CNN's King Played Softball With Gore, But Pressed Cheney With Hard Questions

Photo of Matthew Balan.

During the month of July, CNN's "Larry King Live" both began and ended with interviews of vice presidents. On July 5, host Larry King interviewed former vice president Al Gore. On July 31, King interviewed sitting vice president Dick Cheney. The difference between the two interviews is like night and day. King, for the most part, did not press Gore for an answer to his questions, and asked a few light questions (such as, "How did you get Madonna?" for "Live Earth"). On the other hand, King's questions to Cheney pressed the vice president on a number of hot political topics (for example, "General Powell says he would close Guantanamo yesterday. Would you?" and the oh-so-typical follow-up, "You have to torture them when they're there?") and the interview was almost completely serious.

King's interview of Gore dealt mainly with Gore's "Live Earth" concerts, though it touched on more "hard" political topics such the troop surge in Iraq and the commutation of Scooter Libby's prison sentence. A sample of King's questions to Gore on July 5:

First, we need to ask, how -- how's your son doing? Have you spoken with him? And how's he doing, you know, emotionally?

How did this thing [Live Earth] come about? This massive thing Saturday night? I think we discussed it on this show once.

Penguins or people? [in reference to the Live Earth performance in Antarctica]

There was a question, Al, about Rio de Janeiro. Clear it up.

Wasn't it a question about Rio not coming off?

How'd you get Madonna?

Some items in the news, Mr. Vice President. Just today, Republican Senator Pete Domenici broke ranks with the administration, says he's unwilling to continue the current strategy in Iraq. He joins fellow Republican Senator Lugar, both good friends of yours. What do you make of this?

Can you call the surge [the troop surge in Iraq] now a failure?

Scooter Libby, what do you make of the -- I know your former running mate and former president served with you, of course, you as vice president, with Bill Clinton as president -- really attacked it yesterday. What do you make of the commutation of the Libby sentence?

Your book "The Assault on Reason," are you surprised at how successful it's been? I mean, it's a very strong political statement.

Do you -- how do you feel about Senator Inhofe, who has been, I guess, the most strong critic of yours in the Senate, who calls climate change "a hoax"?

When people say to you, Al, you have such strong feelings. You had the most votes last time. Why not consider it? I mean, it's kind of an obligation. You're so involved. Why not [run for president again]?

We have an e-mail from Jerry in Houston, Texas. "Mr. Gore, how can you fly in your private jet, live in a massive mansion and set an example for others?"

Did you see the Michael Moore film "Sicko"?

Other than the question about whether the Rio de Janeiro concert would get off the ground, it is clear from the interview that King did not press Gore for answers to his questions. The only really tough question he asked - on Al Gore's use of private jets - wasn't even one of King's questions, but was sent in by a viewer.

At the same time, King didn't challenge any of Gore's answers. In fact, when Gore compared Senator Inhofe to people who believe the Earth is flat, and when he made a comparison like "It's hard when some of the largest polluters close their ears and spend millions of dollars a year trying to intentionally confuse people into thinking this isn't real, the same way that tobacco companies spent millions of dollars to try to convince people that the doctors weren't really saying that smoking causes lung disease," King lets both statements go unchallenged. As icing on the cake, after Gore's comparison between polluters and tobacco companies, King gushed, "There's no stronger proponent of your position than you."

King's July 31 interview of Vice President Cheney dealt mostly with a number of political topics. A sample of the questions from the interview:

How do you deal with it when public opinion polls are stridently against the [Iraq] policy?

But in all cases, they did question themselves. In all cases, they said, well, let's look at it this way. Don't you? I mean the question is, don't you ever say, maybe I'm wrong?

In retrospect, you would still go into Iraq?

Does it pain you when Brent Scowcroft says this is not the Dick Cheney I knew?

Wouldn't you like to be liked?

OK, let's go back. On this program, May of 2005, you said the Iraqi insurgency was in the last throes. Why were you wrong?

In that same interview, you said that the Iraqis were well on their way to being able to defend themselves. Why not? Why are they gone?

To which branch of government do you belong? Are you executive or legislative, or both? We were a little confused over recent statements that you're not in either.

We have an op-ed piece by Walter Mondale, a former vice president, who held your job. And at that time, I guess, up to that time, he would be considered the most powerful vice president. He wrote that: "After 9/11, Cheney set out to create a largely independent power center in the Office of the Vice President. It was an unprecedented attempt not only to shape administration policy, but, alarmingly, to limit the policy options sent to the president."He also accused you of having "a near total aversion to the notion of accountability." How would you respond to that?

Don't you think this administration has also had its credibility problems?

Alberto Gonzales. Do you stand by him?

You're going to stand by him? No doubt about that?

In that regard, "The New York Times," which is -- as you said, it's not your favorite paper, reports it was you who dispatched Gonzales and Andy Card to then Attorney General John Ashcroft's hospital in 2004 to push Ashcroft to certify the president's intelligence gathering program. Was it you?

The "Scooter" Libby trial, did it pain you?

The Senate Judiciary Committee is subpoenaing Karl Rove in connection with the firing of federal prosecutors. Why shouldn't he appear?

But the public might say, what have you got to hide?

So he -- so he [Rove] will not appear?

General Powell says he would close Guantanamo yesterday. Would you?

You have to torture them when they're there?

How come in the past though there's been a question on that?

Have you ever said, "We support certain methods of physical harm"?

What is "enhanced" [referring to Cheney's line 'We support the ability of certain agencies of the federal government to have the capacity to use enhanced techniques for interrogation']?

Though King's interview of Cheney did not last the entire hour of the program as Gore's did, there were clearly more questions during the Cheney interview. There were also more follow-up questions and questions that pressed Cheney for an answer. The only critics of Gore that King brought up were Senator Inhofe and Bob Geldof, while King asked Cheney about criticism from Republican senators on the Iraq war policy, Brent Scowcroft, Walter Mondale, and Colin Powell's call for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

It is clear from the two interviews that King was playing "sympathetic ear" to Gore, while he was asking Cheney the questions that his left-wing colleagues in the mainstream media would like to ask the vice president themselves.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

  I like to see Cheney

  I like to see Cheney get tough questions (if asked respectfully and he is allowed to answer).  He can handle them.  It's interesting watching a pro.

  Gore is just a media celebrity.  He is to science what Paris is to acting.

Cheney:  "Well, yes, Larry,

Cheney:  "Well, yes, Larry, we do torture them ... and good!  Hell, the best damn torture method we have down there at Gitmo is duct-taping the bastards to their prayer rugs and forcing them to watch "The View" and your show.  They start-a-squealing like stuck pigs! <heh-heh> Works like a friggin' charm!  Damn fun to watch too.  I have a live video feed I watch while enjoying a nice tall glass of blood ... Lar, huntin' season's just around the corner ... Me and you ... Come on, buddy?"

Is Larry King Alive?

Though King's interview of Cheney did not last the entire hour of the program as Gore's did, there were clearly more questions...

It is clear from the two interviews that King was playing "sympathetic ear" to Gore, while he was asking Cheney the questions that his left-wing colleagues in the mainstream media would like to ask the vice president themselves.

You're right.  CNN made sure they had enough time to critique Cheny's answers after he left.  And although I didn't watch, beyond Cheny's appearance, they said something about following up in the next program, too.

The excitement in their voices was amusing....

Question, Mr. King. For Gore or Clinton

Question, Mr. King. For Gore or Clinton.

Question: If either one of you, Clinton or Gore, would have led on airport security - how about just implementing the reccomendations of Gore's WH Commission on Airport Safety and Security - or perhaps, acted to prevent the hostile takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban which, in turn, gave aid and comfort to al Qaeda, do you think 9/11 may have been prevented?

Folow up Question: But Al, it was you after all, who personally wrote a letter to the ATA asking them to go easy on the airline industry? Didn't special interests win out, over our national security?

Background:

White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security FINAL REPORT TO PRESIDENT CLINTON

Delay, Dilute and Discard: How the Airline Industry and the FAA Have Stymied Aviation Security Recommendations

...The industry reacted swiftly and strongly to the Gore Commission's initial September 5, 1996 recommendation that called for implementing bag matching on domestic flights within 60 days or right around the time that Clinton and Gore would be asking voters to re-elect them.

The industry promptly launched a lobbying campaign aimed at the White House. Two weeks later, Gore backpedaled from the 60-day deadline in a letter to the ATA. "I want to make it very clear that it is not the intent of this administration or of the commission to create a hardship for the air transportation industry," Gore wrote.34

"I think there was a lot of pressure from the airline industry that played into that," former NTSB Chairman Jim Hall told Public Citizen.35

The day after Gore wrote his letter, the airlines started to contribute heavily to Democratic Party committees, such as the Democratic National Committee, which acts as an arm of the presidential campaign during election years. In the election s closing weeks, the airlines gave the Democratic Party $585,000 which was more than twice what the airlines gave Democrats in a preceding 10-week period.

One possible answer ...

Al <In full Gore accent, borderline Preacher Gore>: "Well, Larry, you know those airplanes have huge carbon footprints ..."

 

Wasn't it fmr. Sen. Tom Daschel's wife who was somesuch for the airline industry during the Clinton/Gore era?

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_7_18/ai_83553867

http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/im-linda-fly-me/3232/

Cheney cleaned King's

Cheney cleaned King's clock. 

Hands down.

I watched the show last

I watched the show last night and the VP answers were on target and made a lot of sense. I do believe, even when he said that he will not for office, that he is the best GOP candidate (if he ever wants to run), they have.

Could we start a "VP for President" petition? My candidates: Cheney/Rice in 08.

Cheney

LK was very hard on Cheney. It was a good interview though. Very surprised that Cheney admitted that when he said the insurgency was in its "last throws" was wrong. Never heard that man admit to a mistake. Also following up on my comment in the open, thread. You would think he would remember sending the Chief of Staff and White House council to a gravely ill AG to get approval for the TSP.

As somebody said. Cheney cleaned Kings clock. Maybe he cleaned his own memory as well:)

 

}}}----> Shawn

Really believe it, don't you.

Cool Arrow

 

Believe what Cool Arrow? That Cheney was dishonest about not remembering sending people to see the AG? Without a shadow of a doubt.

}}}----> OK Shawn

BTW, was this for purposes of extending wiretaps or data mining?

cool arrow

I know it had to do with authorizing the tsp. Not sure about specifics. I'd imagine to extend wiretaps you would need a warrant or court order.

at least that is what the President said

 

}}}----> Specifics?

Can you be so illiterate as to feign knowing your accusation that Cheny is lying has everything to do with "specifics"?

Ask Scooter Libby if "specifics" aren't important.

Testimony before Congress has nothing to do with illegal activity and everything to do with catching the mark in an untruth.

You can't possibly be as "babe in the woods" as you pretend.

Sending a chief of Staff

Sending a chief of Staff and White House council to see the AG is the hospital is not rocket science, pretty black and white to me. If you baked a cake, you baked a cake, does not matter if it is chocolate or vanilla

 

}}}----> Yes, it matters

And your buddies at the ACLU will tell you it matters.

The big deal is that you and your liberal buddies demand a distinction between such things as Phone wires (hence cell phones don't fall under wire tap rules).  Also, you're going to need a brand new court order for every new throw away phone a terrorist uses.  Who's mincing now?

Then there's data mining.  An act your Liberal buddies demand be considered separately from wire and cell.

Now try going into a snakepit of hairsplitters such as your Lib buddies and it makes a lot of difference when they ask you about wiretaps and the discussion was really about data mining.

Couple this with knowing you are being set up by select members of the inquisition before you who know this thread of inquiry refers to Secret information (data mining) and you can't answer that the matter in question at the hospital was not wiretaps without bringing up secret operations as the subject.

But you, Shawn, come in here and parrot the Dem talking points as though you're channelling Teddy Kennedy himself.

So keep it up with the standard Cheney lies fare.  You're not enlightening anybody.

Ca, if you read any of my

Ca, if you read any of my prior post you will have notice that I support any kind of spying or torture to get what we need to protect our country.

I just don't believe in "rubbing it in". Also we were talking about if Cheney was honest with LK, you just expanded it to something else. What Liberal talking points did I bring up except for the video of Bush saying for wiretaps we need a warrant or court order?

 

 

}}}----> One level argument

Shawn runs after one simple question.  Logged out even.

Maybe he'll go back into his faux "How can I find God" whine.

ummm, still here Cool

ummm, still here Cool Arrow. I do not duck questions.

btw....kind of cheap shot to question a person asking about religion

 

}}}----> Good

Please reply to the above.

okay


cool arrow

Ok Cool Arrow, I have to take out the garbage right now. I have been waiting for your reponse and it has been 20 minutes. Please don't accuse me of being a coward

 

}}}----> I count 18

I count 18 minutes, Shawn, so you are obviously lying about the time you waited.  You are therefore held in contempt of Cool Arrow.  Your sentence should be a fine of $250,000 and 30 months in prison.

See how easy it is to catch somebody in a lie when everything is literal?

Another investigation will follow to determine who you were covering for when you lied about the 20 minutes.

cool arrow

Lol, good one cool arrow. I was looking at my own clock not the one on NB. Being two minutes off is different than saying you got the name of a CIA officer from a News Person, when 2- 3 people already......Hey I thought we were talking about Cheney?

Anyways CA, If you truly believe the Cheney does not remember, then so be it. Have I answered all your questions? Your not going to throw the crickets at me are you:)

 

}}}----> OK, Cheney it is

You brush aside 2 minutes as if they are nothing?  As though your explanation after being caught lying to the August Cool Arrow is not serious infraction?  I'm afraid it will taint your further testimony. 

Please tell me under what statute the Attorney General reports to the Vice President?  I must have missed that one.

Your beliefs are clouded by your training in the school of "I hate Cheney"

CA

As I told you before, I was looking at my own clock and not the one on NB. Do not know what statute the AG reports to the VP, but if he definately did not send them, then he just could have said so. I never said I hate Cheney, in fact the strongest words I ever used to describe him are dishonest or sercretive. Do you think you would remember something like sending people to the AG? This is not literal CA, pretty darn black and white to me

 

}}}----> Maybe

Can you remember every post you have made in the last year?

Better yet,  If you were faced with only the posts you have made in the past year, could you (without the thread to help you) explain each post in the context in which it was sent?

You assume it was Cheney who sent emmisaries to the ailing AG.  I'm not up on the incident enough to know for sure it was Cheney.

But back to the topic.  What does this have to do with firing federal prosecutors?

 

But back to the topic.


But back to the topic. What does this have to do with firing federal prosecutors?

If you could tell me when you and I discussed firing federal prosecutors, then I will go on that topic

I cannot remember all the posts I made, but If I made a post to Matt a few years ago and I knew he was sick and him authorizing my plan affected all the members on Newsbusters I would probably remember.

 

}}---> Mission Creep

I f you're unwilling to admit this whole "subpoena everybody" fiasco is anything but a witch hunt, you obviously don't remember the Dems declaring before the last election they would do just that.

So, cite the law(s) broken, and pursue them. It is just the same old bait and switch when an investigation starts out in one direction and marches off triumphantly with a victory on an unrelated charge. I know you must be very proud of your party of nitpickers.

The goal is obvious...throw up a bunch of accusations. Doesn't matter if it's true or important. We can always spin it in such a way that Shawn will be sufficiently mortified. All we have to do is repeat the lie often enough. Shawn is easily led.

CA

 

Ok we are way off topic now. sigh....first you accused me of ducking your questions after a few minutes. Then you nitpick me being off my two minutes. Now you are turning a good debate into a spitting match. I am tired now. You can declare victory.

Good night.

}}}----> Thanks

But all I did was wear you down with the same methods your Dem buddies are using against the Administration.

Why?

Because it's easy, it's senseless, and it's counterproductive. 

So the next time you see these "investigations" veer tangentially from their original intent, you need to question the reason for the tangent as well as the legitimacy of the original investigation.

Adjourned.

Cool Arrow

Ok, I'm awake now. Why do you keep asking me about my buddies at the ACLU or my Dem buddies. I said Cheney was dishonest about not remembering, why do you automatically assume I agree with the Democrats.

All I saw is you trying to change the subject over and over again. You said I could keep not keep up with you in the debate because I could not answer one simple question then I asked you how you went from Cheney to fired attorneys and you went off on a rant. Then claimed it was to teach me that is how the Dems play?

I let you claim victory because I was tired and had no time with your ranting. It was counterproductive.

 

OK, take one TSP

Before you surrendered you claimed Cheney lied about sending the folks over to the hospital.

I asked you under what authority he could do that.  Maybe he did have the authority. I don't know.

Cheney said on LK: I don't recall that I was the one who sent them to the hospital.
 

You made a decision to believe Cheney was lying.  I conclude only an outright confession to the likes of Larry King would satisfy you since your mind was already made up.

So was he definitely lying, or do you think he was probably lying?

IMO about the same probality

IMO about the same probality of OJ lying. I'm off to work now, so i don't accuse me of ducking you k?

Does anyone still take Larry King Seriously?

 

Larry King (Still Alive?)

Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.

-Unknown

 

}}}----> Larry King

Thank you for the update, but I think you just posted a picture of Alan Ludden from Password and Betty White fame.

I could be wrong, though as Ludden had strings attached to him after his death, and I'm thinking this was when Larry King hit the big time

HEEEYYY, are you thinking what I'm thinking?