Larry O'Donnell Calls for Occupy D.C. to Bring 'Firestorm' to Nat'l Restaurant Association's HQ
Did MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell ignore President Obama's previous calls for civility? The late-night host, in a five-minute Thursday night tirade, called for violence by specifically telling Occupy D.C. protesters to bring a "firestorm" to the National Restaurant Association (NRA) headquarters nearby, as well as to the NRA's corporate sponsors which include Starbucks and 7-11.
O'Donnell insisted that the organization release presidential candidate Herman Cain's accuser from her confidentiality agreement and let her bring the allegations against Cain to the public. If by Friday they still refused to do so, "then a firestorm should be visited upon the 1200 17th Street Northwest and the members of the National Restaurant Association," ranted O'Donnell. [Video available shortly. Click here for audio.]
O'Donnell carefully articulated the building's address twice and also gave the nearest intersection and Metro stop, telling Occupy D.C. protesters that it lay only five blocks from their protest at McPherson Square.
He also aired a picture of an NRA executive, explaining that "I want people to see the people who are currently protecting the secrets of Herman Cain." This came just before he called for protesters to occupy the NRA headquarters and bring a "firestorm" there.
The MSNBC host also called for a boycott of NRA's corporate sponsors, which include Starbucks, 7-11, Domino's, McDonald's, and Wendy's, among others. "That is who is paying the salaries of the people who are keeping Herman Cain's secrets," he stated, calling for his audience to boycott all the corporations he mentioned.
"If Starbucks wants to avoid a boycott, Starbucks can write a letter to [NRA CEO] Dawn Sweeney telling her to do the right thing," he added.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on November 4 at 10:21 p.m. EDT, is as follows:
[10:21]
LAWRENCE O'DONNELL: Herman Cain's breathtakingly incompetent campaign manager issued that challenge believing that he had the protection of confidentiality agreements that would prevent any woman from actually coming forward. Such confidentiality agreements are locked away in this building –
[Screenshot: National Restaurant Association Building]
– which houses the anti-minimum wage lobbying operation that calls itself the National Restaurant Association. Joel Bennett, a lawyer for one of the women who got a year's pay settlement from the National Restaurant Association as a result of Herman Cain's alleged conduct is negotiating with the association to release her from her confidentiality agreement and allow her to accept the Cain campaign challenge.
Sue Hensley, senior vice president for public affairs communication for the National Restaurant Association – do we have a picture of Sue? We do? Alright, that's good, put it up. Put it right up there.
[Picture: Sue Hensley, senior vice president, public affairs communications]
I want people to see the people who are currently protecting the secrets of Herman Cain. Sue Hensley said today, "Our outside counsel was contacted by Mr. Bennett today and was asked to provide a response to a proposed statement by tomorrow afternoon. We are currently reviewing the document, and we plan to respond tomorrow."
All eyes that are not on the Los Angeles courthouse tomorrow, where the verdict in the trial of Michael Jackson's doctor could be delivered, will be on the National Restaurant Association headquarters at 1200 17th Street Northwest in Washington, D.C. That's at the intersection of 17th and M Streets –
[Screenshot: Street view of intersection, 17th St. NW and M St. NW, Washington D.C.]
– nearest Metro stop is Farragut North. That's only five blocks from the Occupy D.C. protests in McPherson Square, an easy walk for anyone who might feel like occupying the National Restaurant Association.
Today may be the day to begin the National Restaurant Association occupation to force them to open their secret files. As of now, we have no reason not to expect Dawn Sweeney – let's get a look at her – the woman who now has Herman Cain's old job, the CEO of the National Restaurant Association – to do the right thing. Do we have a Dawn Sweeney picture? Looks like we don't. We don't. We have – we don't have one. Alright, well we'll find one, Dawn Sweeney's picture will be here. Maybe not tonight.
She, and anyone else at the National Restaurant Association has a standing invitation to come on this program and explain whatever they decide tomorrow. The National Restaurant Association lives on the funding of its giant corporate sponsors. Here is a sample of who used to pay Herman Cain's salary, and who is paying to keep his secrets now:
7-11, Burger King, The Cheesecake Factory, Chipotle, Denny's, Domino's Pizza, Hooters, Krispy Kreme, McDonald's, P.F. Chang's, Starbucks, Wendy's, Walt Disney World.
That is who is paying the salaries of the people who are keeping Herman Cain's secrets. Now there is some good stuff in that list, but let's face it, most of that stuff is junk. Real junk food. It is not hard, and it's good for you to give up most everything on that list. I mean boycott anything and everything on that list. And yes, it is possible to get coffee in America without going to Starbucks.
If the National Restaurant Association decides to do the wrong thing tomorrow – if they decide to continue to allow Herman Cain and his campaign manager to say anything they want about the former National Restaurant Association employees who have complained against Mr. Cain, while the National Restaurant Association prevents those employees from speaking out in any way, then a firestorm should be visited upon the 1200 17th Street Northwest and the members of the National Restaurant Association. If Starbucks wants to avoid a boycott, Starbucks can write a letter to Dawn Sweeney telling her to do the right thing. But that's what members of the National Restaurant Association should have to do to retain your business if Dawn Sweeney continues to let Herman Cain hide behind their confidentiality agreements.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Lock him up!
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 12:53pm.
Isn't this inciting a riot?
My thoughts exactly
Submitted by Lipton on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:15pm.
nt.
A change of pace?
Submitted by KornKing on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 5:35pm.
Maybe a bunch could "occupy" MSNBC, take shits on the carpet, stuff like that, oh wait, that would be an improvement....
Any Prosecutors out there?
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:41pm.
Seriously, are there any prosecutors out there that can explain to the general public why this is not an act to incite violence? I know Al Sharpton got away with this once, but this is on FCC controlled airwaves and they are just sitting on their hands. If there is violence perpetrated by these anarchists then O'donnell has to be held accountable. If there is no action taken then we know we are on our own and better utilize the rights we have under the 2nd amendment.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
FCC Complaint?
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:21pm.
Should we do what the socialist do? Inundate the FCC with complaints requesting that MSNBC's license not be renewed?
Is it just me, or do we have
Submitted by MichaelPaladin on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 12:57pm.
Is it just me, or do we have a so-called member of the media breaking the law. As it does appear he was trying to incite a riot against a business.
No he didn't
Submitted by GregE on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 1:53pm.
Liberals would never do that, especially after the Gabrielle Giffords shooting when liberals ran to the front of the line to make sure to be first and loudest in calling for stupidly ridiculous levels of so-called "civility"............which they in turn proceeded to table within just a few days once it was no longer of assistance to the agenda.
recorded violation of the law
Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:03pm.
This joker basically got recorded from live TV (and replayed I'm sure) violating the law with his words. There's no way to take that back and the ONLY thing that needs to be done is to fire his sorry ass. And cite him for attempting to incite a riot as these protesters are doing violent things as of late.
He'll get a slap on the wrist if that.
This is much worse than yelling "fire" in a movie theater.
-Jon
yelling fire
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:10pm.
They aren't arresting the protestors when they vandalize and make threats. You know there are more than enough cameras around to document their actions. If they can't/won't touch the people causing damage and committing the violence then they can hardly do anything for some one simply calling for the same.
Yeah, I know
Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:18pm.
I know, you're right, it was just wishful thinking on my part in a real just society. Just goes to show how bad things have gotten these days.
-Jon
jon,
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 2:03pm.
they are just following the example of the current administration - only enforce the laws that support your agenda.
Same thing in DC
Submitted by GregE on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 2:13pm.
........only enforce the laws that support the agenda......
Our federal system of government is setup so that the 3 branches are a "check" on each other. That is rarely the case in recent years. The Congress doesn't check the President. The PARTY opposite the President, in Congress, and if the majority, checks the President. If the majority party is the same as the President's party, the checks and balances the Constitution calls for are nearly null and void. Same in the other direction. The Supreme Court acts in a similar fashion, with 5-4 decisions all over the place when they are SUPPOSED to be the most astute regarding the Constitution. There should be very few 5-4 decisions, and more 8-1 and 9-0. Our nation is worse off for all of this nonsense.
Just following orders
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:19pm.
The orders from the Administration in DC to the local government leaders is "leave them alone." Why? Hmmm? The OWS idiots are mostly only being controlled (if that) in Repub localities.
nightrider
Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:07pm.
Was O'Donnell wearing his white hood while on this tirade?
and straight jacket with
Submitted by TruthMonger on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:49pm.
and straight jacket with drool bucket...
that reminds me - where has ollberdork been lately?
Congratulations Jimmy Carter!
MSLSD
Submitted by HockeyKid on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:08pm.
Sure hires some maroons don't they? How could someone be so stupid as to commit a federal felony ON TELEVISION?! Firestorm, for Pete's sake!
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Larry should be charged with a crime
Submitted by oldfart on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:15pm.
Under United States federal law, a riot is defined as:
A public disturbance involving (1) an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons, which act or acts shall constitute a clear and present danger of, or shall result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual or (2) a threat or threats of the commission of an act or acts of violence by one or more persons part of an assemblage of three or more persons having, individually or collectively, the ability of immediate execution of such threat or threats, where the performance of the threatened act or acts of violence would constitute a clear and present danger of, or would result in, damage or injury to the property of any other person or to the person of any other individual.18 U.S.C. § 2102.
Considering current AG he will most likely request MSNBC to give him a promotion.
Hmmmm....what did the JournOlist memo say?
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:16pm.
One has to wonder.
Because Larry, being the brilliant, 60+ IQ level intellectual that he is, more than likely overplayed the latest directive.
I'm convinced the leftists, once again yearning for their old hippie past (and having glamorized it for the young w/in their orbits)...would love nothing more than to see Kent State type results. Then they would have a perfect excuse for "burning it to the ground".
I know Oakland is ground zero for the fruits and nuts, but the next time the Occupiers get out of control, the powers that be need to bring the hammer down, hard.
Arresting O'Donnell would be a good start, but we all know that isn't going to happen.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
arresting O'Donnel?
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:22pm.
When faced with an idiot running his mouth:
You let the idiot speak and never make a martyr out of an idiot .
The stupidity of a martyr's statement goes uncontested because the "cause" takes precedence. It is just a shame we don't have a media in this country that reaches all political spectrums to report on the maniacal rants of the uninformed.
Kent State Redo
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:08pm.
The socialist are waiting anxiously for a "Kent State" incident to occur. That would give them the reason to shut down the USA entirely, suspend elections, and give Obama president-for-life status. Funny thing about Kent State, the final analysis was that it was justified by the conditions that existed.
Double standards
Submitted by Darasen on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:19pm.
I can only imagine the uproar if Limbaugh or Beck had said the same things.
Rush and Glenn would never think of saying such a thing.
Submitted by jawebster1 on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 3:04am.
Only Liberals talk that way and only Liberals are immune from main stream media criticism for saying such things. I wish it weren't so, but it is what it is.
Hey Larry
Submitted by JayVee on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:19pm.
Hey Larry, that sounds an awful lot like a terrorist threat to me. You should be arrested, you idiot!!!
Management needs to be told about this!
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:23pm.
They NEED to fire him to protect company assets! Management has an OBLIGATION to do that!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Ted Baxter
Submitted by palmaceiahome on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:18pm.
MSNBC now trots there psycho hosts out to incite riots? No one knows the facts,that's why the Politico has no creditability.It's like they are the judge ,jury,and executors They will have blood on there hands when deaths occur with the OWS clan. Good luck spinning that on the ''Morning Joe''
Desperately and blatantly
Submitted by TerryWest on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:33pm.
Desperately and blatantly trying to direct the mobs to do the job they failed to do re the Cain allagations.
Having failed to rally the public behind the OWS Protesters they have nothing to lose at this point, not even their dignity as that was gone long ago.
Can you imagine the out cry had someone such as Glenn Beck had encouraged such an act?
I demand an indefinite two-day suspension.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:34pm.
Seriously, this is so far beyond the pale even MSNBC MUST ACT.
indefinite two-day suspension?
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:39pm.
That actually sounds like something that MSNBC would come up with.
I still say you don't make a martyr out of an idiot.
Well, Mark Halperin got an "indefinite" 30 day suspension.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:47pm.
Yup.
I forgot what Olby, Edward the Arsonist and Shmoe got, but they were very serious, too.
That Phil Griffin doesn't put up with any shenanigans.
indefinite
Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:57pm.
I wonder what MSNBC would say about a Republican that called for an indefinite two day <anything>. They would probably go to great lengths to point out the stupidity of the statement.
Lock
Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:58pm.
this lunitic up before it's to late. MSDNC must be so proud of their employees. Would love to hear Apostle Claver and this buffoon have a conversation.
His Olbermann moment? Any
Submitted by inquiringmind on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 5:54pm.
His Olbermann moment? Any sane person would think so. I would say if he doesn't get canned for this then his time is soon. He is so off the reservation with his comments that the suits upstairs are just waiting for the right moment to can him.
Why Larry, why don't you invite them all over to your house?
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 5:58pm.
Certainly you love those thugs so much that you desire their company, so we'll make sure to tell them it's free beer and wireless internet at your place from now until the election. Go ahead, Larry, embrace your socialist muckraking self. Just forget to shower for a few weeks, dress up all in black, put on your kaffiyeh like a mask and act like one of them. Go ahead, Larry. Quit your job and tell your wife you are moving out of the house because you don't want to be in the 1%. Cut off your electric, cable, water, gas and other utilities and move back into nature by pitching a tent somewhere near those protesters you hold dear.
I give it fifteen minutes before you call for the limo and whine to get your favorite suite at the Four Seasons.
Why not storm General Electric?
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 6:06pm.
After all, GE didn't pay any Federal income tax on $5 billion in US sales.
Or Starbucks -- the corporate sponsor of Morning Joe?
How 'bout they storm Columbia and Harvard?
Submitted by JeffC... on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 7:01pm.
Don't we have the right to see the president's college transcripts, too?
Larry, Larry, Larry
Submitted by tjc-illinois on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 8:09pm.
You poor demented little man. I never thought I would say this, but you make Ober-dork look like the poster boy for good mental health.
'Well, to tell the family secret, my grandmother was Dutch." Bart
No Immunities
Submitted by Lee Hazel on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 8:32pm.
These leftish media types should not be immune from prosecution based only on their self elevated self worth.
O'Donnell is inciting a riot, period. He is not alone in this. Chris Matthews et al have also pushed for fire and basic municipal rioting. This can not go on. It is nothing more than obeying the orders of Obama to create the conditions necessary for martial law and the cancellation of elections.
A few jailed pundits would be a good start. I can't think of a better candidate than O'Donnell. Schultz would run a close second.
Old saying
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:12pm.
An old Jewish saying from a holocost surviver. "The next time someone says he wants to kill you, believe him!" We need to take these socialist media fools at their word and act accordingly.
Where's Big Sis
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 8:49pm.
She'd be all over a conservative like lipstick on her pigface if they made such a comment.
For that matter, why isn't DHS all over the OWSers. They are a clear and present danger to the Republic. Attacking the country is an act of war, isn't it?
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Threat to the people and the country
Submitted by jon_torlin on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 12:18am.
These anarchists would fall under the heading of "domestic enemies" as described by the oath to defend this country. That this bogus potus is supporting them is yet one more violation of his oath of office.
If there are any innocents that are still among these anarchists, they better hurry up and get the hell out of there and go back home because sooner or later, enough is going to be enough on the local level and those people are going to be forced back or worse still, put down. They are affecting businesses and threatening people who are just trying to go about their daily routines. Anything that affects that is a threat that needs to be dealt with severely.
Enough is enough.
-Jon
DHS does not investigate
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 5:58pm.
DHS does not investigate their own.
How many of you remember Obama's words during the Egyptian riots? "This is an example of democracy in action." To this administration democracy is not orderly voting or debating in Congress. It is riots in the street! Who do you think is running the OWS movement?
Hey O'Donnell how about the
Submitted by sfcpete on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:17pm.
Hey O'Donnell how about the OWS do themselves and the world a favor and demolish any and all properties belonging to MSNBC. It would be kinda like giving the "media" an enema.
A REAL POS
Submitted by minky on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 1:14am.
Try as you may, "progressives", but you just can't scrape O'Donnell off your shoe. You OWN this POS!!
What about Larry's background?
Submitted by Bill Brasky on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 2:36am.
Somebody out there must have the ability to find the skeletons. Lets go after this jerk like he goes after conservatives. Or we can just hunt him down and beat the shit out of him. Either way sounds like fun.
Can this guy be prosecuted for inciting a riot? Can...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 3:00am.
MSNBC be sued for hiring such evil, violence provoking people?
Gonna make for an odd moment.
Submitted by Michael30 on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 3:07am.
He demands boycotts of NRA members and specifically mentioned Starbucks, but don't they basically sponsor Morning Joe?
Every time you hear Mika say "Morning Joe, brewed by Starbucks," is Mr. O'donnell going to attack them as well? It seems like a partnership with his own network.
Just curious how far his advocacy will go.
Mike
Why not come forward?
Submitted by Mike009 on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 8:17am.
I don't understand why the women making allegations against Cain are keeping quiet. Their lives would NOT be ruined. Far from it. They'd be treated like heroes. They'd be revered like Anita Hill. And they'd probably rake in big bucks. Must be some other reason they're not talking.
If they don't want to talk
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 5:52pm.
If they don't want to talk about it, why did they bring it up in the first place? Something does not add up.
Larry O'Donnell is a loser
Submitted by panz on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 8:59am.
And all three of his viewers got up and did exactly as he demanded...
He admits...
Submitted by Plumb Bob on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 9:08am.
He admits that the #Occupy movement is a tool of the Democratic party. Note it well, and broadcast it everywhere.
How quaint. The Democratic party has its own, pet mob. Seems to me that Ann Coulter's thesis in "Demonic" has been completely vindicated.
Once again, MSNBC missed the
Submitted by jessieH on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 9:56am.
Once again, MSNBC missed the real corrupt target. I see they still can't seem to spell Washington D.C.
Persuasion v force
Submitted by jmcenanly on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 12:27pm.
Herman Cain's career should rise or fall on the value of his ideas, not whether or not people he used to work with can be intimidated into abandoning him.Since when does an American political party need an enforcement arm?
Crimes and Misdemeanors
Submitted by ruby2ssday on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 5:48pm.
Isn't solicitation of arson still a felony?
Idiot O'Donnell (not Rosie this time)
Submitted by maquignon on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:01pm.
I never watch MSNBC anyway and this is a good example of the reason. If I did watch, I would quit now and I urge everyone to boycott this poor excuse for a television station. In addition to this imbecile, there is Chris Matthews, Mr Ed, Rachel Maddow and Keith Olberman. Has there ever been such a group of idiots gathered in one place?
Occupy Low-rants!
Submitted by pcnav on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 6:12pm.
I think it is time to occupy Low-rants O'Dumbell. This guy is in serious need of a good old fashioned @ss kicking
Whenever I see this nitwit, I
Submitted by poseA on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 9:43pm.
Whenever I see this nitwit, I fantasize about smashing his face with a meat tenderizer.
Does that make me a bad person?