Andrea Mitchell: Hillary Was Right--There Really Was A Great Right Wing Conspiracy
Andrea Mitchell famously said she had to catch her breath after Foster Friess's Bayer aspirin line last week. Well, call me a bit verklempt myself this morning, after Mitchell said on today's Morning Joe that:
1. She felt "nostalgia" for Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign. 2. The opposition to Clinton was "vicious". 3. She hates to revert to the "great right wing conspiracy", but "there really was a group out there . . . There really was an enemy." Video after the jump.
Mitchell's breathtaking remarks came during a Morning Joe segment on a documentary about Clinton produced by Barak Goodman. Watch Mitchell buy into perhaps the biggest smear on conservatives of the last 20 years.
ANDREA MITCHELL: Well, I was struck by a couple of things. First of all, the nostalgia of seeing the '92 campaign, and the way, as Dee Dee Myers put it in your film that he viewed, Bill Clinton viewed, every opportunity as an opportunity to reclaim himself to come back, the "Comeback Kid" as he defined himself even after coming in second in New Hampshire.
But also the anger and the sort of vicious nature of the opposition. You had an interview, bit of an interview, with Lucianne Goldberg, who of course played such a big part in the unravelling of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. And she talked about, so viscerally, about how the wife was so horrible, and the wife had no sense of humor. Anyone who has known Hillary Clinton then and now knows that despite everything that they went through, that's not who Hillary Clinton is. And it was just this, I hate to revert to the great right wing conspiracy, but there was really a group out there who were not going to let him succeed, and he of course played in to that with his own mistakes. But there really was an enemy group out there who just wanted to take him down.
- Mark Finkelstein's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Proud member of the VRWC since 1995!
Submitted by syvyn11 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:26am.
Remember our monthly meeting on the 15th. Tom, you bring the chips.
Mrs Greenspan
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:35am.
Do us all a favor and go make Alan a sandwich.
A group
Submitted by bobsmom on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:39am.
that forced Wet Willie to use a cigar as a proxy.................think about what you're saying Andrea..........or are you just mad cuz he never boinked you? These people are truly losing it.
What's the big deal? This is
Submitted by forest on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:40am.
What's the big deal? This is exactly what I'd expect a Democrat strategist to say. She is a Democrat strategist, right?
As if
Submitted by KornKing on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:41am.
There is no vast left wing conspiracy?
Or, Fifi, are all you lapdog types just morons?
Andrea Mitchell
Submitted by John21 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:41am.
The only enemy Ms. Mitchell is in your limited bigoted mind.
I understand your deep seeded need to protect the far left and Obama agenda but you are on the verge of a psychotic episode. The conspiracy issue that you dream up is about as valid as “little green men”. The idea that anyone may disagree with your agenda means that they are scheming against you; I would suggest a conversation with a good psychiatrist and maybe a large dose of reality outside of the far left fantasy world in which you live. Try associating with other not in the same Kool-Aid club as yourself as a start.
Bill Clinton is the ONLY PRESIDENT in the past 80 years
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 3:35am.
Bill Clinton is the ONLY PRESIDENT in the past 80 years who actually lowered the yearly budget deficit each and every year he was in office, the only president in the past 80 years to do so.
Bill Clinton left office more popular than when he went in, again, the only president in the past 80 years to accomplish this feat as well.
Rather than be outraged by Andrea Mitchell's comment, why not just understand why it could be true.
First off, George Bush and his connections were absolutely offended and disgusted that they lost out to the governor of one of the poorest states in the country, Arkansas. George Bush even insulted Bill Clinton during one of the debates over how poor education was in Arkansas, that is how much contempt George Bush had for Arkansas and Bill Clinton.
Point two, George Bush and friends were absolutely stunned that after having a 93 percent approval rating just 20 months before re-election (and right after Desert Storm), that anybody could beat him.
Point three, Republican politicians were apoplectic when Bill Clinton started using the best ideas from BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum, and unfortunately, they felt Mr. Clinton was taking too much credit, and that really upset them.
And that last point would explain why of the original 12 Republican politicians who witch hunted Bill Clinton, at least HALF were having their own affairs and at least 2 or 3 stepped down when they were outed.
How many of you would admit in court you were having an affair if the only goal of the accusation was to tarnish your reputation? The Clinton Derangement syndrome that exists in about 40% of the ultra hard core republicans may just be the reason that Barack Obama wins this November.
You all don't get that there is a HUGE fracture in the democratic party over the fraud and corruption that was required to get Barack Obama past Hillary Clinton in 2008. You all would have been much better off with Hillary Clinton as president right now versus Barack Obama.
Santorum hit a home run when he ridiculed Bill Schiefer on Face the Nation by stating that nobody in the media questioned how 20 years of Barack Obama listening to anti america sermons could have affected Obama, yet now the media was going after Santorum over a comment a donor made.
That one moment, that one special moment when a republican politician actually had the audacity and conviction to start ridiculing the media for how they completely mishandled the 2008 democratic coverage has me seriously considering voting for Santorum if he is the republican nominee this fall.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
Right wing conspiracy against the Clintons
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 3:52am.
If the republicans could win the presidency in November, but it would require reviewing the 2008 democratic nomination process and revealing how Hillary Clinton was unfairly treated by her own party, which might make her look like a martyr to the country, could you all handle that?
If you say no, then you just proved that there is a right wing conspiracy against the Clintons so hateful they would rather lose the election this fall then make Hillary Clinton look good so they could win the nomination.
Oh the irony of that.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
⇒ Say what?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 3:59am.
Now I get it. You have been spending the last 3 years and 37 weeks learning English.
Please practice among yourself for the next 3 years and 37 weeks and get back to us around June of 2015.
Proof of the Vast Right wing conspiracy can be found above.
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:13am.
either that or you are an Obot. The idea that you would have to paint Hillary Clinton in a sympathetic light to win the presidency this fall just does not compute, does it.
but there is no vast right wing conspiracy against the Clintons, yeah right.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
Ok we admit it...there IS a VRWC!!!
Submitted by ThePickle on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:23am.
'there is no vast right wing conspiracy against the Clintons, yeah right."
Ok, we admit it. There IS a vast right wing conspiracy against the Clintons. We have meetings every 3rd tuesday in my Rec room. You should join us some time.
Come to the Dark Side..........We have donuts.
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Santorum hits a home run when talking about 2008...
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:46am.
This site just ran an article along with the video of Santorum ridiculing the 2008 media for not going after Obama as hard as they were going after Santorum for a comment made by his donor.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2012/02/17/santorum-fires-bac...
There are literally dozens upon dozens of examples of how corrupt MSNBC's coverage of the 2008 DEMOCRATIC race was. If Republican candidates knew what those moments were, they could bring them out whenever the media went over the line in their generally biased coverage.
But then that would make Hillary Clinton look good, and apparently republicans with Clinton Derangement syndrome would rather lose to Obama then have to paint Hillary Clinton in a positive light to win the November election.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
What you don't like donuts?
Submitted by ThePickle on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:53am.
Ok no donuts for you then........how about cookies? They're real yummy. You let me know ok.....I will save you a seat.
Wow
Submitted by Rukus on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:52pm.
It's like you're yelling without the CAPS. Neat trick. You're also an occutard, sorry Ales, Alice, whaterever, not interested in your socialism. Neither are we interested in your slobbering, creepy crush on Ms. Cankles.
⇒ Allesandro
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 3:51am.
Member for 3 years, 37 weeks, and this is your first post here at NB?
Talk about Jihadi sleeper cells? Sheesh.
What's the deal? Up until now everything's been OK?
You've got no fracture in the Democrat Party over how misogynistically Obama treated Hillary. None that you care about anyway.
If you really did have a problem with it, you would've said something 3 years and 37 weeks ago.
So you're a socialist? You want to bring down the banks? What would Hillary say? She's trying to get the head honcho job at the World Bank and you're trying to bring it down.
Make up your mind.
I have several protest blogs, check out my links, here are some
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 3:58am.
more,
www.caucuscheating.com
www.hillary-wins.com
www.fair-reflection.com
www.dailypuma.com
www.florida-michigan.com
All of these sites have attacked the democratic leadership and the media for the absolute fraud they perpetrated on democratic voters four years ago.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
⇒ That's nice, Machi
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:05am.
Your devotion to Our Lady of Stand By Your Man is duly noted.
With all the sites you already have to occupy, don't try to start an "Occupy NewsBusters". That, and your eerie devotion to Hillary Clinton, makes you look unmanly and needy.
Um,
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:17am.
I have other blogs that don't relate to politics.
So either I didn't blog and came out of nowhere with a suspicious agenda, or, I am unmanly and needy.
wanna meet, I'll show you how unmanly and needy I am, idiot. And if you want to continue discussing with me, use your REAL NAME, you wimp.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
Macho Machi ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:19am.
you have convinced me.
Hillary is da bomb.
I'll bet she could run through sniper fire and never get hit.
MD
If you had been paying attention, Hillary Clinton
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:48am.
as Secretary of state has visited war torn sites, and locations that had heavy threats of terrorist attacks. Oh wait, stay in your Ronald Reagen cocoon and don't let new facts upset your beliefs.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
And what, Macho Machi, does Hillary Clinton visiting ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 7:02am.
war torn sites have to do with her lying out her arse about being under sniper fire?
She is, and always has been, as big a liar as Slick Willie.
Who, exactly, ain't paying attention here?
MD
⇒ Hillary the Corkscrewer
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:59pm.
Remember when she went corkscrewing in Bosnia? Dodged sniper fire and everything.
I'll bet old Bill fired some generals for failing to competently secure the landing site for his bride.
Alessandro
Submitted by deadeyedan on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 4:48pm.
Pardon me, but do please tell me where in the following that there is a "vast" or a "conspiracy" or even any semblance of a "right wing" in this country:
There has been plenty of discourse over the least three days about the fiftieth anniversary of John Glenn's orbital flight (I was in eighth grade).
Let's review how the space program has fared against left-wing programs over the years.
Back in the mid-'60's, even as NASA was building the great Saturn V moon rocket, its annual budget hovered close to 5.25 billion. But even then health care and entitlements were about thirty-three billion, leaving our "land a man on the moon and return him safely to the earth" effort at close to 14% of the total.
Fast forward to 1993 and NASA, now at 14.5 billion, was taking plenty of heat from the socialized medicine types claiming it was hurting their budget so much you'd think that they would have been hard pressed for the health care/entitlements coalition to reach 24 billion. Try 770 billion. At that point the combination of health care/entitlements with NASA put the space budget at not even 2% of the total.
The following year would be definitive. NASA had dropped to 14 billion (under your buddy-boy Clinton) and fraud - just FRAUD - in Medicare and Medicaid was 16 billion, yet the socialized medicine apologists explained how small of a fraction of the total that the fraud represented!
By 1998, it was instructive to check out what NASA's budget would become 14% of the combined total with, and at 13 billion that figure would be close to 85 billion. Just add up the amount the country spent on illicit narcotics that year ($38 billion) with the amount of law enforcement dedicated to fighting narcotics (37 billion) and the amount spent on pornography that year (10 billion), and that's what NASA was about 14% of. (Congratulations, country.)
Yet that figure 85 billion was familiar that year for another reason - in the days before the break-up of Microsoft that would be Bill Gates' personal fortune.
If what happened between 1993 and 1998 had been extrapolated to 2006 NASA's budget would have been exceeded by both pornography and Bill Gates' annual income.
In 2009 fraud in Medicare was 60 billion, fraud in Medicaid was 60 billion and fraud in the Bernie Madoff scandal was another 60 billion. NASA, at 18 billion, was one tenth of fraud that year.
Where's the "vast" or "conspiracy" or "right wing" in all of that, Alessandro?????
CLIMATEGATE (now I & II) - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution
Correction
Submitted by AlessandroMachi on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 5:01am.
Santorum was speaking with Bill Rose of CBS morning news.
www.dailypuma.com, www.swarmthebanks.com, www.wallstreetchange.com, www.bloggersagainstchasebank.com, www.occupynews.net, www.changepetitions.blogspot.com,
⇒ Bill Rose - Charlie Rose?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 1:02pm.
Question, Allesandro. Do they both smell as sweet when you sniff their pistils?
wow..
Submitted by driguana on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 10:45am.
How these people get on national television is beyond comprehension. She is an absolute moron!
So we are back to Clintonian conspiracy paranoia politics?
Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:00am.
Oh goody! I treated so many Democrats that year for acute depressive episodes that I had to add another psychiatrist on LT (locum tenens) to deal with the overload. Then came 2000 and the BDS (really acute depressive episode) patients came crying back when Sore Loserman went down the toilet. And for 2004, it was a wonderful end of the year as the same old suspects showed up on my door yet again gnashing their teeth and wailing that Kerry had actually won because the exit polls said so.
I love the VRWC thing. It brings out the more psychotic among the liberal denizens. Good for business in my psychiatry practice side.
⇒ Doc Muleskinner
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:11am.
I'm reminded of that scene in "Jeremiah Johnson" when Bear Claw comes running through the cabin followed by an angry grizzly.
Bear Claw slams the back door on his way out, trapping the bear in the cabin with Johnson. Running off, he shouts "Skin that one, Pilgrim, and I'll git you another"
Isn't it appropriate the Democrat mascot is a jackass?
drsamherman
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 4:21pm.
That's actually scary. I wonder how many will vote for O for fear that the D's would riot?
Ronald Reagan
Amy, you got ahead of the game.
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 8:24pm.
That point won't be dragged out until about late April, early May. Think "Long, Hot Summer".
Which is demspeak for race riots by "justly aggrieved minority residents of urban areas". Damn, I could get a job writing script for any NBC/CBS/ABC "news" show.
Time to speak out
Submitted by FastEd on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:01am.
by the candidates, the GOP mainstream and of course the Tea Party common folks. Strike back at this stupid lame "attacks" comments and point out, regularly, how the media is the mouth piece for the dems.
Every day, speak up against the lies and gross misinformation spewed by the media and the dems, and keep hammering the media to PROVE their point(s).
Until and unless the GOP and the wimpy staffs of our "honorable" congressmen, speak up and shout from the roof tops what is really true, and often enough, the dems will hold the 'high' ground (as far as the media is concerned).
There should be a loud and immediate response, and often by many, everytime a dem says something stupid (ok, everything they say is stupid) there should be a rebuttle, and no backing down from the fight!
So, now I'm off to one of the 57 states, Road Island, then head for another vaction that I can't afford.
"We the People . . " Hey, congress - I'm one of the people - start listening!
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Indeed there is a right wing conspiracy...
Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:02am.
...to fire Andrea Mitchell. I've been a card-carrying member for years.
Andrea Mitchell and Hillary Clinton are BFFs
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:04am.
Mitchell has only kind things to say about the Clintons. NBC shifted her to the State Dept desk because of her close relationship to Hillary C.
honest
Submitted by angelann1 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:24am.
She doesn't have an honest bone in her skinny body !
⇒ That's true angelann
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:31am.
You're right. Alan Greenspan is not honest.
Yikes!
Submitted by Rukus on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 12:54pm.
Did not need that visual. Ewwww...
⇒ Thank you Rukus
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 1:04pm.
I dropped that stinkbomb 24 hours ago and just assumed nobody caught it.
Actually Cool...
Submitted by Rukus on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 1:25pm.
I caught it when I first read it last nite at work (on break) but I'm not too good with the swype on my phone yet (big hands) so I just waited. Still funny as hell though.
How horribly dark and empty
Submitted by Soldat44 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:38am.
How horribly dark and empty life must be for those who have put Obama/Clinton as their savior instead of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
God Bless.
VRWC defined:
Submitted by vrwc13 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:03pm.
...Hillary herself defined us as the following:
•*Evangelical Christian (about 25% of US population)
•Homeschooling Parent (about 5% of US students and growing)
•Attend Church Regularly (over 40% of US population)
•Support the Second Amendment (over 50% of US population)
*Evangelicalism is a Protestant Christian movement which began in Great Britain in the 1730s[1] and gained popularity in the United States during the series of Great Awakenings of the 18th and 19th century. Its key commitments are: (1)The need for personal conversion (or being "born again") (2)A high regard for biblical authority, especially biblical inerrancy (3)An emphasis on teachings that proclaim the saving death and resurrection of the Son of God, Jesus Christ.[2] (4)Actively expressing and sharing the gospel
...pretty scary group
v
The burden of life is from ourselves, its lightness from the grace of Christ and the love of God. - William Bernard Ullanthorne
VRWC defined Part II:
Submitted by vrwc13 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:12pm.
Vast: as per above comment a huge voting block, and usually quite consistent at showing up at the the polls
Rightwing: conservative, and support the US Constitution
Conspiracy: (I like definition) 4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design (and with todays world where they call good evil, and evil good; we are the sinister ones)
optional-
Right: versus wrong
Wing: popular food, esp. in Buffalo
v
The burden of life is from ourselves, its lightness from the grace of Christ and the love of God. - William Bernard Ullanthorne
Andrea is the answer
Submitted by greydawg on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:48am.
To counterbalance that "right wing conspiracy" Andrea has dedicated her life to being part of the vast left wing conspiracy. Question: why was she so shocked by the aspirin comment? With her face and personality, birth control can't ever have been an issue.
VRC
Submitted by BigAlSouth on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 11:57am.
Yes, Hillary was correct. The "Vast Rightwing Conspiracy." That is what Bill affectionately referred to as his pee pee.
Nothing To See Here - Move Along
Submitted by Gothampc on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:11pm.
Things are so bad with the Obama administration, everyone has to turn the attention back to Clinton.
In an election year, why are they spending time worshipping Clinton?
"In an election year, why are
Submitted by MightyMouth on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:21pm.
"In an election year, why are they spending time worshipping Clinton?"
Because they can't bash Bush anymore? OR will Bush bashing be in vogue for ever?
She's A Looney
Submitted by DaMama on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:21pm.
Mitchell hasn't had any credibility as a reporter for years. Anyone on MSNBC's payroll is a shill for the vast leftist liberal conspiracy. Do these people even watch themselves to see just how stupid and sheep-like they really are? I read MSNBC's website just to keep up on their lunacy, but I never, ever watch anything on their channel. I'm not a big fan of vomiting, and that's how every single show on MSNBC makes me feel like doing after watching for only 5 minutes.
I hear ya DaMama, I puke
Submitted by MightyMouth on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:24pm.
I hear ya DaMama, I puke after only 30 seconds of watching any Obama speach.
Mitchell
Submitted by mmilesll on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 12:59pm.
Government workers have a 30 and out program-this woman must be trying for the 90 and I'm still here program. She didn't make any sense when started in broadcasting and it has only gone down hill since then. Can't the networks find anybody with the ability to lie constantly? Scheifer or whatever at CBC, this dumbo at NBC and George the democratic operative at ABC have wasted so much airtime lying to us they all need to go to a rest home.
Andrea Mitchell, Why Did You..?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 1:10pm.
Marry your Grampa?
Please help me understand. I'm sure you won't think so, but I believe the answer to this question provides a window into your obviously-damaged "intellect". The guy is 200 years old, hasn't had an original thought about the economy in 20+ years (that makes him Paul Slugman's daddy...), speaks like he's on Thorazine, yet you married him?
What level of insanity, delusions, and self-loathing are running rampant inside your empty little head, Andrea? There must be some core mental instability that causes these idiotic utterances to pour from your vacuous cakehole.
Was BILDO a serial cheater? Check!
Did he bone Kathryn Willey? Check!!
Paula Jones? Check!!
Gennifer Flowers? Check!!
Get a hummer in the Oval Orifice? Check!!
Where is the "alleged conspiracy"?
Why don't you go focus on your "When to Change Alan's Depends Schedule" and leave the "journalism to someone more capable.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Classic bias
Submitted by Dizzy23 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 1:40pm.
This brings to my mind a classic example of bias. Ms. Mitchell says "anyone who has known Hillary ..." So she probably considers Mrs. Clinton a friend. I know they've done a lot of traveling together over the years. Which tells me that Ms. Mitchell is totally incapable of covering anything about Mrs. Clinton in an objective manner. So Ms. Mitchell should not be allowed to cover Mrs. Clinton. Pure and simple. Also, while I don't usually make comments about people's appearances, doesn't Ms. Mitchell look just like the Joker? Scary.
Freudian
Submitted by stratman on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 2:39pm.
Projection we much!
- Angria Sharpton Mitchell
get off it and look past your liberal nose...
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 3:13pm.
and The Center for American Progress, Pacifica Radio, Move On, Daily Kos, Media Matters, NPR , NYT, Huffinton Post and a hundred more...all of who are one big echo chamber using the exact same words and phrases to attack the right.....many of which are Soros fronts...these are not a truly vast, completely leftist conspiracy?? In the Chronicles of Narnia, Book Seven, we find Aslan has a wondrous description of many Liberals/Socialists: "They will not let us help them. ...Their prison is only in their own minds. Yet they are in that prison and so afraid of being taken in ..... that they cannot be taken out." Open your eyes, Andrea and see your prison bars....
Guilty.
Submitted by IdahoJim on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 4:02pm.
I consider myself a charter member of the conspiracy.
Another name is "The Conservative Movement".
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
She's married to Alan Greenspan
Submitted by MinneMike on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 4:40pm.
and she has tiny right-wing devils dancing beneath her bed.
That is all you need to know for context.
Andrea Mitchell
Submitted by beenaroundyaknow on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 5:03pm.
Just once, I'd like to hear this liberal hag admit there's an equally left wing conspiracy. Did she ever prove with her investigative journalism skills that a R-W conspiracy existed? No. Just repeat the lie enough to doddering morons that watch MSNBC , and the brain dead will swallow it hook line and sinker.
See. I'm proud I didn't use a Lewinskyism there. Proves how civil we right wingers can be.
Andrea, just go home and tuck Alan into his dollar sign snuggie. He needs you more than we do.
cognitive disconnect
Submitted by giatn on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 6:58pm.
This from the station who banned Pat Buchanan due to left-wing
pressure against someone with different views. How can she be
unaware of the evil being directed by mediamatters.org, Geo Soros,
the unions and other leftists against Fox News, Target, Koch Bros,
CPAC, Glenn Beck? The left never wants to debate the issues, but
only to silence opposing opinions. I was looking forward to a discussion
of Buchanan's book hoping to hear the reasons why a shift to
minority/majority would be such a good thing. Msnbc can hardly
contain its excitement over the coming end to a white majority. I
would like to share the enthusiasm but alas no one has ever articulated
the reasons to celebrate. The vast left-wing conspiracy far surpasses
anything the right could even envision and it has the WH and union thugs to carry out its nefarious plots.
Liberals are only happy when playing the victim
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 7:20pm.
Conservatives are only happy when they are the winners.
I prefer being a conservative.
Andrea, you are so right,
Submitted by reddog339 on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 1:35am.
Andrea, you are so right, there was a vast conspiracy that made( forced) Bill to chase many women- and a few young girls - even underage ones in Europe- Conspiracy named HILLARY.
This coming directly from the
Submitted by Smartypants on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 6:19pm.
This coming directly from the source (Dems and msm) who successfully convinced the country that the economic crash in 2008 was all the fault of George W. Bush. These same people have successfully covered up Obama's failings and transgressions his entire time in office. What did gasoline cost when Obama assumed office? What does it cost now? When gas prices spiked under Bush, it was all his fault and people were "suffering" to no end. Gas spikes under Obama, apparently, harm nobody really--not to any significant degree. The fact these gaseous minions of the poltical left have the nerve to get on tv and talk about a "vast right wing coinspiracy" makes me nauseous.
Some Things You Were Wrong About
Submitted by berlet98 on Thu, 02/23/2012 - 2:11am.
Some Things You Were Wrong About
Contrary to popular perceptions, things aren’t always what they appear to be, especially when it comes to politics.
Politicians and media commentators have a unique ability to reinterpret reality so that, by the time they’re finished with their spinning, it’s difficult to distinguish the real from the fantastical and truth from baldfaced lies. They don’t change what’s real and what’s true but they often succeed in so muddying the waters that the average observer doesn’t see the difference between reality, truth, and prevarication.
A classic case in point is former President Bill Clinton who apparently confused his fellow Democrats to such an extent that lying under oath was not an impeachable offense serious enough to find him guilty as charged. Every Democrat senator, even those who had denounced his actions, voted in 1998 to acquit.
If nothing else, Democrats stick together.
Obama White House chief flack, Jay Carney, knows the Chicago art of deliberate confusion, obfuscation, and subterfuge as if he were born to the task.
Despite all contradictory evidence, Carney made the startling claim at a press briefing that the president didn’t really reject the Keystone XL pipeline. The proposed project, which would have funneled millions of barrels of Canadian oil into the United States and relieved the price pressure on heating oil and gasoline, failed because those rascally Republicans made it impossible for Obama to approve Keystone.
And here we cynics thought Obama was catering to his wacko environmental buddies!
Even ABC’s Jake Tapper was incredulous. Tapper asked Carney, ”How can you say that . . . if the President turned down the Keystone pipeline? And you blame the Republicans for making it political.”
The White House Press Secretary’s byzantine explanation for his reality-bending is too complex to summarize here.
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell is as committed a Clintonian supporter as Nina Burleigh but, instead of offering the 42nd president oral sex like Burleigh, offered an amazing, retroactive defense of the Clinton clan.
Commenting on PBS’s surprisingly-honest production of “Clinton,” Mitchell, who never encountered a Clinton she didn’t love, said she felt “nostalgia” for Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign, denounced the opposition to Clinton as “vicious,” and bemoaned the actual existence of Hillary’s fabrication of a “vast right wing conspiracy. . . There really was an enemy.”
No one expects objectivity from most MSNBC commentators but that political paranoia, articulated without a shred of proof of the existence of any conservative conspirators, is so far over the top that one suspects Mitchell was reciting from the Clinton playbook.
How any conspirator could plant semen on Monica Lewinsky’s blue dress, could inspire the Comeback Kid to parse the meaning of the verb “is,” or could make Mitchell’s hero lie under oath is beyond me, unless that Democrat thing about fudging reality is considered.
That same studied unreality is evidently a major factor in how the Obama administration is dealing with the unemployment problem and the American economy. With little concrete evidence to support either contention, we’re told both are improving, a view comparable to VP Biden’s characterization of 2010 as the year of a “Summer of Recovery.”
The president keeps boasting about somehow creating millions of jobs with his $787 billion stimulus although no one seems to know what and where they are. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=13923.)