Anderson Cooper 360 Blasts Santorum With Liberal Talking Points
Determined to vet up-and-coming GOP candidate Rick Santorum, CNN's Gary Tuchmann chose Wednesday to pull a number of liberal attacks on the candidate's social beliefs and call it a report. Apparently for CNN, "scrutiny" entails digging up liberal talking points instead of studying a candidate's voting record and economic and foreign policy plans.
Tuchman attested on Anderson Cooper 360 that "we can already tell you quite a bit about his vision for this country," adding that Santorum "has established a reputation as a conservative in every sense of the word." He then descended into implying that Santorum was a racist and a homophobe. [Video below the break.]
And in the light of the "papist" caricatures that candidate John F. Kennedy ran from, Tuchman claimed that Santorum, a Catholic, "is a staunch supporter of Vatican policy when it comes to contraception," instead of just saying that he obeys the Catholic Church's teaching on contraception.
One of the soundbites Tuchman used isn't even certain from an audio standpoint. He played the clip of Santorum saying "I don't want to make (unintelligible) people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money." Some cried foul that the "unintelligible" word was "black," arguing that he was hitting black citizens. Santorum denied the charges. Nonetheless, CNN chose to air the clip.
Anchor Anderson Cooper explained that for a candidate now near the top of the polls, success brings with it "closer scrutiny of course, and what those dollars are buying in terms of the candidate's viability and some of his more controversial statements." Or it could mean sudden criticism from Cooper, who virtually ignored Herman Cain until he blasted Cain with a "Keeping Them Honest" report in November, when Cain became a GOP frontrunner.
Then Tuchman cited when Santorum blasted then-candidate Barack Obama's 2008 quote that to decide when life began was "above my paygrade." Santorum later said he found it "almost remarkable for a black man to say no, we are going to decide who are people, and who are not people." Tuchman had used that as another example of Santorum saying the word "black," implying again that the candidate was a racist.
[Video below.]
Tuchman also rehashed a stale liberal attack from 2003, one that CNN's John King had confronted the candidate with in an interview earlier that day.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on January 4 at 8:14 p.m. EST, is as follows:
ANDERSON COOPER: Santorum speaking this evening at a town hall in Brentwood, New Hampshire.
(Video Clip)
RICK SANTORUM, Republican presidential candidate: People have asked me repeatedly, you know, well, you know, Rick, you know, you've going to – you've done well in Iowa, but, you know, New Hampshire is such a different place. And it's just nothing like Iowa. I said, they're all Americans. They all have the same fundamental values that our founders put in place.
(End Video Clip)
COOPER: And the sweater vests are back. There's some late news as well, just in from the Santorum campaign on the tangible benefits of his Iowa performance. The short answer, money. About $1 million donated since last night according to the campaign. It also means closer scrutiny of course, and what those dollars are buying in terms of the candidate's viability and some of his more controversial statements. Gary Tuchman takes a look.
(Video Clip)
GARY TUCHMAN, CNN national correspondent: (voice-over): Losing by just eight votes to Mitt Romney has certainly invigorated Rick Santorum.
SANTORUM: There's going to be a rematch. And we're going to – we're going to go to New Hampshire and take – and take him on. And you know we're going to – we're going to run a campaign talking about my vision for this country.
TUCHMAN: But we can already tell you quite a bit about his vision for this country. Santorum, after two terms as a congressman and two terms as a U.S. senator, has established a reputation as a conservative in every sense of the word. Just this past Sunday in Iowa, Santorum was talking about entitlement programs.
SANTORUM: I don't want to make (unintelligible) people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money. I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money.
TUCHMAN: Santorum's comment came in the state where by far most of the public aid recipients are white. Although he says he was tongue-tied and didn't mean to say the word black. But he did mention the word black in another situation. It was from January of last year, regarding comments President Obama made as a candidate on abortion, saying it was above his, quote, "pay grade to say when a baby is entitled to human rights."
SANTORUM: The question is, and this is what Barack Obama didn't want to answer – is that, is that human life a person under the constitution. And Barack Obama says no. Well, if that person, human life, is not a person, then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say no, we are going to decide who are people, and who are not people.
TUCHMAN: Santorum received significant attention when he gave a quote to the Associated Press in 2003 about the Supreme Court and homosexuality. "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery, you have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does."
And he continued, "In every society the definition of marriage had not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be." Santorum has said he wasn't equating homosexuality with all those other activities, but was trying to make a larger point about morality.
SANTORUM: I think basically Christian teaching on the subject, that one can have desires to do things which we believe are wrong, but it's when you act out those things that is a problem. And I was simply reflecting that opinion and that belief structure that I happen to hold as a Catholic.
TUCHMAN: Santorum is a staunch supporter of Vatican policy when it comes to contraception. He said this to an evangelical blog site. "One of the things I will talk about that no president has talked about before is I think the dangers of contraception in this country, it's not OK. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be." It's a belief that may play well with many in the far right but might be a harder sell among other conservatives.
And regarding national defense, he is certainly the antithesis of a candidate like Ron Paul. If elected as president, Santorum says he would tell the Iranians to dismantle their nuclear facilities and make them available to inspectors. And if not –
SANTORUM: We will degrade those facilities through air strikes and make it very public that we are doing that.
TUCHMAN: Many critics thought Rick Santorum's political career was over after he lost his U.S. Senate reelection in Pennsylvania by 18 percentage points. But his star is once again rising. He hopes his Iowa showing helps him broaden his reach to New Hampshire and beyond.
Gary Tuchman, CNN, Atlanta.
(End Video Clip)
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Another Marxist-Media Butt-boy spewing Dem-wit ...
Submitted by Bodini on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 7:55pm.
talking points. Does the Marxist-media have any original thoughts?
well, they seem to think the
Submitted by dzejk113 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:11pm.
well, they seem to think the same, tired old Marxist ideas are original thoughts everytime they're tried, no matter how many times they've failed, so I don't think they're even capable of having an original thought
CNN
Submitted by Andrew H. on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 5:26am.
When media people use their platorms (shrinking?) to put out the lines and lies of a corrupt administration it reveals much about the capacity of the media organization and the people (it) hires. Not even on the payroll, and they propagandize on behalf of the power. Damn shame, damn shameful.
Nope, don't watch these delusional pests, don't buy anything from people who know so little.
The so-called mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the criminal DNC.
calling Santorum's beleif about contraceptives as similar
Submitted by Paarl on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:01pm.
to Vatican policy is like calling Obama's health policy as similar to Soviet health policies...nationally controlled and government run....really low lifes ovewr at CNN...usesless journalists
paarl
Cooper 69 doesn't realize it but criticisms from him...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:09pm.
and his fellow libs only helps Santorum. Perhaps that is the reason he has raised 2 million dollars in the last 48 hours. Keep it up 69, Santorum can always use more money.
I agree those little blurbs
Submitted by jkwtrading on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:36pm.
I agree those little blurbs the media hates is exactly music to people's ears. I am a firm believer people are sick of watching congress spend their money..not only how much, but where.
Yes. Absolutely.
Submitted by Andrew H. on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 6:18am.
Yes. Absolutely.
The so-called mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the criminal DNC.
"Born-alive" redux ...
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:12pm.
Lost in the discussion of the "above my pay grade" quote is the original context.
Obama, as an Illinois state representative, opposed Illinois "Born alive" legislation, later passed, as I recall, without any opposition in both the state of Illinois AND the U.S. Senate.
Obama, alone, would not even acknowledge that a living viable aborted baby, living and breathing outside the mother's womb, was a "person" and THAT is what this issue was really about.
That doesn't even include the issue of partial-birth abortion which is a related question he also tends to dance around.
Of course his supporters and defenders would argue we just don't understand "nuance".
That's because....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:43pm.
with all of his other progressive attributes Obama is a coward.
Breaking news, the chumps in the media lie
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:29pm.
So they basically accuse Rick of being a racist, homophobe, and will ask the Pope permission to do what ever. They even have clips, but none of them are relevant to the accusations.
Every time the media exceeds my expectations, they achieve a new low
Unintelligible? It's pretty
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:47pm.
Unintelligible? It's pretty clear in this clip that he's talking about black people:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMRIPfP4Tok
Pretty clear, actually.
Since when are you not allowed to refer to a segment of the
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:59pm.
population? Oh, I forgot, when you're a conservative.
It's not like calling a segment of the population your enemies or anything...http://fisherlady-1.newsvine.com/_news/2010/10/26/5353685-obama-urges-hispanics-to-punish-enemies-vote-democraticseriously
Well if what he said is so
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:06pm.
Well if what he said is so "not wrong" why is it stated that he's denying saying it, and why is it being said that it's unintelligible when it clearly isn't?
See my reply above
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:15pm.
Because Santorum is a conservative.
So... he's denying that he
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:25pm.
So... he's denying that he said the work "black" when he clearly did because he's a conservative? That... that doesn't make a lick of sense.
Did he deny he said "black"
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:29pm.
or did he deny that he was "hitting on black citizens"? He can't win because elsewhere in the article he was condemned for using the word black.
You want to play race politics? Go back to the liberal sites. Getting tired of it.
⇒ He denied it
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:36pm.
I think it's obvious he said black. Why he's crawfishing to placate a group so proud of its monolithic racism is unclear to me at this time.
He isn't being criticized for
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:51pm.
He isn't being criticized for saying a word; he's being criticized for telling a group of people, of which he is not a part, what they should and should not be doing.
Oh my that's rich!
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:56pm.
Like obama tells people they've made enough money? Like he tells people they should be giving more to the government? Like Michelle tells people what they should be eating? I could go on and on...
But at no point in these
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:06pm.
But at no point in these statements did either one of them invoke race. Completely separate issue altogether.
He doesnt deny it
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:12pm.
Although he says he (Santorum) was tongue-tied and didn't mean to say the word black.
Seems clear he has addressed it.
Make up your mind and stop changing the argument
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:21pm.
You said: he's being criticized for telling a group of people, of which he is not a part, what they should and should not be doing.
Obama and MO have no business telling me what I should and shouldn't do. If I'm not in violation of a law, not their business.
But what about the hispanic "don't help your enemies" thing? Is he hispanic now that he's allowed to tell hispanic's what to do?
Saying that rich people make
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:28pm.
Saying that rich people make enough money doesn't disparage a particular race; saying "what people should eat" doesn't disparage a particular race; what he said towards Hispanics doesn't disparage a particular race - people complained that it disparaged Republicans as being labeled "enemies".
Saying that black people live off of other people's money does disparage a race. Saying that black people shouldn't talk about abortion because of slavery and the definition of personhood in the constitution just isn't wise for a politican to say.
Missing the point
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:32pm.
Obama has no business telling me how to live my life. That's a dictator, not a president.
Pretty sure he's not. Raising
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:38pm.
Pretty sure he's not. Raising taxes on the wealthiest of Americans by 3% and advising them to eat healthier aren't really the hallmarks of a dictatorship.
Read the news
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:42pm.
He now has the power to detain U.S. citizens without a trial for an undetermined amount of time. He's also appointed a position without Senate approval while the Senate was in session.
Oh, and Dave had an interesting link earlier, http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/what-is-big-sis-up-to/
Looking like a dictator in the making to me.
I do read the news and he
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:53pm.
I do read the news and he issued a signing statement stating:
"On New Year's eve, in a 1,800-word signing statement, the president seemed to emphasize the point, claiming: "my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens." "
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/02/aclu-others-slam-obama-for-si...
Signing statements are meaningless
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:54pm.
and do not bind the president in any way.
Well tell you what: you get
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:59pm.
Well tell you what: you get held indefinitely without trial, I'll come bail you out. Deal?
Well, catheter,
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:07pm.
Don't look now, but there are Ray-Ban-wearing, jack-booted government thugs hiding in your closet and they are waiting to take you away.
And as for his majesty taxing the wealthiest 3%??? Three words for you, Catheter: BFD.
The Soros' and the Buffets of America will hide their wealth in tax free bonds or in foreign bank accounts - where it will be untouched and un-taxed.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
Amazing aint it,
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:16pm.
How libtards will just give away their liberties. This moron couldnt even articulate what it is we are supposed to be receiving in return.
Suddenly you're concerned about personal liberties?
Submitted by iFight on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 10:39am.
It's only 10 years after the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act was signed into law. Look on the bright side - you're probably still ahead of the curve.
Really?
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 7:35pm.
But Obama's un-ledgislated regulations dont bother (all 77.000 of em) you one bit I suppose, because leftist are benevolent, right? Dont pretend for a second the Bush admin took the liberties this bunch does, every single day. We will rue this Presidency. These guys hate the Right with a passion of a cult!
How?
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:12pm.
You gonna know?
Without Constitutional rights
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:05am.
Why would you assume there would be bail?
Well, Rad
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:12am.
In case you haven't noticed, catardo can't think beyond "I want".
cathartic1
Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:20pm.
"Saying that black people live off of other people's money does disparage a race."
It does?
But firstly, what Santorum actually said was, "I don't want to make (black) people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money." And he said this based on the reality of today's revolving-door welfare situation with regards to minorities, and how he promises to change this policy that is a) completely unfair and race/group-based (and promotes more class/race warfare and animosity), and b) only damaging and counter-productive to the people it's "assisting".
Secondly, how does saying that black people -- or any race/group -- should not live off other people's money disparage that race?
- shy on vinyl
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
And why are they supposed to
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:43pm.
And why are they supposed to hate the rich or the Republicans? Because they are "against minorities".
Remember when the media
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:13pm.
Remember when the media jumped all over those parts of Obama's book. Like, "white man's greed runs a world in need."? Nah....me neither.
On that point, recently an administrator in Philly was busted for embezzling millions from a Children's Hospital...children..for Pete's sake. He was black, so apparently, greed is an equal opportunity employer.
Tell a hispanic audience to "punish their enemies". Call his grandmother a "typical white woman". "bitter clingers.." No demagoguery from him. No way.
That's because he was quoting
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:15pm.
That's because he was quoting somebody and it wasn't his own thoughts. Pretty sure Santorum wasn't quoting anybody.
Now that's reaching.
Submitted by pockets64 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:54pm.
And who was he quoting?
Reverand Wright. It was part
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:00pm.
Reverand Wright. It was part of his sermon entitled the Audacity of Hope.
⇒ Yeah, that's it
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:53am.
He thought so highly of that sermon he named his book after it. He thought so highly of the quote he included it in said book.
Cathartic, have you never been confronted with the concept of embracing a thought and allowing it to become part of your philosophy? It does happen.
I didn't know that...
Submitted by ckc1227 on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 12:09am.
Reverand Wright. It was part of his sermon entitled the Audacity of Hope.
I didn't know Reverend Wright called Obama's grandmother a typical white woman. Learn something new every day.
Sad
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:56pm.
Those were obama's own words.
cath
Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:34pm.
"That's because he was quoting somebody and it wasn't his own thoughts."
I'm with Rad79 and the others -- this is fast becoming quite sad and pathetic.
It was HIS OWN BOOK. And when you quote someone, in YOUR OWN BOOK, obviously you are thinking those same thoughts, looking up to and siding with those "poetic" words -- of a man whose sermans you devoutly attended for over 20 years with your wife and children -- which you are choosing to quote and fill YOUR OWN BOOK with.
- vinyl mania
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
⇒ cathartic
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:56pm.
That Obama adopted the phrase makes it his view as well.
You lose.
⇒ So "not wrong"
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:20pm.
It's a politically incorrect gaffe, but statistics have a way of exposing stereotypes as having some basis in fact.
If I were to clue you in to the point that >90% of African Americans voted for Obama, you can dance around the ancillary dynamics all you want, but it would be disingenuous of you to fail making note of the common thread. That point of pride was made too often to ignore (see also Colon Powell).
Okay. I think we agree he's
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:56pm.
Okay. I think we agree he's getting criticized for politically incorrect gaffes, but yet you want to justify it by saying that there's a kernal of truth in these types of statements. Okay, great; good luck winning votes with them, though.
It's only a gaffe
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:59pm.
if you're a conservative. If you're a liberal you can say any racist thing you want and get a pass.
Obama didn't get a pass when
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:11pm.
Obama didn't get a pass when he spoke about Boston police officers. And although he didn't bring up race in his remarks, people made a racial issue out of it, hence the "beer summit". I'm sure he learned his lesson about speaking more carefully from that point forward.
The professor, the so-called
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:16pm.
The professor, the so-called 'victim', made a racial issue of it.
Regardless, a liberal didn't
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:30pm.
Regardless, a liberal didn't get a pass. Anybody remember Jesse Jackson back in '84?
Really?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:33pm.
Think it's going to be brought up by the MSM during the election? I sure don't.
Probably because Jesse isn't
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:39pm.
Probably because Jesse isn't running for president this time around.
I was referring to Obama
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:44pm.
Get a clue.
Why would they? Obama didn't
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:57pm.
Why would they? Obama didn't bring race into his statements at all. Per Ant's statement above, it was the Harvard Professor.
⇒ Cathartic
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:17am.
"Separate and apart from this incident is that there’s a long history in this country of African-American and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately"
⇒ Cathartic
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:28am.
Double
Yea, sure he did
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:08pm.
Good grief
⇒ Yes, he did Cathartic
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:41am.
You can't possibly be as ignorant as you present yourself to be.
From the same discussion, at the same press conference where the President proclaimed "the cops acted stupidly"
"Separate and apart from this incident is that there’s a long history in this country of African-American and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately"
You can't say the President didn't bring up race on this matter with so much of the information remaining unscrubbed from the Net.
We've already got one poster here who regularly presents false information to defend his beliefs. I don't think you should get away with it either.
⇒ Winning votes?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:06am.
It's highly unlikely you're going to get a perfectly comfortable (white or black) welfare leech off the couch after his/her years of family tutelage on gaming the system.
Welfare is a learned skill like any other. That you are unaware of that evidently means you have no distant family members who have made a generational living off of the system.
I hope that cancer never finds a crease in your family. Their kids get braces when you're scrambling for the $8k one child needs. They've got the iPhones while your kids can't afford one until they get their own jobs. Your own kids start to ask why, if they're so poor, they get by so well.
Not that I've got any family experience with such things, no sir.
Okay. I think we agree he's
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:01pm.
Okay. I think we agree he's getting criticized for politically incorrect gaffes, but yet you want to justify it by saying that there's a kernal of truth in these types of statements. Okay, great; good luck winning votes with them, though.
It's only a gaffe
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:34pm.
if your a conservative. If you're a liberal, nothing is a gaffe.
⇒ Another point cathartic
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:13am.
Some of your friends are teachers, right? Their bread is buttered by liberal largesse, appropriated from the private sector.
Beyond the promise of more guaranteed money and job security, where do you think a political party's call for personal responsibility falls in their hierarchy of desires?
Yeah, let's appeal to their better angels while those teachers blame the kids' home life for their failure in the classroom.
⇒ double post
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:19am.
double
Funny, cathartic
Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 10:13pm.
Greg Sargent disagrees.
And agrees Ed Morrissey.
Like some other turd.
Maybe it's you.
See boudin's entry above in
Submitted by cathartic1 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:03pm.
See boudin's entry above in which he's now admitted that he was "tongue-tied".
As clear as mud
Submitted by CobraMan on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 1:04pm.
"It's pretty clear in this clip that he's talking about black people."
Yea, it's about as clear as mud. He was talking about SSI and disabilities, and he said "I don't want to make BLIND people's lives better by giving them someone else's money. I want to give them the opportunity to make their own money."
BLIND people, not "black people." Just because the word starts with "bl" it doesn't mean he saying "black." That "i" vowel is very obvious in that clip. Listen to it again and you'll actually hear it.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Cooper and the libs
Submitted by Curly on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:37pm.
The left is panicked that conservatives might actually win. Hmmmm........
Attacking Rick to build the
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:43am.
Attacking Rick to build the loser romeny.
⇒ Santorum a homophobe?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 1:00am.
Has Santorum displayed an inordinate fear of Mr. Cooper?
Santorum should stay off of
Submitted by rono on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 2:24am.
Santorum should stay off of CNN. He'll be eaten alive. Anderson Cooper is not going to give Santorum a break.
Given Anderson Cooper's proclivities,---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 3:53am.
if I were Santorum, I would fear the former far more than the latter.
MD
And what's racist about his comment?
Submitted by AR72 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:08am.
I think Santorum should have stood by his comment. Since the self-appointed leaders of the "African-American" community like to take the 13th Amendment of the Constitution out of context to mean that our founding fathers only considered them three-fifths of one person, I think Santorum has a valid point that our POTUS feels as though he has the right in his position to dictate what is or isn't a person. Santorum should not have backed down.
And what's racist about his comment?
Submitted by AR72 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:08am.
I think Santorum should have stood by his comment. Since the self-appointed leaders of the "African-American" community like to take the 13th Amendment of the Constitution out of context to mean that our founding fathers only considered them three-fifths of one person, I think Santorum has a valid point that our POTUS feels as though he has the right in his position to dictate what is or isn't a person. Santorum should not have backed down.
The Sterile Sex
Submitted by kmichaelfrancis... on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 9:23am.
Our sex obsessed media is shocked when good sex is seen as anything but sterile. Homosexuals and promiscuous heterosexuals do not value sex that is procreative. The economic issues that they express concern for take second place to anything that brings their profligate ideology into question. Santorum's economic plans received good reviews by Forbes and the Wall Street Journal, but are generally ignored and glossed over.
Progressive dictionary -
Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:46pm.
Homophobe n - anyone who does not openly and flamboyantly approve of, embrace, and promote the homosexual lifestyle.
-see also conservative
Scrutiny
Submitted by angelann1 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 2:01pm.
Where was their increased scrutiny with the sen obama and now with pres obama ???
Homophobe?
Submitted by 76United on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 3:05pm.
Santorum isn't a homophobe. "Homophobe" implies being afraid of gays. He's not afraid of gays, he just hates them and doesn't want to afford them the same rights as straight people. If the GOP nominate this guy, you are guaranteeing an Obama win that will rival Reagan beating Mondale.
"Guaranteeing an Obama win"?
Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 3:43pm.
Because the 1%-3% won't cross over and vote for Santorum/Romney/Gingrich? Got news for you, dis-United, they won't cross over anyway.
On what planet do gays not
Submitted by ckc1227 on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 12:18am.
On what planet do gays not have the same rights as straight people? Planet liberal retard, also known as your home planet, also known as your anus?
Under the heading "Oh hell yes he did":
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 3:22pm.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/joe-scarborough-grills-colleague-eugene-robin...
Eugene Robinson says he did not mean to offend anyone including Santorum. Eugene is a bald-faced liar! He meant to offend and he certainly meant to offend anyone who would vote for Santorum as some kind of religious crackpot.
Eugene is a no-class nitwit, and honestly he needs to resign for consistently offending every human on the planet for impersonating someone with ethics.
Under the heading "Oh hell yes he did":
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 3:21pm.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/joe-scarborough-grills-colleague-eugene-robin...
Eugene Robinson says he did not mean to offend anyone including Santorum. Eugene is a bald-faced liar! He meant to offend and he certainly meant to offend anyone who would vote for Santorum as some kind of religious crackpot.
Eugene is a no-class nitwit, and honestly he needs to resign for consistently offending every human on the planet by impersonating someone with ethics.