CNN to Rep. Peter King: Are You Obsessed With Muslim Radicalization?
CNN seemed to fear the worst before Thursday's hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims, pressing committee chair Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) on his stance toward radical Islam with the shadow of Joseph McCarthy looming in the background.
CNN correspondent Dana Bash asked King, the chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security, if he was "obsessed" with radical Islam, and what he thought about being compared to Joseph McCarthy. Her exclusive video interview with the congressman was aired multiple times Wednesday on the network.
In a voice-over, Bash reported that the hearing appears "to some, akin to Joseph McCarthy's 1950's communist witch hunt." She then asked a question of the congressman in real-time, this much of which was included in the segment: "Peter King is the modern day Joseph McCarthy?" Bash was probably alluding to the thoughts of King's critics, and was asking him for his reaction.
"I would say, first of all, there's no basis for it, and secondly, I tell people to wait and watch and listen to the hearing," the congressman replied. Bash followed up later by asking King if he was "obsessed" with radical Islam.
"You've been called a man obsessed, obsessed with the Muslim radicalization. Are you obsessed?" Bash pressed. King replied in the negative.
"American Morning" anchor T.J. Holmes posed this obnoxious question to King during the show's 7 a.m. EST hour: "Do you think, generally speaking, that Muslims in this country are not patriotic enough?" Holmes said so referring to a previous comment by King that a patriotic American Muslim wouldn't refuse to cooperate with him on the hearings.
A partial transcript of the video, which aired on March 9 at 9:33 a.m. EST, is as follows:
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
(...)
BASH (voice-over): Homeland Security Chairman Peter King preparing for his hearing on what he calls radicalization of Muslims in America. To some, akin to Joseph McCarthy's 1950s communist witch hunt.
(on camera): Peter King is the modern day Joseph McCarthy?
KING: I would say, first of all, there's no basis for it and, secondly, I tell people to wait and watch and listen to the hearing.
(...)
BASH (on camera): You've been called a man obsessed, obsessed with the Muslim radicalization. Are you obsessed?
KING: No, I am very focused. I had lost so many people on my district on September 11th and within a 30-mile radius of my home, probably, a thousand people -- over a thousand people murdered on September 11th.
(...)
BASH: But some call King's efforts against American Muslim terrorism now hypocritical. King is Irish-American. In the 1980s, he was an active supporter of Gerry Adams and an Irish group the State Department then deemed terrorists -- the Irish Republican army.
(on camera): The IRA was responsible for hundreds of civilian deaths and effectively what are terrorist attacks.
KING: During the 1980s I knew what Gerry Adams and Mark McGinnis were attempting to do within the IRA and I was saying that continually, that there is a real opening here if the United States would take advantage of it, to be an honest broker. Bill Clinton did that.
BASH: He insists the IRA was a legitimate force that had to be dealt with to achieve peace.
Back in his committee room, King says he knows his hearing on radicalization of U.S. Muslims is stirring anger against him, accusations of bigotry, but has no apologies.
KING: Hey, listen. I would love to be loved. I'm not a masochist, but on the other hand, I have a job to do and I would not want to wake up the day after an attack and say I should have done something differently.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
BOLDUAN: And Dana Bash is joining me from Capitol Hill.
Hey there, Dana. Great piece, by the way. Amazing to learn more about the man behind these hearings. You say Congressman King, I mean, and he says it himself, believes that the Muslim community is not cooperating with law enforcement.
So, why didn't he invite anyone from the law enforcement community to testify?
BASH: It is such a good question, it's one that I asked Congressman King because he says that because of his connections with local law enforcement, particularly in New York, which he calls the epicenter of this, he hears all the time that there's a there a lack of cooperation. But he is not inviting the FBI director, the attorney general or anybody from local law enforcement.
His answer effectively was that he doesn't necessarily think that they are going to say what he hears privately. That they're not going to say that. That publicly they'll say they are getting cooperation, which we should note for the record does actually jibe with some academic studies which say the same thing.
But there will be one sheriff there from Los Angeles. And that sheriff, Kate, was invited by the Democrats on the committee. The witnesses that he invited are, what he calls average Muslims, but they are two family members of Muslims in America who were radicalized and also another doctor from Arizona who agrees with him.
BOLDUAN: Amazing how much this hearing, which, you know, as we know, hearings don't often create -- there are so many hearings on Capitol Hill, they don't often create this much conversation. But definitely one to watch.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Obsessed with Radical Muslims??
Submitted by ThisnThat on Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:28pm.
Somebody had better pay attention to the screaming of the so-called "muslim community" today. I'm watching CSPAN re-runs this evening, and there are muslims upon muslims coming out of the woodwork, "outraged" at the "attempts to demonize muslims".
But where are these "concerned muslims" when a terrorist attack occurs? They certainly don't put themselves in front of cameras as they are today, expressing outrage over the attacks, expressing concern, and demanding that the attacks stop. Nope -- crickets. But yet when we want to finally investigate these attacks, they become all "outraged".
The whole damn muslim community needs to be investigated, and the killers locked up for life. What a sad day it is when Americans are attacked by a religious community for investigating killings committed by said community.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
nothing wrong with Joe
Submitted by TruthMonger on Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:50pm.
nothing wrong with Joe McCarthy - he was %100 correct about commies taking over the US and now it has happened - why do conservatives always seem to concede the leftward take on the guy as being the absolute embodiment of satan?! how will these false notions get turned around if we don't stand up and challenge this crapCongratulations Jimmy Carter!
Peter King
Submitted by RightRealDeal on Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:59pm.
I applaud his efforts and his guts.Dang. They cut the tape right at the point where King
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 03/09/2011 - 10:10pm.
fed Bash an apple.Hey CNN, are you obsessed
Submitted by rbosque on Wed, 03/09/2011 - 11:21pm.
Hey CNN, are you obsessed with sticking your head up your ass when another Muslim shouts "allahu akbar" while they kill Americans?He May Not Be Obsessed, But He Ain't Too Bright Either...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:33am.
For all I know, King probably has an agenda, regardless what it is and what motivates it. After all, I recall he had a fit when the Democrat congresswoman from Texas (the one that recently used some colorful language to some motorists) wanted to dedicate a moment of silence to Michael Jackson when he died. Not that I thought it was appropriate for her to waste the time of the House floor on something that could be better talked about in private. But King couldn't let it be, and opened his yap and scurrilously claimed that Michael Jackson was a pedophile, despite not even having any evidence to back up his claim. That's why I can't particularly take anything from King seriously.
I am confused.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:12am.
You must have missed this headline in 1994.
Jackson set 'to settle sex case out of court', admit to molesting young boy with 6 sticks while beating him about the head with 7th.
I got a good laugh
Submitted by sp23 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:49pm.
I got a good laugh from the line "despite not even having any evidence to back up his claim." Thank you.Sticks---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:38am.
Michael Jackson WAS a pedophile. That's why I can't particularly take any posts from you seriously.I was gonns say that,
Submitted by ant on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 12:54am.
I was gonns say that, matthewdean. He sees no proof? Damn, I wished I had missed that whole media circus like sticks did. I'm sorry but I don't see how the IRA is a fair comparison. First of all, Americans didn't feel threatened and were never attacked here by the IRA and, secondly, I don't believe the IRA has been killing people for their "cause" for thousands of years up to and including the present.Perhaps, the "watchdog media"
Submitted by jdhawk on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:54am.
Perhaps, the "watchdog media" is upset with King because duhbama is so adoring of Muslims. Here is what King knows that duhbama doesn't: Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America 's story." AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE: Dear Mr. Obama: Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians. Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians. Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence ? Bill of Rights? Didn't think so. Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England ? No. Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves." Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama? Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights. Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they? Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews. Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East . No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo , Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day. And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America ... Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslim. And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan . That, Mr. Obama is the "Muslim heritage" in Americabeautiful
Submitted by sp23 on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 4:53pm.
beautifuljd---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/10/2011 - 5:28am.
That is an outstanding post.
As was pointed out on another thread, the Muslims in the U.S. are upset with and vocal about the Congressional hearings chaired by Rep. King; but are completely silent when attacks are made by jihadists.
MD