CNN's Zakaria: Obama's Afghan Speech 'Remarkable Speech for an American President'
By Matt Hadro | June 24, 2011 | 16:45
Fareed Zakaria, CNN's world affairs analyst, hailed President Obama's Afghanistan speech as a "remarkable speech for an American president" Wednesday and defended the president's decision to ignore the advice of his generals on the target dates for pulling troops out of Afghanistan.
"It was a remarkable speech for an American president in the caution, the strategic emphasis, rather than the idealistic emphasis," sounded Zakaria, no stranger to praising Obama's foreign policy speeches. He lauded the president's May 19 Mideast speech as "remarkably comprehensive" and "fair" and "balanced."
[Video below the break.]
He also gave positive reviews of his "very thoughtful" face-to-face conversations with Obama on foreign policy. "What I'm struck by, though, honestly, Eliot, is how much time he's spending thinking about the issues of the Arab spring particularly the issues of Egypt," Zakaria told CNN's Eliot Spitzer May 12.
On Wednesday, the CNN pundit claimed Obama was "boxed in" by the military at the beginning of his presidency and only now has been able to carry out the foreign policy ideals he championed when running for office. He also defended Obama's refusal to heed the advice of Gen. David Petraeus on when the draw troops out of Afghanistan.
"Every general always wants more troops. And I think that the job of the president is to say, I have concerns beyond just Afghanistan and Iraq....And I've got to look at our – how much we have spent on these wars in blood and treasure."
On Thursday night, Zakaria also appeared on In the Arena to preview his interview with Afghan president Hamid Karzai, to air on his 10 a.m. EDT Sunday show Fareed Zakaria GPS. The CNN host claimed that the Taliban members who have returned to Afghanistan "do not have global jihadist aims. In other words, they don't want to kill Americans."
A transcript of the Anderson Cooper 360 segment, which aired on June 22 at , is as follows:
ANDERSON COOPER: Fareed, first of all, what do you make of the president's announcement tonight?
FAREED ZAKARIA, CNN world affairs analyst: I think it's been in keeping with his basic strategic rationale from the start. He did announce the surge. Part of that was I think the military boxed him in. You remember Stan McChrystal leaked his recommendation. It became very difficult for a Democratic president to overturn it. But Obama has started his presidency saying, we are too committed overseas, we are too militarily engaged, we have too large a footprint, we have got to re-balance, we have got to focus on nation-building at home, we have got to focus on Asia.
And he sounded all those themes. It was a remarkable speech for an American president in the caution, the strategic emphasis, rather than the idealistic emphasis. He said things like, we must be as pragmatic as we are passionate, as strategic as we are resolute. People would have us – have America overextend itself, confronting every evil that could be found abroad. This is reminiscent of a very different strain of America, in many ways a strain that goes back before the Cold War.
(...)
COOPER: Do you both agree that this is a movement away from the McChrystal counterinsurgency, and more to a counterterrorist-style operation?
ZAKARIA: I think it is. I think that it clearly is a movement in that direction. It may not happen in the next few months because they will clearly want to show the Taliban that they are not drawing down. But there are two signs of that. The first is, of course, the nature of the troop withdrawal. The second is, who is going to prosecute the counterterrorism strategy for the United States over the next three or four years? David Petraeus. The movement of David Petraeus to the head – to become head of the CIA is very significant in this respect, because what he is doing is saying to Petraeus, you make counterterrorism work as well as you have made counterinsurgency work in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(...)
GERGEN: And I, frankly, must say, what I'm partly puzzled about is, when you're trying to wind down a war – and everybody agrees you have to wind it down in Afghanistan -- you've got a general who's turned around two wars, is the most successful general of modern times. And he comes to you with a recommendation on how to do it, and you say, no thank you. I'm going to do it a different way. I find that puzzling.
ZAKARIA: Every general always wants more troops. And I think that the job of the president is to say, I have concerns beyond just Afghanistan and Iraq. I have got to look at America's strategic –
GERGEN: I agree with that.
ZAKARIA: And I've got to look at our – how much we have spent on these wars in blood and treasure.
GERGEN: He's got the best defense secretary in decades. He's got the best general in place in a long time. And he did not accept their recommendation.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments



















Comments
Once again, the media show the
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:22pm.
Once again, the media show the soft bigotry of low expectations. Because, you know, it's unheard of for a president to make a decision against the wishes of his generals.
Sen. John Kerry thought otherwise:
It’s long past time for a President who insists that he listens to his generals – and not politicians – to finally heed his own advice, and to end a disgraceful record of ignoring the very military the Administration professes to believe in.
Oh, wait! He was talking about George W. Bush. Nevermind.
It was "remarkable" all right.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:14pm.
It isn't everyday that an American president goes on prime time television to announce that he is ordering the U.S. military to retreat.
I'm sure the tolly-bon is still celebrating their victory and going on a 12 month drunk until they can just walk in and assume control.
Some day soon, some Republican will have to go back to Alf-land to sort it all out. I hope by then we just leave one huge crater and are home by dark.
You mean RINOs like McCain and Graham?
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:25pm.
They are about the only real "hawks" remaining on Afghanistan.
Jer
My two favorite ahh, souls, Jer.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:39pm.
McCain and Graham may as well switch to the Democrat Party as far as I'm concerned. They're idiots.
They want to half-fight a war. I want to see total and complete victory with surrender or total destruction.
Don't start it if you're not going to finish the enemy forever, or at least another 500 years.
I get so tired of
Submitted by UpNorth on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:17pm.
liberals like Zacharia bemoaning the spending of "blood and treasure".
It's hypocrisy, because they're just worried about the treasure, most could care less about the blood.
"We have too large a footprint"? What does Fareed Obama, er Zacharia think of Yemen, Kosovo, LIBYA? How is our involvement in those places reducing our footprint.
"We've got to focus on Asia"? Um, Fareed, if that's your real name, do you even know where Afghanistan is? Here's a clue, it's in Southwest Asia.
The entire Middle East is in
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:34pm.
The entire Middle East is in Asia!
Here you go, Fareed....
I guess to him "Asia" means "China."
I think he took the same geography class as Rick Sanchez.
You're right, MB.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:56pm.
Like all good muslimes, Zackie is willing to forge an alliance with communist and socialist countries if they will further his aim of destruction of the USA.
After they accomplish that, they will then turn their attention to the destruction of the communist and socialist "godless" countries. They have very different views on God to say the least.
China is a problem on the horizon for the muslimes. They would love for the USA and China to go after each other, allowing them to take care of the rest of the world. Then when China and the USA have battered each other, the muslimes can step in and finish off whoever is left standing ... they think.
My hope is that they overreach with the Chinese who will not hesitate, unlike us, to stomp the living shiite out of the bastards. They will take NO prisoners.
We should have the CIA working overtime helping that conflict along. It should be entertaining to watch. Hell, China is still mad about Genghis Khan. They would love to take out their share of the muslime world and any others that get in their face.
I agree with you on what I
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:52pm.
I agree with you on what I perceive to be China's view and dealing with Moooooooooooslems. And I think that the only place that they really have any trouble with it is in western China, and I don't think that they hesitate to lay down the law and put the hurt on them if ANYTHING goes against their way of doing things. And I think that Islam probably knows this about China, so it isn't on the short list of places that they want to overrun..........because they KNOW that they will get their Mooooooooooooooooslem asses handed to them.
Of course, we are easy pickings here, because we wouldn't want to hurt anybody's feelings or seem like we're .......'intolerant'?????
Actually, I believe that Genghis Khan ( can I prounouce it the way that John F**king Kerry did?) laid waste to Persia and killed millions of them..................of course, he did the same thing whereever he went, right??
Moron Zakaria
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:34pm.
It was nothing more than a political speech, a campaign speech, you moron! Remarkably poor speech analysis for even a non-American. Go back to wherever the hell it is you came from foreigner. This is our country.
__________________________________________________________________________
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Yeah, HardRight...........but
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:54pm.
Yeah, HardRight...........but this supposed foreign affairs 'expert' probably HELPED Boy Bin Barry WRITE the damn tedious, boring, surrendering speech................so he's probably patting himself on the back at the same time!!! Remember, he IS a part-time advisor or foreign affairs to Osama Obama.
After having been outed as an
Submitted by robert108 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:43pm.
After having been outed as an obama advisor, how can anyone take FZ seriously as a journalist?
His bias is obvious.
Oh, barf!
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:53pm.
"What I'm struck by, though, honestly, Eliot, is how much time he's spending thinking about the issues of the Arab spring particularly the issues of Egypt,"
Gush, slobber, drool........isn't he amazing???
Could Zakaria be any more worshipful????
I saw an add in Our State
Submitted by ricklail on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:08pm.
I saw an add in Our State magazine where this asswipe will be speaking at Guilford College in Greensboro April 2012. Maybe he will ignorant away by then.
Give CNN a Break!
Submitted by NC Boy on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:10pm.
With their money troubles, it only makes sense to use on-air talent that is paid by the White House.
After his Leno appearance
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:38pm.
After his Leno appearance where Fareed Zakaria claimed to be better because he choose to come to the USA vs all the people who live here because of what he said was "the accident of birth" I can not even listen to his left wing re-visioning of America. He insulted every father who has been an American who built this country.
Fareed Zakaria we let you come to this country with open arms, now you just insult the people of the country you come too. Fareed Zakaria's hatred of people is OK, because he believes he knows better. What a POS
I watched the entire Leno/Zakaria interview...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:31pm.
and your depiction of it--and your accusation that he "insulted every father, etc."--is absolutely absurd.
Jer
Jer, I watched the entire interview, too.
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 4:44pm.
What do you think Zakaria meant when he said "...I am an immigrant, I'm not an American by accident of birth as Glenn Beck is. I'm an American by choice"?
Isn't it reasonable to infer that Zakaria feels that people who come to America by choice are superior to people who are Americans by "accident of birth"?
Isn't the phrase "American by accident of birth" in and of itself a dismissive statement that is insulting to Americans who were born here?
If, during a conversation in which Glen Beck is being derided, Zakaria uses a derogatory statement like "...American by accident of birth as Glenn Beck is", is Zakaria not denigrating all Americans who are "American by accident of birth"?
I don't think the depiction of Zakaria's statement was "absolutely absurd" as you claimed. I think Zakaria's statement was clearly an insult.
CX
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 5:19pm.
Isn't the phrase "American by accident of birth" in and of itself a dismissive statement that is insulting to Americans who were born here?
No. It shouldn't be construed as such. Beck, as he has done in the past, reacted to one's political differences by insinuating a lack of patriotism and insufficient 'Americanism'. In this case, he had labeled Zakaria a "useful idiot" and an "out-and-out America basher". It was those slimy, McCarthyesque charges which Zakaria--who has said he fell in love with this country when he first arrived here--explicitly addressed, and the fact that he chose to come here was evidence of his admiration for America, not a claim of moral superiority over all who were born here.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 7:15pm.
You shouldn't try to excuse Zakaria's condescension by appealing to Beck's comments.
There is a huge difference between the phrases "American by birth" and "American by accident of birth."
Zakaria's use of the latter was an insult.
CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:15pm.
You shouldn't mischaracterize Zakaria's words as condescension by ignoring the context in which they were spoken as well as the pretext on which they were based, i.e. Beck's anti-American smear.
Again, Zakaria was neither insulting nor demeaning the patriotism of those who were born in this country, but, having had his own loyalty called into question, simply pointing out that his choosing to come here and live here was in and of itself evidence of his admiration for America.
Jer
Jer...
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:30pm.
Zakaria's statement taken in context is clearly consescending and meant as an insult. He made it clear he believes that someone who immigrates to America is superior to someone who is "American by accident of birth."
If Zakaria had responded to Beck's comments by saying, as you did, his choosing to come here and live here was in and of itself evidence of his admiration for America, there wouldn't be an issue. It's his inability to make that statement without wrapping it in an insult that's the problem.
Well, CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:04pm.
We disagree. I heard nothing that was condescending nor insulting to the hundreds of millions of Americans who were born in this country and obviously neither did Leno inasmuch as he immediately applauded Zakaria's remark. I can assure you Jay Leno is not in business to 'clearly' insult--or endorse the deliberate insulting of--the vast majority of his viewing audience.
Jer
Refresh your memory, Jer
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:22pm.
Leno applauded when Zakaria said he is not an American by birth as Glenn Beck is.
Of course Leno is not in business to insult the vast majority of his viewing audience, which is clearly comprised mostly of liberals, and is in no danger of going so by endorsing Zakaria's statement.
Zakaria's statement is an insult whether you choose to see it that way or not.
We disagree.
My memory didn't need refreshing...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:44pm.
I had just watched the video for a second time five minutes before posting my previous comment. What is your point?
With respect to the ideology of Leno's viewing audience, is your statement based on hard data or is it just a supposition?
Jer
In answer to your question about Leno's audience, Jer,
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:01pm.
let's let Mr. Leno speak for himself:
Jay Leno says, “I’m not conservative. I’ve never voted that way in my life...He believes “the media is in the pocket of the government, and they don’t do their job” so “you have people like Michael Moore who do it for them.” He has on his joke-writing staff a number of former professional speechwriters for Democratic candidates. “No Republicans.”
If, as Leno says, he is not conservative then it follows that he is going to attract far more liberal viewers than conservative viewers.
As to your question about my point, my point is that Zakaria's statement about being "American by accident of birth" is an insult.
We disagree.
One more thing, CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:00pm.
Are you suggesting Leno, an American by birth, enjoys being one of the targets of a deliberate insult? And that American born liberals likewise have no objection to being insulted by Zakaria?
Jer
To your one more thing, Jer...
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:13pm.
Based on the response by Leno and his audience to Zakaria's statement, I would have to conclude that not only do they have no objection to being insulted by Zakaria, they will applaud him for doing so.
Maybe they didn't realize they were being insulted. Maybe they wish they were immigrants, too. Who knows? I have trouble understanding how liberals' minds work.
CX...Maybe this will help.
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:36pm.
Bill Maher Heckled by 'Tonight Show' Crowd for Saying Conservatives Want to Kill People They Disagree With
By Noel Sheppard | January 12, 2011 | 15:51
Comedian Bill Maher had a tough evening on the "Tonight Show" Tuesday.
As he spewed his typical vitriol at conservatives and Republicans, he continued to get negative feedback from the audience (video follows with transcript and commentary):
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/01/12/bill-maher-heckled-tonight-show-crowd-saying-conservatives-want-kill-#ixzz1QLVmzLJL
Jer, you're practicing rhetorical legerdemain
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 12:09pm.
My point in this string is not the composition of Leno's audience. That is a topic you introduced.
I believe you are attempting to divert the converstation from my original point which is that Zakaria's statement about being "American by accident of birth" is an insult.
I will be more than happy to explore the political composition of Leno's audience some other time.
My point is that Zakaria's statement about being "American by accident of birth" is an insult.
We disagree.
CX...Check again. You are mistaken.
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 3:45pm.
I only mentioned Leno's viewing audience as an implication of the obvious: that most are American born. You are the one who introduced the issue of its political composition.
That said, we do seem to have reached a dead end on the fundamental question.
Cheers,
Jer
Mistaken on a minor point, Jer.
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 4:29pm.
It's true that I introduced the political composition of Leno's audience, but it was germaine to the discussion at that point. I was wrong to say that you introduced it. You, however, are the one who subsequently attempted to make it the central issue.
Let me recap for you:
You said:
I can assure you Jay Leno is not in business to 'clearly' insult--or endorse the deliberate insulting of--the vast majority of his viewing audience.
I replied showing why Leno was in no danger of insulting his viewing audience:
Of course Leno is not in business to insult the vast majority of his viewing audience, which is clearly comprised mostly of liberals, and is in no danger of going so by endorsing Zakaria's statement.
You responded:
With respect to the ideology of Leno's viewing audience, is your statement based on hard data or is it just a supposition?
I replied with the following Leno quote:
Jay Leno says, “I’m not conservative. I’ve never voted that way in my life...He believes “the media is in the pocket of the government, and they don’t do their job” so “you have people like Michael Moore who do it for them.” He has on his joke-writing staff a number of former professional speechwriters for Democratic candidates. “No Republicans.”
To which you replied:
Are you suggesting Leno, an American by birth, enjoys being one of the targets of a deliberate insult? And that American born liberals likewise have no objection to being insulted by Zakaria?
To which my answer was:
Based on the response by Leno and his audience to Zakaria's statement, I would have to conclude that not only do they have no objection to being insulted by Zakaria, they will applaud him for doing so.
And your response was an attempt to show that Leno's audience is not predominately liberal by showing that Mahr hadn't gotten a warm reception from them during a visit with Leno:
Bill Maher Heckled by 'Tonight Show' Crowd for Saying Conservatives Want to Kill People They Disagree With
To which I responded that you were attempting to divert the conversation from Zakaria's insult to a discussion of the composition of Leno's audience.
As I said in in the beginning, I introduced the fact that Leno's audience is Liberal. I was wrong to say that you introduced it. However, the fact remains that you are attempting to divert the conversation from my original point which is that Zakaria's statement about being "American by accident of birth" is an insult.
That being said, I agree that we have reached a dead end on the fundamental issue that Zakaria insulted all who are Americans by birth.
Have a great day!
"American by accident of birth."
Submitted by Boudin on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:13pm.
I garrendamtee ya, it's a damn sight better then were he was accidentally born. Where ever that was!
Obama is following Zakaria's "Weak America" advice...
Submitted by OxyCon on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:43pm.
...while he's telling General Petraeus to pound sand.
We should send Fareed Zakaria on an all expenes paid vacation...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:20pm.
...to the next round of camel races over in India.
Only, the airline ticket should be one-way.
BTW: Is Fareed camelese for Fred?
-Dave
Fred?
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 8:43pm.
More like Faraud!
Ruk,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:24pm.
Actually, I like that even better.
-Dave
I knew you fa-would
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:54pm.
LOL! Put another steak on the barbie for me buddy. : )
Ruck, I have seen a Porterhouse with your name on it
Submitted by Dave. on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:13am.
LOL - And when I can actually afford to buy it, I'll be sure and drop it on the Weber for ya. :-)
BTW: How do you like yours cooked?
-Dave
Porterhouse?
Submitted by Rukus on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:17am.
I will SO come and visit you if you will grill me a big porterhouse! I like mine medium-rare. Just let me know buddy, I'll be there come whatever. : )
And take the Turkish Turd,
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:56pm.
And take the Turkish Turd, Shank Hunger, with him................
killa,
Submitted by Dave. on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:17am.
Yeah, it's like I said on another thread yesterday, they can both split the one-way ticket.
After all, we know what they do on trains when you run out of fare.
Heck, it might just work the same way on certain airlines.
Kind of a two-birds-with-one-stone sort of thing. :-)
-Dave
Can't square the circle
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:20pm.
ZAKARIA: Every general always wants more troops. And I think that the job of the president is to say, I have concerns beyond just Afghanistan and Iraq. I have got to look at America's strategic –
"I''ve got a re-election next year, and I have to appease my anti-war base."
GERGEN: "He's got the best defense secretary in decades. He's got the best general in place in a long time. And he did not accept their recommendation."
So, does that constitute a sound strategic decision?
Once again, liberals can't square the circle.
In Afghanistan, Obama has set and declared a timetable for withdrawal over the advice of experts and regardless of the consequences. Essentially, we declare the job done and leave, ala Vietnam. The Taliban and AQ merely wait us out, as they planned all along.
Simultaneously, Obama and his allies (Lieberman, Reid, Rubio, McCain, Graham, Kerry, et al) maintain that we cannot cease military operations against Libya until we secure a victory (not quite defined beyond the exit of Gaddafi) or our national security will be imperiled.
Afghanistan was approved by the Congress; Libya has not been approved after months of activity.
Can anyone offer a stream of logic that meshes the two?
Also like Vietnam
Submitted by ckc1227 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 2:32am.
"Essentially, we declare the job done and leave, ala Vietnam."
Unfortunately, also like Vietnam, we aren't really in it to win it, so we may as well bring them home. If we were, it would have been over 5 years ago.
A remarkable B.S.
Submitted by Bob K on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:26pm.
campaign speech by a hack politician with an enormous ego. Beyond that, I was not impressed.
Next question is
Submitted by Tjexcite on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:36pm.
Next question is what did Obama have for breakfast yesterday. Fareed is so far up Obama's colon he has to move to the side to let it by. And as they share a bed every night but, Zakaria is a fair and balanced in his options.
The very second I heard Obama praise Pakistan:
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:42pm.
I went on Youtube and listened to Reagan's NY campaign speech. Reagan WAS, and WILL ALWAYS BE the best president of this country. Obama is nothing but an empty suit that will GO AGAINST every single issue that this country is for.
Remarkable as we haven't
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:40pm.
had many anti American leaders. Yup, that's remarkable.
This loser is a dead ringer for
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:43pm.
Achmed
yep wish he would turn his
Submitted by jkwtrading on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:35pm.
yep wish he would turn his cell phone on near the pump...
Maybe CNN decided to have
Submitted by RMR on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:47pm.
Maybe CNN decided to have their local broadcast mirror CNN International by bashing everything American and appointed Fareed Zakaria to spearhead the effort.
How else do you explain him repeatedly attacking the American Constitution? Advising Obama? Viciously attacking Conservatives? Advising Obama? Openly disrespecting all American Presidents that came before Obama? Uh, did I mention he's advising Obama? Oh yeah, I did.
Anyway, I think something's up. At this point those desperate souls at CNN will do anything for ratings.
Dear, "Faraud"* ...
Submitted by Hog_Flambe on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:27pm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgz5-8chSlk
* Props to Rukus :-D
Of course Fareed liked Obama's speech...
Submitted by Sasquatch on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:49pm.
...Fareed probably WROTE the stupid thing.
→ We heard that, Fareed!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:50am.
I was slammin' back cocktails with Maureen Dowd and she said she heard you say "Nice speech, boy"!
Fareed, why are you so patronizingly condescending of people who can read a teleprompter? Even if it had not been a good speech (and it wasn't) you would be driven to say it was.
Bla, bla bla bla bla obama's
Submitted by jessieH on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:47am.
Bla, bla bla bla bla obama's great bla bla bla bla. THIS is our media. Trustworthy? Or paid for?
Lack of credibility
Submitted by Student1776 on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 5:17pm.
Zakaria long ago surrendered any claim to impartiality with Re Obama - from the time he took on the role of "advisor" and started doing interviews with unending softball questions. It would be nice to have an intelligent CNN analyst who is not in the administrations pocket as a cheerleader but just asked the obvious key questions.