with a Dem controlled Congress approval rating lower than that of President Bush. Seems it's all about political priorities with this incestuous demedia bunch.
Will New Orleans completely recover..?
August 29, 2007 - 12:43 ET by Gary HallMatthew. There's a bit of history to the question posed in the online poll shown in the snapshot which asks, "Will New Orleans Ever Completley Recover from Hurrican Katrina?"
This history invlolves the mass exodus of New Orleans residents during the 40 years preceeding Katrina - and that did not involve President Bush. The viewers deserve to get a full accounting from the media on this history, and certainly are not.
Following hurricane Betsy in 1965 to the day that Katrina hit, the population of New Orleans slowly decreased by about a 1/4 million people.
Prior to 1965, the City of New Orleans was rapidly growing.
1900 - 287,104
1920 - 387,219
1940 - 494,537
1960 - 627,525
1965 - 702,108
1980 - 557,515
2000 - 484,674
2003 - 469,032
Now - ? It continues.. as before.
233,000 people - almost a 1/4 million residents - had fled New Orleans from the time of the Great Society, thru the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, and prior to Hurricane Katrina forming in the Atlantic ocean.
Why were the residents of New Orleans fleeing in the decades leading up to 2005?
For reference: Image:HurricaneBetsyFloodingAirForceONE.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
Spike Lee to Make Movie on Hurricane Betsy
August 29, 2007 - 13:03 ET by kwGreat post, thanks for the history lesson. I never heard of Hurricane Betsy. It says that 164,000 homes were flooded. Katrina claimed 266,000 in LA and MS.
I like this entry from Wikipedia..."Evidence suggests that cheap construction and poor maintenance of the structures led to the failure of the levees. However, popular rumor persists that they were INTENTIONALLY BREACHED, possibly as a means of salvaging the more prosperous French Quarter."
When is Spike Lee going to make a movie about Hurricane Betsy?
kw - he ain't
August 29, 2007 - 13:43 ET by Gary Hallkw - I doubt that he will. Betsy roared in during a Democrat administration. In regards to the conspiracy theories which Spike Lee, Louis Farrakhan and other radicals have helped to keep alive, Lee added to the claim, saying, “I don't find it too far-fetched,” Lee said in a recent television interview, “that they try to displace all the black people out of New Orleans.” (Lisa Myers, NBC)
What is very disturbing here, is all the hype that is going on over at CNN with Soledad O'Brien putting on a special "with" Spike Lee tonight.
Why yes, it's so obvious...
August 29, 2007 - 17:34 ET by KhyrisWhy yes, it's so obvious... those racist whities wanted to displace black people out of their homes... and fill their priveledged whitey neighborhoods with possibly violent transients. Yes, that is a masterful plan indeed... so obvoius.
Houston vs New Orleans
August 29, 2007 - 21:05 ET by UnsaneBack on 1 September 2005, Thomas Lifson compared two cities separated by 325 miles and the Sabine River, and how differently they turned out, as part of an article titled "New Orleans, The Tragedy." His words are italicized below.
Alicia hit the city of Houston HARD in August 1983 and last time I checked, its residents weren't sitting around whining for the rest of America to help them a year later. The same with Tropical Storm Allison in 2001, when it dumped vast amounts of rain here.
Many years ago, an oilman in Houston pointed out to me that there was no inherent reason Houston should have emerged as the world capital of the petroleum business. New Orleans was already a major city with centuries of history, proximity to oil deposits, and huge transportation advantages when the Houston Ship Channel was dredged, making the then-small city of Houston into a major port. The discovery of the Humble oil field certainly helped Houston rise as an oil center, but the industry could just as easily have centered itself in New Orleans.
When I pressed my oilman informant for the reason Houston prevailed, he gave me a look of pity for my naiveté, and said, “Corruption.” Anyone making a fortune in New Orleans based on access to any kind of public resources would find himself coping with all sorts of hands extended for palm-greasing. Permits, taxes, fees, and outright bribes would be a never-ending nightmare. Houston, in contrast, was interested in growth, jobs, prosperity, and extending a welcoming hand to newcomers. New Orleans might be a great place to spend a pleasant weekend, but Houston is the place to build a business.
Today, metropolitan Houston houses roughly 4 times the population of pre-Katrina metropolitan New Orleans, despite the considerable advantage New Orleans has of capturing the shipping traffic of the Mississippi basin.
It is far from a coincidence that Houston is now absorbing refugees from New Orleans, and preparing to enroll the children of New Orleans in its own school system. Houston is a city built on the can-do spirit (space exploration, oil, medicine are shining examples of the human will to knowledge and improvement, and all have been immeasurably advanced by Houstonians). Houston officials have capably planned for their own possible severe hurricanes, and that disaster planning is now selflessly put at the disposal of their neighbors to the east.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
unsane - that was a perfectly sane..
August 29, 2007 - 21:12 ET by Gary Hallunsane - that was a perfectly sane followup to my comment. Perhaps those folks left NOLA and headed to Houston in the years preceeding Katrina looking for opportunity, instead of the corruption they had back home. (;~> gary
I don't know how/why
August 29, 2007 - 21:16 ET by balboaI don't know how/why someone would live in New Orleans. LOVE the food, the atmosphere, etc., but I could never live there.
Clinton News Network
August 29, 2007 - 12:51 ET by mattmCNN and the rest of the MSM has a threefold agend when it comes to tragedies.
1. To promote the idea that Government's job is to bail people out of difficulty.
2. To bash the GOP in general and the Bush administration in particular.
3. To further the political advance of socialistic politicians who use every excuse to grow government.
Beneficence is one thing, but why should all the taxpayers have to pay for the dumb decisions of others? Build a city below sea level; it gets flooded out, and you complain to the Feds???
I'm sick of bailing out idiots who build on flood plains, or who spill coffee on themselves, or who make stupid financial decisions, or who refuse to work for a living.......
Nobody frickin' bails me out!
International Tribunal on Hurrican Katrina - what the...???!!!??
August 29, 2007 - 12:52 ET by kwDid you catch the last paragraph of the AP story? It talks about an International Tribunal hoping to pin human right abuses on the government. Check out the link here for the tribunal. Can you say whacked out liberal moonbats?
Slow work?
August 29, 2007 - 12:59 ET by ricklailIt would not surprise me that the work was slow. First the skilled people, electricians, carpenters, plumbers, masons are probably in short supply. Building supplies are are in short supply. There are just so many concrete companies that can be put in an area. FEMA is not going to allow for junky houses to be built. There will be strict codes on new housing like building off the ground and building to sustain certain wind speeds. The MSM does not bring this up. It is Bush's fault period.
A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.
Idiot kid liberals named "Soledad". What do they know?
August 29, 2007 - 13:05 ET by pickerseniorNote previous post about decline in New Orleans population since mid 60's.
Algiers (the un-flooded part across the river), is being decimated by receivers of government graft moving into one of the only relatively decent and safe neighborhoods. It won't remain decent and safe for long due to those who cheat and live off goverment handouts, grants, graft, and other crimes more violent.
When visiting relatives there in the '60's, before, and subsequent visits for business, and relatives, it was known by those who lived there that the city would flood when a large hurricane hit. They lived there because they liked that part of the South, and were locked in due to their previous generations. They knew they would have to pay the piper some day. That day is now.
"Soledad", "Katie", "Hillary", "Barak", "Ray", etc. keep screaming and manage to mitigate any help or local pride in repairing the city correctly, sans moving away, which is another logical path.
Maybe the city shouldn't be there anyway. Maybe the best idea yet, is to fill the swamp.
Pickersenior
"If liberals didn't live it, it doesn't exist."
I can see the anticipation, the drool...
August 29, 2007 - 13:13 ET by JayTeeI think MSM WANTS another HIT on New Orleans...they can't put it down, and they can't wait for the next Hurricane.
Zero hurricanes last year must have been a Terrible disappointment, and continues to Frustrate them......Even the Midwest Floods are getting knocked off the News by Katrina/New Orleans.
I guess the Midwest guys are "taking care of themselves"....don't need no Stinkin Govt. help.
What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ? David Foote GoE
Just another example of
August 29, 2007 - 14:49 ET by ckc1227Just another example of people refusing to view the situation logically. How long did it take to build New Orleans into the city it was before Katrina? I suspect it was longer than two years. So, since, I'm guestimating here, at least 50% of this city was destroyed by Katrina, why would anyone in their right mind believe the city could be rebuilt in two years?
Anyway, if Bush is so incompetent, and FEMA has become a shambles under his watch, why was every other area that was hit by a hurricane during his administration handled properly....except for New Orleans and Louisiana? Why is every other area hit by a hurricane during his administration well on the road to recovery....except for New Orleans and Louisiana?
Wait, what am I talking about. It's because Bush doesn't like black people, since, as everyone knows, blacks, and only blacks, live in New Orleans. There are no blacks in Florida, Texas, Mississippi, etc, etc.....
The Katrina story: One of the most "spun"stories in our history.
Kevin - on New Orleans
August 29, 2007 - 15:23 ET by Gary HallKevin - on New Orleans. You made a very interesting point on the time it takes to rebuild. Take a look at my earlier comment, posted above, for a different sense of something else that was ocurring in NOLA, prior to Bush's term.
It's worth a look also to note that it's been mentioned (only mentioned - not covered, I note) that both Homestead, Fl., and the Midwest, which were devistated by Hurricane Andrew (1993) and the Great Miss. Floods (1994), respectively, ten years on, were limping along and full of despair and anger over the role of the govenment's assistance during those 7-8 years of the Clinton admin. (;~> gary
In other words, maybe
August 29, 2007 - 15:42 ET by MidAmericaIn other words, maybe there's a sense that the help is slow in coming because America doesn't want people to really come back and repopulate the Gulf Coast, New Orleans specifically, in the way that it once was.
Gee, you think maybe all the billions being spent on putting people down in a hole in the ground couldn't be better spent on say bridges or 'healthcare for the children'? Plus it's going to flood again. Al gore says, without any doubt, all the coastal areas will be flooded within ten years.
New Orleans. It would have
August 29, 2007 - 15:49 ET by bassndudeNew Orleans. It would have been wiser to just fill it with concrete and build a bridge over it. Would have cost less to.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Much watch video - the hapless Gov. Blanco
August 29, 2007 - 15:51 ET by Gary HallMuch watch video - the hapless Gov. Blanco. Lisa Myers, NBC, ran one of few reports that looked someplace other than President Bush for blame. I hope this works, as the original link has been removed.
Gov. Blanco - ooops I really messed up.
The caption:
Pick me up off of the
August 29, 2007 - 16:46 ET by Del DolemontePick me up off of the floor-Wolf is discussing the Hillary finance thing. Candy Crowley is doing her best to cover for Hill. She says every campaign has unsavory people for donors.
Total time spent on this story: 2 minutes.
Proof that Bush does not
August 29, 2007 - 18:04 ET by USA4freedomProof that Bush does not care:
Federal spending on Katrina relief and reconstruction
spending could top $200 billion (plus tax incentives).
The
2001 No Child Behind Act, the most expensive education bill in American
history, which led to a 100 percent increase in education spending;
The
2002 Farm Security and Rural Investment Act, the most expensive farm bill in
American history;
The
2003 Medicare Modernization Act, the most expensive Great Society expansion in
history;
International
spending leap 94 percent;
Housing
and Commerce spending surge 86 percent;
Community
and regional development spending jump 71 percent;
Health
research spending increase 61 percent;
Veterans’
spending increase 51 percent; and
The
number of annual pork projects leap from 6,000 to 14,000.
So what
did this spending buy us? Nothing but complaints from every one! The right
because the congress and the president
spend money like drunken sailors. It did not get us a fence! Or more
border security. Just more entitlements for future generations to pay for.
The left
hates you no matter what you do all you have to do is have a (R) next to your
name.
The left
will always say: we starve, keep uneducated, keep in the employment lines, put
in jail all the down trodden, in effect WE NEVER CAN SPEND ENOUGH.
So next
time, save the money, cut taxes, kill pork, kill earmarks, NO NEW ENTITLEMENTS.
So with
that in mind..try, just try, to please the base.. (and your approval rate will
not be in the mid teens to the low 20’s.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day