Time's Top Editor Stengel Asks Bill Clinton Why He Isn't Tea Party 'Hero'
In a recent interview, Time magazine's Richard Stengel asked former President Bill Clinton why he was not a Tea Party "hero." Stengel's "criteria" were that Clinton oversaw a balanced budget and cuts to the rate of growth of the federal government.
However, as CNN's Wolf Blitzer pointed out to Stengel on Thursday, Clinton did so at the behest of a Republican Congress. [Video below the break. Click here for audio.]
Stengel, in the interview published on November 9, posed this question to the former Democratic President: "Speaking of policies, you balanced the budget and cut the size of the government. How come you're not a hero of the Tea Party?"
Clinton replied "I thought I should have been their favorite politician."
"I think because I didn’t do it according to the ideology," he added. "I raised taxes and cut spending. I did it with a mix of policies that also left us money to invest in our future and in our quality of life. I think that’s really important. There are some things that the government has to do because the private sector does not have the capacity to advance the public interest in that way."
Stengel was asked about this exchange on CNN on Thursday. CNN's Wolf Blitzer actually challenged him on the point that Clinton was responsible for the budget and the decrease in spending.
"What he didn't say to you is that at the time, when he balanced the budget and saw surpluses, he did it in part because of enormous pressure he was under from the Republican majority in Congress," Blitzer noted on Thursday's The Situation Room. Stengel did acknowledge that fact.
"Yes. I mean, remember, it was Bill Clinton who famously said 'The era of big government is over.' He was under great pressure from Newt Gingrich and the Congress to reduce the size of government," Stengel answered.
"And remember, that was still the era. He was coming after the era -- you know, the Ronald Reagan era of saying that government is not the answer, government is the problem. So he was reckoning with that."
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
To be honest,
Submitted by zenman1661 on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 4:52pm.
Clinton did have the intelligence and political flexability to tack to the center when the Republicans took control of Congress. So, he should not be reviled like some Democratic Presidents we know and hate. But, he was a liberal, so the Tea Party is not going to consider him a "hero"
No he should be reviled for
Submitted by Bhaal on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:54pm.
No he should be reviled for things like impeachment, Lewinsky, Jones and ofcourse, lying.
Agreed
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 9:03pm.
Clinton was and for all we know remains a sexual predator. The fact that MSMers from Andrea Mitchell to Joe Scarborough are infatuated with this sicko is indefensible.
exactly so
Submitted by michiganruth on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:30pm.
zenman, you beat me to the punch. Clinton was certainly not a perfect president, but he didn't do so bad. and looking back, those were pretty comfortable times: maybe the last of the good times and prosperity for awhile, or so it seems...
Clinton also always--I believe--had the best interests of this country at heart. Bill Clinton loved America--I don't get quite that same vibe from Obama.
I always felt that Clinton
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 10:55pm.
had Clinton's best interests at heart. I still feel the same way.
oh for sure
Submitted by michiganruth on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 11:00pm.
Hillary too. they look out for themselves without question.
but what I meant was I think Clinton felt about America the way I feel about America: that it's the greatest country on earth (all the greater for allowing a slick sucker like him to become president, yes?)...and who would ever want to live anywhere else? that IMHO is an important quality in a president, and I don't see it in our current one.
Clinton was the only man in the history of our nation
Submitted by nonncom on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 5:10pm.
to be re-elected for doing nothing in his first term, except to have the good sense to stay out of the way of policies put in place during the Bush administration, which led to the most enriched economic times we've ever known, and may never know again....his first election was a joke, only eclipsed in scope by the election of Obama....
And failing to establish
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:11pm.
socialized healthcare in the first two years. Remember that.
Speaking of that election, and the next...
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 7:36pm.
...if I ever come near Ross Perot, I'm gonna kick him in the berries. I'd say nuts, but I don't think that analogy would apply to that munchkin.
O/T - did you notice Ross looks like Alfred E Neuman?
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 9:19pm.
But with a Texas accent?
Why are they still
Submitted by rockyracoon on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 5:26pm.
Why are they still interviewing the big creep on TV? He's been out of office for over a decade, yet he never seems to leave.
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
Remember
Submitted by Chaitealover on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 5:40pm.
how long it took him to get out of DC on Bush's Inaugural Day? And how much airtime the media spent covering it? The man's an egomaniac and the liberal media feeds his self-indulgence, mistaking it for wisdom.
WRONG
Chai
The reason it took a long time
Submitted by wingnut55 on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:49pm.
If you remember his staff destroyed many computers and other equipment. He and Hillary took china and silverware from the White House and security had to be sent to their home to retrieve it. It took a long time because they wanted so much stuff from the White House that wasn't theirs to have.
They need to remind people
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:14pm.
that Dems can be competent presidents...if they're passed budgets by a Republican Congress to sign and given the high-volume mandatory business activity of Y2K conversion. And that it may take 13 years later for their CRA to hit the fan, where the link can be denied by the media.
Billy Jeff sold this country out to the UN when he signed...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:05pm.
Executive Order #12858.
And eternal shame on George H.W. Bush for siging that God-forsaken treaty to begin with.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Clinton
Submitted by HudsonRiverGirl on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:48pm.
The left sure does love it's favorite pervert.
Evidently shame is not part of their DNA
"Evidently shame is not part of their DNA"
Submitted by Bhaal on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 6:57pm.
Only when it applies to a conservative.
Gov't Accounting
Submitted by IrateNate on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 7:56pm.
Any business that did their books like our federal government does would be shut down and the owners jailed. Yet, even after 11 years, we still have Slick Willie taking credit for things he did not do - balance the federal budget or create a surplus. So many people simply accept these lies as if they were true. But the truth is that our National Debt increased each and every year Clinton was in office.
Clinton coasted on cheap oil, h/t Reagan.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Fri, 11/11/2011 - 9:46pm.
What else did he have to do, other than spewing cruse missiles around Creation.
You Didn't Build That.
Love This
Submitted by Maestroh on Sat, 11/12/2011 - 1:59pm.
Bill Clinton took office promising to lower taxes and promptly raised them. On everybody (duh, everybody buys GAS!!) - despite during his campaign attacking others (like Paul Tsongas) for proposing the very things he did.
Then he and the boys pulled a 1990 all over again. They raised taxes RETROACTIVELY to the start of the year but - being good liberals - postponed the very spending cuts that were supposed to occur in 1993 (under the 90 budget deal) to 1995.
Then a major thing went wrong for them....the Republicans took over the nation's purse strings. And enforced those actual "reductions in increase." Clinton fought them every step of the way.
And now he wants credit for stuff he opposed in the first place.
Pardon me while I laugh.