NY Times, CBS Bury Own Poll on ObamaCare; Times Plays Up Declining Prestige of SCOTUS
With the president's signature "achievement" on life support, The New York Times decided to bury the story in the Friday front-page article "Approval Rating for Justice Hits Just 44% in New Poll." Times reporters Adam Liptak and Allison Kopicki attacked the most prestigious institution in the country, claiming "the public is skeptical about life tenure for the justices, with 60 percent agreeing with the statement that appointing Supreme Court justices for life is a bad thing because it gives them too much power. One-third agreed with a contrary statement, that life tenure for justices “is a good thing because it helps keep them independent from political pressures.”
While the Times seems to insist the court is losing public prestige, it doesn't want to report on how ObamaCare is still a flop with the public. They save this for paragraph 16: "41 percent of Americans want the Supreme Court to overturn the entire health care law passed in 2010, while another 27 percent want the court to throw out the part of the law that requires most people to buy coverage. The poll, conducted by the New York Times and CBS News, reveals that more respondents disapprove of the law than approve, 48 percent to 34 percent."
Moreover, " that marks only a one-percentage-point uptick in those who disapprove of the law since the last poll was conducted, in mid-April, but a five-percentage-point drop in those who approve."The coup de grace is "the percentage of people saying they want the court to throw out the entire law rose four points, from 37 percent to 41 percent, since the last CBS News/New York Times poll was conducted. About a quarter in the new poll—24 percent—said they want the whole law upheld.
How is this possible? Well, as George Will stated on This Week two years ago, 85% of Americans already had coverage. Furthermore 95% of that 85% said that they were satisfied with their health care coverage. Even Politifact said that was mostly true! In addition, we've had an unemployment rate that has been above 8% for over thirty-eight months. During twenty-six of those months, the rate was above 9%. This is after a $830 billion dollar stimulus with interest rates at zero. Factor in a trillion dollar new entitlement, Obamacare, and we have a recipe for economic anxiety.
PS: At least the New York Times published their polling numbers in connection with a front-page story. CBS buried the poll results, reporting them only on Friday's early-early CBS Morning News:
HAZEL SANCHEZ, anchor: And later this month, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on President Obama`s health care overhaul. The law has become a key campaign issue. A just released CBS News/New York Times poll finds forty-one percent of Americans want to see the entire health care law overturned. Fifty-five percent believe Justices will decide the case based on personal or political views. And concerning Arizona`s tough immigration law that allows police to check the immigration status of anyone who is lawfully stopped, fifty-two percent believe the law is "about right."
- Matt Vespa's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
The main meme during the coming campaign
Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:28pm.
Opposition to Obama is racist.
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/cb...
It's now official. Get ready.
Humm...
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:47pm.
"Approval Rating for Justice Hits Just 44% in New Poll."
Isn't that just about where Obama is at?
"Monday, June 11, 2012
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Mitt Romney attracting 47% of the vote, while President Obama earns 44%."
If you insist on comparing the approval rating itself:
"Currently, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's job performance. Fifty-two percent (52%) at least somewhat disapprove."
I guess 47 percent is better than 44, but not by much.
And then there's healthcare:
"Monday, June 11, 2012
Most voters continue to support repeal of the national health care law and feel it will increase the federal budget deficit.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% are at least somewhat opposed. Those figures include 44% who Strongly Favor repeal and 28% who are Strongly Opposed."
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
I bet the NYT will rehabilitate the Supremes if they behave OK
Submitted by needle on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:46pm.
“Times Plays Up Declining Prestige of SCOTUS”
Boy, if that ain’t a bald-face hint to all those celebrities sitting on the Supreme bench.
This sounds pretty much like the meddlesome remarks Obama made a month or so ago. I wonder if there is any connection (cough, cough).
I categorically do not read the NYT because in my book the NYT’s prestige has already declined to about the fifth ring in Dante’s Inferno.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
We don't need no stinking
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 5:55pm.
We don't need no stinking independent judiciary!!
The drafters of our Constitution were keenly aware of the dangers and excesses that can occur when the majority in government controls virtually all matters, a situation James Madison referred to as the "tyranny of the majority." To prevent those dangers, our founders painstakingly designed a balanced government with a wall of separation between the branches, an independent judiciary, and a Constitution that is supreme in all respects.
Ahhh, what did they know??? Bunch of dead white guys!
SCOTUS odds-making
Submitted by CO2Maker on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 6:04pm.
I predict the Supreme Court will strike down the individual mandate.
It will not be 5-4. Probably 6-3; 7-2 is pretty unlikely, and 8-1 or 9-0 is prohibitively improbable. Remember that the Supreme Court's decision in the Nixon contempt of Congress case (before the impeachment hearings) was 8-0 because the Chief Justice Warren Burger (Rehnquist recused himself) wanted a very unified decision (but the SC was 5-4 in the Bush v. Gore case, which led to all the "stolen election" and "elected by 5 white men" complaints.
I also would not be surprised if some of the justices in concurring opinions limit the reach of the Commerce Clause.
I think they
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 6:18pm.
meant the declining prestige of the POTUS
The SCOTUS
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 10:30pm.
needs to kill the bill completely and watch its popularity double.
Scotus is right down the middle politically.
Submitted by gopcongress on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 1:22am.
SCOTUS is truly right down the middle, with four justices strong or reasonably conservative, four justices strong or reasonably socialist, and one justice that plays both sides of the fence. If Kennedy were a staunch liberal, the 44% would be closer to (at least) 64% as they would have had a lot more anti-constitutional decisions; had there been 6 liberals, the libs would never worry about who was in Congress because they'd just litigate every damn thing.
On the other hand, if we would have had 5 strong conservatives (Bork instead of Kennedy??) then 44% would have been very high. We DEFINITELY would have seen time limits LONG before this year.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
If their poll
Submitted by texasborngranny on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:01pm.
showed a majority approved of ObamaCare the NYT would be shouting it from the rooftops.
That aside, if fact, all polls aside, the salient point is that SCOTUS' job is to rule on the constitutionality of the PPACA, NOT its popularity.