CNN Looks to Obama to Solve Crisis of Partisanship
After quoting an op-ed which criticized President Obama for his partisanship, CNN's Carol Costello then asked her audience to chime in on how the President could "end the partisan bickering."
She appeared exasperated later in the hour when she read the responses to the question – all of them negative – and whined that there just had to be something Obama could do about America's partisan problem. "I mean, we're Americans, for god's sakes!" she exclaimed.
[Video below the break.]
Costello had quoted a Washington Post op-ed that criticized Obama for "pulling a blatantly partisan stunt" in scheduling his address to Congress for the night of the Republican Presidential Debate, on September 7. "This spat sums up so well the image problems that Obama has faced since the start of his term," the article stated.
Then after reporting the White House statement on the matter, Costello sounded like a disillusioned liberal. "Yawn," she described the statement, before reporting a liberal criticism of the President. "Obama's critics say he may want to look Congress in the eye and challenge them on jobs, but any dream of bipartisanship is just naive. The Daily Beast called the President the 'wimp in the White House' for expecting Republicans to compromise.
CNN anchor Suzanne Malveaux showed some more sense on the matter, remarking that it was a "tall order" for Obama to end the partisan sniping. "You know, every President tries to do this. It doesn't happen. It doesn't work," she told Costello.
"President Bush tried it before, as well. And President Obama said he tried to do the same – it's still essentially where it is. It's a – who knows what to do," Malveaux added.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 1 at 11:05 a.m. EDT, is as follows:
[11:05]
SUZANNE MALVEAUX: Carol, you know, it's not surprising, but it's another ugly dust-up in Washington between the President and Congress. But this time, it's not the economy, jobs, debt, right? It's over a scheduling conflict? Really?
CAROL COSTELLO: (Laughing)
MALVEAUX: Really?!
COSTELLO: Really! I wish I could say it isn't so, but it is. You know, Suzanne, President Obama's jobs plan is not exactly off to a fantastic start. The President has already had to postpone the unveiling of his plan by 24 hours to avoid a clash with Republicans. As a Washington Post op-ed put it, "This spat sums up so well the image problems that Obama has faced since the start of his term. If the White House has spent months working to appear above the partisan fray – as they insist they have – then pulling a blatantly partisan stunt like this torpedoes all of that PR work."
And don't think the Republicans running for President didn't pile on.
(Audio Clip)
Rep. MICHELE BACHMANN (R-Minn.), GOP presidential candidate: Now does this show maybe a little insecurity on the part of the President? Either A, he wants to distract the American people so they don't watch it, he doesn't want the American people to hear what the next president of the United States is going to say about the President's job plan.
(End Clip)
COSTELLLO: Whether you think that's fair or not, it may resonate more than a statement from the White House saying, quote, "the President is welcoming the opportunity to address a joint session of Congress on Thursday, so our nation's leaders can focus 100 percent of their attention on doing whatever they can to help the American people."
Yawn. Obama's critics say he may want to look Congress in the eye and challenge them on jobs, but any dream of bipartisanship is just naive. The Daily Beast called the President the wimp in the White House for expecting Republicans to compromise. The Daily Beast says, quote, "The plan can be bold. The plan can be modest. The point is that he has to fight for it like hell. But he won't. Please Mr. President – you're the guy who ran on change. Well, change."
So the "Talk Back" today: How can Obama end the partisan bickering?
(...)
MALVEAUX: Yeah, that's a tall order to ask the President.
(...)
[11:52]
COSTELLO: Give me a solution, people! There has to be one!
MALVEAUX: You know, every President tries to do this. It doesn't happen. It doesn't work. President Bush tried it before, as well. And President Obama said he tried to do the same – it's still essentially where it is. It's a – who knows what to do.
COSTELLO: I know. There's some – there has to be something you can do, though. I mean, we're Americans, for god's sakes!
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
We're Americans, says Carol?
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:11pm.
Really?
Hm, let's see. You guys are supporting someone who advocates re-writing the Constitution or at least shredding it to hell. You guys are supporting someone who wishes he could be a king or dictator and he's acting the bit of dictator already making demands instead of requests such as the joint congressional meeting. You guys are supporting someone who's spent tons of money on so many vacations and golf trips, way more than Bush ever has, and that he places a low priority on different things such as the incidents and situations that come up like the flooding and wildfires and so forth. You even support him when he's committing international crimes such as communicating with known terrorists, taking action against a country without any real interest for the US(speaking of Libya here) and prefers talking to America's enemies while disrespecting our allies. You guys are NOT Americans, you are ANTI-Americans.
And then you guys say any number of terrible things, numerous lies, and on and on about those who are against these things and still believe in the Constitution, everything that your manchild and his cohorts have done, you accuse the other side of doing, which are the Americans.
You can take your idea of being Americans and shove it, lady.
-Jon
Amen and
Submitted by dr-go on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:29pm.
well said.
Kudos
Submitted by Wildcatter1980 on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 9:12am.
Well said.
I would add that the President is POTUS in name only. That means if you do not support him and his efforts:
In other words, the President will only respect you if, IF, you support him in his policy choices. And that ladies and gentlemen is simply not Presidential.
--
If you want to know what liberal secular progressives are really doing, just listen to what they are accusing others of.
Recommended reading: Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
He can being by knocking off VP Biden . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:24pm.
. . . and then pardoning himself just prior to resigning from the Presidency.
COSTELLO: You know, Suzanne, President Obama's jobs plan is not exactly off to a fantastic start. The President has already had to postpone the unveiling of his plan by 24 hours to avoid a clash with Republicans.
He actually "had to postpone the unveiling of his plan" by a couple of weeks to avoid a clash with his vacation at Martha's Vineyard.
And that about sums up how important this grandiose plan is.
.
Galvanic,
Submitted by ant on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 12:05am.
Love the last line, and an excellent point.
I have to wonder, seeing how the postponement(sic) of the much anticipated, dreadfully important, stimulating speech from The One is being 'journolisted' as RAAAACCIIIIIIIISM! if maybe Obama planned his address to be moved and sent out a call to his media, "label them racists for denying me.". Isn't it sad that I would think a President would stoop to that level?
Well golly gee whiz, Carol,
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:30pm.
Well golly gee whiz, Carol, did it ever occur to you that Obama is the main cause?
Of course you didn't.
Exactly
Submitted by 98ZJUSMC on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 12:45am.
Exactly.
How
Submitted by John21 on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:33pm.
How can he solve the problems of partisanship when he is the primary cause?
He has created a toxic atmosphere in Washington with his arragance and ego that will only be solved in 2012 with his replacement. Washington can then quit the trivia politics of the Obama/liberal/union/muslim administration and begin to work for the country.
Obama solve partisanship?
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:37pm.
Trick question, right?
Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 8:35am.
Trick question, right?
Ronald Reagan
Well, sure!
Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 9:06am.
He was able to fix everything else! I mean, come on, how can anyone not realize that things are so much better, our enemies are less our enemies, we don't need our allies anymore, our country is so much more secure than ever before, everyone's got a job, prices are at their lowest and we have health care for all!
Why, he even diverts hurricanes and lowers the seas! Look at his accomplishments with Irene!
Oh man, if I type anymore crap like that, I'm gonna hurl.
-Jon
Obama can't solve it until he
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 10:42am.
Obama can't solve it until he acknowledges the fact he's the main cause of it.
The first step of a political twelve-step program.
Since Obama is such an extreme political idealogue who is also a megalomaniac, he will never acknowledge he's the cause of the problem.
In the spirit of bipartisanship to once and for all end...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:40pm.
... the bickering, all Democrats should embrace Republican goals and convert to capitalism and the problem will be solved.
CNN
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:41pm.
The Deceiver solve partisanship...him? Good luck with that sh*t.
The only 'Crisis of Partisanship' is that there isn't enough...
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 4:56pm.
...partisanship, as the repubs continue to roll over for Obama at nearly every opportunity.
Time for the GOP to start acting like an opposition party and seriously get in Obama's face early and often.
Or else quit and make room for some people that will actually oppose this dictator wanna-be before it's too late.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
"The Daily Beast called the
Submitted by ThePickle on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 6:04pm.
"The Daily Beast called the President the wimp in the White House for expecting Republicans to compromise."
And this says it all. The idea of bi-partisanship for these people is for Republicans to compromise.
They come to the table with a fixed proposal and as far as they are concerned the only negotiations will revolve around getting their opponents to "give in".
When that idea is soundly rejected and they are reminded that "negotiation" is a two way street they and the squawking harpies of the MSM just screech "OBSTRUCTIONISM"!!!!!
Next headline....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 6:13pm.
"CNN Looks To Muslim Brotherhood To Solve Crisis with Israel"
What a howler!
Submitted by russedav on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 6:31pm.
That's like looking to a rapist to protect virginity.
You mean the man that said
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 9:16pm.
you bring a knife and I'll bring a gun? The man that likes to remind those that disagree with him that he won, that's guy that will foster bipartisanship? That's the guy that told the GOP they can get to the back of this bus. These are the tones to bridge the gap?
I DON"T THINK SO.
Repressivist Inventionism
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Thu, 09/01/2011 - 11:32pm.
The American political system is partisan by design. Just look at the built-in safeguards in the branches of government scheme for the proof of that.
Compromise and bipartisanship are leftist tools they use to get what they want. Don't make deals with the agents of evil.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
I would've liked to have seen
Submitted by ant on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 12:10am.
I would've liked to have seen some of the responses to her question. Please don't tell me I have to link to CNN for that, I wouldn't want my friends to find out.
New Diet Book......
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Fri, 09/02/2011 - 9:42am.
On the heels of this we can eagerly expect Michael Moore's soon-to-be released diet and exercise book on how to be trim and fit, ready for that upcoming Ironman Triathlon.
And I hear that the bridge they'll run across is for sale, too!
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...