Frank Rich: John Birch 'Radical Right' Is Now the GOP Base
Liberal columnist Frank Rich claimed on Monday's Piers Morgan Tonight that the "radical right" which began during the Kennedy administration is now the base of the Republican Party. Both he and CNN's Piers Morgan also drew parallels between the environment which led to Kennedy's assassination and the politically-charged atmosphere now.
Rich's most recent column – which NewsBusters has dissected – asserts that the same "hate" which fueled the assassination of President Kennedy is now alive and well in the Obama era. [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
Rich expounded on his article on Monday, claiming that the fringe John Birch Society – which was then denounced by conservative leader Bill Buckley – morphed into the movement to elect conservative Barry Goldwater in 1964, and that now the very base of the Republican Party accepts such "extreme right-wing views."
"In 1963, the year that Kennedy died, there was polling that showed 5 percent of Americans supported the extreme right-wing views of the John Birch society. Now we have a major political – major political party, the Republicans, where that's the base," Rich absurdly claimed.
Not to be outdone, Morgan excoriated the "intransigence" of the present-day political environment – a word he has used in the past to describe Tea Partiers and the Washington atmosphere to which the well-intentioned President Obama fell victim.
"But the level of intransigence in Washington right now seems so contrary to the national need in the sense that nothing seems to be getting done," Morgan lamented.
Towards the end, Morgan also complained that the liberal media's favorite Republican candidate, Jon Huntsman, is not gaining in the polls. Rich rightly observed that Huntsman's biggest constituency is within the media – which has repeatedly buttered him up to no avail.
"His main constituency is within the press," Rich responded, before tearing into Republicans once more. "[H]e's running as a man of sanity in a crazy situation with this perpetual sort of 'American Idol' version of American politics that is the Republican sweepstakes this year."
A transcript of the segment, which aired on November 28 at 9:16 p.m. EST, is as follows:
[9:16]
PIERS MORGAN: On the day Barack Obama took office, the comparisons to John F. Kennedy began immediately. Both young, both groundbreaking in their own ways, both with attractive families. There's something else, something surprising that the two leaders may have in common. And Frank Rich who compared their presidencies in an article in "New York Magazine" joins me to explain what it is.
Frank, a fascinating piece.
FRANK RICH, columnist, New York Magazine: Thank you.
MORGAN: And the parallels are pretty obvious. I mean 1963 seems a long way away, but actually in terms of racial tension, of economic inequality, a lot of parallels there.
RICH: There are a lot of parallels there. And also there – the early '60s during the Kennedy administration was really the birth of the radical right as we know it today. The John Birch society, what would become the Goldwater movement and, famously of course, Kennedy went to Dallas against the advice of people close to him right into that nutty atmosphere where people were accusing him of treason. Sort of like the birther craziness today that people thought he was an illegitimate president. A communist possibly. A – as a Roman Catholic, there was a lot of discrimination then in the United States. And so it was a sort of savage atmosphere that Obama has inherited today.
MORGAN: So in your experience, I mean, is Obama facing anything new here in terms of the level of viciousness and the level of partisan disapproval, partisan fury, if you like? Is this new or does it just seem new?
RICH: It seems new. First of all, there's been partisan fury in this country since the hallowed Founding Fathers. That's always been the case. People like Thomas Jefferson were despised and ridiculed in some quarters. So of course was Lincoln later on. But this particular flavor, it's not new, but the genesis of it was about 50 years ago coming out of the Eisenhower years when this new radical movement that really was so unalterably opposed to government took charge and started to organize and the centerpieces of it back then were Orange County, California, and Texas.
Now it's a much bigger movement. In 1963, the year that Kennedy died, there was polling that showed 5 percent of Americans supported the extreme right-wing views of the John Birch society. Now we have a major political – major political party, the Republicans, where that's the base. There's a – much more than 5 percent subscribing to these extreme views and reflecting it in ways like shouting out "you lie" when Obama speaks before Congress.
MORGAN: I mean, it seems to me, who obviously I'm not an American, I've come into this from Britain where we have a lot of nonsense between politicians. But the level of intransigence in Washington right now seems so contrary to the national need in the sense that nothing seems to be getting done.
RICH: It's this complete disconnect between Washington and the rest of the country. And I think if there's anything that even has polarized America that both political parties or voters of both parties agree about – not to mention independents – is that Washington is a cesspool.
Congress has a 9 percent approval rating in a recent poll. And that tells – and that was before the breakdown of this so-called Super Committee that was anything but super. And not really a committee actually. And so you have a country that's in enormous economic distress, that is still fighting a major war, arguably several, which is heating up. And you have a dysfunctional – dysfunctional is too weak a word. You have a nonfunctional government in Washington that now has essentially adjourned until Election Day 2012 because certainly nothing positive is going to happen during this campaign season.
(...)
MORGAN: I mean the one who's always impressed me but doesn't get much traction is Jon Huntsman. Why does he not get more attention?
RICH: I think most people don't know who he is. He's someone with actually a distinguished record of public service, moderately conservative but quite conservative views, you could argue, more consistently conservative than Romney if you look at his whole career, but he doesn't really have a constituency within that party.
His main constituency is within the press. Everyone who's interviewed him – and I've done that – likes him, finds him smart. I may not agree with all of his views. But this is – you know, he's running as a man of sanity in a crazy situation with this perpetual sort of "American Idol" version of American politics that is the Republican sweepstakes this year.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Really? Poor Frankie the Bitch
Submitted by ConservaSerb on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 4:08pm.
Guess the left isn't full of Marxists, Communists, Anarchists, America-haters, Flag-burners, Islamo-fascist sympathizers, and freeloaders, eh?
80-plus percent of those supporting Soetoro the Fraud would LOVE to see this country burned to the ground.
That's the side we should be on, right?
A wise & frugal government, which shall leave men free 2 regulate their own pursuits of industry & improvement, & shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. T. Jefferson
right out in the open too
Submitted by dmacleo on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 4:20pm.
they don't hide their affiliations either and somehow get portrayed as the good guys.
OK, I'll agree to the IDOL
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 4:14pm.
OK, I'll agree to the IDOL vibe - 2008 set the standard for it, but the R's taking their ball and going home? Where were these fools when D's shut doors on R's and Pres. Obama said "I WON"???
Ronald Reagan
Well, Karl Marx "Loony Left" is now the DNP!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 4:19pm.
And theyve been going that way, and will stay on the verge of Communism as long as O'Bozo and his ilk are in power, or near power, or have anything to do with ANYTHING of how our country is run!
Project much....?
Submitted by NeoKong on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 5:24pm.
What is funnier than being lectured about a climate of hate and anger by some leftie on MSNBC.....?
It's like being called a fat slob by Michael Moore as he woofs down a box of Twinkies.
Go back to criticizing off-off-off-Broadway plays, Frankie.
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 6:27pm.
As a political commentator and columnist, you rank right up there with Louella Parsons, Rona Barrett and Hedda Hopper. They were leagues ahead of you in writing style and you are leagues behind them in coherent, cogent political points.
Frank Rich is to serious political commentary what Paris Hilton is to acting.
Rich will regret that comparison
Submitted by Kansasgirl on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 7:02pm.
I'll take the "bircher's" over O with my last breath.
OK, so if the far L and R are
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 7:49pm.
OK, so if the far L and R are comprised of big gov't that tells you how to live, how is limited gov't, low taxes, personal responsibility far R??? And if being a Bircher is the latter, why is it considered bad?
Ronald Reagan
Had Piers Morgan even heard of the John Birch society?
Submitted by lrgon on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 9:41pm.
The Chairman of the organization back in the 1980's was a Democrat from Georgia named Larry McDonald.
There are no hard-right conservatives in the party anymore
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 10:37pm.
And the republicans currently running the party have been so wussified it's ridiculous.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Then As Now Right Is Where The Country Is.
Submitted by Avitar on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:23am.
Back then the vast consolidated progressive media could slam down anyone. The John Birch society was just another victim of a smear campaign as Herman Cain is today.
They certainly had nothing to do with killing Kennedy and given what was known about LBJ would probably give their lives to keep Kennedy in the White House and LBJ out.
Oswald also did not kill Kennedy in connection with LBJ. That it worked so well for the worldwide Communist conspiracy was just a happy but unplanned accident for them.
Respect
Submitted by BobAnthony on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 7:27am.
I have more respect for the John Birch Society than I would for that SPLC-loving Mockingbird spy Frank Rich of the NY SLIMES!
Speaking of the SPLC...
http://www.jbs.org/news/protecting-rights-loyal-americans-targeted-by-th...
The reason the media is corrupt? Two words...OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD!
MOCKINGBIRD - The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA
All I need to know about Piers
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:05am.
is that he called Rich's heap of insinuation a "fascinating article". Rich offers no detail either in that piece or this interview. The proper popularity of the John Birch society "ideas" was set in the 60s, it's relative popularity today just shows "how far we have fallen". How popular was Gay Marriage in the 60s, Mr. Rich? Is that the proper level of popularity? Have we fallen or risen with the popularity?
Even if Rich is remotely right in the "anti-government ideas" of the JBS, there is a difference between distrusting the government and spitting on people. One is a position, the other is a temperament. Just because more people might agree with a position that was unpopular, doesn't mean that they then back all the presentations of that idea during the time it was unpopular.
Imagine this argument: Gay Rights would have been a vastly unpopular idea in the 60s, and in the 70s, groups like Act Up, which supported Gay Rights were highly unpopular for their disgusting antics, now the ideas that drove Act Up are mainstream, thus every supporter of Gay Marriage consents to the behavior of Act Up.
Again, Rich does not seem to be able to divide anything from anything; it's all a morass of assumption and insinuation and, yes, Guilt By Association. Since Rich shows none of his math, you have to trust the analysis of the very same person that wrote this slag heap of free association.
Although I share few of the motivations of JBS, from what I have researched of them, I find their predictions about that time amazingly prescient. As well, I have always thought of myself as if I would have been a federalist during the time of the union's founding. However, I have found the Anti-federalists also amazingly prescient and much more accurate in understanding how state power would be confiscated by federal courts than the (face it) pie-in-the-sky federalists, including one of my favorites, James Madison.
I find much less credible the liberal strain that gained hold by indignation that any conscientious American should be considered an "enemy within" only to find them obsessed with the conservative enemy within.
I sometimes wonder whether Buckley nobly opposed the JBS or just was the first squish act gaining favor with the press, just as conservatives of those decades gradually demurred to the liberal narrative on Tail-gunner Joe and associating investigations into Communist ties to cabinet offices (under Senate oversight duties) to the "Blacklisting" done by the largely Democratic HUAC under the term "McCarthyism".
Quasi-socialist
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:13am.
Thank you - that helps put things in perspective for me!
Ronald Reagan