Breitbart.com Editor Slams CNN for Mistreatment of Andrew Breitbart
Correction appended below page break | Breitbart.com's editor-in-chief went right after CNN for its treatment of the late Andrew Breitbart, when asked about the "controversial" journalist's "tactics" in the Shirley Sherrod incident. The interview took place Thursday afternoon during the 1 p.m. hour of CNN's Newsroom.
Joel Pollock, a friend of Breitbart's, accused CNN of telling a story "completely contrary" to what Breitbart actually did, and challenged the network to "rethink" the way it treated him. "I'm going to do an Andrew Breitbart and ask you if CNN has rethought its tactics on the issue," he contended to CNN host Zoraida Sambolin. [Video below the break.]
Pollock referred to the network asking Sherrod if she wanted Breitbart's website shut down – which NewsBusters reported – and added that Anderson Cooper completely bungled the actual story.
Back in July of 2010, Breitbart had initially posted an edited video of Sherrod, then at the Department of Agriculture, giving racist commentary. Sherrod was hastily fired before it was discovered that the video of her was doctored and in fact she was speaking out against racism.
[Editor's Note: We apologize for Mr. Hadro's error. The video was not doctored as we have previously noted and chastised the media for getting wrong. Our deepest apologies.]
After Sherrod was vindicated, CNN gave her a full podium to tee off on the conservative blogger without asking first if he had made a bad mistake and had not attempted a deliberate smear.
CNN allowed Sherrod to smear Breitbart as a "vicious" racist without a challenge, and also asked her if she wanted his website shut down. Analyst David Gergen compared Sherrod to Nelson Mandela, while Anderson Cooper called Breitbart a "bully." Cooper later apologized for letting Sherrod smear Breitbart as a racist.
"So Andrew would throw that challenge back at you and say when CNN rethinks the way it covered that story, maybe Andrew would have some rethinking to do," Pollock declared. The CNN host sheepishly replied that Breitbart was "unfortunately" not present to debate, and quickly moved to another subject.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on March 1 on Newsroom at 1:20 p.m. EST, is as follows:
ZORAIDA SAMBOLIN: He was quite a controversial figure, also. A lot of people are talking about the Shirley Sherrod incident, and how he handled that. What do you think – do you think that he ever rethought his tactics on that issue?
JOEL POLLOCK, editor-in-chief, Breitbart.com: I'm going to do an Andrew Breitbart and ask you if CNN has rethought its tactics on the issue. CNN brought Shirley Sherrod on in the wake of what happened, and invited her to say whether she wanted to shut his website down, and what she wanted to do to get back at him. And Andrew used to joke that if he had a life story, he would call it "The Anderson Cooper Story," because he felt like Anderson Cooper had set up a narrative about the Shirley Sherrod incident that was completely contrary to what Andrew had done.
So Andrew would throw that challenge back at you and say when CNN rethinks the way it covered that story, maybe Andrew would have some rethinking to do.
SAMBOLIN: Well unfortunately, Andrew's not here right now to talk about this. How did he see himself?
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Thanks Joel
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 8:50pm.
Joel you made my day a little brighter on a sad day.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Joel Breitbarted them
Submitted by Demonhunter on Fri, 03/02/2012 - 12:04am.
Attaboy Joel! This may be the beginning of what I hoped would happen. There are many missionaries on the field today as a direct result of Jim Elliot's death at the hands of the Alca Indians. I was hoping Andrew's death would similarly cause more people to be bolder in challenging the media when they spread lies. I hereby coin a new phrase, "Joel went Breitbart on them" or he "Barted" them. (Feel free to improve it)
Sambolin's misstatement
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 9:00pm.
unfortunately, Andrew's not here right now to talk about this.
She really meant to say fortunately.
Yeah, it's really too bad that you did and he can't defend himself, right?
If he's not there to talk about it, why the hell bring it up?!?
No class, all @$$. -my mother
Unfortunately, MSM outlets
Submitted by lesterwink23 on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 8:58pm.
Unfortunately, MSM outlets like CNN do not have a habit of admitting fault or mistakes in situations such as this. They and many others were all too eager to vilify Mr. Breitbart purely because of his work and ideology. It is not at all surprising that he received the brunt of the blame for the Sherrod fiasco even though no one ever came close to proving that he was responsible for the doctored video that led to her hasty firing. The truth is that CNN and other like-minded MSM outlets resented Andrew Breitbart for his determination to do what they would not.
Showing a portion of
Submitted by G L on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 9:21pm.
Showing a portion of something is not quite the same as "doctoring" a video. Breitbart didn't doctor anything, he simply showed a clip from Sherrod's speech, rather than the speech in its entirety, a very common practice. As you said, whether it was Breitbart who edited the video to the way it was shown, or whether he received it that way, has not been established.
And Breitbart's piece, according to him, was about the reaction of the NAACP crowd in response to Sherrod, with its favorable outcries to Sherrod's description of her own blatantly racist thinking, not about Sherrod herself.
I just love how Sambolin says
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 9:06pm.
I just love how Sambolin says A lot of people are talking about the Shirley Sherrod incident,
There you go again....
Really Zoraida? A LOT of people? You and who else?
I don't suppose "a lot of people" are talking about his takedown of ACORN?
Nah.....at least not in YOUR circle of friends.
She couldn't recover from
Submitted by mayjon on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 10:02pm.
She couldn't recover from that shellacking. The MSM is big government state run media aka. PRAVDA.
back in time
Submitted by Tjexcite on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 10:40pm.
It took many years to define a person after they died for history to record. Now they do it within hours and even before. Every report will include this issue as it was all Andrew was about for all time not just a footnote in a great life.
Main St Media
Submitted by averageschmoe on Thu, 03/01/2012 - 10:45pm.
Bash the dead. They stop at nothing.
Brietbart's spirti lives on!
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Fri, 03/02/2012 - 8:47am.
BOLD colors!
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Joel
Submitted by mmilesll on Fri, 03/02/2012 - 1:30pm.
Way to go Joel, Andrew lives on
Great comment motherbelt
Submitted by soCal on Fri, 03/02/2012 - 2:17pm.
hit the nail right on the head
by the way a lot of people (this comment section) are talking about CNN's bias against conservatives make that a news story.