CNN's Piers Morgan Pushed Rudy Giuliani, Libertarian Comedian Jillette to Endorse Higher Taxes
CNN host Piers Morgan argued for tax hikes during interviews with two separate guests on his Tuesday night show.
The former British tabloid editor tried to persuade Rudy Giuliani, a possible GOP presidential candidate, that the Tea Party is in the minority in its stance against higher taxes and should consider spending cuts paired with increased tax revenues to cut the deficit.
[Video below the break.]
Later on in the show, Morgan hosted libertarian author Penn Jillette and stumped for raising taxes. "The solution is probably to raise taxes, to cut spending, to do special incentivizing for small business people," he told Jillette.
Morgan used poll numbers and the words of billionaire Warren Buffett to support his position. "Recent polls seem to be more and more in favor of tax increases. And then you have Warren Buffett, for example, one of the richest men in the country, almost pleading to be taxed more," he told Giuliani.
"Why not have a two-tier attack on this economy where you have more revenue, but you also dramatically reduce spending? What is wrong with that?" he posed.
During his interview with Jillette, Morgan touted a liberal view on the role of government. When his guest spoke of his concern that people are "thinking that somebody above us, someone in power, can take care of all of us, can fix everything," the CNN host replied "They should. It's their job in government, isn't it?"
He added that "when you've had these great recoveries from difficult times, they've come through great leadership and good government and big ideas." In this case, Morgan was referring to strong leadership and not necessarily big government. However, his previous quote lends to the thought that he believes in both.
He also said that in order for the rich to give financial assistance to the poor, "They have to be directed by government."
A transcript of the segments, which aired on August 16 at 9:10 p.m. and 9:42 p.m. EDT respectively, is as follows:
[9:10]
RUDY GIULIANI, former New York City mayor: And I think the President should pay less attention to the Republican candidates and more attention to the economy. I also think, you know, his criticism of the Republicans saying they wouldn't raise revenues, and his desire to get higher revenues is kind of a big mistake. What it shows is he's addicted to spending. He can't seem to get himself off the idea that he needs more revenue so he can spend more money.
The reason I wouldn't raise revenues has nothing to do with the rich or poor or these class warfare battle that he gets into. I wouldn't give the government any more money to waste. I think this government is a profound waster of money. Just like I wouldn't give a business more money to waste, I wouldn't give this government more money to waste.
MORGAN: Recent polls seem to be more and more in favor of tax increases. And then you have Warren Buffett, for example, one of the richest men in the country, almost pleading to be taxed more.
So although I understand the Tea Party in particular, and many Republicans alongside the Tea Party have got a bit of traction with this "we will not raise taxation" campaign – the reality is it wouldn't be that unpopular, would it? So why rule that out? Why not have a two-tier attack on this economy where you have more revenue, but you also dramatically reduce spending? What is wrong with that?
[9:42]
PIERS MORGAN: Give me the atheist way to get out of economic strife? In other words, harsh reality, with your business brain, successful guy, where has America gone wrong? What's the answer?
PENN JILLETTE, author, "God, No!": I always seem to think that the most important thing is individuals. And the most important thing is diversity. And the most important thing is to have someone like you, someone like me, who disagree on a very important issue – constantly talking, constantly working it out. I think that the problem is maybe thinking that somebody above us, someone in power, can take care of all of us, can fix everything.
MORGAN: They should. It's their job in government, isn't it? That's why you vote for people. It's why they get elected. It's why they run for office.
JILLETTE: I'm not sure that's exactly the way I see it.
MORGAN: But that's how it ought to be. When America has been revived in the past, whether it's FDR or Harry Truman or John F. Kennedy or Bill Clinton or Ronald Reagan – when you've had these great recoveries from difficult times, they've come through great leadership and good government and big ideas.
JILLETTE: That's not – the way it feels to me is that when you wait for a decision to be made from someone in power above you, and you give up your personal responsibility, you give up your own power. That's where the danger comes.
MORGAN: Yeah, but right now, small business people, for example, they have absolutely no mechanism out there to get their businesses going again. They just don't. It's just not there.
JILLETTE: Right.
MORGAN: So what do you say to those people? How do they – how do they operate? In this government –
JILLETTE: – the solution to give them government money?
MORGAN: I think the solution is probably to do a bit of that. The solution is probably to raise taxes, to cut spending, to do special incentivizing for small business people.
(...)
JILLETTE: But we know – there is a place for charity and there is a place for compassion.
MORGAN: It's not charity, though. That's completely the wrong response. It's not about me or you giving a few handouts to these people. This is about a system in America that's gone horribly wrong. When one in seven Americans is living off stamps, this system is broken.
JILLETTE: Well that's six in seven Americans that can help them.
MORGAN: Yes. How? They have to be directed by government.
JILLETTE: They do?
MORGAN: I think so.
JILLETTE: You don't think can you help people directly? I've seen experience of helping people directly.
MORGAN: On a mass scale that can change –
JILLETTE: Yeah. I think so. I think so.
MORGAN: Really?
JILLETTE: I think, you know, you got your Keva doing the micro loans all over the world that are making huge changes without any government force at all. Micro loans have ended up doing huge things overseas and now they're working a bit in the USA.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Dagnabit!
Submitted by HelenS on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 5:33pm.
Why the HECK don't these blow-hards set the example and PAY UP! NO one is stopping them from sending a check to the IRS as a show of support.
Hypocrites and frauds.
Me - "The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years - the cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil."
I torqued off the family
Submitted by dmntd1 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 10:42am.
I torqued off the family liberals by stating that the tax forms we file should change the "tax due" field to "minimum tax due". THEN let the uber-rich 'pay their fair share'. It'll be voluntary.
Alternatively, maybe we SHOULD raise taxes on the uber rich. Say, anyone worth (not making, mind you, but WORTH) over $10B and residing for more than 90 days in the U.S. is required to pay 50% on their capitol gains and 70% on their income. That will cover Soros, Gates and Buffettt. All three of whom are clamoring for higher taxes on the uber-rich.
We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.
taxes
Submitted by ray johnson on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 5:43pm.
Why is it that libs want so badly to raise taxes? It seems like it's their only answer. Is it like the saying, "If all you have is a hammer, every thing looks like a nail?" It's amounts to a very childish and simplistic way of thinking, and there wouldn't as a result be enough money...and if it did it would just get spent anyway. No number of super rich megalomaniac, attention seeking, faux-caring people can pay even a small portion of this dinner check. The disease malady must be more about not being able to say no, and not being able to connect cause and effect. That is, there really don't seem to them to be any negative outcomes coming from the massive overspending. The disconnect between the spending and economic outlook must be invisible to the dems.
Buffett EVADED taxes on
Submitted by FaulknerFan on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 5:55pm.
Buffett EVADED taxes on something like $10 Billion by transferring it to Bill Gates charity. Also, he set up his compensation as capital gains as opposed to salary specifically to avoid taxes. Then he says he pays less than his secretary who doesn't have the money to shift hers to capital gains. It's apples and oranges. The man is a complete hypocrite.
Piers "the phone hacker"
Submitted by jdhawk on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 6:26pm.
Piers "the phone hacker" Morgan wants us to raise taxes so that the socialist here can spend as freely as they do in the country he escaped from, Britain. There, they are instituting auterity measures after decades of huge government spending increases and their accompanying budget deficits. In Britain they tax up to 70% of your income counting the so-called Valued Added Tax that is now 20% on every purchased retail good.
In addition, Britain has gradually but surely cut the growth of all other programs except social programs including defense. This year marks the first year in five centuries that Britain can't say they are a "blue water" navy. They shelved their last remaining aircraft carrier. The third largest government employer on the planet is the British health care system after the Indian railway and the Chinese army.
Yeah, Hacker Morgan, it really is working in Britain. You can safely say it is NOT "great" Britain any longer.
Meanwhile, the old trick of talking conservatives into raising taxes today and putting off to never-never land reductions in the growth of government is fooling no one except maybe Speaker Boehner. In that idiotic deal Boehner championed we are reducing government by some $22 billion dollars in the coming fiscal year which begins on Oct 1, 2011. Meanwhile, the budget is $3.8 trillion, but only $2.2 trillion of that is payed for through taxes. The rest Geithner is running the printing presses for over at Treasury.
So, Hacker Morgan STFU.
Yes, Partisan Hacker Morgan,
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 7:07pm.
Yes, Partisan Hacker Morgan, STFU and go home!!!
"Keep Britain Tidy"
Rightly and accurately stated, jdhawk...
Submitted by packman on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 8:21am.
and not to mention that Great Britain's open immigration policies have practically eradicated the Brits themselves, with the non-British (mostly Muslim) population now nearly outnumbering natural born British citizens. Their policies have actually served to give away the soul of their country to foreigners. Too bad Morgan doesn't go back there to shore up those sagging numbers.
And those are exactly the kinds of policies that Morgan and others like him would have in place in this country. NOT!!
"...Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread..." ~Thomas Jefferson
Christine O’Donnell walked off the set of Piers Morgan show
Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 7:22pm.
today. O'Donnell is the former Delaware U.S. Senate candidate. O'Donnell is on a book tour promoting her book "Troublemaker". More info HERE.
She walked off?
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 8:04pm.
Morgan Piers is a snotty sleazy leftist partisan hack who loves playing "gotcha" with conservatives, particularly women. She should never have walk ON!
I completely agree. What is the value and benefit of
Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 8:12pm.
Conservatives and others on the right being badgered and treated with disrespect by appearing on the Leftist media? However, in this instance, Christine O'Donnell may have the last laugh. The publicity she will receive by walking off should help in publicizing her book.
Here is the Christine O'Donnell walkoff VIDEO
Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 8:53pm.
VIDEO.
As I wrote earlier:
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 1:37am.
She should NEVER have agreed to go on his show. Especially if she wasn't prepared to answer questions about the very book she went on to promote...including Morgan's tired old standby regarding gay marriage. If she's so unashamedly against it, she has nothing to lose in answering that or any other stupid question that jerk chooses to ask, in an honest and intelligent manner. Refusing to do so not only made her look as if she were dodging, but walking off was simply childish and just gave her detractors more ammo to bash the Tea Party with.
I know something Piers Morgan can hike
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 8:38pm.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
STOP SPENDING THE MONEY!!!
Submitted by Order270 on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 9:07pm.
How hard is that? Just stop spending it. I do it all the time. Prove to me you can balance the budget before you even think about mentioning the T-word.
Republican Counterpoint
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 9:58pm.
Ask how, how high, how much revenue, and what will any new revenue realized, if any, be spent on. Make these repressives be specific.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
What is lost ...
Submitted by Hog_Flambe on Wed, 08/17/2011 - 11:18pm.
... in the discussion is that Penn prefers an individuals' preference ( in regards to federalism) to Piers' state solutions to everything.
Piers Morgan - why does he
Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 4:35am.
Piers Morgan - why does he have a show???
Ronald Reagan
Raise Taxes On Business, (Already Highest In World) - Morgan
Submitted by Avitar on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 6:01am.
Piers "the phone hacker" Morgan does not intend this country well. Taxes are at the top and the country is crumbling beneath us.
Some Democrats favor "tax reform" which is possible if we begin taxing the 49% of low income earners that we don't today. Add a VAT and the politicians will be falling all over themselves to refund taxes that were never paid to the professionally unemployed just like in the Europe that Piers Morgan left.
Democrats do not want to allow business to deduct, as the Europeans do, for plant and equipment, entertaining vendors and customers and in general every perk and junket business can make a case for. .
Piers Morgan=FULL BLOWN,
Submitted by Diesel on Thu, 08/18/2011 - 9:35am.
Piers Morgan=FULL BLOWN, LIBERAL RETARD