Media Question Whether Santorum's Comments In CNSNews.com Interview Are Racist
In an interview with CNSNews.com last week, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum (R) referenced President Obama's African-American heritage last week and "found it remarkable" that he could be pro-abortion. Santorum, later clarifying his comments under media scrutiny, said he meant he is dismayed that a President who "rightfully" fights for civil rights ignores the civil rights of the unborn in America.
Santorum, speaking of President Obama's position on abortion, said in the interview "the question is--and this is what Barack Obama didn't want to answer--is that human life a person under the Constitution? And Barack Obama says no. Well, if that person, human life, is not a person, then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say, no, we are going to decide who are people and who are not people."
The media picked up on the comment and, without publishing what Santorum said leading up to the segment, questioned if he had racial motivations. Jennifer Epstein's Politico piece was headlined "Rick Santorum plays race card on President Obama." Epstein labeled Santorum's remark "eyebrow-raising."
USA Today reported "Ex-Senator Ties Obama's Race to Abortion Rights." New York Magazine's piece was titled "Rick Santorum Can't Believe Obama Doesn't Know Exactly When Life Begins, Because He's Black."
Other sources picked up the piece, such as Slate, the Washington Post, the Daily Caller, the Huffington Post, National Journal, MSNBC.com, and ABCNews.com. NBC correspondent Norah O'Donnell ran the clip of Santorum's comment on MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports" and asked her guests to comment.
The former senator was being interviewed by Terry Jeffrey, who edits CNSNews.com, a division of NewsBusters's parent company the Media Research Center.
Jeffrey quoted Dr. Martin Luther King's "Letter From the Birmingham Jail," that just laws are those in conformity with natural law. He asked Santorum if he agreed.
"Absolutely," Santorum replied. "I quoted it in my speech."
Jeffrey then asked if natural law principles apply to the controversy over when an unborn child should receive the right to life. "Every person, every child conceived in the womb has a right to life from the moment of conception," Santorum answered. He pointed to the absurdity of President Obama being unable to answer the basic question because it is "above [his] pay grade."
Bob Parks, senior video producer at the Media Research Center, produced and edited the interview between Santorum and Jeffrey. Parks responded on his blog "Black and Right" that President Obama should be able to address the issue of abortion.
"Maybe [Epstein] should do a little research and look up the Negro Project, how liberal icon Margaret Sanger targeted blacks for extermination with Planned Parenthood, and how wonderful it was that almost 60% of black babies were aborted last year in New York City alone," Parks wrote.
"Barack Obama should be able to say something about this specifically," he added.
A transcript of the segment of the interview between Santorum and Jeffrey is as follows:
TERRY JEFFREY, Editor-in-Chief, CNSNews: Dr. Martin Luther King, when he was thrown in the Birmingham jail--
Fmr. Pennsylvania Sen. RICK SANTORUM: I quoted it in my speech! Yeah.
JEFFREY: In 1963, on Good Friday, wrote his “Letter from the Birmingham Jail.” And in that he cited two Roman Catholic saints, Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas Aquinas, saying that a just law is a law that comports with the natural law or the law of God and an unjust law is one that doesn't, and the reason that the segregation laws of the South were unjust is because they violated the natural God-given law. Do you agree with Martin Luther King?
SANTORUM: Absolutely. I quoted it in my speech. In fact, I read the entire quote. And I believe--the call in my speech was for what Madison referred to as the perfect remedy. In essence what freedom of conscience is all about, what you are talking about is all about, is how do we live with our differences? If you think about it, America is unique in the sense that we have people coming from very disparate backgrounds, very different points of view, and yet we have a equanimity here in America. We always figure out a way to sort of work things out in America. Why? Why does someone from Serbia and someone from Croatia--that if they lived in the Balkans would be at each others throats--move next door to each other in Cleveland and are on the PTA together and get along. How does that work? Well it works because America is different. It's Madison perfect remedy, which is a vibrant, active, inclusive public square. Everybody's allowed in. People of faith, people of non-faith, and you can make your claims, you can argue your point, and then you can let the discourse decide. You don't have the elite, the planners, the smart people saying, no, this is how we are going to do things. And if the sacred law and secular the law don't match up--as the Supreme Court has done now on numerous occasions, whether its marriage or abortion, or a whole host of other issues--they've sort of pulled that discussion, that perfect remedy, and pulled the plug on it, and said, no, we're going to impose our remedy, an imperfect one, based upon the elites of our culture.
JEFFREY: All right, let's talk in specific terms about how this natural God-given law that is at the foundation of our country plays into current concrete issues. We asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi--I think I mentioned it to you earlier--this past summer whether she believed Jesus had a right to life from the moment of conception. What's your--Did Jesus have a right to life from the moment of conception?
SANTORUM: Every person, every child conceived in the womb has a right to life from the moment of conception. Why? Because they are human, genetically human, at the moment of conception. They have the same genetic composition as you and I do from that moment on. And it's alive. So it is human, by genetic, and it is alive, so it's a human life. So the question is, not whether this is a human life. When Barack Obama is asked, you know, is a child in the womb a human life? 'Oh, well, that's above my pay grade.' Just about everything else in the world he's willing to do, to have the government do, but he can't answer that basic question, which is not a debatable issue at all. I don't think you'll find a biologist in the world who will say that that is not a human life. The question is--and this is what Barack Obama didn't want to answer--is that human life a person under the Constitution? And Barack Obama says no. Well, if that person, human life, is not a person, then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say, no, we are going to decide who are people and who are not people.
- Matt Hadro's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
A perfect example of the
Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 8:12pm.
A perfect example of the liberal media omitting information that wouldn't fit their narrative; using cherry-picked quotes to smear a political opponent. Politico is nothing but another arm of the liberal wing and everything they print should be viewed in that light.
If Santorum said anything a person of color does not agree with
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 8:49pm.
...then he is, by default, a racist.
As for the planned genocide of unborn black Americans that the left whole-heartedly supports, Dr. King would be appalled.
And he would be even more appalled at the number of black Americans who support this hideous practice.
As for Obama's position on abortion, particularly of the post-natal variety, he would be disgusted.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
But But But....
Submitted by miss911ninja on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 8:56pm.
Dave! Women and girls should not "be punished with a baby!" ~ Barack Obama
miss911,
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:36pm.
I wonder if he feels that he and Moochelle were punished with their daughters?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Punishment
Submitted by miss911ninja on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:59pm.
Well probably not THESE daughters, because they were allowed to live. But who knows how many (if any) babies Moochelle aborted to avoid "punishment" before she made the "choice" to go full term.
miss911,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:45am.
Good point.
I hadn't considered that previous pregnancies might have been considered "inconvenient."
Damn that human life for getting in the way!
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
He's not racist; he's just
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 10:38pm.
He's not racist; he's just trying to score cheap points by bringing up a totally irrelevant point.
bal
Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:07pm.
How is it you don't get even one iota smarter around here?
It's got to be biological.
- Shy Vinyl
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
So how is it relevant in any
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:59pm.
So how is it relevant in any way? Enlighten me.
bal
Submitted by MrShy on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:24am.
Enlighten me.
We've long discovered that's impossible.
- Shy on Vinyl
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Nice cop out.
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:18am.
Nice cop out.
You're right balboa
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:29pm.
You're right. that's not racist. Racist would be a politician telling hispanics (specifically) they should punish their enemies.
I know you're referring to
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:03am.
I know you're referring to something, but I don't know what it is.
A point irrelevant only to ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 10:53pm.
a liberal dunce, balboa. Is that why you wear a cone-shaped hat? MDShy---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/20/2011 - 11:28pm.
Got the package Candance was showing on the vid.
Easy listening; many thanks.
I put this post here so I could mention, in addition to your talent, how lucky you are to have Candance in the video.
An articulate cutie, she is.
My wife thinks the same of you.
Crazy world, is it not? :o)
Thanks again, Shy.
You, too, Candance.
MD
MD
Submitted by MrShy on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:34am.
I will share this post with Candance ASAP!! :)
Your wife thinks I'm articulate, too? (and thanks.... *blushes* and *preens* :p)
- Mr-Shy.com
(a little Shy spam exclusively for the Deans :))
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Speaking of Candance
Submitted by Boudin on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:23pm.
Where has she been, we miss her perspective. There have been great opportunities for her to express it as of late
bal---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:06am.
Look up the very pertinent, extremely relevant, exceptional post on the Dred Scott decision on another thread today.
I doubt it will satisfy you, even if you can understand it.
Give it a shot, though, as it may stay your hand from the keyboard and quell any other moronic questions on this subject.
MD
Not A Very Good Source To Begin With...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:33am.
See, this would be like Media Matters trying to run a news site. They would probably have a far-left editor asking Santorum (though I highly doubt he would ever consider being interviewed by a far-leftist) loaded questions like "Do you believe in a woman's abortion rights and that it is necessary to protect them at any length?" or "Do you believe the baby Jesus should have been aborted?" (I'm referencing, of course, to a meaningless line of questioning I read on that CNS rag about if certain congressmen believed the baby Jesus had a right to life at conception. Who do you think is going to say no to that? It's designed as a loaded question that shows the bias of the reporter more than the interviewee). So please spare me of all of those Margaret Sanger conspiracy theories I have read about on right-wing websites for so many years. All you would have to ask about President Obama is how you feel about his unusual support for partial-birth abortion. That alone is a good, solid question about what any average person would believe as unethical or morally wrong. And that's saying something because I'm a secular Jew saying it.
Maybe Santorum was wondering
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:25am.
Maybe Santorum was wondering how a black president could support a practice that destroys a disproportionate number of black babies.
Yeah, that's pretty racist.
\sarc
Comment deleted - inappropriate content
Submitted by morristhewise on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:24am.
This user has been banned.
Aw, somebody is looking for attention
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:40am.
.
I wonder if the cold weather
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:47am.
I wonder if the cold weather and snow in the Northeast is bringing these trolls out of the woodwork? We sure are getting a lot of them lately.
Good point Rad - home from school for yet another snow day?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:06am.
.
Too bad you weren't around in 1930s-1940s Germany
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:09am.
You would have made a great assistant to Joseph Mengele.
Ghoul.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Morris is Spamming
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:19am.
Check it out...he's leaving this same awful comment all over the interwebs.
7:59 a.m.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
J,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:44am.
Yeah, I suspected morrissthewuss was a human spambot.
You know, given the level of spam (serial and otherwise) along with certain posters who repeatly cross the line profanity-wise that we have been seeing around here lately, I am really beginning to wonder if anyone is minding the store here at NB anymore.
I have PM'd several admins of late expressing my concern in this area, and have gotten no response.
Not even so much as a "Thank you."
I don't get it.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
~Well
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:55am.
There's no fundraiser going on right now.
.
Bru,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:09am.
I think you may have nailed it, as this all started shortly after the new site was up and sort-of running.
And it's still giving me fits.
I still have to get to my inbox through the back door, the search function slows my machine to a crawl (when it's not locking it up completely), the recent comments column is too short to follow a conversation with, and locating new comments on a thread is virtually impossible because of the still (inexplicably) red comment title lines which practically hide the "new" labels.
Grrrrrrr.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Good morning Dave
Submitted by cocodrie on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:24am.
There isn't much to do since he isn't doing cat food commercials anymore and living on SSI leaves a lot of time on his hands.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Mornin' coco,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:09pm.
LOL - You always manage to crack me up. :-D
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
~Stereotype much?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:45am.
Hypocrite.
I CANNOT REPLY AS I WOULD LIKE....
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:04am.
BECAUSE "EXPLETIVES DELETED" IS IN FORCE IN NB. HOWEVER, ANYONE WHO HAS A MODICUM OF BRAINS KNOWS A FEW THINGS...THE PRO-DEATH (NOT THE EUPHEMISM PRO-CHOICE PEOPLE) NEVER WANT A PREGNANT WOMAN TO SEE A SONOGRAM OF HER UNBORN CHILD...THEY CLEARLY SHOW HOW MUCH THE UNBORN CHILD IS FORMED BY ABOUT 11 WEEKS...AT 17 , IT IS ACTIVE AND RECOGNIZABLE. ANY READING OF THE ROE V. WADE DECISION SHOWS THAT ONE JUSTICE FOUND THE "RIGHT" TO ABORT NOT IN THE US CONSTITUTION BUT IN THE EMANATIONS AND PENUNBRA ISSUING FROM IT; THAT THE UNBORN CHILD IS CONSIDERED THE PROPERTY OF THE MOTHER...A FORM OF SLAVERY? SO, tHE RIGHT TO PRIVACY/14TH AMENDMENT TRUMPS EVERTHING ELSE IN THE CONSTITUTION?! OK...ENOUGH SHOUTING. Justice Blackmuncites the "fact" that "the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense" to justify denying rights to the unborn. First, that "fact" is not accurate. The unborn child was, and is still treated in certain tort and negligence law as a person. Secondly, we seem to be going back in time a bit, when we arbitrarily decided that some people are not "full persons." Recall the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford decision, which declared that slavery could not be prohibited by Congress in any territory of the U.S. and that African Americans were not full persons and not afforded the same rights as "full persons." Independence.
The Declaration of Independence states that "all men are created equal" and are endowed by their Creator with the certain unalienable rights, one being the right to life. The Declaration is clear that this right belongs equally to all human beings. Thus, under this definition of the right to life, there can be no distinction based upon whether human life is "potential" or full. Yet, that is the core distinction of Roe v Wade, and it directly contradicts the right to life retained by the people according to the Ninth Amendment! The Ninth Amendment was used to justify a newly found, unmentioned right to privacy that magically extends to the right to abort, when in fact, denying the unborn rights based on the fact that the unborn is inside, rather than outside the womb, contradicts the Ninth Amendment! In addition, the Court used the Ninth Amendment to justify this unmentioned right to privacy, yet then turned around and denied the unborn rights because the unborn child was not specifically mentioned! So how can we say that we have a constitutional right to privacy that extends to abortion even though it is not mentioned in the Constitution, and then turn around and deny rights to another human because the unborn wasn't specifically mentioned!? Roe actually extended this nonexistent right, saying the 14th amendment went even further than the Bill of Rights.back to shouting: MORRIS THE UNWISE THINKS MEDICAL PEOPLE WHO ROUTINELY VIOLATE THEIR OATH NOT TO HARM ARE HEROES? BECAUSE ALL THOSE UNBORN CHILDREN WOULD BECOME CRIMINALS...AS BUGS BUNNYWOULD SAY...WHAT A MAROON; AS I WOULD SAY, WHAT A DEVIANT, HATER AND POSSIBLY RACIST IN REVERSE
..
Ignore Morris, Ron
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:15am.
He's not worth raising your blood pressure.
Garden variety troll, or as my pal Cajun would say, a sto'bought troll.
40 million and counting....that's Morris' "joy"? That's just sick. I see that number and wonder how many Einsteins, Hawkings, and Renoirs have been purposefully destroyed. Abortion is unfathonable, truly.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Santorum's argument is akin
Submitted by troglodyt on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:14am.
to the one made by critics of Israel regarding the occupation on Palestine. In general that would be: "Because of your people's history and especially regarding what your people suffered, you shouldn't do that to other people."
The argument in any case establishes a double standard concerning ethics, i.e. who suffered has to be hold accountable to a higher standard of ethical behaviour.
Whether Santorum wanted to play the race card I don't know, but he showed poor judgement.
Comment deleted - inappropriate content
Submitted by morristhewise on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:41am.
This user has been banned.
~ADMINS
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:48am.
Please remove this hateful, spamming troll.
Bru
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:00pm.
It's rather instructive to see the hateful left.
This one just proves how mean and hateful the lefties supporting abortion are.
As NL would say, just debunk the snot out of them.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
~J
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:03pm.
I used to have more patience than I do now. I think turning 30 was a tipping point. LOL
Bru, It appears the NB admins are AWOL
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:07pm.
...and have been for some weeks now.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
If this isn't HATE PORN, I don't know what is
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:58am.
Get rid of it now.
morrissthewhacko,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:08pm.
You are one seriously twisted, sick b*st*rd.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Let me join the chorus
Submitted by jdlybrand on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:14pm.
I'm all for spirited debate, but this way beyond the pale. Morris...you are one sad, sick, pathetic human being.
Banish him from the kingdom, NB.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Yay! Morris is NO LONGER
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 12:56pm.
Banned!
What an evil hate-filled troll. I'll expect we will shortly be reinfested since things aren't going so well for Oblameya!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Ah, yes. Access denied
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:01pm.
The two most beautiful words you will ever see on the pages of NB.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
~Thank you
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:00pm.
What vile poison he spewed.
Wow, two in 24 hours. Who wants to go next?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:26pm.
Interesting that his identical disgusting posts were received with a mostly ho-hum response and allowed to stand over at the Daily Beast (as Blonde linked to above).
SoL, Maybe Q will step up to the plate
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:34pm.
:-)
Or maybe it will be that serial blog spammer guy who keeps randomly posting links to posts on his stoopid blog that are totally unrelated to the topic of the thread he puts them on.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
SoL...who was the other?
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 1:34pm.
I must have missed it yesterday, I was busy harassing trolls on the Gator Boards.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)