Gullible Wolf Blitzer: I 'Sort of Believed' Weiner's Lie
CNN's Wolf Blitzer admitted Monday that he believed Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) when the congressman told him in an interview that he did not send a lewd photo of himself over Twitter. Blitzer related to CNN's Piers Morgan Monday evening his thoughts immediately after the interview.
"I'm saying to myself, you know what, it sounds to me like it may have been his picture, but it was out there, but somebody else hacked it and somebody else sent it out to embarrass him. I sort of believed, you know, that line," he confessed.
[Click here for audio. Video below the break.]
Blitzer had revealed similar details earlier right after Weiner confessed Monday afternoon to sending the lewd picture of himself to a 21 year-old woman. "When I sat with [Weiner] about 20 minutes the other day he seemed so convincing," Blitzer observed, "he seemed to make the case, 'you know what, there may be photos out there but I did not send that photo on Twitter to that young college student in Washington state' and now he admits that was a flat out lie."
Also in the interview, Blitzer connected Weiner's lie with former President Clinton's cover-up of his relations with Monica Lewinsky. He said Clinton looked right at him as he lied about his relationship with Lewinski.
"I was the network television pool correspondent when [Clinton] looked me – and I was standing right there, and he had that famous line, 'I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky' – he was looking right at me when he said that."
Although, Blitzer bizarrely added, because Clinton was a Southerner the phrase "sexual relations" could have meant something different to him than to others and thus it may not have been a lie.
"Now, technically, as [Clinton] later testified, before, you know, the investigation, the phrase 'sexual relations' had a specific meaning in his mind as opposed to the kind of sex he and Monica Lewinsky were engaged in. So, technically, it may not have been a lie, because as a Southerner 'sexual relations' meant certain things to him that it didn't mean [to others]."
"Now, remember, Bill Clinton, he came through, and his reputation is very high right now," Blitzer affirmed.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on June 6 at approximately 9:07 p.m. EDT, is as follows:
PIERS MORGAN: Well, watching that clip of you and him, he was so credible, really. You know, he was looking you straight in the eye.
WOLF BLITZER: I've got to tell you, when I left that – I was in his Capitol Hill office, in the House of Representatives, and I remember rushing back to our CNN studios in Washington, and I'm saying to myself, you know what, it sounds to me like it may have been his picture, but it was out there, but somebody else hacked it and somebody else sent it out to embarrass him. I sort of believed, you know, that line, especially when some technology experts were telling me, there are certain Twitter, you know, TweetPic opportunities where it's not that difficult to get somebody else – to look like somebody else is sending a picture that really you're sending.
MORGAN: In all your time, Wolf, at CNN, have you ever had anyone in political life, reasonably high office, look you in the eye and lie like Anthony Weiner did?
BLITZER: Well, I was in the Roosevelt Room when Bill Clinton was accused of the Monica Lewinsky. I was the network television pool correspondent when he looked me – and I was standing right there, and he had that famous line, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky" – he was looking right at me when he said that.
Now, technically, as he later testified, before, you know, the investigation, the phrase "sexual relations" had a specific meaning in his mind as opposed to the kind of sex he and Monica Lewinsky were engaged in. So, technically, it may not have been a lie, because as a Southerner "sexual relations" meant certain things to him that it didn't mean. But it sort of, you know, it reminded me of all of those sordid days. Now, remember, Bill Clinton, he came through, and his reputation is very high right now.
MORGAN: And it gets higher all the time. Maybe I asked you the wrong question, Wolf – is it the other way around? Is it, when these politicians look you in the eye, Wolf Blitzer, in these times of personal crisis, should we believe the complete opposite? Are you the barometer for them lying?
BLITZER: In all my years, and most almost always, you know, there are plenty of liars out there, but they tell the truth, and if they're going to – they don't blatantly lie as Anthony Weiner did, you know so specifically. He knew it was a lie, and he just spoke out the way he did, because he says he was embarrassed and he was –
MORGAN: He apologized to a few people from the podium. Has he apologized to you yet?
BLITZER: Well he apologized to everybody, he didn't apologize to me directly, specifically didn't call me up or anything like that, and he doesn't have to, you know. I think to our viewers, though, a lot of people were watching, here in the United States and around the world, you know, he went on television, he should have just, you know, kept his mouth shut and not said anything rather than blatantly going out there and lying. But he was arrogant, and he thought he could get away with it, as he himself now acknowledges, and he made a huge, huge mistake.
MORGAN: You've seen people resign or be fired over very serious financial impropriety and so on or criminal activity. This does raise again that whole issue of personal misbehavior against a political life or life in high office? What's your view? I mean, you've seen them come and go over the years. Do you actually believe that it is material to a man's fitness to preside in high office in American politics as to how he conducts himself in his private life?
BLITZER: I think to most Americans, it is. If you want to serve in the House or the Senate, or as President of the United States, for that matter, the American public wants to hold you up to a much higher standard, as if you're just a private citizen and you make a mistake and move on. But when you're elected to public office, they expect that you're going to have some standards right there. And, you know, he made a huge, huge mistake, and we'll see if he can survive this, (a), as I said, with his own marriage, but (b), with his political career.
MORGAN: Are you a betting man?
BLITZER: No.
MORGAN: If you were, how long would you give him?
BLITZER: I don't know. I know there are other members of Congress, Chris Lee – that congressman from Upstate New York who showed that photo of him on Craigslist or whatever, he didn't survive. Some other members of Congress might survive. I think it's – I would say it's 50/50 right now, depends on how this falls out. And I think a lot will depend on how his wife reacts publicly as well, because she's a wonderful, wonderful woman. She doesn't deserve this.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
That's the thing with people who are comfortable lying....
Submitted by krendler on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 6:44pm.
...they've had a lot of practice and, for that reason, they're good at it.
Live and learn, Wolf.
Imagine that!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 6:48pm.
Wolf believing a Democrat?
You can drop the "sort of", Wolf.
Insight
Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:04pm.
And Blitzer comes across as such an elite and know-it-all reporter pertaining to politicians?? Appears his insight is quite flawed when Dem's do the nasty. He spent hours on Foley and Craig.
Let's see . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:23pm.
Blitzer accepted that a photo of an underwear shrouded erection may be Weiner . . .
BLITZER: "and I'm saying to myself, you know what, it sounds to me like it may have been his picture, but it was out there . . "
. . . But without wondering why such a photo of Weiner would be "out there," he accepts Weiner's explanation that he'd been hacked.
Did anyone get the number of the turnip truck this guy fell off of?
Even in Weiner's lame mea culpa Modnay afternoon, he stated that he had intended to send the photo to a woman on the West Coast "as a joke," -- why would a woman thing this was a joke?
With clown's like Blitzer in the MSM, it's no wonder the journalism is absent.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the dumbest man on TV...
Submitted by PrairieSky on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:29pm.
Wolf "...I sort of believed, you know, that line..." Blitzer...
Wolf, you "sort of believed" Weiner's bs because as a good little liberal, you wanted to believe it. This isn't about gullibility...It's about bias....Pure and simple.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
Wolf Blitzer is as dumb as a
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:29pm.
Wolf Blitzer is as dumb as a car full of Meghan McCains
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Wow! That's pretty dumb...
Submitted by PrairieSky on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:39pm.
And a car full of Meghan McCains?? That's scary!
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
Even more frightening, the
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:43pm.
Even more frightening, the Make Believe Media treats Meghan as if her opinions matters . . .
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Meghan McCain is nothing more than a useful idiot for the left..
Submitted by PrairieSky on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:52pm.
Her opinion, such as it is, isn't worth a cup of spit, and only matters to the left because it usually is critical of those on the right.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
Precisely!
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 8:07pm.
Precisely!
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Figures
Submitted by Joe C Camel on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 7:46pm.
How could you be duped by this Wolfie my friend? He is a politician and his mouth moved. What more proof did you need?
Dear Wolf:
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 8:04pm.
Leave your dentures under your pillow tonight.
When you awake in the morning, there will be a five-dollar bill in their place, which you may use to purchase lunch tomorrow in the CNN Cantina.
And you know why I kind of believed that
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 8:17pm.
Because I'm not a news journalist I'm a water boy hack for the left wing in this country and if anything leans right it's evil but if it leans left it's got to be good. I mean how could a democrat possibly have done something like this?
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Wolfe Baby-
Submitted by JIMMY1660 on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 8:32pm.
you must have gotten shell shock from those roof tops in Baghdad-
Liberal Scum bags
you amaze me with your stupidity.
→ Is it true?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 9:02pm.
Is it true Congress may pull Weiner's franking privilege?
Barney's
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 9:12pm.
Gonna be chapped
→ Barney's Purple Dinosaur
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 9:17pm.
Maybe he should give it a rest.
Blitzer
Submitted by jessieH on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 9:47pm.
Hey, I believed he was lying from day one. I guess CNN needs to hear from their boss, Soros, before they pick sides.
There, there...
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 10:23pm.
Of course you did, Wolfie. Of course you did.
Blitzer is a putz and always
Submitted by mostlymoderate on Tue, 06/07/2011 - 11:32pm.
Blitzer is a putz and always will be. However, he shouldn't feel bad about almost falling for Weiner's B.S. story. Seriously, I almost fell for it too. I know things can be done with Photoshop that would blow the mind. I know there are a lot of nefarious people out "there" in cyberspace. I was ready to give The Weener the benefit of the doubt. Damn I feel stupid.
Hell, Wolfie has been
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 12:28am.
Hell, Wolfie has been believing all of the lib/Dem lies for years, and reporting them as 'truth', so why wouldn't he be going for this one too????
Remember "Balloon Boy"?
Submitted by Too Old To Be Cool on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 1:12am.
When the kid told his dad "we did it for a show", Blitzer never pressed for a full explanation. The dad BS-ed his way out of it and Blitzer never pushed for a real answer...you know, like a JOURNALIST IS SUPPOSED TO.
Careful Wolfe...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 1:31am.
...He know's when you are sleeping, he know's when you're awake,
He knows when you've been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake...
Honest mistake Wolf
Submitted by SharonMcP on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 2:35am.
My "sort of" pregnancies are 35, 31, 29, 27 and 25.
Yo, Blitzer, seems to me you always believe dem/lib/prog lies.
Submitted by texasborngranny on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 8:12am.
Weiner said: '...you know what, there may be photos out there...' Well? How'd they get 'out there', bub? Even if he 'did not send that photo on Twitter to that young college student...' HE would have had to put it out there to begin with.
Blitzer said: 'they don't blatantly lie as Anthony Weiner did, you know so specifically. He knew it was a lie, and he just spoke out the way he did, because he says he was embarassed.' Yeah, politicians lie, but when we have this kind of proof of their blatant disregard for the truth, it is time for them to go.
Morgan asked Blitzer: 'Do you actually believe that it is material to a man's fitness to preside in high office in American politics as to how he conducts himself in his private life?' The twitter might be considered part of his private life, but HIS LIES were to the PUBLIC.
Possibly true at the very
Submitted by Semus on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 9:11am.
Possibly true at the very initial stages but after he/Weiner starting talking only an idiot a "Useful Idiot" could have possibly believed him. It's surprising that Blizter isn't even smart enough. to realize how stupid he's revealing himself to be.
You believed
Submitted by ohio granny on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 9:12am.
You believed because you wanted to believe. Nothing more needs to be said.
How monolithic are you gonna
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 06/09/2011 - 4:14pm.
How monolithic are you gonna be. Is everything on CNN bad because you think it is? Blitzer said what he believed. YOU think that is media bias? GMAFB.
He said he got it wrong, in what he was thinking, but not what he was reporting. His reporting of the matter seems fine, and the interview was good too.
Sorry but I also did not think that Weiner was so stupid to lie on camera the way he did, knowing it was on the internet, and that 6 women could easily say he was lying. I did not think he would screw up as big as that, after as much of the story was already out.
Me being surprised he furthered lied, is a simple "he best be able to back that up....he couldn't be that stupid to lie here and now again" I never had any question that the truth was going to come out, I knew the story would finish, its the internet, if the account was hacked, there would be traces, IPs, MAC IDs etc. I fully expect that Wolf knew the story would go on until it would be verified what would happen.
The need of newbusters to attempt to make every little quibble as media bias, is diluting the original strengths of this site. A reporter can report a story, and be surprised how the story came out.....Newsbusters used to be about reporters who knew better, but only reported what they wanted, for their own agenda.
I can probably expect replies from people that know not the difference.