Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matt Hadro's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

Jon Meacham: Bush Would Be 'More Barbecued' Than Obama for Touting NCAA Bracket During Crises

By Matt Hadro | March 17, 2011 | 16:23

A  A

Jon Meacham, the liberal host of PBS's "Need to Know," frankly admitted Thursday that media scrutiny of President Bush would far surpass the mild criticism of Barack Obama when it comes to a 10-minute ESPN segment on the President filling out his NCAA Tournament bracket.

Stalwart liberals such as MSNBC "Morning Joe" co-host Mika Brzezinski and California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom (D) agreed.

"My only point is that Bush would have gotten more barbecued for this," Meacham claimed on "Morning Joe" Thursday. "Anyone who thinks that he didn't – he wouldn't – is crazy." The panel was debating the merits of President Obama appearing on ESPN to discuss basketball while Libya is in turmoil and Japan is facing a possible nuclear catastrophe.
 

 

Even liberal co-host Mika Brzezinski echoed Meacham's sentiments, and actually brought up the original question. "The President doing his brackets yesterday, and then going to a fundraiser – would we be more critical if this was George W. Bush?" she surprisingly asked.

Newsom agreed that the media would have been tougher on Bush but excused Obama for his actions. "You can do more than one thing in a day," he remarked. "I think it's a positive thing for the President to connect on that level."

The outspoken former CNBC host Donny Deutsch took that thought a step further.

The veteran advertising executive countered that many thought Bush as disengaged from the crises of the job, while most believe Obama to be engaged in the tasks of the presidency. He added later that as a chairman of a business, Deutsch, Inc., a leader needs to appear calm and normal in the midst of a crisis, and that ESPN bracketology helps Obama to do just that.

The panel didn't buy that and voiced its disagreement.

"Americans are not reassured by his picking," Meacham sounded off. Co-host Joe Scarborough thought Deutsch's assessment was incorrect and claimed that Obama looks disengaged while filling out brackets during two international crises.

A partial transcript of the segment, which aired on March 17 at 7:11 a.m., is as follows:

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: I've just got a question for the group, and Gavin, I'll throw this out to you, but if anyone has an idea – I just wonder about the optics here, maybe this is too critical because things have to go on, the country has to function. But the President doing his brackets yesterday, and then going to a fundraiser – would we be more critical if this was George W. Bush?

(...)

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

GAVIN NEWSOM: I think we'd be more critical, but you can do more than one thing in a day. And I think it becomes – we're so hyperbolic, and it's unfair – if you're in the White House, are you going to sit around all day just waiting for that one photo-op to call in the Prime Minister and say "Boy, we really were engaged today." Or are you going to move on with other things in life – and I think it's one of the nice things the President does, it makes him more humane, it connects him to a broader group of folks and makes him more of a real person, and I think it's a positive thing for the President to connect on that level.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Jon Meacham, you said that George W. Bush, had he done these things, would have been criticized. Why is that?

JON MEACHAM: Sure. Because the prevailing media narrative in the Bush years, was that he was isolated and interested in his exercise, and projecting power.

BRZEZINSKI: Getting to beddy-bye at nine. Yeah.

SCARBOROUGH: And ESPN.

MEACHAM: And ESPN, and watching ESPN. And so unquestionably, George W. Bush would be criticized more harshly for this sort of thing than Barack Obama is.

DONNY DEUTSCH: Because there was the belief, and a lot of truth that he was disengaged. I don't think Pete, whether you like Barack Obama or not, I don't think anybody thinks this guy is disengaged. You know, I've said a lot that I think he is too exposed in certain ways, that in certain way kind of takes down the mantle of the Presidency. But I want to caveat that and say, you know – and to Gavin's point – I think Americans are smart. And I think Americans clearly can understand that if you spend the eight or nine minutes, maybe giving the Americans some relief, maybe connecting on a level of humanity, that does not take away what he's doing in (Crosstalk)

BRZEZINSKI: We're pretty clueless though –

MEACHAM: Americans are not reassured by his picking (Crosstalk)

SCARBOROUGH: No, no, Donny, Donny – the one thing this White House has not figured out is the symbolic value of being President, the theater of being President, and yes we all know he can pick his brackets. But it's what do you do in front of the cameras? And I can tell you, when most Americans are connecting on an international crisis and talking about a nuclear meltdown in possibly four, five, six reactors, I can tell you it is not assuring to Americans.

(...)

SCARBOROUGH: We are in just terrible times, and the President's doing NCAA brackets. Again, I'm just talking about the symbolism. We all know we can do that.

(...)

JON MEACHAM: My only point is Bush would have gotten more barbecued for this –

BRZEZINSKI: Totally.

MEACHAM: – and anyone who thinks that he didn't, he wouldn't, is crazy.


                                          

About the Author

Matt Hadro is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matt Hadro on Twitter.
  • Japan
  • Libya
  • Foreign Policy
  • Sports
  • Gavin Newsom
  • Morning Joe
  • MSNBC
  • PBS
  • Sports
  • Video
  • Matt Hadro's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Ok, something of an admission.

Submitted by Ashrak on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 4:32pm.

So when will they explore the "why"? Ahh, the denial is still there.

"I don't think Pete, whether you like Barack Obama or not, I don't think anybody thinks this guy is disengaged."

Correct! There is no thinking going on in that sentence whatsoever.

Mika saying "we're pretty clueless though" sure is a keeper.  Love it.


 

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

So. Where in the MSM has Obama been half-BBQ'ed ..

Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 4:38pm.

So. Just where in the MSM has Obama been half-BBQ'ed .. for being disengaged - dysfunctional - late to the game - focused on the wrong things (bullying amongst kids, vacation, etc) - during this latest time of crisis in the world (not to mention the past several, as well)? (;~> gary
  • Login to post comments

This the latest from half-baked Obama

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 4:56pm.

Everyone knows I am no fan of Hillary's, but if I were she, Obama would have my resignation on his desk in the minutes after my plane landed.

Obama himself made light of her strong feelings for supporting the opposition in a speech last week at the Gridiron Club Dinner, an annual gathering  that traditionally features a stand-up comedy act by the president.

"I’ve dispatched Hillary to the Middle East to talk about how these countries can transition to new leaders — though, I’ve got to be honest, she’s gotten a little passionate about the subject,” Obama said to laughter from the audience.
 

“These past few weeks it’s been tough falling asleep with Hillary out there on Pennsylvania Avenue shouting, throwing rocks at the window.”

 

That is just inexcusable.  He's so in love with himself, I don't even think narcissism begins to describe it.  Disgusting creature.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

J. indeed.

Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 6:59pm.

Yea, I'd read that today as well. No fan of Hillary here - most notably for her social ideology (I don't want to sleep in her village). On the other hand, leaving not wanting Bill lurking around the WH off the table, I'd given almost everything I have in the moment to have her as president - for reasons concerning the future of the world, the survival of humanity, and the security of the US going forward - instead of what's his useless name. (;~> gary
  • Login to post comments

Heck Gary, where has The

Submitted by Scuba Dude on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 8:28am.

Heck Gary, where has The Absentee President even been marinated much less BBQ'ed? And I do not consider what Tingles does marinating. ;-)
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." President Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Newsweeks Jon Meachum

Submitted by Texndoc on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 4:48pm.

Since when does he get to change titles? The man took Newsweek, with Howard Fineman, and liberalized it to the point where it sold for a dollar. He is the face of Newsweek.
  • Login to post comments

Watching the Liberals trying

Submitted by Thoreau on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 5:04pm.

Watching the Liberals trying to comprehend reality is like watching a mentally ill person cope with Elisabeth Kubler-Ross' stages of dying.
  • Login to post comments

You are absolutely right Mr.

Submitted by AngryInOhio on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 5:05pm.

You are absolutely right Mr. Meacham, Americans are not "reassured by his pickings", we are astounded and disgusted.
Apathy is killing this Country
  • Login to post comments

This was them trying to

Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 5:26pm.

This was them trying to appear "fair and balanced" I was hopeful and surprised the first time I saw this behavior, now I know it for what it is - a pre-empt. Probably works for the surface thinkers - they get reassured and it ends there. If they {MJ} get criticized, they can say, but we said this... And the viewers eat it up. Reminds me of a room-mate I had in the USN. She drank. A lot. It got so bad I confronted her after one of her drunken screw-ups, and she admitted to being an Alcoholic. Great. I am left thinking she gets it and will correct herself. NOT. After her {3d?} tearful admission, I said "So what? What are you going to DO about it?" She was stunned into silence, then bargaining ensued {she had a crush on me btw} I would have none of it, and she moved on - literally - not long after. That's who these people remind me of. They are so invested, personally invested, in Pres Obama, they must go to any lengths to rationalize his behavior/lack of action and when it gets so cloying, so obvious to even them, they pretend to look at the situation objectively. But they just can't. They have to much to lose.
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Interesting view, amy...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 12:29pm.

I became very familiar with that stratagem during my 8-9 years of watching O'Reilly before I finally threw in the towel. He would bluster for five minutes or so about left-wing extremists, citing names, dates, quotes,--meticulously describing every detail of the outrageous conduct--and then in a brief aside he would say something like "of course there are some extremists on the right too" and then return to his verbal bludgeoning of Soros, the ACLU, Tom Daschle, Michael Moore, the NYT, MoveOn.org, CNN....The following night he would be sure to read a viewer's email commending his "fair and balanced" reporting.

Bill is a master at scamming his audience.  Scarborough is a mere piker in comparison.

 Jer

  • Login to post comments

O'Reilly gets on my nerves

Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:29pm.

O'Reilly gets on my nerves too, but the difference is he gets people on to say the more "extreme" stuff FOR him, while he picks apart their argument/concedes points he thinks are "middle" ground. On the other side, he brings on someone like Colmes, who he knows his audience doesn't agree with, and tears into him for "us folks" . I watched him years ago, and when the Clinton sex crap took over 24/7, I quit watching. Now I FF through the segments where he pats himself on the back.

Joe, on the other hand, wanting to be seen as an R AND as "reasonable", allows the left to define the starting line. I get it, I really do - I find I agree with the conservative platform as correct for our federal/state/local gov'ts but in real life, I like the freedom to decide who and how I help. That's my personal disconnect.

As far as scamming? I never thought either of them set out to do so - self-deluding was more like it!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by Jerry Mack on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:37pm.

I agree. He has never given a name of whom he considers to be a right wing wacko.
  • Login to post comments

Jerry...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:48pm.

O'Reilly actually did one time, and he completely botched it. He pegged FreeRepublic for some unfathomable reason. I checked out the website the next day, and needless to say they were pissed.  The general reaction was "what the hell is that idiot talking about"???  And they had a good point.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Don't be so cruel

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 6:48pm.

Can't you see the savior is "heartbroken" over this "potentially catastrophic disaster"?

Imagine how sad he would be if it really was a catastrophic disaster.  Oh, well,  Off to Rio!  Got my clubs, Chewy?

  • Login to post comments

I don't think this President is disengaged

Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 8:19pm.

I think this President is immature, unprepared, and incompetent.
That's just my opinion; I could be wrong. -- Dennis Miller
  • Login to post comments

The primary reason so many

Submitted by Smartypants on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 8:21pm.

The primary reason so many people thought GW Bush was "disengaged" was because that is exactly the portrait the media painted of the man at the time. Let's face it, the media largely controls the thoughts of tens of millions of Americans who do not have time or the inclination to do their own digging. Bush was probably more "engaged" than Obama on world events; however, the media would not accept Bush as an actual thinking, caring person. Bush never did enough to change the characterization of him, and the rest is history. In contrast, Obama is aloof, disassociated and a true elitist. Yet, the media still believes he is thoughtful, insightful and a true man of the people. This is the image that is conveyed to the masses.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

What about

Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:24am.

the golf outting? What about the soon to be trip to Brazil? Oh that's ok, because he's making a "speech" while there. I'm sure it's to give more of OUR money to them to drill offshore, but let's make sure WE can't do anything to become more energy independent. . . .
"Apparently, I'm supposed to be more angry about what Mitt Romney does with his money than what Barack Obama does with mine"
  • Login to post comments

BO's Family is Joining Him in Rio ...How Sweet!

Submitted by gruyere cheese on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:43am.

While the whole world is engaged in what is going on in the Middle East, Japan and how it will affect the global markets, the master and comander of this country is taking a trip to Rio more than likely to discuss offshore drilling with this socialist and campaign donnor ex-president "Lula" of Brazil. If the trip was planned in advance, I could care less if he goes there, but this is not the right time to give this image to the world. Specially, when his entire family and entourage will be joining him there for some R&R. Simply, patetic!
  • Login to post comments

How long are you visiting this planet, Deutsch?

Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 9:41am.

DONNY DEUTSCH: Because there was the belief, and a lot of truth that he was disengaged. I don't think Pete, whether you like Barack Obama or not, I don't think anybody thinks this guy is disengaged.

Actually, even some Democrats now think he is disengaged, and the MSM has been reporting it.  On the issues of Japan and Libya, Obama has been little more than rhetoric. 

Deutsch is apparently still worshiping the pre-Inaugural Obama image -- the one with the "Hope and Change" T-shirt.  President Obama may be the most disengaged President in my lifetime, and world leaders know it.

  • Login to post comments

Calm and normal

Submitted by Model850 on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 11:20am.

He added later that as a chairman of a business, Deutsch, Inc., a leader needs to appear calm and normal in the midst of a crisis.

But when Bush appeared "calm and normal" in that school classroom, right after being informed of the terrorist attacks, libs lambasted him for being seemingly "frozen and indecisive."

  • Login to post comments

You are correct, Model...I

Submitted by marpel on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 2:25pm.

You are correct, Model...I still get angry about their remarks during 9/11. Bush did exactly what he should have done...he did not want to scare or alarm, and he did a fine job.

"Deep within my heart lies a memory.  A song of ol' San Antone..."

  • Login to post comments

No excuses...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 3:16pm.

Bush did an extremely fine job beginning later in the day, once he recovered from his catatonic shock. But those seven minutes he sat frozen with the terrified "deer in the headlights" expression were seven minutes that cannot be rationalized or justified with "he didn't want to upset the kiddies" nonsense. [I've also read a report he was awaiting signals from aides at the back of the room.  But that, too, is an extraordinarily weak explanation.]  A Commander-in-Chief, having been informed his country and its citizens are under attack, announces to the children that "an important matter has come up that the President must immediately attend to", says goodbye to the kids, leaves the room and starts making decisions.

For that period of time, for whatever reason, Bush was shockingly unpresidential.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Yes, Jer, and Gulf Coast residents are still buzzing about

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:03pm.

how Obama instantly swung into action and displayed his impressive leadership skills in the face of the worst oil spill in US history. We all know the timeline of that.

As a reminder, Carville's famous "We're about to die down here" was 37 days after the incident. Or 75,480 minutes.

As to your seven minutes thing, could it possibly be that 1) assuming Bush was now a real target, 2) it may have taken a number of minutes to secure the perimeter so that an ironclad safe exit could be arranged? The whole story may come out some day, but your he-was-in-catatonic-shock explanation is a tired liberal meme and frankly, seems pretty unfair.

  • Login to post comments

It's not nearly as tired as the conservative meme that

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:18pm.

he didn't want to upset the kiddies--which I've heard repeated ad nauseum.  That is the worst of all possible excuses.

But you know me, SoL...I'm a fair guy.  [Pausing for guffaws]  If there's a more plausible and justifiable explanation--maybe along the lines you suggest--I'll scale back the mockery.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Wow! Seven WHOLE minutes?

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:27pm.

Wow! Seven WHOLE minutes? Really? Tell me exactly what would have changed had Bush reacted the way you say he should have.
  • Login to post comments

Bush Reaction

Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:39pm.

Most likely walked out with a security team not ready for his movements, no route established and no secure communication in which to make plans.

 

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Every minute counted, NC Cop...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:46pm.

But it was like an episode of Keystone Kops that morning. Even once the Presidential motorcade finally got underway, it traveled in the wrong direction and had to turn around and backtrack to the airstrip...then the secure lines on Air Force One went down and Bush and his aides were frantically trying to communicate with the Pentagon by cell phones. In the meantime, Flight 93 was turning around and heading toward DC on a collision course with the Capitol, but there was no directive or shootdown order delivered to the F-16 pilots [who would have been unable to timely intercept the hijacked airliner anyway.] Thank God for the true American heroes on board.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:02pm.

I have a lot to argue with you on this post Jer but my Wildcats just blew the game against George Mason and I'm in mourning. So all I can get out right now is I strongly disagree. Now I'm sticking my head under the covers for awhile.
Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Radical...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:10pm.

How do you think I feel? Vandy got bounced yesterday in the first round in a cliffhanger for the second year in a row. And TN was humiiiated by Michigan this afternoon 75-45.

 Jer

  • Login to post comments

Geez, Jer, when did you turn into the Erin Brockovich of NB?

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:08pm.

Your research skills are awe-inspiring

;)

  • Login to post comments

Maybe not so awe-inspiring, SoL...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:14pm.

I was just doing a quick scan of a 9/11 timeline, and I didn't see a reference to the communications glitch and the wrongway motorcade. I remember it from a TV documentary...must have been Soros funded.

 Jer

  • Login to post comments

Yeah, I saw that - Behar actually did a pretty good job as host

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:17pm.

Tee hee.
  • Login to post comments

I felt like she did, too, SoL...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:19pm.

except I thought her reference to '9/11 humor' was a bit tacky.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

LOL

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:31pm.

LOL
  • Login to post comments

JER!

Submitted by GG_NB on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:16pm.

I see you.

"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan

  • Login to post comments

I SWEAR that isn't me, GG....

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:25pm.

It's an imposter.  Probably ADK or Leon stole my account.  Shame!

The Real Jer

  • Login to post comments

You goober!

Submitted by GG_NB on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:27pm.

:)

"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan

  • Login to post comments

Wait a minute...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:36pm.

How'd you do that?  You conservatives sure are clever.

The Very Impressed Jer

  • Login to post comments

Goober says "what"?

Submitted by GG_NB on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:38pm.

Bwahahahahahaha! ;)

"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan

  • Login to post comments

Again, I will ask the

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:50pm.

Again, I will ask the question: What would have changed had Bush reacted the way you described??
  • Login to post comments

It may not have changed anything, NC Cop...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:06pm.

although it might have meant Flights 77 and 93 could have been intercepted. But we' ll never know. What we do know is that they weren't.

Frankly, given the level and character of the threats which caused Tenet to run around with his hair on fire that summer, I believe the first crash into the WTC should have been presumed to be terrorist-related.  And if that presumption had been acted upon, the entire timeline and our response capabilities would have been altered accordingly.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

The shootdown orders were

Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:16pm.

The shootdown orders were given and they would have been able to intercept the flights if needed. However, the orders never got to the fighter pilots in the air. Regardless of those 7 minutes, there was a communications breakdown and the orders never got through the military chain of command. "I believe the first crash into the WTC should have been presumed to be terrorist-related." Well, hindsight is 20/20, isn't it? Considering all the mass confusion that day, I think that your statement is a bit much. "And if that presumption had been acted upon, the entire timeline and our response capabilities would have been altered accordingly." You just got done saying that it may not have made a difference, now you are saying if they had been acted upon things WOULD have changed. Which is it?
  • Login to post comments

It's both...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 6:26pm.

The first scenario is based on what actually occurred. The second scenario is based on the initial WTC-attack presumption of terrorism.

Regarding your statement about the interception if necessary of Flight 93. That's contrary to what I have read.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

conservative meme

Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 4:38pm.

I know that when called in for emergencies, especially patient emergencies, I always get try to get confirmation before making decisions that have consequences to staffing, work flow , safety or patient care. I can see where there was a report of one plane going into the building and upon the report of a second it would have to be confirmed by a reliable source, probably pre-selected, before emergency transportation of a President could be ordered. Two minutes for confirmation, five minutes to change plans, clear route and establish communications for the president in route - 7 minutes just doesn't seem that far out there.

Sure he could have been frozen in fear but on something he hadn't even witnessed with no confirmation on effects - seems unlikely.

Of course you know if he would have reacted and the incident would not have been a disaster the press would have been all over how the President scared little children and ran in fear.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Yeah, the upset-the-kiddies thing was just spin, I agree

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 5:00pm.

.
  • Login to post comments

I never got why they made

Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:28pm.

I never got why they made such a big deal out of this. We were ALL in shock, and I know I wouldn't have acted half as welll!!!

 

When Pres. Obama gave that awful "shout out" before acknowledging Ft Hood, I found that to be VERY telling - and I was disappointed the left kept on with the "pet goat" bs after that!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

compare Bush to Obama*

Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:48pm.

I don't know about you guys, but the news today had me laughing all day

  • Login to post comments

Mygod...we've come full circle.

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:55pm.

George Bush is Obama's brain.

 Jer

  • Login to post comments

Too bad*

Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:59pm.

It's too bad Obama didn't steal Bush's masculinity.

  • Login to post comments

Well...

Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 9:31pm.

I want him to swipe his conviction!!! I told my sis we just elected me that night and we were in for it - I look at all sides, then when I find validity in all sides, I can't ignore it, so I can't sound/be convincing!!!
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Calmly

Submitted by Rush to Judgement on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 11:11am.

"Excuse me, children, I have something very important to tend to."

Nothing irrational about that statement. Nothing scary or alarming that even 5 year olds could understand.

  • Login to post comments

Oh goody!

Submitted by Blonde on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 11:18am.

Another feckless liberal to bash Bush.

Go figure.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Look. Another Angry Black Zippers is back.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 11:34am.

Obama has been reading “My Pet Goat” for four weeks

We’re going on four weeks now, or more, that Barack Obama has been reading My Pet Goat.

Podhoretz: Obama's "My Pet Goat" Month

Obama’s Presidency Hangs by a Thread (Reading "My Pet Goat" for Past Month)

Say, you did not answer why your account was created within 5 minutes of Pickles & Peppers.
 

 

  • Login to post comments

Correction

Submitted by Rush to Judgement on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 11:29am.

"Mr President, the 2nd tower has been hit and it appears we are under attack."

"Give me 5 more minutes. I'm almost done here and I want to see how the book ends."

  • Login to post comments

Project much?

Submitted by amyshulk on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 12:29pm.

Project much?
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

How long can one man read one book?

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 1:01pm.

He leaves out my favorite moment so far… Obama reading ‘My Pet Goat’ while thousands freeze in Kentucky and Missouri.

PRESIDENT OBAMA PREPARES TO READ "THE PET GOAT" IN BRAZIL.

+++

Barack Obama’s ‘My Pet Goat’ Moment

Posted by Erick Erickson (Profile)

Friday, November 6th at 3:43PM EST

13 Comments
On September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush, while reading a book to children in Florida called “My Pet Goat,” found Andy Card whispering in his ear that America had been attacked and we were at war.

Not wanting to drop everything and flee lest he scare the children, the President calmly finished the book, then left to a profoundly changed America. Ever since then, the left has excoriated President Bush for continuing to read “My Pet Goat.” Barack Obama, careful to never have such a moment, has just failed miserably.

You can hear the audio, with Fred Thompson’s commentary over it, here. It is profoundly disturbing and disrespectful to the families of the victims and the soldiers at Ft. Hood, Tx.

Instead of acting to not alarm unsuspecting kids, Obama couldn’t be bothered to interrupt his cool-guy image and interest-group pandering.

President Obama had his press conference about the Ft. Hood incident in conjunction to an address of American Indians. Before the President could be bothered to address the grieving, the wounded, and the dead, he had to thank everyone for a wonderful conference, thank the Department of the Interior for hosting it, attribute to one attendee a Congressional Medal of Honor the attendee never won, and go on ad nauseam about the wonders of the conference. Just listen to him.

It would have been one thing to give a brief thank you and get to the pressing matter of the day. But the President had to be the cool-guy pandering to favorite interest groups. And the military is decidedly not a favorite interest group.

 

Yeah, how is bringing that up over and over working out for you Angry Black Zippers?

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use