Soledad O'Brien Welcomes Dem Mayor But Belittles Romney Advisor
While CNN's Soledad O'Brien tossed softballs at Democratic Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, she was not so kind to her Republican guest during the next hour, on Thursday's Starting Point. O'Brien reported poor poll numbers for both the Romney and Obama campaigns, but went after only the Romney campaign's economic message in detail.
O'Brien teed up the Democratic mayor to respond to Romney hitting Obama for wanting more public sector workers. But she posed the same question of Romney advisor Jim Talent, putting him on the defensive, rather than bringing up, say, President Obama's remark that the private sector is "doing just fine," a statement he later retracted.
And the CNN anchor was content to ask Villaraigosa about both candidates' economic plans polling poorly with independent voters. But with Talent, O'Brien specifically put the Romney campaign's poor numbers in the spotlight – even though the actual polling report emphasizes President Obama's "chilly reception" from independent voters.
"So terrible numbers for both of them on something that everybody has said is the most important issue in this election, which is the economy. What should they be doing?" O'Brien asked Villaraigosa. Contrast that neutral question with her pointed skepticism of the Romney campaign in her interview of Talent.
"When you look at that poll, bad news for both candidates. But let's talk about your candidate specifically. Why do you think that number is so low?" she pressed Talent.
While she initially reported the complete poll numbers on the economic plans – which show President Obama with a slightly higher approval rating than Romney, but a significantly higher disapproval rating – O'Brien only mentioned the approval numbers in her second interview as "bad news for both candidates."
The ABC News/Washington Post poll report states that while the polling for both candidates is not good, Romney "avoids majority criticism" which Obama did not, and has "some room to maneuver" since more voters were undecided about his economic plan. O'Brien didn't shed light on this analysis, however.
A partial transcript of both segments, which aired on Starting Point on June 14, is as follows:
[7:18 a.m. EDT]
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: You mentioned what Governor Romney said. And I want to play a little chunk of it – just from Friday where he talked about really the lessons from Wisconsin and targeting what President Obama had said about the private sector doing fine. So let me play a little chunk of that and I'll ask you a question on the other side.
(Video Clip)
MITT ROMNEY, Republican presidential candidate: He wants to hire more government workers, he says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It's time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.
(Applause)
(End Video Clip)
O'BRIEN: So then what do you make of the governor's remarks when he says it's time to cut back on government and help the American people, and he listed firemen, policeman, teachers?
ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA (D), Mayor of Los Angeles: Well the 325,000 jobs that the President is talking about is saving jobs, not adding jobs, that's one. Two, there's no question that we have to cut programs and cut the deficit. The President's proposed a $4 trillion cut over the next ten years. Mr. Romney talks about cutting the deficit and also proposes a $5 trillion tax cut for – primarily targeted to the wealthy, that we can't afford.
What Democrats and Republican mayors are saying is we have got to do both. We have to cut some spending, no question about it. But we've got to make investments in infrastructure, transportation, in education, in helping us export when 95 percent of the new markets are outside the United States of America. We've got to do things across the aisle, do things to make investments, but also make the cuts that we need.
O'BRIEN: Both the President and Mitt Romney are in the state of Ohio campaigning. And there is a new poll out that's sort of bad news for both of them, I think. Washington Post poll talking about favorable numbers of their economic policy, President Obama at 38 percent and Mitt Romney at 35 percent. And if you look at the margin of error, actually, it's very close. If you look at their unfavorable numbers, President Obama at 54 percent, among independents I should say, and Mitt Romney at 47 percent. So terrible numbers for both of them on something that everybody has said is the most important issue in this election, which is the economy. What should they be doing? What should they be talking about?
VILLARAIGOSA: Well, I think both candidates have to talk about the economy, not just what's gone wrong but also what we're going to do in the future. And I think the President has done that. He said, again and again and again, that he's willing to cut spending. But we also have got to make investments. We can't continue to extend the Bush tax cuts and not make investments in education and transportation, in the infrastructure. We have got to do both. And I think the President has tried to extend the hand to the Republicans. But the House leadership has refused again and again and again. And in the Senate, if you recall, Senator McConnell has said his number one job is to defeat the President instead of putting the country back to work.
(...)
[8:08 a.m. EDT]
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: There's a new Washington Post/ABC News poll that shows crucial independent swing state voters don't think very highly of either of the candidates' economic plans. Only 38 percent have a favorable view of the President's plans, 35 percent have a favorable view of Mitt Romney's plans. And they are both within the margin of error. So literally neck and neck.
Brings us right to Jim Talent. He's a former senator from the state of Missouri. He's now the senior economic adviser to the Romney campaign. Nice to see you, sir. Thanks for being with us. Appreciate your time this morning. When you look at that poll, bad news for both candidates. But let's talk about your candidate specifically. Why do you think that number is so low?
JIM TALENT, senior economic advisor, Romney campaign: Well, I've seen a lot of poll numbers indicating the governor is being received very well by independent voters, Soledad. And look, he is proposing things that really ought to have bipartisan support and have had in the past like approving the Keystone Pipeline, stopping the cap and trade regulations the President wants to pass that he'd – the President said will skyrocket the price of electricity.
So, I mean, his message is that the President's policies were well-intended but are failing. And he's going to move in a direction of empowering the economy. And I think that's being pretty well received.
O'BRIEN: It sounds like that maybe it's – are you saying you think just this particular poll from The Washington Post is wrong because the poll numbers certainly don't say well-received. It says more like, meh.
(...)
O'BRIEN: Okay. So let me ask you a little bit about what Mitt Romney said last week about the hiring of teachers and firefighters and police officers, and the context as I know you know was sort of lessons from that Wisconsin recall vote and Scott Walker obviously won. The governor said that there was a message in this for President Obama. And here's what he said. Let's play that.
(Video Clip)
MITT ROMNEY Republican presidential candidate: And his answer for economic vitality, by the way, was of course pushing aside the private sector, which he said is doing fine. Instead, he wants to add more to government. He wants another stimulus. He wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message in Wisconsin? The American people did.
(End Video Clip)
O'BRIEN: So my question for you is this. Was the governor there saying that we don't need more teachers and more firefighters and more police officers? Because that's what it sounded like to me.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
More people have escaped her
Submitted by texastommy on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 12:57pm.
More people have escaped her namesake than rational thoughts have left her mouth.
Which he later retracted?
Submitted by pockets64 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 1:01pm.
Obama danced around his comment, but never retracted it. This is typical of how he has always presented himself. He puts vacuousness where people expect substance. As a result, people walk away inserting what they think should have been said, not what was said.
On the nose
Submitted by KornKing on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 1:21pm.
Exactly
Villaragosa
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 1:17pm.
Yes, that's right, Soledad. Welcome the little (physically as well as mentally) guey. Welcome the "man" who still uses his ex-wife's name (her name is Ragosa. His name is Vilar) whom he cheated on with that hot little Univision reporter who he later cheated on.
Typical Dhimi-cratic, anti-white, pro-illegal alien Kalifornyastan politician.
Hey, Soledad - who's your husband cheating with on you? Just something to think about.
Soledad is a mental
Submitted by Curly on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 1:33pm.
Soledad is a mental midget....period.
I am confused
Submitted by John21 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 1:55pm.
I do not understand, everyone know what a mentally limited Obamabot Soledad O'Brien is, why would you continue to appear on her show? Are you trying to impress her 34 viewers? You cannot possible believe that you will change her little mind with facts or truth, she would not recognize them, the Kool-Aid and delusions are much too strong for so weak a mind.
You cannot honestly expect common sense or common curtiseies from her that is not something that liberals are taught or observe with anyone besides their own kind, unless they want something from you.
The Liberal Agenda followed by Ms. O’Brien does not acknowledge that anyone not a liberal is an intelligent human being only the “enemy” to be insulted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ignorance is our most expensive commodity..." - Rush Limbaugh
and Soledad is very high maintenance
Villargairosa?
Submitted by Samaritan01 on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 2:00pm.
Has anyone looked at Los Angeles lately? It is fast becoming the West Coast version of Detroit, and both are run by Democratic administrations.
Soledad O'Brien is an unskilled bad joke who needs to get a job that better fits her skill-set, and by that I mean paper hats and french fries.
This interview reminds me of
Submitted by scotto on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 2:06pm.
This interview reminds me of the scene in Ghostbusters in which Bill Murray conducts an experiment on two subjects - one a beautiful blonde he wants to get closer to, the other a poor schnook who has no idea what he's strayed into. Murray smiles at the blonde. He tells her every answer is right no matter what she says, making her feel like a bona fide phenomenon. He glares at the schnook, and no matter what he says, right or wrong, he applies an electric shock. Easy to figure out who Gitmo O'Brien considers the schnook to be.
Oh Soledad...
Submitted by mejay on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 3:06pm.
When will you ever NOT promote Obama and take cheap shots at his (soon-to-be) successor, Romney? If you stopped being so hateful, you could maybe come off the meds.
Think for a change, Miss O'Brien
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 3:27pm.
"O'BRIEN: So my question for you is this. Was the governor there saying that we don't need more teachers and more firefighters and more police officers? Because that's what it sounded like to me."
O'Brien sounds like she is yet another Leftist who does not understand that she is a citizen of a country with a federal government, not a unitary government. Leftists cannot comprehend that difference. The federal government, with VERY few exceptions (like DODDS teachers, firefighters for federal property, and federal law enforcement) has NO BUSINESS paying for teachers and firefighters and police officers.
Along with that, there are these points to make:
1) What good will hiring more teachers do other than to increase campaign contributions ERRRRRRR dues to public sector unions?
2) Miss O'Brien, you DO understand the far reaching majority of firefighters do what they do FOR FREE? But I'd be willing to bet you have no idea what a VFD is. Have you ever contributed to a VFD, Miss O'Brien?
3) What good will hiring more police officers do? Sure, it makes sense when a jurisdiction expands either in terms of population or geography. But I would submit that if you want a crime rate to fall, you'd want to liberalize (!) gun restrictions. After all, when seconds count, police officers are minutes away, even if, say, half a town's given population were cops.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
UNS, you have just witnessed.............
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 10:18pm.
our "Brilliant Midget Mayor", the most hated man in the city!! The stuttering fool!! Only outdone by SoleTOOL O'Brien!
BTW, should I mention he is an "EX" (ya right) Gangbanger?? That is why you will NEVER see him in short sleeve shirts!!
OH.....Should I mention he took the BAR Exam 3 times, and FAILED each time?
One more thing..........Guess what he was before he became the "Alcalde~" of Los Angeles............. A.........Community Organizer!!!!!!!! Then he became a HACK Assemblyman, a HACK State Senator, then a HACK City Councilman, then a HACK Mayor!!!!! And the "Alcalde~" now wants a Federal Office!!
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
see below
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 10:58pm.
see below
do you mean Villar?
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 3:38pm.
So, Solead...did you see fit to mention these facts: remember, Villaigrosa nee Villars says he is a family man.
At age 21, Villaraigosa fathered the first of his four children, Marisela Villar, after having been involved with the mother for only six weeks. At age 25, his second daughter, Prisila Villar-Contreras, was born to yet another woman. At age 34, as Antonio Villar, he married Corina Raigosa November 28, 1987 and adopted a combination of their last names as his family name. The couple had two children, Natalia and Antonio Jr. ...makes 4.
BUT, Corina filed for divorce In the wake of extensive media coverage of his affair with Spanish-language television reporter, Mirthala Salinas...Villaraigosa acknowledged that he and Corina had had difficulties over the course of their marriage.Tactfully put and nuanced...
In 1994, while Corina was undergoing treatment for thyroid cancer, Villaraigosa was involved with a friend's wife and Corina filed for re-dissolution of marriage at that time. Villaraigosa has a relationship with Lu Parker, a local television news anchor and 1994 Miss USA, from March 2009. I guess he is a many family man...as well as a many women man...and, I supose he has extensive economic experise balancing costs of those women and the children
Don't remind me
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:01pm.
That whole thing with Frances Louise Parker (she goes by Lu) was and is depressing. I remember when she was an anchor on KABB's 9:00 News (the San Antonio Fox affiliate), from 1998 to 2003/2004 or so. She was perfectly good as an anchor, and she was quite easy on the eyes. Back when it was her as an anchor and the ridiculously hot Jenny Hansson as a reporter on that channel, that is where I got ALL of my news, not just because I could go to bed earlier.
More serious note: Villaraigosa is a Leftist. He can say and do as he will damn well please, as far as the media is concerned.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
She's a vile
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 4:07pm.
little thing...isn't she?