Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matt Vespa's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

NY Times, CBS Bury Own Poll on ObamaCare; Times Plays Up Declining Prestige of SCOTUS

By Matt Vespa | June 11, 2012 | 17:23

A  A
Matt Vespa's picture

With the president's signature "achievement" on life support, The New York Times decided to bury the story in the Friday front-page article "Approval Rating for Justice Hits Just 44% in New Poll." Times reporters Adam Liptak and Allison Kopicki attacked the most prestigious institution in the country, claiming "the public is skeptical about life tenure for the justices, with 60 percent agreeing with the statement that appointing Supreme Court justices for life is a bad thing because it gives them too much power. One-third agreed with a contrary statement, that life tenure for justices “is a good thing because it helps keep them independent from political pressures.”   

While the Times seems to insist the court is losing public prestige, it doesn't want to report on how ObamaCare is still a flop with the public. They save this for paragraph 16:  "41 percent of Americans want the Supreme Court to overturn the entire health care law passed in 2010, while another 27 percent want the court to throw out the part of the law that requires most people to buy coverage. The poll, conducted by the New York Times and CBS News, reveals that more respondents disapprove of the law than approve, 48 percent to 34 percent."  

Moreover, " that marks only a one-percentage-point uptick in those who disapprove of the law since the last poll was conducted, in mid-April, but a five-percentage-point drop in those who approve."The coup de grace is "the percentage of people saying they want the court to throw out the entire law rose four points, from 37 percent to 41 percent, since the last CBS News/New York Times poll was conducted. About a quarter in the new poll—24 percent—said they want the whole law upheld.

 How is this possible?  Well, as George Will stated on This Week two years ago, 85% of Americans already had coverage.  Furthermore 95% of that 85% said that they were satisfied with their health care coverage.  Even Politifact said that was mostly true!  In addition, we've had an unemployment rate that has been above 8% for over thirty-eight months.  During twenty-six of those months, the rate was above 9%.  This is after a $830 billion dollar stimulus with interest rates at zero.  Factor in a trillion dollar new entitlement, Obamacare, and we have a recipe for economic anxiety.  

PS: At least the New York Times published their polling numbers in connection with a front-page story. CBS buried the poll results, reporting them only on Friday's early-early CBS Morning News:

HAZEL SANCHEZ, anchor: And later this month, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on President Obama`s health care overhaul. The law has become a key campaign issue. A just released CBS News/New York Times poll finds forty-one percent of Americans want to see the entire health care law overturned. Fifty-five percent believe Justices will decide the case based on personal or political views. And concerning Arizona`s tough immigration law that allows police to check the immigration status of anyone who is lawfully stopped, fifty-two percent believe the law is "about right."

  • Medical Insurance
  • Banking/Finance
  • Health Care
  • District of Columbia
  • New York Times
  • ObamaCare
  • Matt Vespa's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

The main meme during the coming campaign

Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:28pm.

Opposition to Obama is racist.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/cb...

It's now official. Get ready.

  • Login to post comments

Humm...

Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:47pm.

"Approval Rating for Justice Hits Just 44% in New Poll."

Isn't that just about where Obama is at?

"Monday, June 11, 2012

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Mitt Romney attracting 47% of the vote, while President Obama earns 44%."

If you insist on comparing the approval rating itself:

"Currently, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's job performance. Fifty-two percent (52%) at least somewhat disapprove."

I guess 47 percent is better than 44, but not by much.

And then there's healthcare:

"Monday, June 11, 2012

Most voters continue to support repeal of the national health care law and feel it will increase the federal budget deficit.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% are at least somewhat opposed. Those figures include 44% who Strongly Favor repeal and 28% who are Strongly Opposed."

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

I bet the NYT will rehabilitate the Supremes if they behave OK

Submitted by needle on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:46pm.

“Times Plays Up Declining Prestige of SCOTUS”

Boy, if that ain’t a bald-face hint to all those celebrities sitting on the Supreme bench.

This sounds pretty much like the meddlesome remarks Obama made a month or so ago. I wonder if there is any connection (cough, cough).

I categorically do not read the NYT because in my book the NYT’s prestige has already declined to about the fifth ring in Dante’s Inferno.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

We don't need no stinking

Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:55pm.

We don't need no stinking independent judiciary!!

The drafters of our Constitution were keenly aware of the dangers and excesses that can occur when the majority in government controls virtually all matters, a situation James Madison referred to as the "tyranny of the majority." To prevent those dangers, our founders painstakingly designed a balanced government with a wall of separation between the branches, an independent judiciary, and a Constitution that is supreme in all respects.

Ahhh, what did they know???  Bunch of dead white guys!

 

  • Login to post comments

SCOTUS odds-making

Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 6:04pm.

I predict the Supreme Court will strike down the individual mandate.

It will not be 5-4. Probably 6-3; 7-2 is pretty unlikely, and 8-1 or 9-0 is prohibitively improbable. Remember that the Supreme Court's decision in the Nixon contempt of Congress case (before the impeachment hearings) was 8-0 because the Chief Justice Warren Burger (Rehnquist recused himself) wanted a very unified decision (but the SC was 5-4 in the Bush v. Gore case, which led to all the "stolen election" and "elected by 5 white men" complaints.

I also would not be surprised if some of the justices in concurring opinions limit the reach of the Commerce Clause.

  • Login to post comments

I think they

Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 6:18pm.

meant the declining prestige of the POTUS

A Recession is when your neighbor is out of a job. A Depression is when YOU are out of a job.. A recovery is when OBAMA is out of a job Hat tip to Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

The SCOTUS

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 10:30pm.

needs to kill the bill completely and watch its popularity double.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Scotus is right down the middle politically.

Submitted by gopcongress on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 1:22am.

SCOTUS is truly right down the middle, with four justices strong or reasonably conservative, four justices strong or reasonably socialist, and one justice that plays both sides of the fence. If Kennedy were a staunch liberal, the 44% would be closer to (at least) 64% as they would have had a lot more anti-constitutional decisions; had there been 6 liberals, the libs would never worry about who was in Congress because they'd just litigate every damn thing.

On the other hand, if we would have had 5 strong conservatives (Bork instead of Kennedy??) then 44% would have been very high. We DEFINITELY would have seen time limits LONG before this year.

"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER

  • Login to post comments

If their poll

Submitted by texasborngranny on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:01pm.

showed a majority approved of ObamaCare the NYT would be shouting it from the rooftops.

That aside, if fact, all polls aside, the salient point is that SCOTUS' job is to rule on the constitutionality of the PPACA, NOT its popularity.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use