Friday’s earlier post on CNN’s "God's Warriors" hinted that CNN and Christiane Amanpour gave Muslim "fundamentalists" in the U.S. sympathetic treatment, while they showed discomfort towards Christian conservatives. The original intention was to give examples of each in that post, but the distinction is so clear and important that it deserves its own separate post.
Bob Knight of MRC’s Culture and Media Institute detailed some examples of Amanpour’s biased treatment of Christian conservatives in his latest column. She spent the last 20 minutes of "God’s Christian Warriors" profiling the Battlecry Campaign of Ron Luce, an evangelical Christian who runs a larger organization called Teen Mania Ministries.
As Knight pointed out, Amanpour "couldn’t quite conceal her hostility" towards Luce. A partial transcript from this segment showing the full context of her rather-pointed questions clearly demonstrated this hostility.
Video (1:39): Real (1.21 MB) or Windows (1.03 MB), plus MP3 audio (759 kB).
AMANPOUR (voice-over): His [Luce's] ministry is located on 472 acres in rural east Texas.... Here, he trains teenagers how to spread his message.... They are the foot soldiers in Ron Luce's army for God.... They also serve as the backbone for BattleCry. They plan the events, act in them and even create their own media to combat today's mass media.... On campus, students must follow a strict set of rules.... No secular music or television. No "R"-rated movies. No alcohol. No drugs. No dating.
AMANPOUR (on camera): When I, you know, read that women have to wear skirts of a certain length, and guys aren't allowed to, you know, go on the Internet, unsupervised. And I think, you know, totalitarian regimes.
LUCE: No. It's about learning to have disciplines that communicate purity. You know? The skirts' length are to keep guys from -- you know, any man on the planet can be distracted, and we don't want to unintentionally create distraction.
AMANPOUR: But, Ron, that's what the Taliban said. They kept women in their house, because men couldn't be trusted around them.
LUCE: Well, there's extremists. You came to our campus. They did, your team did. They can see that we're not extremists. The kids are normal, and they have fun, and they wear normal clothes. It's just not -- it's not -- they've not adapted. We haven't adapted the dress code to the sexualization that's happened in our culture.
Amanpour is being more than a bit hyperbolic concerning how Luce and his organization treats his young female students. In the video accompanying her voice-over detailing Luce’s east-Texas campus, there are more than a few women visible who are wearing pants instead of skirts. The young woman featured immediately after Luce’s answer to Amanpour’s "Taliban" comment wore blue jeans during all of the time she appeared on-camera. She also obviously couldn’t tell the difference between the Taliban, who, as she said, "kept their women in their house," and the students on Luce’s campus, who are free to come and leave as they please.
It should also be pointed out that all of the people and groups detailed in "God’s Christian Warriors" belonged to conservative evangelical/Protestant Christianity. Other than Amanpour’s passing reference to "Catholic, Mormons, and social conservatives" joining Jerry Falwell in his Moral Majority, and stock footage of the annual pro-life March for Life in Washington, DC in which a protester praying the Rosary is prominent, there is no significant mention of other conservatives in the program. The evangelicals are clearly a bigger "boogeyman" for CNN and Amanpour.
By contrast, Amanpour spent a whole segment detailing the plight of Muslims in the U.S. The six-and-a-half minute segment, titled "A Personal Jihad," profiled Rehan Seyam, an American-born Muslim of Egyptian descent who, in Amanpour’s words, is a "jihadist, just not the sort you’re thinking of."
The following partial transcript demonstrates the clear sympathetic treatment Seyam and her fellow American Muslims received from Amanpour.
Video (2:07): Real (1.54 MB) or Windows (1.29 MB), plus MP3 audio (965 kB)
AMANPOUR (voice-over): She's a lifelong American.... Born and raised in Islip, Long Island.... But Rehan Seyam is a jihadist, just not the sort you're thinking of.
SEYAM: The word jihad means struggle. I treat me wearing hijab in the United States as a struggle, jihad itself, struggle. That's my jihad. I mean, holy war, really? Who made that up? That's really a very bad translation. It's a self-struggle. Living in a secular society, where you have to work to maintain your Islamic values, that's jihad.
AMANPOUR: Rehan Seyam's parents came here from Egypt. They were devout. But, like so many immigrant children, she was a typically Americanized teenager.
SEYAM: So, when I would be called to pray by my parents, I would just run between commercial breaks, and wash up and pray, and run back, and hopefully I didn't miss my TV show.
AMANPOUR: But, as she grew up and went to college in what was now a post-9/11 world, she began to get closer to Islam. And, one morning, she made a decision that would change her life, to wear the hijab, the traditional Muslim head scarf.
SEYAM: It was very dramatic for me. And I remember how -- like, even now, thinking about it, it really does make my heart beat a little bit faster, because I was making a decision I knew was permanent. You put on hijab, you don't take it off. So, I said, that's it.
AMANPOUR: Rehan's jihad isn't violence, not even close, but it is public. It is a deliberate display of faith, not just covering her head, but swearing off alcohol, praying five times a day, which isn't easy in a typically busy American life.... For Rehan and her husband, Rahmi... and most practicing Muslims, Islam is their identity. It shapes every aspect of who they are.
SEYAM: Islam is a way of life. Ask anyone who practices. They will tell you, it's not just your religion. A lot of people go to the church on Sunday, and that's their religion for their week. Mine is every single day, every minute of my day.
AMANPOUR: Islam even shaped their courtship. Rahmi asked Rehan's parents for permission before he asked her out.
SEYAM: I like that. I was like, he's, like -- he's religious, like, I could tell he wasn't going to try to meet me without any sort of, like, parental notification.
Islam shaped Seyam and her husband’s courtship? Could you imagine Amanpour’s reaction if one of the BattleCry students had said that their Christianity shaped their courtship?
Amanpour continued her profile of Seyam by focusing on her use of the Islamic veil, the hijab.
AMANPOUR: Rehan insists that covering up is not a sign of a woman's inferiority, as many Westerners believe, but a sign that Muslim women refuse to be degraded, as she feels they can be in American culture.
SEYAM: I don't want any guy looking at me, except for my husband, provocatively. Why would I want that? Why do I want to be a piece of meat?
Amanpour brought in author and religious historian Karen Armstrong, who was featured on all three segments of "God’s Warriors," to comment on this statement by Muslim women, since she as a former Catholic nun wore a habit, which is similar to the hijab.
KAREN ARMSTRONG, RELIGIOUS HISTORIAN: In some ways, it was very liberating. For seven whole years I never had once to think about my hairstyle, my makeup, my clothes. I never had to wear man-pleasing garments. I never had to fill my head with the junk that society tells women, to trivialize their lives about.
Earlier, Armstrong even came to the defense of Islam during Amanpour’s examination of Islamic fundamentalists’ treatment of women.
KAREN ARMSTRONG, RELIGIOUS HISTORIAN: It's important to say that none of the great world religions has been good for women, not a single one of them.
AMANPOUR: Religious historian Karen Armstrong says that Islam's Prophet Mohammed was actually ahead of his time when it came to women.
ARMSTRONG: The Koran gives women rights of inheritance and divorce that Western women would not receive until the 19th century. There is nothing in the Koran about all women having to be veiled or secluded in a certain part of the house. That came in later.
Unsuprisingly, Amanpour didn’t challenge Armstrong’s claim about Mohammed, who had 11 or 13 wives, and consummated the marriage to his "favorite" wife Aisha when she was nine years old.
Steve Kellmeyer of "The Fifth Column" blog (hat tip to Dawn Eden of The Dawn Patrol blog) pointed out in a column before the airing of "God’s Warriors" that the Jewish settlers on the West Bank featured in "God’s Jewish Warriors" drew their inspiration from the Book of Ezekiel. In fact, the verse from the Book of Ezekiel is only one of two religious texts that are directly cited in the six hours of programming of the miniseries, and it also appears prominently on the screen. Amanpour’s only other reference made to a religious text by name in "God’s Jewish Warriors" is that "in the Jewish bible, the Torah, the Book of Genesis says God gave this land to the Jewish people."
There is no direct reference to any passage in the Koran in "God’s Muslim Warriors." There are only three indirect references - the indirect reference by Armstrong mentioned above; a reference by religious historian Bruce Lawrence that in Islamist suicide bombers’ "interpretation of scripture, [their] reading of the Koran, martyrs go to paradise;" and in an interview of the family of a Palestinian gunman killed after he opened fire on Israelis, Amanpour mentioned that "the Koran says that suicide is haram, that you don't go to heaven if you kill yourself."
The "Christian Warriors" featured by Amanpour do talk about the Bible. For example, John Hagee, a pastor and "Christian Zionist" from Texas, made the second of two direct references to religious texts in the entire series, when he cited Genesis 12:3, that God "will bless those who bless you [the Jewish people] and I will curse those who curse you." But the only reference to a religious text by name by Amanpour in "God’s Christian Warriors" is her mention that "fifty-three percent, that's more than half of all Americans, believe in creationism, that God created the earth and everything on it, as it says in the book of Genesis."
Not everything in "God’s Warriors" is biased. In fact, Amanpour should be applauded for her profile of one of the "founding fathers" of modern Islamic radicalism, Sayyid Qutb, in "God’s Muslim Warriors," a figure who is not as well-known by Westerners as he should be. Also, while Amanpour did show her apparent hostility to Ron Luce and his BattleCry ministry in the last 20-minutes of "God’s Christian Warriors," her coverage of a BattleCry protest in front of San Francisco’s city hall did, perhaps inadvertently, show the organization in a good light, as the protest’s opponents came out in strength in their own display of intolerance towards Christians (as mentioned by Bob Knight in his column).
As Amanpour closed out her miniseries at the BattleCry concert in San Francisco, she said that "what struck me [at the BattleCry concert in San Francisco] was one woman in the wings." This young woman, named Jodie Dickens, poured out her heart about her love of God, as Amanpour listened sympathetically. This moment even "choked-up" one analyst for MRC. But it is clear that Amanpour approached the subject of "religious fundamentalism" from a more secular perspective.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Amazing how Annanpo
August 24, 2007 - 18:14 ET by motherbeltAmazing how Annanpour manages to make Christianity into the "totalitarian regime" but apparently has nothing but admiration for the restrictions of Islam on women.
Her tone is critical when speaking of the Christians:
On campus, students must follow a strict set of rules.... No secular music or television. No "R"-rated movies. No alcohol. No drugs. No dating.[ ] ...women have to wear skirts of a certain length, and guys aren't allowed to, you know, go on the Internet, unsupervised. And I think, you know, totalitarian regimes.
But oh, so respectful to the Muslim woman:
Rehan's jihad isn't violence, not even close, but it is public. It is a deliberate display of faith, not just covering her head, but swearing off alcohol, praying five times a day, which isn't easy in a typically busy American life...
(And you know she doesn't get to watch secular TV or movies either.)
and
Rehan insists that covering up is not a sign of a woman's inferiority, as many Westerners believe, but a sign that Muslim women refuse to be degraded, as she feels they can be in American culture.
So if a Christian woman swears off alcohol and drugs, and wears knee-length skirts, it's because of totalitarian Christianity. For a Muslim woman, it's a refusal to be "degraded."
Unbelievable. Just unbelievable.
Line In The Sand
August 25, 2007 - 00:19 ET by Mr. TerryIt is obvious that they can no longer hide their contempt. This is such a blatant display of a double standard that even the casual observer could see it. It didn't matter that Ron Luce was helping college kids see that dressing like little prositutes on campus wasn't normal. The content of their efforts and beliefs didn't matter. What mattered was that the Christians are bad and the new persecuted ones are the Muslims and we should put them in a good light. Poor Jihadists.
I also didn't like the shot the Muslim girl took at Christians about her religion being every day, minute of the week while Christians only have religion on Sunday morning.
A real Christian has a living faith. But, if that person lives for Christ every day they are nowadays considered a religious fanatic, a right-wing extremist or some other epithet. Oh, I forgot, they are uneducated and somehow southern...lol
It's Called Intellectual Stupidity
August 25, 2007 - 04:51 ET by josephsamuelsonIt's also called hypocrisy, bias, intolerance, and discrimination.
Amanpour has clear bias for Muslims and against Christians. That's hypocritical, intolerant, and discriminatory.
Read Much?
August 24, 2007 - 18:11 ET by mattmFor all the reading Libs are supposed to do, it's obvious Amanpour hasn't read this.
I liked how Amanpour just
August 25, 2007 - 06:48 ET by LighthouseJI liked how Amanpour just glossed over the fact that the Taliban exercises their will over all people forcefully but people choose voluntarily to be involved.
Take my job for instance, it's voluntary, I could quit if I wanted but I agree to exchange my time and effort to doing tasks my bosses ask me to for something I want in return. The same compact happens with the kids that are associated with Luce's events. The Taliban just wants to exert their will (being Sharia law, perhaps?) over everybody.
The bad thing is the libs are nodding their heads thinking "see, Christians are totalitarian, she says it" but her views are a farce.
Thank you light
August 25, 2007 - 07:22 ET by USA4freedomThank you light house,
What you posted was exactly what I was yelling at when I
watched the clip.
No one is beating them with sticks if they are out in the
public with out a man.
Give me a break! She knows this, and is only trying to tie
the two together with the smallest string on the planet.
If she was under Sharia law, she would not be doing what she
is going. Back in the house, put on your Burka.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
I have no problem with any
August 25, 2007 - 09:40 ET by moonjohnI have no problem with any religion requiring woman to dress modestly.
It’s the Religious Police that beats women to death with sticks in the streets for not dressing to code that I object to.
That is the totalitarianism.
This Christain Group may have a modest dress code, but they are not hunting down "Cher" to beat her with baseball bats.
Anti-Christian Bias?
August 25, 2007 - 15:21 ET by No DhimmiI don't think there was anti-Christian bias. The American goofballs with the head scarves - blechh. God told her to cover up - right. God made a terrible mistake by giving women beauty - and hair!
The world's just a tad mixed up.
Check out this scary site:
The Truth About Islam
http://islamwatchers...
I've watched the
August 25, 2007 - 15:26 ET by Senior ChiefI've watched the 3-day/6-hour God's Warrior series to see for myself what CNN was trying to show regarding the teachings, lifestyles and beliefs of these three religions. They proved that of the three, only Christians don't kill people from other religions in the name of faith. They are a peaceful group of people proclaiming the message of God. The hearer chooses to accept or dismiss, and if one chooses to dismiss, there's no order to kill him/her. Can't say the same with the other two.
Start demanding that CNN fire Amanpour!
August 26, 2007 - 18:37 ET by 1389Throughout the 1990s, Amanpour and CNN were key players in blood-libeling the Christian Serbs with allegations of genocide against the supposedly victimized poor innocent Muslim jihadists in the Balkans.
Well, after all this time, and exhaustive investigations on the part of those who have vested interests in proving Christians wrong and Muslims right, no evidence has been found to back up those allegations against the Serbs. Rather than admitting any of this, CNN and others in the mainstream media have simply let the issue drop quietly off the radar screen.
The fact is that Amanpour, and all others who took part in this media spin at CNN, knew exactly what they were doing. They knew it right at the beginning and they knew it the entire time. No excuses can be made for any of them. They, and not the Serbs, have been and still are the true war criminals of the Balkans from the 1990s through the present.
I will come right out and say it, as I did back then: Amanpour and those who have been collaborating with her are evil people through and through. They deserve the same fate as Josef Goebbels and Julius Streicher, and for precisely the same reason.
Rope, tree, corrupt journalists... some assembly required.
Let's all start posting some contact information for CNN and starting a campaign to call for Amanpour and everyone who has participated in her evil activities to be fired!
I've been blogging about jihadism, especially in the Balkans, at http://1389blog.com and http://1389moblog.bl....
If you have any suggestions or comments regarding how to remove this individual from her undeserved position of influence, there's an email form at http://1389blog.com - feel free to contact me there.
1389
No.. I think I'll demand CNN
August 26, 2007 - 19:21 ET by Jack BauerNo.. I think I'll demand CNN make her wear a Burka for a month, then fire her.
Triumph of the will
August 27, 2007 - 11:18 ET by Sergeant ROCKNothing more than apologist claptrap.
But leftists were claiming that it was a ratings victory for biased CNN.
http://www.pollyticks.com/item/cnn-s-christiane-amanpour-challenges-fox-s-bill-o-reilly-for-the-title
Check out Butch Reno's comment.
UPDATE: I found this nutty blog on the CNN page about this special. Oddly enough, I didn't see NB's link any where on the page. Check out the exchange with the nut that runs this blog.