CNN Brings On Former Democratic Strategist to Analyze GOP Victory in NY-9
For analysis of the special election in New York's 9th Congressional District, CNN hosted Hilary Rosen – a former Democratic strategist and former interim head of the Human Rights Campaign, a leading LGBT civil rights organization.
The network simply listed Rosen as a "CNN political contributor," failing to disclose her past as a Democratic strategist. Not surprisingly, Rosen downplayed the shock of a Republican victory in former Congressman Anthony Weiner's district, which had been Democratic since the 1920s, remarking that "there's too much made of it."
Rosen claimed that "it wasn't a particularly liberal Democratic seat" and "this is a district that barely supported President Obama the last time around." However, Obama won the district by 11 points in 2008 – not a landslide, but not a very close victory either. The 2010 Almanac of American Politics states that the district is "unquestionably a Democratic district, but conservative by New York City standards," so Rosen's first point may well be valid.
[For audio, click here.]
Rosen blamed the defeat mainly on the disgrace of former Congressman Anthony Weiner, not the policies of President Obama. As a good Democratic strategist she turned the focus to the effect the loss would have on the morale of Democrats and noted that the White House would have to "pay attention" to the media's reaction and make sure the party was supporting its candidates.
The analyst also gushed over rumored Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, who could challenge incumbent Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) for the Massachusetts Senate seat.
"Here you have somebody who's sort of the anti-politician in Elizabeth Warren, really just a phenomenal consumer advocate, a professor, perceived to be the kind of nice lady truth-teller who really is smart and accomplished and almost single-handedly brought some of the Wall Street reforms to Washington to encourage them to be enacted – and President Obama embraced them, of course," lauded Rosen.
A transcript and video of the segment, which aired on September 14 at 12:32 p.m. EDT, is as follows:
T.J. HOLMES: Hilary, let's turn to New York and that election. Republican Bob Turner won that special election, a heavily Democratic district here. A Democrat hasn't held this seat – or excuse me – a Democrat has held this seat since the 1920s. So is it a lot going to be made of this? Too much made of this that this is a signal that Obama's in trouble? Or is this really a signal that Obama might be trouble next year?
HILARY ROSEN, CNN political contributor: Well, my instinct is that there's too much made of it. First rule is, like, don't tweet pictures of yourself without your underpants because you'll turn all your constituents kerflooey. And they won't know what to do.
(Crosstalk)
HOLMES: Yeah, that's rule one.
ROSEN: You know that was Anthony Weiner's seat. It was a Democratic seat before. And it wasn't a particularly liberal Democratic seat. So I think the Republicans, while they're going to try and make a lot out of this, this is a district that barely supported President Obama the last time around, and you know, not in the sort of maelstrom of kind of political liberal New York.
Having said that, the fact that it's an isolated seat, and there will be a lot of media around the Republicans taking charge, you know, the White House is going to have to pay attention to this because members of Congress who are being asked to go out on a limb for the President – we want to get this economy moving, we want to pass the President's jobs bill – you know, they're going to want to make sure that the White House and the Democratic Party has their back.
And so if the party can't support their candidates in these races, that's going to give members pause. So, the White House does have to pay attention.
HOLMES: And last thing here, is Elizabeth Warren the right person, the person, the best chance for Democrats to unseat Senator Scott Brown in Massachusetts?
ROSEN: I love this race. I'm going to be watching it so closely. Here you have somebody who's sort of the anti-politician in Elizabeth Warren, really just a phenomenal consumer advocate, a professor, perceived to be the kind of nice lady truth-teller who really is smart and accomplished and almost single-handedly brought some of the Wall Street reforms to Washington to encourage them to be enacted – and President Obama embraced them, of course – against another kind of anti-politician, Scott Brown, who sort of came out of nowhere, was in the state legislature but not particularly noteworthy. This is going to be sort of a matchup of the Senate, I think. This is the race of the year.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Analyze this Rosen...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 6:37pm.
Just like the failed Wisconsin recall democrat temper tantrum.... No big deal. Nothing to see here. These aren't the seats we wanted to keep anyway... Move along...
"First rule is, like, don't tweet pictures of yourself without your underpants because you'll turn all your constituents kerflooey. And they won't know what to do."
The constituents knew exactly what to do with a married, pervert, liberal politician sending pictures without his underpants to other YOUNG women while drawing a paycheck from the American Taxpayer. They went "kerflooey" (whatever that technically means) on the liberal democrat party and sent you, the weiner, and the party out of office!
Of course...
Submitted by GeneralAl on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 6:35pm.
Of course the problem is not Obama, it never is!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
One man's 'landslide' ....
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 7:09pm.
Obama wins the presidency with 52.7% of the total vote and that's a "landslide".
Obama "barely" wins the 9th District by an 11% margin and that's a narrow win.
You have to admire the guts of liberals to say things like this with a straight face.
Of course having an in-the-tank news media does help.
Not to mention this piece of comedy.
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 8:31pm.
"Here you have somebody who's sort of the anti-politician in Elizabeth Warren, really just a phenomenal consumer advocate, a professor, perceived to be the kind of nice lady truth-teller who really is smart and accomplished", yada yada. Sorry, but that's a laugher, just on the face of it. A "professor" who's a "truth-teller"? Like Obama?
And, Debbie Watercan Schlitz said it's no big deal, losing a district that the dems have held since 19and23. It certainly can't be viewed as a referendum on Obama./s
It's a what?
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 8:33pm.
"Having said that, the fact that it's an isolated seat"
"Isolated," my butt! It's another House vote for the Republicans, thus increasing their majority, which is a good thing! Or don't they want us to think about that? Had it turned out the other way around, I have no doubt that it would have been classified as a "backlash," a victory against the Tea Party.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Had it turned out the other
Submitted by HypocriteHater on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 9:44pm.
Had it turned out the other way around, I have no doubt that it would have been classified as a "backlash," a victory against the Tea Party.
That's exactly what they said about the Democrat Kathy Hochul who won Christopher Lee's seat, except the "backlash" was supposedly against Paul Ryan and his Medicare reform plan.
The response, coverage & silence from the Liberal Press is
Submitted by djwolf12 on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 8:41pm.
extremely astonishing for this special election. Anthony "Maintaining his hot physique" Weiner's old seat goes over to a Republican and the press buries it? The Silent Majority has had enough of this idiocy from the rimjobbers in the press.
You must remember the rules
Submitted by Marcus Porcius on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 8:47pm.
The rules for special elections are as follows:
If a Democrat wins, even if it's a liberal seat or if the Democrat ran as Ron Paul light, it's a huge referendum on everything from Ronald Reagan's movies to what tie Boehner is wearing...and the answer is not good for the Tea Party.
If a Republican wins, even if it's in a heavily Democrat district and he runs entirely on the idea that he wants to undo everything liberal starting with Obamacare, nope, sorry...doesn't mean anything...move along...these are not the droids you're looking for...
They're just keeping to the official press rules, right?
"Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." G.K. Chesterton
www.theconservativereview.com
I don't know how they do it.
Submitted by NeoKong on Wed, 09/14/2011 - 9:15pm.
The way that they can just lie right through their teeth when everything they say is so easily refudiated.
You are NOT
Submitted by Bob K on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 12:52am.
going to believe this. I came across this comment at the leftist website DU where they were discussing the election. Of course, many of them were condemning the result and balming the outcome on the "stupidity" of the voters. I expected that. But then there was this absolute gem of an exchange between two of them when one asked "what the party stands for:
tblue: "Epic fail there. People aren't as afraid of Teapubs as we were hoping. Sorry but it's true. What does this party stand for? I mean really and truly stand for? I freaking do not know so how can we expect voters in a swing district to know?"
tcaudilllg: "We stand for the gradual, egalitarian improvement of American living standards by means of enhanced technology, productivity, public services, and behavioral regulation.
LOL! "behavioral regulation" That really is how they think. LOL!
"behavioral regulation"
Submitted by celator on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 8:26am.
"behavioral regulation" LOL... yep, our little radical liberal friends see us as laboratory mice that need to be trained to respond positively to their little cheese munchies reward for pressing the correct political lever. They were raised as trained rats by their parents and schools and they think we were also. Too funny!
MIKA"S CLONE
Submitted by D'saredumbpeople on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 7:40am.
yippeeeee. they cloned MIKA....