GOP Senator Educates CNN Host: 'Your Job Is Not to Convince Me'
When CNN's Carol Costello admitted to Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) her inability to convince him that Republicans on the super committee didn't raise enough tax revenue, he simply responded that "your job is not to convince me."
In an interview during the bottom of the 8 a.m. hour, the senator had finished explaining how Republicans had proposed to get rid of tax loopholes. The proposal had come to the dismay of some conservatives, but Costello lectured him that such measures were still not enough to raise the necessary amount of tax revenue. [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
"But a lot of people said that wasn't enough. You didn't raise enough revenue. You could have raised more by doing these other things," Costello preached to Kyl. "But you know, I'm not going to convince you. I realize that," she added.
"Well your job is not to convince me," the senator pointedly responded. "No, it's not," Costello quickly corrected herself.
And as she did to conservative guest Grover Norquist, the liberal CNN anchor peppered Kyl with Democratic talking points. She brought up the conservative Grover Norquist, who some Democrats blamed for the lack of agreement, to Kyl. "A lot of voters, though, see that, you included, all the Republicans on the super committee, signed this tax pledge by Grover Norquist's group," she told him.
"And that you went in there and you couldn't negotiate, you know, on a level playing field because you had already made this pledge and you weren't going to budge on it, and you knew that that issue was important to the other side – Democrats," Costello lectured Kyl.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on November 21 at 8:32 a.m. EST, is as follows:
[8:32]
COSTELLO: The elephant in the room was raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans, or extending the Bush tax cuts.
(Crosstalk)
KYL: Exactly so. Our Democratic friends said – our Democratic friends said we won't cut one dollar more without raising taxes. I think that tells you a lot about the ethos in Washington. We went into this exercise in order to try to reduce federal government spending. And what we get from the other side is, no, we're not going to make any more cuts unless you raise taxes.
COSTELLO: A lot of voters, though, see that, you included, all the Republicans on the super committee, signed this tax pledge by Grover Norquist's group. And that you went in there and you couldn't negotiate, you know, on a level playing field because you had already made this pledge and you weren't going to budge on it, and you knew that that issue was important to the other side – Democrats.
KYL: But we did budge on it. And Grover was very disappointed in what Senator Toomey and the Republicans offered, which was tax reform which would have resulted in the upper two income brackets paying a higher marginal rate because their deductions and credits, the so-called tax expenditures, would have been greatly reduced in value. That's what all the experts had recommended. They said make the tax code flatter and fairer. Get rid of those loopholes. You can raise a lot of revenue that way. And we did, $250 billion worth. So Grover was not happy with that, obviously.
COSTELLO: But a lot of people said that wasn't enough. You didn't raise enough revenue. You could have raised more by doing these other things. But you know, I'm not going to convince you. I realize that. Um –
KYL: Well your job is not to convince me –
COSTELLO: No, it's not
(Crosstalk)
KYL: – but get some information out.
(...)
KYL: I quoted the President who said you don't raise taxes in a recession.
COSTELLO: Well, but President Obama also wants to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans in this country. He's also said that.
KYL: Well, last year he extended all of the current tax rates, the 2001 and 2003 tax rates. They applied to the wealthier and to the less wealthy.
COSTELLO: He compromised.
KYL: He did that – yes. He did that because he recognized that this was not the time to raise taxes on anybody. And the people in the upper brackets are the ones who create the jobs. And he understood that. Well, the situation is no different today. And that's why we've resisted raising taxes on small business people who need to create jobs.
COSTELLO: I think that voters, though don't look at small business people and their taxes raised. They look at these like giant banks who are sitting on tons of money and they have the money to spend and they're not spending it. So that when they hear you saying that, and I'm talking Democratic voters now and maybe some independent voters, when they hear you saying that, they said, where are the jobs? It's not like these giant corporations aren't making money. They're just sitting on the cash.
KYL: Right. And the fact is coming out of a recession most of the jobs are created by small business. In fact, since 1980 all of the net new job creation has come from small business. A lot of the big businesses in this country have lost jobs, as you know.
(Crosstalk)
COSTELLO: And they're hiring now, small business people.
KYL: Well, no they're not. That's the problem. We still have over nine percent unemployment in this country. And the small business folks are the ones who will be creating the first jobs as we come out of this recession that we are in. So that's why we don't want to raise taxes on them right now.
Incidentally on the corporate side there was agreement by both Democrats and Republicans that we should have corporate tax reform that would take the top corporate rate down to perhaps 25 percent if we can get it there so that our country can be more competitive internationally. On that there was agreement.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
→ Crackberry speed dial!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:08pm.
Congratulations, Carol. You've just bumped Scarlett out of the top spot.
Carol, I've seen more graphic "what I would do if I had you alone, Barack" , but it was by a man, on "Hardball"
Good.
Submitted by johnsonl on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:11pm.
I'm not impressed with what the SuperFail committee has done. I'm not surprised, either. It's a very clear that the answer to these damn congresscritters is term limits. They will never vote against themselves or do the right thing on their own.
That being said, Senator Kyle was absolutely correct to shut Costello down. She knew it and acknowleged that it's not her place to lecture him.
CNN's Job is not to reflect public opinion & sentiment
Submitted by kch50428 on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:13pm.
Their job is to manipulate opinion & sentiment. To their leftist direction. Get with it Senator.
"..but to get some
Submitted by ant on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:29pm.
"..but to get some information out." Haha. Now that's funny. I'm thinking Kyl has visited NewsBusters.
Costello talks about banks sitting on large sums of money, (given to them by whom? Democrats) and then mentions specifically that Democratic voters..and independents..are asking, 'Where are the jobs?' What is she insinuating there? That Republican voters aren't asking the same, that all Republican voters are employed? Is that "getting some information out"? This country is being adversely affected by this pathetic excuse for a media.
"Ralph"
Submitted by mad53PA on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:31pm.
As my buddy Ralph Kramden would say:
'Pow, Right in the Kisser!!!!
We are not the lobbyists you seek
Submitted by kata on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 5:42pm.
Ooops, that didn't quite work.
Kyl should have added the words..
Submitted by greggy on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 6:06pm.
"supposed to be", or "in theory"..
As in, "Your job is not SUPPOSED TO BE to convince me", or, "Your job is not, IN THEORY, to convince me"...
The reality is very different. That's why she laughed, a bit guiltily, when he said that and she replied "No, It's not"..because in truth, she very much feels that that IS her job.
To be even more accurate - to convince the PUBLIC..
Damn I wish I could answer some of these
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 6:03pm.
asinine questions.
COSTELLO: But a lot of people said that wasn't enough. You didn't raise enough revenue. You could have raised more by doing these other things. But you know, I'm not going to convince you. I realize that. Um –
KEYSER: Some people will always say that wasn't enough. But let me ask you, Ms. Costello: How much is enough? If we got the entire $1.2T over ten years in tax increases, even if it only came from people earning more than $200k annually, how significant do you think that will be on our current $15T debt? Do you realize that even under the rose-colored CBO predictions, our national debt on this date in 2015 will be more than $17.6T? That's four years from now. The $1.2T the committee was charged to find -over ten years- doesn't even cover the amount of increase in the debt projected in the next four years.
COSTELLO: No, it's not.
KEYSER: So tell me Lou, why is it that given these facts, you have no interest in discussing spending cuts? That's the real reason the Stupid Committee wasn't able to achieve any common ground; Democrats steadfastly refuse to discuss the real problem we're facing; that we're spending too much money. We're spending money we don't have, and won't generate. We're creating another Greece.
COSTELLO: Well, but President Obama also wants to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans in this country. He's also said that.
KEYSER: Well, you're an idiot.
(Maybe that's why I won't be interviewed...)
Hey Liberals-if we take all the cash from the 1%ers-
Submitted by JIMMY1660 on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 6:13pm.
we have enough to last 60 days-Not a revenue problem-its a spending problem.
at home -my net income is $4.00-i can only spend $4.00 not $100.00
funny how that works for me and not the federal Government.
Hey Liberals-if we take all the cash from the 1%ers-
Submitted by JIMMY1660 on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 6:13pm.
we have enough to last 60 days-Not a revenue problem-its a spending problem.
at home -my net income is $4.00-i can only spend $4.00 not $100.00
funny how that works for me and not the federal Government.
Don't say.......
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 7:16pm.
Homer's brain: Don't say "beer".
Homer Simpson: Beer. DOH!
I wish I wish I wish
Submitted by Paarl on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 8:02pm.
that the GOPers would come prepared with a succinct and easily understandable explanation of current services baseline budgeting and that these 'cuts' are merely reductions in the rate of spending increases.....it is not a difficult concept to understand....and explain to the general public..it can be done in a humorous fashion that will penetrate most peoples aversion to budgetary issues..
and they can add::::::::: when the DEMs want tax increases at the same time as spending cuts....they could just say that the tax increases are real and imminent while the spending cut are chimera...an imaginative thing that does not occur...
paarl of Rhodesia
One of the rules of conducting an interview Do your homework!
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 8:31pm.
Costello, who was as big an airhead co-anchoring the local TV evening news, is typicall of the MSM these days. They like to arm themselves with slogans and play to role of advocate, but they are totally unfamiliar with the other side's argument. Hence, they tend to crumble when someone like Kyl or Gingrich push back.
it went into one ear and out
Submitted by GreenTea on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 8:47pm.
it went into one ear and out the other, they, the so-called journalist and news anchors, never listen to conservatives, they only debate them
More of this, please, from conservatives....
Submitted by krendler on Mon, 11/21/2011 - 10:58pm.
A LOT more. Don't treat these encounters as "interviews", because they aren't. Treat them as debates. Throw questions at the talking head about their statements and their behavior.
What a stupid woman.
Submitted by fatboy on Tue, 11/22/2011 - 9:17am.
Funny, I didn't see her name on the list of SC members. What a stupid woman.
Krypton Alert!!!!
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Tue, 11/22/2011 - 2:02pm.
[Rattling around inside her empty cranium...]
Oh my non-or-non-specific-or-whatever-diety/thing (or not)!!!
Here comes another fact! What shall I do?
Quick, bob and weave!
Aaarrrrgh!! It's smashing my Dem/Prog speaking points into smithereens!!
KRYPTON ALERT!!
My strength is failing, my thoughts jumbled, my words are slurring...
I'm meeeeeeeeeellllllllltiiiiiiiiiiiiiing.....
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
Some people are born stupid,
Submitted by east tennessee john on Tue, 11/22/2011 - 3:12pm.
Some people are born stupid, some just acquire it over the course of living. Which are you Carol? Of the 6 demoncrats on the super comittee has one, since 2007 or even before, EVER EVER vote against a spending bill with the possible exception of funding the Iraq War or trying to keep Bush from getting an increased debt ceiling? But that doesn't matter you formulaic ignorant bitch. You were better with Abbott, Costello.