Romney Gets Standing Ovation From NAACP, But CNN Calls Reception 'Very Negative'
After Mitt Romney addressed the NAACP on Wednesday, CNN's Jim Acosta focused on the boos he received from the audience without mentioning the crowd's standing ovation and their applause scattered through the speech. Acosta simply reported a "very negative" reaction from the audience.
"[N]o question about it, this was a very negative reaction to what Mitt Romney had to say here earlier this morning," he rounded out his post-speech report. However, NBC's Garrett Haake tweeted that Romney got a standing ovation as he finished his speech, and National Review's Jim Geraghty noted the cordial reception by the NAACP. [Video below the break. Audio here.]
A standing ovation hardly justifies Acosta's "very negative" label for the crowd's reaction to the speech. And the newspaper The Guardian reported during the speech that aside from the booing, the audience had treated Romney "politely" and "with plenty of applause at the appropriate places."
Nevertheless, Acosta focused on the boos. "I don't think it really is sort of overstating it. This was perhaps one of the most negative reactions Mitt Romney has had in the course of his 2012 presidential campaign," he stated.
"He [Romney] used the term 'ObamaCare,' which by the way, that's fine in Republican circles, but there are a lot of Democrats who sort of bristle at using the term 'ObamaCare,'" Acosta expounded. "We at CNN use the term 'the President's health care law', at least in our news reporting," he stated before using the term "ObamaCare" later on in his report.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on July 11 on CNN Newsroom at 11:10 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
JIM ACOSTA: I have to tell you, I have not – I've been covering the Romney campaign for the good portion of a year now, and I talked to some of my fellow Romney reporters with the other news outlets that are covering this campaign, and Ashleigh, I have to tell you, I have not heard that kind of sustained booing for Mitt Romney during the course of this campaign up until what happened today at the NAACP.
I don't think it really is sort of overstating it. This was perhaps one of the most negative reactions Mitt Romney has had in the course of his 2012 presidential campaign. That booing that went on after he said he would repeal the President's health care law went on for nearly ten seconds. He used the term "ObamaCare," which by the way, that's fine in Republican circles, but there are a lot of Democrats who sort of bristle at using the term "ObamaCare." We at CNN use the term "the President's health care law," at least in our news reporting.
And so to come into an audience that is very friendly to the President and use the term "ObamaCare" and say you would repeal it is almost sort of inviting a confrontation. Now if you go on social media right now, Ashleigh, you will see there are a lot of Republicans out there who are applauding Mitt Romney for coming into this audience and saying what he would do as President of the United States.
And this message, Ashleigh, may be designed not just for the NAACP, but to go out across the country, obviously, because it's being carried live in all sorts of places, and go to those independent, moderate sectors of suburban areas, swing states, battleground states, where perhaps seeing Mitt Romney going after ObamaCare in front of the NAACP might be an effective message.
So it's interesting to see the different takes on what happened here today, but no question about it, this was a very negative reaction to what Mitt Romney had to say here earlier this morning.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
CNN
Submitted by Anon150 on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:06pm.
Circling the drain, faster and faster...
Is it possible that they are not aware that other people, and I mean "people" like you and me, have access to the raw, unedited footage that they are commenting on?
That we are not simpletons and can see the truth with out own eyes?
Hey! CNN! The monopoly is over! You Libs don't get to 'make' the news up anymore!
I haven't seen ratings for the news channels for
Submitted by Lipton on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:12pm.
a long time. I wonder if that is because Fox has started to lose conservative viewers. Either way, I don't know who is on top with MSNBC, CNN. I belive Fox is still ahead. how do they compare with the nets evening news casts. I was hoping to see a decline there as well.
I remember
Submitted by KornKing on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:17pm.
couple years back Rush Limbaugh was on some show, 3 or 4 people out of a big audience boo and all Joy Behar could talk about was "Rush Limbaugh got booed"
(when you saw the tape you had to listen multiple times to pick the boos out of the cheers)
Hiding the reality from whom?
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:45pm.
So from whom is it that CNN is trying to hide the reality that Mitt Romney was over-all well recieved at the NAACP convention?
There is no objective reason to actually lie and skip reporting the facts, so there must be a subjective reason.
The question that needs to be asked is, what is served by this omission? Does their audience not deserve to know what really happened? Who do they think their audience is?
So this seems to me to be the summary: Romney was booed at the begining and a little through the early part of the speach, and then wound up getting a standing ovation at the end.
Yeah, that's not news....lets focus on the early booing.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
NAACP
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 1:57pm.
Even though they are a partisan group that does not act in the best interest of the people looking to them for leadership - they are a group made up of mostly professionals and will be polite for an invited guest.
I agree with some of the articles that put forth the idea that this was Romney's first real chance to be bold without too much risk (he is not getting more than 2-6% of the black vote anyway). He should have stated why Conservative ideas are not detrimental to the black communities in a more 'in-your-face' style - always making it clear that relying on the individual to do be independent and resourceful is the highest level of equality the government can acheive.
Tonight
Submitted by grammajane on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 2:21pm.
on the big 3 network "news" shows, the first clip they will show is the boos for Romney remarking about obamacare. No mention will be made of the standing ovation. Wonder why barry didn't show up to speak and sent his partner bieden to do the deed??
Gramma, that's precisely what
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 10:28pm.
the local 10p.m. news show just did. They even lied about the length of the booing, and failed to mention a single applause line he got. If you believed the local news, you'd think that Romney was booed out the door. Of course, the local 10p.m. news is on a Chicago Tribune-owned station.
Black people are not stupid
Submitted by I hate marxists on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 3:08pm.
When they gave the standing ovation it was for two reasons,Mitt stood his ground on his reasons why they should vote for him, he talked to them with respect and dignity and he said thank you for allowing him to speak to them.
Obama would speak at them as if they were stupid and they're NOT STUPID Mr. Obama
You're right on the news shows
Submitted by gwalt on Wed, 07/11/2012 - 4:34pm.
They will all start off with Romney Gets Booed. And my inlaws will watch those shows and laugh and believe every word having no idea some 75-80% of the actual news is kept from them every day on the Libtard nets.
"A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered". Ronald Reagan