Andrea Snarks Sarah's Foreign Trip: 'Where Do You Start?'
Could Andrea Mitchell possibly be more snide and condescending toward Sarah Palin? On her MSNBC show today, here's how Mitchell introduced her interview with Jeanne Cummings of Politico concerning Palin's current trip to India and Israel:
"Well. Heh-heh. Where do you start?"
Dismissive as was the language, only the video does justice to the derision in Mitchell's tone.
View clip after the jump.
A bit later, Mitchell added insult to insult, sarcastically observing about Palin's India-to-Israel itinerary "it's a strange concurrence of travel schedule, Jeanne."
Fellow MSMer Cummings was happy to agree: "Absolutely, Andrea."
Note: the sarcasm extended to the segment's graphics: "Palin's Grand Tour."
- Mark Finkelstein's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
<<<WARNING>>>
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:28pm.
Do NOT watch that in full screen mode.
Full Screen Mode
Submitted by The_Barrel_Guy on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 11:36pm.
The pixellation is NOT the result of the full screen display... It starts with the visual subject... At some point, politically correct hiring (read that Mitchell, Clift, Crowley, Couric, etc.) is gonna bite them in the backside... Former GOVERNOR Palin is everything these old crows said they wanted... Bright, informed, witty, attractive, decisive, confident... They just did not connect the dots that to be that it required a CONSERVATIVE woman... Ya gotta luv it...Andrea's uber elite snarkeyness
Submitted by pickersenior on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:31pm.
This "woman" represents all the intellectual activity that is destroying our relationships to the world. Not to even mention her destroying our relationships with ourselves. A pox on her house and the mainstream media spending our dollars on this nonsense.Remember her praise when
Submitted by kg on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:58pm.
Remember her praise when Obama went overseas as a candidate and tried to make back room deals and undermine the President of the United States?"DumbAssity of Dope"
TALKING POINTS
Submitted by capav on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:33pm.
Must be Chris Jansing, Norah O'Donnell, Contessa Brewer and Andrea all got the same memo from MSNBC honchos. "Say Palin SLAMMED President Obama". Every one of them said it today. Talk about sheep!Talk about sheep!
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:19pm.
Actually sheep serve a purpose on earth. MSNBC bimbos, not so much.Unprofessional, unethical,
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:34pm.
Unprofessional, unethical, and yes, she can be much more snide and condescending and I fully expect to her go that route the closer we get to 2010. Unless Comcast puts her on waivers before then.Um Beuke, 2010 is in the rear view mirror
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:53pm.
No worries, sometimes I'll do something insane like write 2003 on a check!
As for old Andrea....she's probably still remembering the treatment she got at the 2008 RNC, when those meany Republicans kept throwing all of the balloons in her face. Hilarious. She was mad. And it was Palin's fault for electrifying that crowd. Andrea's holding a grudge. Definitely.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Andrea's holding a grudge.
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:20pm.
That's what Mr Greenspan says anyway.Whoops...my
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 9:28am.
Whoops...my error...definitely meant to type 2012, not 2010. Thanks for the correction.This Mr Buke will be on your
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 9:52am.
This Mr Buke will be on your PERMANENT record.Straight News?
Submitted by Wineguy13 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:37pm.
Mark, You would know better than I but hasn't the fig leaf of Mrs. Greenspen's neutrality come off? Does she purport to be straight journalism anymore? If she doesn't then this is a fine report, since she is doing nothing more than Hannity, or Huckabee would do vis a vis Biden for instance. If however, she is still hoping to be considered straight journalista, then you have a case. Not sure which camp she is in and don't want to watch to find out.Wineguy
Submitted by Mark Finkelstein on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:43pm.
MSNBC bills Mitchell as a "correspondent," which I take to denote a straight-news reporter.Jealous
Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:39pm.
All Andrea ever does is travel the world on Hilliarys coat-tail and has never done any traveling on her own. Those two lib women just can't stand the popularity of Palin and will continue to use the most bias and radical tv station to try and condem every move Palin makes. Just a couple of 2 year olds trying to sound important to a zero audience. Maybe they could interview Farakon and his choice words about obama."Where do we start?"
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:45pm.
Well Andrea, start with professionalism, objectivity and honest analysis, throw in the same courtesy you would show for a Dem. Of course with the lying liberal media, this can only be a suggestion.
I can't watch clips of
Submitted by ant on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:57pm.
I can't watch clips of Mitchell, ever since she freaked me out playing Zelda in Pet Sematary.
http://photobucket.com/images/zelda%20pet%20sematary/
dagnabbit. Formatting is
Submitted by ant on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:58pm.
dagnabbit. Formatting is givin' me problems lately.Just accept it
Submitted by KornKing on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:52pm.
FiFi strikes againLet me guess. Sarah can't
Submitted by Thoreau on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:57pm.
Let me guess. Sarah can't understand the Israeli's because she's white.How interesting.
Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:06pm.
I guess anyone who would do anything different from Obama is slamming Obama. I am sure everyone will be the target of ire for daring to exchange ideas, about their own actions, if they differ from the "One".
But, but, but
Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:19pm.
Palin already has MORE foreign policy experience than Oblunder did when he was selected, elected and now protected.
Andrea is a beautiful................. straight news........... err um........... reporter............unbiased....er, er.................
Damn I got nothing.
Well, gee, Andrea...
Submitted by johnsonl on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:20pm.
I start by ignoring snarky liberal jerkoffs who pose as news commentators, like everybody at MSNBC.She's Only Talking to the Stage Crew!!!
Submitted by scottyusmc on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:27pm.
This "woman" is so jealous of Ms. Palin that she has to try and bring her down to her own level.It look like Andrea could use a bit of spackling paste
Submitted by virginia republican on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:29pm.
on her Botox puss: http://www.reagantopalin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/andrea-mitchell.jpg But what the heck do I know? I'm from Virginia outside the "high tech corridor" of Northern Virginia, which that elitist b*tch describes here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5raIzKI97hw Of course, I'm not in southwest Virginia, so maybe in her book, I'm just semi-ignorant and am only missing half my teeth.vr, I was thinking more along the lines of Bondo
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:51pm.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
doesn't fly
Submitted by MidAmerica on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:35pm.
I'm also in obama's new no-fly zone. Went to get my haircut today and the boys at the barbershop aren't too keen on obama's new war. It's not gonna fly with anybody here.Palin's speech was so good
Submitted by Free Thinker on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:35pm.
Palin's speech was so good even the NYT of all media outlets admitted so. Andrea Mitchell can see a Palin presidency from her doorstep. Here is a link to some highlights in case you missed it: http://hotair.com/archives/2011/03/20/palins-energy-on-display-in-india/Free
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 12:36am.
Breitbart has the whole thing.
We Are The 53%
I agree...
Submitted by JLin on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 10:20am.
As Jack Palance might have said, Sarah Palin has chunks of corn in her stool that's smarter than Obama and Mitchell.Remember when The Mummy ambushed Palin at her book signing?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 5:40pm.
The look of pure, visceral hatred. And she even tries to climb over the cops.
Skip ahead to 1:40.
At about 2:30, Andrea's hand
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:25pm.
At about 2:30, Andrea's hand gets close to the officer's side arm. Bad form for both. Then about 10 seconds later it looks like Andrea's hand (or something) gets a little too intimate with the officer and he jumps a little.What is telling is that there
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 6:19pm.
What is telling is that there were no protests against Sarah in India or Israel. But there were protests against Obama in Brazil. And Sarah was received extremely warmly in both India and Israel, something I doubt would occur should Mr. Obama ever visit Israel before the end of his first term. (Indeed, if he doesn't visit Israel before the end of his first term, then, should he be re-elected, God forbid, he will never visit Israel in his second term, (God forbid)). I have no idea what that snake-y liberal propagandist means by a strange concurrence of a travel schedule. Anyway, I don't think her travel schedule is anywhere near as strange as Mr. Obama's, who is travelling to Latin America when there's no budget, there are three wars, a nuke meltdown in Japan, and a gasoline price crisis. Imagine the press treatment a republican would get if they flew the American coop in like circumstances? There would be a hundred democraps congress critters calling for impeachment and for a special prosecutor to charge dereliction of duty, etc. But, there's no bias, none at all in the lamestream media.Andrea still bitter Proactive wasn't around when she was a kid
Submitted by redright88 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 6:24pm.
Resents any woman with a clear complexionHuh?
Submitted by sherlock1 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 6:30pm.
"it's a strange concurrence of travel schedule, Jeanne." What does that even mean? Is Mitchell trying to imply that Palin's traveling abroad at the same time as Obama is somehow bad behavior, when Palin was invited to address that internation business leaders conference months ago? How the hell can MSNBC justify paying such high-priced "celebrities" to insult the intelligence of the majority of their potential customers? On the rare ocassions that I even look at MSNBC, I note who advertises there, and make a point of not buying their products. And GE products have had no place in my house for years.Actually...
Submitted by Diesel on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 1:11am.
.....it's a strange concurrence of travel schedule when anyone travels when the vacationer in chief ISN'T travelling.Andrea is just mad because...
Submitted by KyWriter on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 6:34pm.
...Sarah Palin is a successful, attractive, articulate woman who is respected and admired, and has never compromised her principles for success. She is also twenty years younger than Mitchell and has great legs. Andrea's time is running out and the only thing she has to show for it is a case of flat knees.Oh Jeeeez
Submitted by dregstudios on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 6:57pm.
For the first time in her life, Palin will leave our continent in pursuit of spreading her insane and violent rhetoric to another part of the world. What impression will the most vane and vile political figure of our time leave on the people of other countries? You can see my portrait and commentary on the effects of her absurd ranting on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/01/sarah-palin-made-me-do-it.htmlwell dregs*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:01pm.
Sarah Palin impresses the heck outta me. She is able to make rats, roaches, and skunks like you come out the woodwork screaming...gotta love the woman.
dregs
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:06pm.
Actually dregs, I don't think to many people here are up for discovering new "art blogs" that will tell us how uninformed people like you feel about Sarah Palin, or how you feel about anyone else for that matter. However, if you want to make a point try to use some facts and leave off the liberal talking points. One spittle filled Chris Matthews is more than enough for the world.Really, Dreg, really?
Submitted by KyWriter on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:14pm.
Even the most delusional troll would come up with a better name than "Dreg."KW,
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:17pm.
Not if his beverage of choice is bong water.
:-)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
It was a typo
Submitted by no tingly legs on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:32pm.
Should have read "dreck"I will repeat myself as a new troll has not met The Vet.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:49pm.
Sarah Palin can drop a 400 pound Grizzly while it is making a 35 MPH sprint directly for her exposed neck from a distance of 30 yards with 3 shots from a single shot bolt action rifle, reloading with one hand while waving with the other saying Hoo Bear Hoo Bear. Then she will step aside as the carcass of the bear slides across where she stood just from the forward momentum left from it's sprint. And she will the start skinning the bear with one hand and slapping your crying whimpering scaredy butt with the other while telling you to reach in and pull out the gut sack. --- The Vet's Christmas gift to sissy cut and run trolls.
Watch Sarah take down a Bear with 2 shots while slapping a sissy troll that is crying for his mommy.
Oh, and Welcome to NewsBusters, troll
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:54pm.
Sheesh, forgot my southern manners there for a minute.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Why on earth???
Submitted by Joe W. on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 8:29pm.
Why on earth would any right minded person deign to go to YOUR liberal blog spot to see any more of your nonsense, Hasbro?? We've seen enough of your blind hatred in this simple blurb you spewed right here. Try hustling over at the KOS or HuffPo....they have loons of your ilk over there....TROLL
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:27am.
Just another self-serving troll. UPDATE: Apparently dregstudios has been removed from NewsBusters.Looks like spam to me
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 8:21pm.
Insane, violent rhetoric? Like what?
The most vane and vile political figure of our time? Last I checked, she lacks a personality cult like your God, His Majesty The Shahinshah.
Why would I want to read more of your vapid, brain-numbing commentary? Do I look like I want to drive nails into my eyes?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
dregs,---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:25pm.
of which, one definition is "the least desirable part".
What an appropriate username.
'tudios" is what, a 'tude' for the O's?Also, your use of "vane" was inappropriate for the insult you were attempting to fling.
MD
Note to Mark, THERE'S MORE of this garbage......
Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:32pm.
Mark , if you want to REVISIT the frat party that is MessNBC, take a peek at the end of Matthews today at 05:00.
He had that Corn guy on from Mother Jones and marbles mouth himself Eugene "they give away Pulitzers" Robinson and they were guffawing, laughing at Palin and she did nothing wrong or dumb and was actually pretty damn convincing and pleasant as all hell and the people liked her.
They asked Palin something and Sarah said it is common courtesy to not bash a sitting President on foreign soil and she lightly spoke of how she disagreed with Obama , not harsh at all,
They of course thought that was the worst thing in the world, but when Clinton and Carter did it too Bush, A-OK.
Turned the channel immediately
Submitted by Texndoc on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 8:21pm.
Turned to Tingles and quickly flipped away when he had that stupid smirk "we're going to talk Sarah Palin next segment" and it is ZERO SURPRISE his panel consisted of David Corn and Eugene Robinson. Three turds circling the bowl. I caught the first segment about Libya with an Arab specialist who had that "Why the hell did you have me on the show if you're going to ask a question and then answer it yourself?" look on his face. Thanks for coming, guy!Since when is suggesting
Submitted by smgx on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 7:33pm.
that someone is dithering, a slam. I thought that midget Andrea was tougher then that.Andrea's entire career is a "where do we start" moment.
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 8:18pm.
If she were not married to the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, she would be stuck reporting on PTA bake sales for a local bird cage liner."Andrea Michell... NBC News" **snargf, snargf **
Submitted by JLin on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 10:15am.
"....one ringy dingy, two ringy dingy...." Are there ANY professional news people anymore? One ? No? Not even one?First step towards a cure....
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 12:46pm.
"Where do you start?"
Well, Andrea, dear little presumptuous journalistic wannabe, the fact that you actually admit that you have absolutely no clue, intellectually or otherwise, as to where to start is commendable. Recognizing your weaknesses and failures is the first step towards obtaining a cure for what ails you. Public confession is sometimes good for the soul.
"Hello. My name's Andrea and I have no clue."
As that famous urban (and urbane!) philosopher Inspector Harry Callahan more than once observed, "A man's gotta know his limitations!"
Why, it can make your day! :)
Good luck on the road to eventual (we can hope) enlightenment and recovery (or, perhaps, the initial discovery) of rational, factual thought processes and straight-news reporting.
We're not holding our breath waiting, however. (Holding our noses, maybe...)
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
MSNBC sucks, but that does not mean that Palin is right.
Submitted by tombaker on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 5:02pm.
Yes the bias on MSNBC is gigantic. Chris Matthews is a Carter Speech writer, and top aid to Tip O'Neill, and is every bit a political operative who is working the media as propaganda. Andrea was well aware and said on air that she and others were aware of Valarie Planes CIA role....but that was excused....yes yes....I understand all that.So they reported about her snarkly....so what. Its meaningless. Palin did a minor flub after all "But according to the newspaper, she may have not realized what she had to do to visit the holy site, which is in the Palestinian city in the West Bank. A defense ministry official confirmed to the newspaper that she made no formal request to visit the occupied territory, despite that being standard procedure for any foreign dignitary.
More importantly Palin on her trip criticized the sitting President on foreign policy, on the very active topic of Libya
"Palin went on to charge that President Obama had failed to act decisively with regard to Libya.
"Certainly there would have been more decisiveness, there would have been more commitment to making sure that those who are freedom fighters, who truly desire democracy and free and fair elections and respect for human rights and women's rights, that they know that America is on their side," Palin said in response to question, according to CNN. "So, yes, there would have been more decisiveness and less — though the word has been beaten to death — the word 'dithering'? I, heaven forbid you hear that again in national news over in the U.S. because it's used all the time. But less dithering, more decisiveness."
I do not think a mad rush to go into Libya would have been wise...an Palin seem to think it would be. Obama skipped even going through Congress would Palin do this also. Why not have Europe be the lead, they have advanced weapons also.
Palin is trash talking the President on foreign soil....I did not respect that when Democrats and the Dixie chick did it, and I don't respect Palin for doing it now.
Palin does not show the caliber of judgment and skills needed. Lovely that she is a conservative, but she is far from being the most competent or able, or have any new ideas beyond the Republican platform. Surely if she was very able, she would not have tanked in Alaska and resigned her job in retreat, because she could not stand the pressure. She gave up....she gave up here position as Governor for a good reason....skills.
So Close, yet so far
Submitted by sentry_99 on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:28pm.
I was perfectly happy to agree with you on some points and then just agree to disagree on others but then this.... "Surely if she was very able, she would not have tanked in Alaska and resigned her job in retreat, because she could not stand the pressure. She gave up....she gave up here position as Governor for a good reason....skills." Absolute HORSE SH@T. After seeing some of your previous posts on the subject, I just have to know if you enjoy getting beat down on this subject repeatedly? Does it turn you on? You are a sick man tommy.Scorecard
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 7:04pm.
Sentry_99: 1
Tommy: 0
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
I think the score should be
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:30am.
I think the score should be amended since tombaker is being soundly defeated by many NB commenters.
Beukeboom
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:54am.
I doubt anyone has the time or inclination to not only tally the beating he is taking here but use the track function to see how many times he's been stomped in the past. I only looked at one previous thread and it was obvious he is not capable of learning from the past.
That assumes he is capable of
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 12:19pm.
That assumes he is capable of learning at all.
Updated Scorecard
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 4:31pm.
(anyone): 58
Tommy: - 7
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
You're being way too nice
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 6:13pm.
...to TommyBonkers. ; )
A quitter never wins, a winner never quits.
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:01am.
Sorry if you think that resigning Governorship of Alaska is a badge of merit. I disagree. I don't buy into this politically correct stuff that we need to grade Palin on a curve.Results count. She failed to convey to people that she is capable, she had Couric of all people school her. Being stumped on what you read? Really you have a new excuse for that gaff? I have to wonder if she is computer savvy, because most people I know read internet aggregators of reliable sources. RealClearPolitics.com is one example. But she could not come up with anything besides "I read them all" Yes yes, I know she blames McCain for telling her to go on.
Sentry_99 what can you offer to say that Palin would not crumble again under the pressure of being President, and turn tail and resign. She resigned because she could not do the job....why do think you know better than Palin?
Results DO Count
Submitted by sentry_99 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:59pm.
If you are so into results, maybe you should criticize something/anything relating to her job AS governor of Alaska. You have yet to do that in any post where you have blasted her. I doubt you even know any of her accomplishments as a mayor or as governor let alone any of her failures in either office.
Ignoring the fact that the question was what NEWSPAPERS does she read, I'm still amazed that anyone gives a flying flip about the Couric question. What newspapers do you read? Who cares? Only liberals and Palin haters really think that question/answer means anything. Did the article I read off Yahoo come from the AP, Reuters, NYT?? I don't know, nor do I care.
What can I offer to say that Palin would not crumble? She DIDN'T crumble in the first place. No matter how many times you say it, doesn't make it so there Tommy boy. If you have the incredible mind reading powers you think you do, you are wasting your talents trolling the interwebs.
tombaker,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 7:21pm.
Do you happen to have a good link to a transcript of the speech to which you are referring? Not to be picky but nothing you quoted from the speech supports your allegations so I'm thinking there is some missing context. As decisiveness is spoken of in the excerpt it appears to me to be speaking of stating the US position and supporting those who favor liberty while having the resources to know who is doing what and why. Waiting to be told by the UN what the proper response for the US should be was not decisive and showed no support while I do grant that it only took a few days for the administration to decide that Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi needed to step down.
While I do agree it is bad form to criticize policy on foreign soil, even for a citizen, during a time of war or conflict you would be hard pressed to prove it from the actions of the Democrats, the members of the current administration or the media during the previous administration. Do you remember Sen. Rockefeller, Gore or even President Obama apology tour - maybe even his speech in Germany where I believe he was none to kind about the policies of he Bush administrations however to give him credit he didn't attack so much as tell how he wouldn't make such mistakes.
What a difference two years make. I would appreciate it if you have the link but I will take a look around for myself but I've only seen video and I don't care to listen to speeches.
Link with Video and quotes
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:08am.
http://www.thepajamapundit.com/2011/03/sarah-palin-less-dithering-more.html I think rushing in Libya when Europe has a major vested interest is a mistake. If we are going to do something we need to just bomb Gaddafi. Dial in some JDAMs toss in some cruise missles, and get it done, don't tell me we can not do that in one day, we have the technology and the intelligence data to do it. We have bunker busters too So Sara wants to rush into Libya without a clear objective and end game....nope I don't think that is prudent.tombaker - still nothing
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 7:17am.
Once again - there is nothing there about taking military action that seems to be in your head due to your prejudices. Being more decisive does not necessarily lead to military invasion.He dont hate Palin
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:03am.
He just makes up crap about her to satisfy his PDS.
Who cares if she resigned to keep the libtards lawsuits from interfering with the Governors office?
She cant take the pressure? Never mind every 2bit libtard makes fun of her and her family. Never mind she battles back with thoughtfully commentary and facts. Pressure, when has the media ever scrutinized anyone as much as her and her family? Never, thats when
Only the Bush Family
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:05am.
Has received that level of media scrutiny. Not really scrutiny either - just adolescent attacks and one sided arguments. Even when the media had a legitimate point they never really related a logical argument. I honestly don't have a problem with politicians that are socialist, communist or far, far left of Mao as long as the media is reasonably fair the ideas of the left would never gain any traction. Alas, we do not have a reasonably fair media - we have Pravda without the coercion.
So what is Palin saying?
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:25pm.
Under your theory, what is the pundit saying? She is saying the President is wrong, in the chosen military position. We have attacked, this is all post-attack. Without having any answers she is spouting off on foreign soil....the next question she gets is if she is going to run for President. This is just one example of the lack of Political savvy of Palin. You can not comment on the current military action, initiated by the POTUS without talking about military policy...do you understand that?
tombaker - The Arrogant
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:33pm.
Do I understand? Try not be condescending it demeans what value you may or may not bring to the discussion. Or was that just snarky?
One of few such comments from you - "I do not think a mad rush to go into Libya would have been wise...an Palin seem to think it would be. Obama skipped even going through Congress would Palin do this also."
You made the statement implying that Palin wanted to rush into Lybia and it is clear she never said any thing to that effect. Yes she made a not so subtle back-handed slap at the administration and their lack of willingness to be decisive and that, IMO, is wrong. However, this rushing in with guns a blazing is a scenario that exist only in your prejudiced thoughts. It was never manifested by her words or actions.
I don't think Palin is a legitimate candidate though I believe she would do better in many respects than the current administration and I would be very, very curious who she would chose for advisers - at this point I wouldn't vote for her but I would vote against the current administration.
Where were you when the likes of Sen. Rockefeller was warning our enemies of up coming attacks (admittedly-no big surprise), Al Gore was running down the previous administration in SA and then Sen. Obama was running down this administration in Germany.
<Sci-Fi Geek Moment>Let go of your hate and step away from the dark side.
While not a big supporter of Palin she has in truth done nothing to warrant the type attack you have waged let alone the vitriol she has received from the media for the last three years. The only thing that kept her in the spot light was the attacks from the media and other leftest groups. If they wouldn't have kept her in the news she would of most likely finished her term in relative silence outside of Facebook. Perhaps she would have made a national run still but you wouldn't hear about everything she does day to day with the requisite liberal media spin - or yours.
tombaker, that is a typical
Submitted by bassndude on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:28pm.
tombaker, that is a typical non veteran view. It is not that easy. JDAMs require a team on the ground feeding information to the computer on the plane. A lot of the "smart bombs" require someone on the ground marking the target. Cruise missiles are expensive, about 1.5 million each. We have already fired 164, last count. You don't have a clue about military operations. If it's so easy, and you have the answers, join up. Other wise I suggest you keep ignorance in its place.
And I will tell you your idea could not be done in a day. Only someone with out experience would think such a moronic thought.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
For tomparrot
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 7:50pm.
We get it already tom! You hate Sarah Palin because she quit the governorship! Can you say this two million more times, you parrot?
Listen, Parrot, if any politician from AK wants to be in the national limelight, he or she is GOING TO HAVE TO LEAVE THE STATE. AK is too big and too far away.
Finally, it is hysterical to me you constantly attack Palin as the source of all the evil in the world, yet you back a shrieking populist like Donald Trump. If you have me choose between Palin and Trump, I pick Palin every single time, because she, as CinC of the AK NG, has on occasion signed off orders knowing people could DIE as a result of those orders. Trump hasn't. When Trump screws up, he and his people make less money. Wow.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Unsane
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:47am.
I do no hate Palin, and I voted for the ticket. While you think its fine for a politician to not follow through with their promises to the electorate, I don't. Alaska is not some sort of Podunk state that she had to leave to do something for the country. As Governor she could have really pushed to get drilling going, as we know it is safe, and the environmentalist are extreme, with the agenda to raise gas prices. Palin was in a position of having the Governor's bully pulpit to push for a reasonable energy policy. She quit, she retreated, she caved, she crumbled. All she does now is just a pundit, another one. If Sara had skills she would be using them. I generally think Senators are not suited to the Executive branch because they just vote, the don't run anything. Sara is just a pundit, she is not even held to a vote. My issue with Palin is her ability, as demonstrated. The proof is what she did, before she resigned her position of responsibility. FWIW Dave says the Grape is wonderfulWe found him.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:43am.
Sarah Palin in her autobiography wrote that she gave a swirly to only one male back in her grade school days. A particularly nasty and vicious little twit I believe she called him. And he cried like a little sissy for 2 hours she said.
Looks like tombaker is still carrying a little emotional baggage if you ask me.
Hey, tombaker, how does it feel to get a swirly from a girl anyway? 36 years and the little crybaby is still whining about Sarah Palin. Wow. No wonder his only posts in 4 years is whine after whine about Sarah Palin. Someone still has a hurt butt and wet toilet water swirled hair.
If you don't have the facts...baffle them with BS
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:33pm.
Pander away you BS artist. How about talking merits, if you don't want to be serous stop being a waste of everyone's time here, there is a TMZ site for your caliber of thought and insight.
Whatever Sissy.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:45pm.
Sorry. You can't borrow my comb.
I looked up masochist
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 6:22pm.
It said "See Example:" - here
Seems 'bout right.
Tommy wanna cracker?
Submitted by Unsane on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 10:32am.
Unfortunately for you, though AK is not a podunk state - I have lived there - it is very distant from the rest of the United States. If any politician from there wishes to be nationally known, they MUST leave the state for good portions of time. Anchorage is a 90 minute flight from Juneau, and Anchorage is then 3 hours from Seattle; 5 hours from Minneapolis; and 7 hours from Atlanta.
That you cannot, and are completely unwilling, to figure that out, only shows me the intensity with which you hate Palin.
And I realize that you have this bright idea that if you say that Palin quit and that this means she couldn't handle the pressure (or something to that effect) about 15 million times like a good little parrot, then all 300+ million Americans will simply rise up and run that evil, disgusting woman from the country...but you are going to have to try a lot harder. And this from a guy who is quite frankly unsure about Palin (but is liking the fact that her continuing to breathe fills you and other political opponents with overwhelming rage to the point of irrationality) as things stand now.
You claim your issue with Palin is her ability, as demonstrated. BS. You support the shrieking populist Trump for President, which makes your criticisms of Palin ring hollow on that score.
But by all means, just say "Palin quit, Palin retreated, Palin caved, Palin crumbled" 30 million more times. We will magically accept that she is an infinitely more evil politician than our current President if you keep doing that.
If only you, as a "conservative", would invest as much energy in going after His Majesty The Shahinshah politically as you do someone who is allegedly on your side. But then, considering your support of Trump, I'd wager you are far from being on the Right.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Unsane proves his name.
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:44pm.
You are way of the reservation again. You assessments of my views have little to do with anything I have said. Make me the strawman you need.
Yes I realize many from the Democrat party want to run against Palin. They wanted O'Donnell too. She was a general election loser in 2008, and will provide a losing ticket again. Results matter.
Sorry you don't want to address that she shirked away from the responsibilities as Governor, because she did not believe she could do the tasks.
If you want to pretend that most Americans in the GENERAL election won't see the problem of Palin failing to complete her Governorship as being respective of any of her potential as POTUS.
If you think the USA needs a quiter as POTUS....sorry most don't share you devotion to this former elected Politician. Palin could have been doing something about drilling in Anwar you know?
Y'know tom, you seem to want
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:00pm.
Y'know tom, you seem to want to appear intelligent and knowledgable about current events however with you habit of making claims with no evidence and engaging in ad hominem attacks, you really do more to hurt yourself.
Jes' sayin'...
A quitter, sorry
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:16pm.
Yea she sure has quit, she has helped get about 50 Tea Party members elected in State and Federal elections.
Tom, you are simply not a bright guy, for you to level insults at Unsane and others goes to show you have no debating skills. You have repeated the same nonsense over and over. You claim to be a Right wing-er, yet show no value as one.
Palin has single handedly done more for the Republican party then ANY current member, ANY.
A quitter, sorry
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:16pm.
Yea she sure has quit, she has helped get about 50 Tea Party members elected in State and Federal elections.
Tom, you are simply not a bright guy, for you to level insults at Unsane and others goes to show you have no debating skills. You have repeated the same nonsense over and over. You claim to be a Right wing-er, yet show no value as one.
Palin has single handedly done more for the Republican party then ANY current member, ANY.
A quitter, sorry
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:18pm.
Yea she sure has quit, she has helped get about 50 Tea Party members elected in State and Federal elections.
Tom, you are simply not a bright guy, for you to level insults at Unsane and others goes to show you have no debating skills. You have repeated the same nonsense over and over. You claim to be a Right wing-er, yet show no value as one.
Palin has single handedly done more for the Republican party then ANY current member, ANY.
A triple
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:41pm.
Not bad for the Rook
For the perv tomparrot
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 9:50pm.
You whine about strawmen, yet you have failed to back up your statements when other posters have asked.
Really? SHE lost the election in 2008? Are you SURE that had nothing to do with some joker named McCain? Are you sure about that? And on what basis do you instantly declare her a loser on a 2012 ticket (which, by the way, we have ZERO clue if she is running or not)?
C'mon, parrot. That's your cue to say "she quit, she crumbled, she caved" 500 million more times. If you simply say it enough times, people will hate her as much as you do.
She "shirked" the responsibilities of Governor? Please explain to me why, in HER words, NOT yours, why she resigned. To help you, please reference her resignation speech/letter.
Can you please show me where the completion of a political office is a prerequisite of the Presidency? Anywhere? Dole didn't lose the 1996 election because people were bent that he quit as Senator from KS. That's just one example I can think of. Or Phil Gramm's quitting as Representative in 1983 could have been termed as his bucking under the pressure from Tip O'Neill and his gang. Did the voters see it that way? Apparently not...
So not only are you a talking point vomiting parrot, you are extremely arrogant and utterly condescending. What's worse is that you have a base of political knowledge that is exactly zero, so you have no business being condescending.
Lots of people have quit before at different things. Including presidents. TR, for instance, quit cattle ranching in the Dakota Territory some 12-13 years before becoming President. That didn't seem to slow him down any. And what's this? You wanted Palin to drill Gabrielle Anwar? You perv...
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Your account has been active for 4 years, 9 weeks
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 8:38pm.
...yet you have less than one page of total comments.
I could do a page worths while downing my morning coffee. One handed, even.
Do you really expect anyone here to take you seriously?
Sarah Palin is only interested in returning this country to the constitutional ideals that made it the greatest country in recorded history.
Your comments on this thread clearly indicate that you do not support this most worthy of goals, as you are attacking one of the most visible supporters of that effort.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
I hate it when self professed Reagan-ites
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 8:52pm.
And Conservatives bash other true Conservatives. Were doing the libtards job,Enjoy the Kool-Aid
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:35am.
Dave: Posting dribble repetitively is no virtue, keep counting postings. What Sara wants to do has little to do with my critique of her abilities. Sara is a failed governor that resigned because she could not stand the pressure. America would be far weaker to have a President that retreats away from the task she was elected to do.Sara is a fun pundit, but her support of O'Donnell cost Republicans a key Senate seat. You do realize this? All the rhetoric is fine for a TV personality and reality TV star, but if you don't have the Republican Senators you don't have the vote.
As far as you conclusion that anyone who does not drink the Palin Kool-Aid as you do, is somehow not worthy...grow up.
Speaking of kool-aid
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 7:42am.
but her support of O'Donnell cost Republicans a key Senate seat.
Wake the heck up, without Palin we never would had taken the House, or would the Senate even been in play. Coons or Castle, there aint NO light between em.
But please, continue your Palin bashing, it is highlighting your ignorance.
Now O'Donnell did not lose?
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:51pm.
So Rove did not call the end effect of Palin's support of O'Donnell.
Palin calling out that the Tea Party movement was significant is not Palin causing it. You theory is that a weather forecaster is responsible for the actual weather that occurs.
Palin is a wonderful side line Pundit, my issues remain with her skills as an Executive, her ability to stand the pressures of Executive office, and her track record of losing in the national General election.
You think Republicans can win without independents....great theory.
I see you failed again to address my points Tom
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:23pm.
One might start thinking you cant make a coherent point. So, once again, tell me whats the difference between Coons and Castle? Do you know? Can you articulate it?
google is messing with my browsing of NB's?
timbaker: her name is Sarah.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:45am.
.He is quite stupid.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:01am.
I saw elsewhere he misspelled rallies numerous times in one post. You try to be polite because everyone makes mistakes but this guy is getting beyond grating.
thanks for the spell check
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 4:58pm.
if you can not deal with ideas, go for grammar. I am happy you are thrilled with Palin's talk, most of the rest of the country will be looking at her accomplishments. Quitting her job before its finished, making political errors on the campaign trail, and being part of losing ticket. Pardon me for interrupting your stupor....you may resume
Sissy does nothing but whine about his swirly hair.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:47pm.
Then whines because we mock him for his swirly hair. Whatever sissy. You are nothing but a pissy whiner, what do you expect us to say about it?
Did Sarah Palin cause Japan's earthquake?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:02am.
O'Donnell cost herself a Senate seat. She ran in a highly democratic state for one thing. She also happened to have said a few things when she was younger that the media was happy to dig up and play over and over that really hurt her. You can't be serious about blaming Palin for O'Donnell's loss. Oh, I've reread your posts. You can be.Politics is a numbers game
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:14pm.
Rove knew O'Donnell would lose the General Election...that is why he warned about supporting her in the primary, against a Republican who all the polls showed would win the general election. Palin's advocacy of O'Donnell was a political mistake, when view on the national scale.
Endorsing and Electing ....
Submitted by NL207 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:10pm.
the liberal, Mike Castle, is a mistake from the conservative viewpoint.
We can see that in the House today : non-Conservative old-bull Republicans in House leadership positions lack the intestinal fortitude to defund Obamacare. If these people cannot find the political courage to defund that monstrosity when a clear and decisive majority of the people back repeal of that law, then how will such leaders ever manage to successfully address the runaway spending on current programs?
Sarah Palin has the courage to confront this spending binge. I believe that Christine O'Donnell also had this courage. Mike Castle has showed us in his House record he does not. Coons openly admits he wholeheartedly supports Obama's destruction of prosperity.
Regardless of whether the United States suffers sovereign default, history will judge that Rove, Castle, Coons and Obama were all wrong. Palin and O'Donnell had it right.
Evidence?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:42am.
"Sara is a failed governor that resigned because she could not stand the pressure."
Yes, we get it. You have made this charge multiple times, yet...
you've not provided one shred of sound, documented evidence to back up your charge.
Please rectify your omissions if you desire to be taken seriously.
link
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:52am.
This is the quote in the poster is using along with video clips from CNN:
"The U.S. has a tradition of course of Americans as we travel to foreign soil we don't criticize our President's foreign policy -- even as friendly soil as India is -- I won't criticize what his foreign policy has been. But, to answer your question, certainly there would have been more decisiveness, there would have been more commitment to making sure that those who are freedom fighters, who truly desire democracy and free and fair elections and respect for human rights and women's rights, that they know that America is on their side. And we have a rich tradition, a history in America of being on the side of those who would seek democracy, who would seek freedom, and free markets. So, yes, there would have been more decisiveness and less, though the word has been beaten to death, the word 'dithering'? I, heaven forbid you hear that again in national news over in the U.S. because it's used all the time. But less dithering, more decisiveness." -Sarah Palin, while at a speaking engagement at the India Today Conclave in New Delhi.
Quitting your job is failing
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:21pm.
Palin retreated from her job as Governor, she quit, that is failing to complete the job she was elected to do. She did this because of external pressures she could not effectively deal with. It you need your hand held to do this basic reading of articles, or understand how to do internet searches, I am not going to be you spoon feeder.
Deal with the facts. How do you reconcile Palin failure to complete her elected office, with the needs of POTUS to be able to deal with many pressures of office. As if she did not tuck her tail and run away from the Governorship?
Tommy,
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:56pm.
So, please let me get this straight, you are saying all the reasons she gave are all lies and your version of how things happened is the absolute truth. Since you seem to 'know' perhaps you have an answer for a question I've had about this whole 'stepping down' issue. Why did the lawsuits go away when she was no longer Governor?
Quitting is failing?
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:05am.
I have quit several jobs to increase my payroll. Is that failing? Palin did the same thing.
Quitting is failing? Wow,
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 12:20am.
Quitting is failing? Wow, what a retarded statement you made. Here are some folks that quit, got fired or failed numerous times before succeeding:
Henry Ford: While Ford is today known for his innovative assembly line and American-made cars, he wasn't an instant success. In fact, his early businesses failed and left him broke five time before he founded the successful Ford Motor Company
R. H. Macy: Most people are familiar with this large department store chain, but Macy didn't always have it easy. Macy started seven failed business before finally hitting big with his store in New York City.
Soichiro Honda: The billion-dollar business that is Honda began with a series of failures and fortunate turns of luck. Honda was turned down by Toyota Motor Corporation for a job after interviewing for a job as an engineer, leaving him jobless for quite some time. He started making scooters of his own at home, and spurred on by his neighbors, finally started his own business
Bill Gates: Gates didn't seem like a shoe-in for success after dropping out of Harvard and starting a failed first business with Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen called Traf-O-Data. While this early idea didn't work, Gates' later work did, creating the global empire that is Microsoft.
Walt Disney: Today Disney rakes in billions from merchandise, movies and theme parks around the world, but Walt Disney himself had a bit of a rough start. He was fired by a newspaper editor because, "he lacked imagination and had no good ideas." After that, Disney started a number of businesses that didn't last too long and ended with bankruptcy and failure. He kept plugging along, however, and eventually found a recipe for success that worked.
Albert Einstein: Most of us take Einstein's name as synonymous with genius, but he didn't always show such promise. Einstein did not speak until he was four and did not read until he was seven, causing his teachers and parents to think he was mentally handicapped, slow and anti-social. Eventually, he was expelled from school and was refused admittance to the Zurich Polytechnic School. It might have taken him a bit longer, but most people would agree that he caught on pretty well in the end, winning the Nobel Prize and changing the face of modern physics.
Isaac Newton: Newton was undoubtedly a genius when it came to math, but he had some failings early on. He never did particularly well in school and when put in charge of running the family farm, he failed miserably, so poorly in fact that an uncle took charge and sent him off to Cambridge where he finally blossomed into the scholar we know today.
Thomas Edison: In his early years, teachers told Edison he was "too stupid to learn anything." Work was no better, as he was fired from his first two jobs for not being productive enough. Even as an inventor, Edison made 1,000 unsuccessful attempts at inventing the light bulb. Of course, all those unsuccessful attempts finally resulted in the design that worked.
Abraham Lincoln: While today he is remembered as one of the greatest leaders of our nation, Lincoln's life wasn't so easy. In his youth he went to war a captain and returned a private (if you're not familiar with military ranks, just know that private is as low as it goes.) Lincoln didn't stop failing there, however. He started numerous failed business and was defeated in numerous runs he made for public office.
Harry S. Truman: This WWI vet, Senator, Vice President and eventual President eventually found success in his life, but not without a few missteps along the way. Truman started a store that sold silk shirts and other clothing–seemingly a success at first–only go bankrupt a few years later.
You on the other hand are an idiot.
Castle wasn't going to vote
Submitted by Free Stinker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 10:00am.
Castle wasn't going to vote Conservative, do you realize that Tom Parrot ? What good is winning a seat if the RINO keeps voting Liberal?/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Good point Free
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:33pm.
What good is winning a seat if the RINO keeps voting Liberal?
Fact is, it's worse. They have NO conviction.
tomparrot needs more crackers
Submitted by Unsane on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 10:37am.
By declaring the evil Sarah Palin cost the GOP a Senate seat by daring to support a conservative candidate, you further reveal yourself to not be a conservative by any stretch of the imagination.
I drink no one's Kool-Aid except my own, but your constant parroting is forcing me into a position where I have to stick up for Palin. You are in fact the one who needs to grow up and get some more material. Working for the Department of Redundancy Department isn't going to sway people's opinions here, as much as you might believe otherwise.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Un-sanity...if the name fits, let it be your Alias
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:28pm.
Unsane says "I drink no one's Kool-Aid except my own"
Believing one's own factless BS, is insane...thanks for confirming. Lots of bluster and lots of inability to deal with the facts.
Tom Parrot
Submitted by Free Stinker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:02pm.
This coming from a guy who goes to a website that exposes Liberal media bias, yet uses that same biased Liberal media as the basis for his criticism of Sarah Palin.
I'll just bet you have no idea what ELF or PPT were, what ACES is, or how much of Alaska's capital budget Sarah Palin vetoed her 1st year in office. If I told you she's done more to provide America with natural gas than all of Congress combined (AGIA), you would probably say "huh?" She's written frequently on Facebook, but, much like the Make-Believe-Media, you don't quote what she says in an effort to mock her - because you can't. In several days all you have been able to come up with is "she's stupid" (ad hominum) and "she's a quitter!" That's all you've got?
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
The projecting parrot
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 10:06pm.
Sounds like a great case of projecting. Why? Because you have been asked repeatedly to prove your theory of why the evil b**** Palin quit, and you just parrot, parrot, parrot.
Repetition does not make a fact.
Please explain what your shrieking populist hero would do differently.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Dont let him use your comb
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 10:21pm.
Trust me
"Posting dribble repetitively
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:43am.
"Posting dribble repetitively is no virtue"
Yet that is exactly what you are doing, tom.
Oh, and by the way, the word is "drivel" not "dribble."
Heis quite stupid
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 12:10pm.
36 years to carry a grudge is really sad. He needs to comb his hair and move on.you are dishonorable in your
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:30pm.
you are dishonorable in your every insult....know that is what you are....always
You should put that to music. It's quite beautiful.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:37pm.
.
Tell it, tombaker, tell it---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:52pm.
you pluperfect moron.
PDS - Palin Derangement Syndrome hidden behind catch phrases that you can't even manage to dress up as respectable because you are stuck in a rut.
A rut is a grave with both ends knocked out, you chuckle-headed fool.
A ton of posters here have danced politely with you so far; but I personally don't think you merit either politeness, a second glance, or civil treatment.
You, with your tin hear and condescending blather, play a one note song ---
"Palin sucks, Palin sucks, Palin sucks".
Your type of weeping, wailing, whining diatribes against Palin have echoed off the walls and among the threads around here since the infamous Couric interview; and have cleared up nothing, solved nothing, convinced no one of anything, and proven only that there are some incredibly dense and prejudiced individuals that have slipped their moorings and found access to a computer keyboard.
You rail about someone being dishonorable, you piece of crap?
You are a joke.
MD
Don't hold back, MD
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:44pm.
;)
A bad joke
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:24pm.
Folks like Tom are why are media focuses on the cult of personality rather then policy. By definition, that makes Tom a libtard. So yea, another bad joke.
NB's is glitching all over the place tonight?
It don't get better said than md.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 6:29am.
A whiny little troll comes here to insult, dismiss, lie about, and distort any record of Sarah Palin. Said troll gets a little pushback and whoops, out pops the nasties. Only Sarah Palin is allowed to be insulted here, not little lying trollies.
MD if you have no point, why continue?
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 7:10am.
I have laid out clear reasons why the Sarah Palin is a unconvincing and ineffective future political candidate. You can complain all you want for the reasoning I use in my rationale, but spare me the childish whining about poor little Palin's feelings or yours. Palin could not handle the pressures of the office of Governor of one of our smallest states, and turn tail and resigned her post, instead saying another could do the job better than her. The record is clear.
Palin is not a strong candidate for POTUS, and it would be a republican fiasco to see otherwise. I love the Dems that post all about Palin's glory, as they want that political contest.
Palin became a reality TV star with her show, and the Dancing with the Stars, and People magazine covers etc. All this she chose to do, because she could not complete her elected office.
I don't hate her, why should I....I want a skilled leader, one that has substance and not just bluster. Do I want a new surgeon to work on me, or do I want someone with a track-record.
The pressures of the POTUS as much much greater than Governor of Alaska, and there is little doubt by historical standards, that Palin would similarly fail as POTUS from the pressures, that caused her to resign as Governor.
You are welcome to address these above topics....hint....I am not the topic. Seems like you have nothing to say to the substance.
PopTech has PDS bad.
Submitted by Denny Crane on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:19am.
Dancing with the Stars? Gee, I didn't know Sarah was on dancing with the stars.
The problem is that you see her from your trolling PDS colored glasses.
The only thing that caused her to resign was because some idjits were mucking up the Alaska system. She had to follow the law, that she pushed for, and was spending more time defending bogus lawsuits, than governing. She made a decision to step aside because that is what was best for her state. Not because she couldn't handle it.
We Are The 53%
DWTS... LOL!
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:32am.
Betcha he's a HUGE Tina Fey fan, too.
The ignorance of "tombaker"
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:47am.
The ignorance of "tombaker" is revealed to be larger than originally thought.
Definitely a troll with no interest whatsoever in truth or even bothering to get off his (metaphorically) lazy a$$ to do proper research.
In all seriousness, she shouldn't have done Jersey Shore either
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:07am.
That pole dancing episode at the Bamboo Bar was decidedly un-presidential.
"Housewives of Alaska"? ;-)
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:40am.
"Housewives of Alaska"? ;-)
You owe me a new monitor
Submitted by Denny Crane on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 1:55am.
ROFLMAO
She probably shouldn't go hunting penguins in Alaska either.
We Are The 53%
"you are dishonorable in your
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:38am.
"you are dishonorable in your every insult"
Pot...kettle...black...again...
No Beukeboom
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:28pm.
I think he means Dribble,,,,
Well, for my money, if MSNBC
Submitted by bassndude on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 5:14pm.
Well, for my money, if MSNBC don't like it, it has to be right. Trash talking the president is one thing(Pelosi), but telling the God's honest truth, well now...that is something else. Palin holds no formal office. She is simply a citizen of the United States. She is free to say anything she wishes. Now if she was a sitting congress woman or senator, that would be different. But she is not. That in and of its self makes a big difference.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Weak
Submitted by tombaker on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:15pm.
Palin did hold office, claims to be some sort of self appointed leader of the Tea Party movement., and is actively suggesting she will run for President. Palin even said this week that it is time for a woman president, meaning herself. So yes she is a political entity and trash talking foreign policy while out of the country is poor form, and shows a lack of control. Palin said the Obama should have rushed in with Military force....you consider that the honest truth? Well that is a weak political and military position. Enlisting more forces to do the work makes sense. We have already spent a billion dollars in this affair, who are we going to send the bill to? Perhaps you and Palin want to be the world's policeman, most conservatives think that spending taxpayer money protecting Europe's and Korea's and others interest is not smart, and just runs up the debt. Palin is wrong to trash the policy of the Congress and President on foreign soil even if I agree with it, and in this case I simply think that Palin is a knee jerk reactionary, that loves to be a pundit, and pundits have no responsibility.Wrong again Tommy
Submitted by sentry_99 on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:30pm.
This is not the policy of Congress and the President. If you read other articles on NB besides only those about Palin, you'd know that.All he seems to know is
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:48pm.
All he seems to know is bashing Palin./// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
the policies of the current Congress and President
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:27am.
I am talking about Palin citing the "U.S. tradition" of not criticizing the President while on foreign soil... then proceeds to criticize the President on foreign soil.Yes I understand its not a law or official policy. Thanks for that special "insight"
And...? You break tradition.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:05am.
One is not supposed to be both Stupid and Profuse but you have no issue with breaking that tradition.
Quote please?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:44am.
Please provide the full, in-context quote of which you refer. Link included.I don't think you know what you're talking about
Submitted by sentry_99 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:11pm.
I was talking about the fact that you said she was criticizing the policy of the Congress and the President on Libya. If you read anything (do you read anything by the way, if so what and why do you seem so uninformed) you would know that Obama did not go through Congress to start this new military campaign, thus it is entirely the Presidents policy.
You should have known that by using your special mind reading powers. Maybe your mind reading powers only work on Palin????
tomparrot
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 7:52pm.
hey tomparrot, what would your shrieking populist hero do different?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Wrong again, tombaker
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 8:11pm.
Palin has specifically said she is NOT a leader of the Tea Party movement, self-appointed or otherwise. Try to find a quote of hers (with the context, and a link) to back up your false claim.
Michele Bachmann, on the other hand, is the leader of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus. However, even with that position of "leadership", she also denies the role of leader, informal or otherwise, of the Tea Party.
Both of these women realize that the Tea Party is not a top down movement. It's bottom-up, both in terms of organization and leadership.
Try again.
<edit> Here's how it's done, Palin Hater....from the National Tea Party Convention last year, where Palin was the Keynote Speaker.
"I caution against allowing this movement to be defined by any one leader or any one politician. The Tea Party movement is not a top-down operation," Palin declared -- then added a dig at President Barack Obama. "This is about the people, and it's bigger than any king or queen of the Tea Party, and it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a teleprompter."
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
not another dumb blonde joker
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:44am.
Blonde check out http://www.google.com/search?q=Sarah+Palin+tea+party+rally you can see how many times she is a prime speaker at the rallys. Do you need to be spoon fed a quote for you to comprehend how a politican is positioning herself? When you repeatedly get up in front of Tea Party Rallys as a speaker, you are a leader of said organization like it or not. You can put you head in the sand if that makes you feel better.You added quote just indicates she is not the only leader...you make the point, that she is not the ONLY leader.
Blondie you really want to tell me that the Keynote Speaker at the National convention is not one of the key leaders of the same? Maybe you would prefer the Orange Kool-Aid?
I don't hate Palin, she is a pundit who has opinions just like everyone else. My issue with her, is that she has shown that she does not have the skills, the stamina, and the record of accomplishment to be President of the USA.
Palin crumbled under the pressure, and resigned the Governorship of Alaska because she could not do the job effectively. I have no reason believe it was not in the electorates best interest for her giving up, and retreat. She is free to quit the job.
I just don't think that Palin could stand up to the pressure of being the POTUS. Palin tucked tail and ran away from the Governorship, where she was elected by citizens....why do you think that track record will serve well the USA? Oh wait....you are drinking the orange Kool-Aid..... Buy a signed copy of the book to go with your drink
Mr I dont hate Palin
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 7:51am.
So, when the Tea Party invites someone to speak at their event, they are suddenly the leader? You dont hate her? The post above sure proves that. You have the second worst case of PDS of anyone I have seen.I don't hate her at all, I
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:43pm.
I don't hate her at all, I simply think she is a weak ineffectual leader that can not stand up to the rigors and pressures of Executive office, and has evidenced that by quitting and retreating from her elected office, and then going around and being a Pundit with little responsibility. She is a failed Governor, a failed VP candidate, and offers little proven skills. Anyone thinking that a quitter will be able to win elected office is a fool.
I don't think the country can afford to have Obama be in office for a 2nd term. Thinking that Palin can change that is simply not dealing with reality.
What part of being a Governor who resigned, makes you think she is qualified to do anything besides being a paid pundit on the sidelines?
The reality is Palin is a losing proposition as a candidate for any future elected office in government.
No I don't hate her, I am simply one who appraises her ability and skills for what they are. So many want to ignore the facts of her track record. I don't hate a lame horse that has no chance of winning at the race track....but I will think you are a fool to put money on that lame horse.
You, tombaker, are not a very convincing---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:55pm.
liar.
MD
if you had something of
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 1:26pm.
if you had something of thought to say I am sure you would, if you don't understand what you read, I presume you will say its a lie
Disingenuous
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 9:55am.
"I don't hate her at all"
Please cease insulting our intelligence with such a blatant lie.
You presume that you are
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 1:36pm.
You presume that you are speaking for others by saying "our". Look just because I think a previous elected official that was forced to resign from office due to her lack of skills in dealing with the MSM, is a weak leader that could never stand up to the rigors of being the POTUS, does not make me dislike a person.
Rove, George Will, and others all think she is a losing proposition when put into an election. The last time she ran for office she had one job, to enhance McCain....all she became was a drag on the ticket, she was schooled by the likes of Katie....Katie Couric of all people. Katie is a lightweight, Putin would run circles around her.
Other Republicans have track records of accomplishment....not just quitting when things got rough.
I know its hard for you to comprehend that someone can not have the skills for a job, and still be liked as person. Palin is a Republican Dukakis.....and I am sure that I would enjoy spending time with him also.
Grow up.
Actually, tom, it's clear I
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:25pm.
Actually, tom, it's clear I am speaking for several other NB participants as well as myself when I wrote "Please cease insulting our intelligence with such a blatant lie" when others have also exposed and objected to your prevarications. Based upon their posts, I credit them with a goodly amount of intelligence and common sense. Blatantly lying, as you have done, is an insult to anyone's intelligence.
Your subsequent response, however, is merely perpetuating that lie as well as trying to justify it at the same time. The content and tone of your posts regarding Sarah Palin are clearly that of intense dislike and disrespect. Your denials of this clear truth ring hollow. You continue to make claims concerning Palin of which you cannot substantiate with sound, documented evidence.
Your ad hominem is also duly noted.
This post of yours further illustrates your lack of credibility and why you have earned no respect.
Anyone home? Hello Hello
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 7:26am.
There is nothing I am lying about, She could not handle the pressure, she believed that others could do the job of Governor better than herself, the POTUS has much more pressures as what caused Palin to punt the ball. She is busy peddling books, being a Reality TV personality, and getting paid to speak. She backed O'Donnell who clearly cost Republican a Senate seat. Palin plays the poor little victim card left and right, meanwhile putting her daughters on Reality TV to be part the gossip pages of TMZ and E-News.
Am I missing something? You don't think Obama wins over Palin in the General.....look at the long list of polls on that match up. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Fox has her being beaten by 21 points by Obama as of 6 weeks ago.
I don't think its very controversial.....Palin was a loser in the last election, she quit the Governorship, and every indication by experts like Karl Rove, and masses of Polling data over months and months show Obama wipes the floor with Palin.
So pardom me for pointing out that supporting Palin is like putting Obama back in office.....the country call ill afford to have Obama for another 4 years.
Do you need more hand holding?
"There is nothing I am lying
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:05am.
"There is nothing I am lying about,"
Sure there is. For one, you claiming you don't hate her even though your hateful words, false accusations, et al permeate your posts.
"She could not handle the pressure"
You've made this accusation now well over two dozen times yet you've provided not one shred of sound, documented evidence to back it up. This is quite disingenuous of you. Your attempts at character assassination further reveals the hatred and disrespect you have towards Sarah Palin. This also illustrates why we know your denials are lies.
"she believed that others could do the job of Governor better than herself"
Another claim of your which you have not substantiated.
"the POTUS has much more pressures as what caused Palin to punt the ball"
Grammatically speaking, this sentence fragment makes no sense.
"She is busy peddling books, being a Reality TV personality, and getting paid to speak."
Irrelevant.
"She backed O'Donnell who clearly cost Republican a Senate seat."
You've already been refuted multiple times on this claim by others so there is no need to do so again. Suffice to say you clearly know not of what you write and your hatred of Palin clouds your thought process.
"Palin plays the poor little victim card left and right, meanwhile putting her daughters on Reality TV to be part the gossip pages of TMZ and E-News."
Another example of your falsehoods and hatred. This claim of yours is just patently absurd and desperate.
"Am I missing something?"
Yes, you are. You are missing a lot. Intentionally. You are making things up as you go along just to smear Sarah Palin. Much of what you claim is clearly untrue and has been proven to be untrue. Yet you continue to espouse those lies. You've been repeatedly asked by myself and others to back your claims up with documented evidence and you have repeatedly failed to do so. The words "epic fail" definitely apply to you and your posts here. You seem to be unable to get your facts straight and you also seem to be unable and/or unwilling to actually research before writing.
"You don't think Obama wins over Palin in the General.....look at the long list of polls on that match up."
Much can happen in the next 20 months so it is quite premature to put much stock in any poll at this point.
"Do you need more hand holding?"
No, never did. But clearly you desire spoon-feeding.
So your suggesting now, that McCain wins
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:18am.
If not for Palin? Your not half as bright as I originally gave you credit for. You and Obama havent a chance. Too stupid to survive. BTW you might want to get out of the basement for a little while.
Danger tombaker Danger
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:16am.
CAUTION Calling "Blonde" the name "Blondie" is probably going to get your @ss whipped. You really need to work on your reading comprehension Tom. The fact that Palin is a speaker at the rallies means she was invited to be the "prime" speaker. She didn't organize the rallies, nor does she call anyone and tell them she will be speaking. Again, read slowly, she is invited to speak. As a guest, not the boss.
The quote you refer to does not indicate she is the leader, or even a leader of the Tea Party. She is saying NO ONE should be leader, The Tea Party movement is not a top-down operation,
If you want to ignore the fact that the media and the lawsuits interfered in Palin's ability to be an effective governor Alaska, well, I just wonder if you'll ever get all the sand out of your hair from having your head stuck in it and all.She quit because she could not handle the office
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:56pm.
YOU SAID: "If you want to ignore the fact that the media and the lawsuits interfered in Palin's ability to be an effective governor Alaska"
You make the simple point that Palin could not deal with the pressures of the Media, and bogus lawsuits, that because of her skills she was not able to be an effective governor. All the same conditions and more apply to the POTUS.
As she failed as Governor she would fail as POTUS. She did not have the skills to overcome the hardships off office as Governor.....it is all that more clear she would be the same again. Nothing has changed
. She can not handle the pressure. She will cave and quit and turn tail again. She quit for good reason, the job was bigger than her abilities.
Give it up, tombaker---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:00pm.
all you have is your opinion, nothing more.
It sucks, as do you; about a google's worth more than you think Palin does.
MD
Yes I have my opinion.
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 1:44pm.
Yes I have my opinion. Others do as well. Rove and others clearly think Palin would be a loser again in a general election. Their opinions.
The facts remain, that Palin is a paid pundit, a reality TV subject, and saw as her best option to resign elected office. When she resigned from the Governorship she essential crossed off any chances she had for other offices, much less higher office.
If she was indeed highly skilled in making government work, she would be working on drilling in Anwar, instead of letting it be wasted for stupid and false claims. The footprint for the drilling has no damage to the wild life. We put a man on the moon, we can drill oil in Alaska.
I've already corrected you on
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:28pm.
I've already corrected you on ANWR (not "Anwar"). Let me remind you:
You are completely ignorant of ANWR (not Anwar). First of all, ANWR stands for Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. Pay attention to the second word in that name: NATIONAL. That would seem to indicate it was something run by the FEDERAL not state government, wouldn't it? Why yes it does! In fact it is maintained by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. And U.S. stands for United States indicating that this is under one of the FEDERAL government departments, right? Why yes it does as well! And if one looks with a little bit of investigative skill (like going to the bottom of the USF&WS website) one finds out that that agency falls within the Department of the Interior.
So the Governor of Alaska, be they liberal or conservative, has very little say concerning ANWR. About all they can do is encourage the federal government to drill in the extremely small percentage of ANWR land. Palin did that, and took a massive amount of undue harassment as a result.
In short, tom, you are incredibly ignorant of the facts. As usual.
"When you repeatedly get up
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:51am.
"When you repeatedly get up in front of Tea Party Rallys as a speaker, you are a leader of said organization like it or not."
Being asked to speak multiple times at various local meetings of national or international organizations does not not necessarily mean one is a declared or implied leader of said organization. You are committing a logical fallacy known as a non sequitur. I suggest you read Fallacies by C.L. Hamblin. You also might wish to look up "ad hominem" as well.
Careful who you're implying is the dummy, Parrot
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 10:55am.
You are the one who (1) made an idiot claim, and when called to the carpet on it, became (2) reading deficient. Your own words:
Palin did hold office, claims to be some sort of self appointed leader of the Tea Party movement.
Now you're trying to back up, waaaaaay up, and say that because she is the headliner at numerous Tea Party rallies, she is therefore the not only the de facto but de jure leader of the Tea Party. Seriously? You really want to go there?
I said she has openly stated she ISN'T, that the Tea Party doesn't have (and shouldn't have) one....read her very own quote which I conveniently linked above.
Now, since I've demolished all of your unsubstantiated stupidity regarding Palin's non-leadership of the Tea Party....let me further correct your other idiot notion. Palin resigned as governor of Alaska because she was spending all her time as the State's Chief Executive Officer defending moonbat lawsuits and charges, costing the state to spend precious dollars and resources. Her Lt. Governor held all the same beliefs as she, and didn't have the baggage of being the Left's favorite target.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Sick him Blonde!
Submitted by bassndude on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:21am.
Get him good girl!Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Yup..confound poor ol' tom
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:46am.
Yup..confound poor ol' tom with facts. LOL!Blondie: Demolished? sure
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:03pm.
Blondie: Demolished? sure sure....anyways as you say above, she could not deal with the pressures of office....and punted. She would similarly fail if she had any elected office again.
I guess you are saying that Palin could not offer anything special as Governor over someone else.....that Lt. Governor was just as good. Great. So Blondie you are saying that Palin is nothing special.
Again, as Governor, I would have expected that Palin would have worked on the Anwar problem. The nation need energy.
Blonde is think arguing the minutia makes you point, perhaps you should become part of the spell check crowd and looking for spelling issue to try to win an argument. Lightweight
tombaker
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:16pm.
Since drilling for oil requires a federal permit, how on earth could Palin have "worked on the Anwar problem". Bobby Jindal is itching to get drilling done, but he can't. What, exactly, should Palin have done?
Snap her fingers, maybe Rad
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:22pm.
This little trollster is delusional, and I suspect yet another retread. Arghhh.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Yes Blonde,
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 7:05pm.
as much as tombaker disses Palin he seems to think she has magical abilities, or maybe bypass federal law.
Don't these trolls have any liberal sites to clog up?
Its a Republican Congress,
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 1:47pm.
Its a Republican Congress, and the price of gas is 4 dollars and over, the public sentiment is there to get things moving. If Palin does not have the skills to drive that, what can she do, do a reality show? Oh boy
tom, are you THAT ignorant?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:33pm.
tom, are you THAT ignorant? It's NOT a Republican Congress. The Republicans control the House of Representatives but the Democrats control the Senate.
And the average price of gas in the United States this week has been reported to be $3.56 a gallon not "4 dollars and over."
You are unable to get even basis facts straight.
jinx, Beuke
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:49pm.
Although you beat me by several minutes as I was reheating and totally enjoying leftovers from last night's most delicious homemade deep dish deluxe pizza extravaganza (crust and all!).
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
OMG, geez The House is oft
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 7:37am.
OMG, geez The House is oft referred to as Congress and the Senate as the Senate, ironically the two bodies together are referred to as the Congress.....but still often are called the Congress and the Senate. Part of this comes from the terms of Congressman vs Senator.
Oh goodie the average price, for areas with low taxes and whatnot is under 4. How about looking at the average price per capita, and you find that most people are paying near 4.
Meanwhile instead of focusing on the minutia....I would hope you would agree we need to drill and tap the huge Oil reserves in Alaska.
The country does not want to constrain supply in the for the dreams of eco-terrorist who want the price of gas to go up so high that only the rich (they are trust fund babies often) can drive freely.
My point is that a Governor of Alaska has a duty to use the land of Alaska for the benefit of the people....and if the Feds are in the way, the State can fight the Feds.....and the Political will of the people can be harnessed. A leader makes these connections.....Palin punted and resigned her post to go off and do a reality TV show.....great credibility Palin has?
Dang. Another contender to the throne.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:04am.
King Satchmo is dead. Long live King tombaker the Beclowner.
Idiot trolls can't even admit they made a mistake in addition to the multitude of lies.
Yes, King Beclowner, only the House of Representatives is called Congress. How did you know? That was supposed to be a secret only the Royal Society of Retard Beclowners knew.
I gave tom the benefit of the
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:15am.
I gave tom the benefit of the doubt and just chalked up his posts to ignorance (e.g. -- "lack of knowledge" -- basic definition supplied for tom's benefit), then tom's hatred became apparent. Then when he couldn't get basic facts straight I recognized his ignorance to be greater than originally thought but when he tried to justify his incorrect claims even in the light of correction, I finally recognized that tom is dishonest and stupid.
And as Ron White correctly points out, "You can't fix stupid."
"The House is oft referred to
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:12am.
"The House is oft referred to as Congress"
How ignorant can you reveal yourself to be, tom. The House of Representatives is never referred to as "Congress" nor can you prove your claim here either.
"Part of this comes from the terms of Congressman vs Senator."
Another statement of ignorance. Congressman (or Congressperson for the politically correct - I prefer the sardonic "Congresscritter") is the term used for both Representatives (the term used for those in the House of Representatives) and Senators (the term use for those in the Senate).
And your pathetic statements trying to justify your misstatement concerning the price of gasoline in the United States are just moronically ignorant.
I'm not wasting my time correcting the remainder of your ignorant post since you only shoot yourself in the foot.
No, Tom, it's not a Republican Congress
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:47pm.
It is a Republican House, and a Democrat Senate.
Furthermore, Palin holds no elected or appointed office, so other than being the CEO of Exxon, how do you expect her to "drive that"? She's doing a fine job of hammering home the stupidity of Obama's so-called energy policies, however, from her bully pulpit. Seriously, those who advocate for a more self-sufficient oil policy use what as their rallying cry? Oh yeah, that would be Palin's "Drill, Baby, Drill", wouldn't it, Sparky?
You are obviously a fact-challenged, reading and grammar/spelling impaired Feckless Shill Potted Plant.
We need a better class of troll, here.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
So you think Obama would be
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 7:41am.
So you think Obama would be beaten by Palin in an Election? Perhaps a click of reality for you http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Drill baby drill was said by RNC head Steel, in his address to the convention....not Palin....but that is a nit of a thing. Give a little tug and that should unbunch your problem
Polls change daily. Like
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:51am.
Polls change daily. Like Obama's approval rating during the same period was 48%. That percentage is now history. Obama couldn't win election for dog catcher today. Wed. he said no troops in Libya, today there are 2200 marines headed for the area. God be with them. But Obama, unless God from Heaven comes down and anoints him in front of the world, will never serve another term as President.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
tombaker*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:17pm.
If you are indeed going to continue false statements, please go back to your poly sci class.
The Republicans do not have a majority of congress. They have obtained a majority of the House in Nov 2010. The Democrats continue a majority in the Senate.
Secondly, the Democrats hold a majority of the Senate for 40 of the last 56 yrs. The Democrats had a majority of the house for 44 of 56 yrs which includes the current republican majority until 2012.
Obama has repeatedly ingnored congress authority.The senate deals with laws and rules, the house with budgetary matters. Get the picture? Clearly, the democrats are to blame for our current economic crisis. Obama has warned us of "necessarily skyrocketing" prices of fuel and engery. He has done so by imposing a multitude of ridiculous rules and regulations designed to stifle exploration for coal, natural gas, and oil. His moratorium that has been over ruled by a federal judge is being continued. Only one permit has been issued in over a year and that permit is basically 25 yrs old. The moratorium also extends to the east coast for 7 yrs.
He has issued increasing % of ethanol for gasoline knowing that food sources are used in the refinery process. A process that has been found to be inefficient, polluting, and scientifically proven to be an error.
Your inability to argue any points with substance confirms that you are a sto'bought troll. Go back to your boss and obtain links and proof to support your lies if you can. If not, then you are dismissed.
Shhhh, Cajun
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:24pm.
Tombaker the potted plant don't care nuthin' fo pesky facts. He can't hear them, and even if he could, it's beyond his reading comprehension skills (or lack thereof) to understand what they mean.
You'll make him cry and whine if you keep it up, cajun. I know, I already reduced the poor little fella to tears.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
can see that Blonde*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:31pm.
If he calls you Blondie one more time. His post was very telling, he does not understand the legislative process. He is definetly a sto' bought troll and has now begun to bore me.
Tears are ok, just dont hurt him too bad Blonde, his mom and dad will have to pay medical expenses.
The House is often refered to
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 7:50am.
The House is often referred to as the Congress with Congressmen differing form the Senate, I think you understood the point I made. Palin could have worked on the nations oil needs and the Alaska reserves, there are ways to get things done in politics, especially with the will of the people wanting lower gasoline prices. The time is right to drill in Alaska. Maybe you don't want to see that happen. But I think Palin skipped out on a national role when she quit the Governorship.
Her quitting the Governorship makes it most likely she could never deal with the White House because the pressures are so much greater. Maybe you think Alaska is too small of a forum for Palin to show her great savvy....that is why she retreated and resigned. Nobody buys that.
A person who quits elected Executive office.....is a very poor choice for President. And the polls show that Obama would mop the floor with Palin in the election.
You seem totally unable to listen to this message, and instead want to attack the messenger instead. Did I get something of substance wrong? Besides spelling and using a common referral to the House as Congress vs the Senate.
No, the House is NOT "commonly referred to as Congress"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:12am.
Now act like an adult and just admit you stuck your foot in your mouth.
Or don't, which would be a tacit admission that you would fail a 5th grade social studies class.
Foot?
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 6:29pm.
Damn! It's up to the knee by now! Sheesh!
"The House is often referred
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:18am.
"The House is often referred to as the Congress with Congressmen differing form the Senate,"
Factually wrong, tom. You didn't take civics class in high school apparently (assuming you aren't still in high school).
Here ya go stupid, the
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 12:33am.
Here ya go stupid, the dictionary meaning of Congress:
con·gress
/n. ˈkɒŋgrɪs; v. kənˈgrɛs, kəŋ-/ Show Spelled[n. kong-gris; v. kuhn-gres, kuhng-] Show IPA
–noun
1.
(initial capital letter)
a.
the national legislative body of the U.S., consisting of the Senate, or upper house, and the House of Representatives, or lower house, as a continuous institution.
b.
this body as it exists for a period of two years during which it has the same membership: the 96th Congress.
c.
a session of this body: to speak in Congress.
2.
the national legislative body of a nation, especially of a republic.
3.
a formal meeting or assembly of representatives for the discussion, arrangement, or promotion of some matter of common interest.
4.
the act of coming together; an encounter; meeting.
5.
an association, especially one composed of representatives of various organizations.
6.
familiar relations; dealings; intercourse.
7.
coitus; sexual intercourse.
–verb (used without object)
8.
to assemble together; meet in congress.
(emphasis mine)
You should seriously consider going back to school. May I suggest you start with the 3rd grade?
You're crusin' for a bruisin' little reading deficient troll
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:21pm.
I did not say "she could not deal with the pressures of office" (you did). If you think I did, why don't you copy & paste my post proving it.
My post dealt with your now-proven-wrong assertion that Palin is the self-identified leader of the Tea Party. She's not. Deal with it.
Secondarily, I addressed the reasons for resigning, which have absolutely nothing to do with your contention. If you think you can prove otherwise, be my guest. With links that actually prove your point this time. Try to find an article with Palin addressing the pressures of her office being part of the reason for her resignation. Anything else, guess what, you lose again!
I am absolutely not arguing that minutae makes my point (how reading impaired are you, anyway?). I'm am arguing that proof makes my point, and disproves yours. Straighten up and prove your point(s), as we are fond of saying here, link or slink. Else we'll know you're merely trolling, here, and you won't last very much longer in the NB community.
Don't call me Blondie again. And don't worry, I couldn't be bothered with your horrid spelling and atrocious grammar. You're not worth my time with that, Sparky.
As for the lightweight, look in the mirror, Feckless.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
one more time Blondie
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:03pm.
YOU SAID: "If you want to ignore the fact that the media and the lawsuits interfered in Palin's ability to be an effective governor Alaska"
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/03/21/andrea-snar...
You admit that Palin did not have the skills to be an effective Governor because of a few lawyers and the MSM. Guess what, the POTUS has to deal with that times 100. Clearly the same failings of Palin in Alaska would make her ineffective as POTUS. Get it? She caved under the pressure. Its that simple. She is not a strong Republican, she is a reality star, and paid pundit, and book selling....great
Blondie, as others call you,
you refer to me as all sorts of insulting names, which no one calls me that I know.
So much for the strength of your fabled ass whoopping, cry to mommy next? Blondie is a good name, except for you, where its a negative I guess, air headish I suppose.
If you have the gusto to talk about the abilities of Palin that make her suitable for high office, do share, but lets not spend time talking about feeeeeelings.
Gusty winds around your cranium persist. Blondie
So you think a Palin who resigned the Governship, is a winner for POTUS in a General election? Why is that?
Been nice knowing you.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:06pm.
Not really.
SOL, Blonde is not going to
Submitted by bassndude on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:22pm.
SOL, Blonde is not going to answer him. I don't think she would answer him if he capitulated at this point. Not calling her Blondie. That's a no-no, and in my view, very disrespectful.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Bass:
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:35pm.
yeah, and taunting and daring is even more disrespectful.
Not that I haven't done my share of it of course, but at least I have the common sense to know where not to aim it.
LOL SOL,
Submitted by bassndude on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:53pm.
Blonde is not really a good target. I have not noticed this guy do anything but insult and repeat, his own personal views with out providing anything to explain where he got it. Now I am not going to argue if she was an effective leader or not. I will say she did good things while governor. And Tom's argument that the POTUS deals with lawsuits is totally bogus. The Justice Department deals with those. The POTUS never even knows about such things unless Congress is the plaintiff. And even at that, the DOJ deals with it.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
tombaker, there you go again.
Submitted by bassndude on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:19pm.
tombaker, there you go again. Blonde is not arguing about Palin's abilities or lack there of. She was expounding on the reasons. Which, you, with your limited understanding of the English language, are having very limited success comprehending.
So far you have not provided any evidence to back up your presupposition of the reason(s) Palin resigned, or her lack of skills in governing. So far you have only regurgitate your own thoughts. If, indeed, they are your thoughts, and you are not being spoon fed by the Sarah fearing liberals you seem to quote.
No evidence on your part, only ignorance and stupidity.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Did she resign because she
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:02am.
Did she resign because she felt she could do the job as Governor effectively? NO
Did she resign saying the Lt. Governor would do a better job? YES
Did she say her family was a big part of her decision? YES
Did she complain about the MSM being part of the reason she resigned? YES
Did she complain about lawyers looking at her ethics? YES
Are all of these things that the POTUS would have to deal with? YES.
You can cut it anyway you want, put all the spin that Palin did during her 18 minute improptu speech making her resignation.
But at the end of the day its always the same, Palin could not deal with the rigors of the Executive Branch, and she tucked tail, retreated, and resigned her post. We don't need to say its dereliction of duty.....but its what someone does when the job is too big for them.
POTUS is a much bigger than Governor of Alaska, and since she could not deal with Governorship, there is no way she could deal with being POTUS. Its pretty logical.
The polls show Obama 15-20 points winning over Palin. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi... I am not making it up.
In the end its pretty simple, when the going got tough....Palin quit.
Nice bumper sticker..... I quit as Governor, make me your President now...Palin 2012
Oh and by the way, Couric of all people made her look like a chump.....Couric of all people,.GMAFB
tombaker
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:05am.
Are all of these things that the POTUS would have to deal with? YES.
In reality, no. The President doesn't deal with this stuff. He has the DOJ, and the office administration that deals with it for him. The lever of ignorance you display about the workings of the office of the President is astounding! Even for a bigoted misogynist, like yourself.
DOJ intercedes for the President on the lawsuits. Anything pertaining to ethics, the Whitehouse has lawyers to deal with. Not even Congress can force the President to testify unless there are impeachment proceedings.
Check the functioning procedures for the federal government and the office of President. Or continue to display ignorance.
Es gibt kein Heilmittel für dumm.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Functioning procedures?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:12am.
It'll take a couple years at least to reach that level.
He STILL claiming that most people refer to the House of Representatives as "congress."
SOL, only the mentally
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 12:00pm.
SOL, only the mentally challenged refer to the House as Congress. I guess that lets us know which hole that tombaker peg fits in.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
"Did she resign because she
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:20am.
"Did she resign because she felt she could do the job as Governor effectively? NO
Did she resign saying the Lt. Governor would do a better job? YES
Did she say her family was a big part of her decision? YES
Did she complain about the MSM being part of the reason she resigned? YES
Did she complain about lawyers looking at her ethics? YES
Are all of these things that the POTUS would have to deal with? YES."
Please back up your claims with documented evidence.
[Yes, folks, I know tombaker won't 'cause he's too doggoned lazy, but I had to ask once again.]
He won't ever present any
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 4:37pm.
He won't ever present any facts. It looks as if Tom Parrot is trying to prove he has a worse case of PDS than PoopTech ever did.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
tombaker---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:15pm.
"The nation need energy."
"Blonde is think arguing--"
"--and looking for spelling issue to try to win--"
Who in Billy Blue Hell are you to term someone a lightweight?
World class dork is what you are.
MD
I anticipate that if he
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 10:09am.
I anticipate that if he doesn't change his methods, he will be removed from NB.
Try talking about
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:09pm.
Try talking about Politics....as I am. This is for discussion and comments on topic. Palin is not a strong conservative candidate due to her decisions in the last years.....If you think otherwise say why? Don't just stomp your feet at the notion.
What?
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:19pm.
Palin is not a strong conservative candidate due to her decisions in the last years
How about you prove your point first?
.If you think otherwise say why
She has help elect dozens of solid Conservatives. She is a conservative, you Tom, are not. Your just another lib who gets his memos from the libtard media.
Now your even boring
I can read the polls too, and
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:13am.
I can read the polls too, and say I want X to win.....and then when they win, can I take the credit for all that too. I have some great stock picks for you too. Geez.
She is a weak candidate, she quit as governor, she is not a little tabloid reality TV starlet, the Palin show....whoopie. She shows up to Dancing with the Stars. All that instead of serving out her term in elected office.
Strong? Look at the polls http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Palin is losing by 15 points to Obama.
Strong is defined as, as a Political candidate. Why would the electorate pick a Politician that quit their job and ran away from her elected duties. She quit.....its not a trivial thing.
So when only 15% of Republicans support Palin vs other candidates....the 85% are all liberals......get logic girl.
Ever hear the phrase "too stupid to know when to quit?"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:19am.
I didn't think so.
Two quotes apply to
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 12:22pm.
Two quotes apply to "tombaker"
"You can't fix stupid." -- Ron White
"You are stuck on stupid." -- General Russel L. Honoré [ret.] (a.k.a. -- The Ragin' Cajun)
Even your ad hominemic
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:34pm.
Even your ad hominemic implications are simply lies for I have been talking about politics and in a couple of recent instances, correcting your errors.
I am posting comments on the
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:05pm.
I am posting comments on the skills of Palin.....if you have nothing to contribute besides personal insults to me, why bother?
"I am posting comments on the
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:36pm.
"I am posting comments on the skills of Palin....."
Of which demonstrate a marked lack of knowledge and honesty on your part.
We're still waiting for you
Submitted by Free Stinker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 4:40pm.
We're still waiting for you to tell us what ELF, PPT and ACES are.
But it's okay, we realize you don't know what they are. To know that would mean you have a rudimentary knowledge of what has been happening in Alaska politics.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Fair warning, tom (assuming
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 10:08am.
Fair warning, tom (assuming you actually care): if you continue with this tactic of insults and personal attacks, you run the risk of suffering the same consequence of previous trolls: banishment.
Also, you are completely ignorant of ANWR (not Anwar). First of all, ANWR stands for Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. Pay attention to the second word in that name: NATIONAL. That would seem to indicate it was something run by the FEDERAL not state government, wouldn't it? Why yes it does! In fact it is maintained by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. And U.S. stands for United States indicating that this is under one of the FEDERAL government departments, right? Why yes it does as well! And if one looks with a little bit of investigative skill (like going to the bottom of the USF&WS website) one finds out that that agency falls within the Department of the Interior.
So the Governor of Alaska, be they liberal or conservative, has very little say concerning ANWR. About all they can do is encourage the federal government to drill in the extremely small percentage of ANWR land. Palin did that, and took a massive amount of undue harassment as a result.
In short, tom, you are incredibly ignorant of the facts. As usual.
Beukeboom
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:19pm.
I think if you review the above you will see lots of insults to me as initial responses for the heresy of not being enthralled with Palin as a candidate for POTUS, and see that I am trying to stay on topic. So you can take your fair warning and
Yes I expect that a Governor with States rights, including eminent domain and other tools, has the ability to work public sentiment and effectively lobby DC to open up lands for oil and energy needs.
I expect that an excellent Governor can do these things.....I see by Palin's resignation she gave up on trying. I don't see Palin as having any more skills that she has evidenced, which are not enough to be a strong Republican running for Executive office.
Maybe she can be a Congresswoman, they just need to vote, the Executive branch needs the ability to move things by delegation of others. She gave up
I had a feeling you didn't
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:38pm.
I had a feeling you didn't care.
And you continue to demonstrate abject ignorance in how much influence the Governor of Alaska has on federal decisions concerning ANWR (not Anwar).
You keep posting only to reveal even more ignorance.
What's the matter, Tombaker? I hear crickets chirping
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:11pm.
In reply to my total demolition of your unsubstantiated claim that Palin leads the Tea Party, furthermore that she self-identifies as its leader.
You got caught spouting pure lies and smears, oops, and now you are just being totally silent.
As my ex-BIL, who was in the Special Forces used to say, "You Lose, Buckwheat".
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I said some sort of self
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:28pm.
I said some sort of self appointed leader....as which she acts, and continues to (perform) act. When she speaks at events she talks the role as which I say. We can continue to disagree on what the meaning of "self-appointed" means. It does not mean self-declared.
You total demolishment is pretty much trivial semantics.
If you would care to discuss how her resignation due to external pressures in any way puts her in good position to be POTUS, which I have made arguments does not....I would enjoy reading them.
Other Republicans are far strong that Palin, as Rove, George Will, and others who understand how elections are WON say.
Palin vs Obama = Obama second term.....so sorry for being opposed to such a terrible outcome. Pretty much everyone agrees that would be the outcome, including some rabid Palin posters who are Dems.
Blonde: Do you think Palin wins against Obama?
Dyamm
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:36pm.
We can continue to disagree on what the meaning of "self-appointed" means. It does not mean self-declared
You really this stupid Tom? So whats "your" definition of "self"?
We can go into the difference
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:18am.
We can go into the difference between Self-appointed, and self declared....I used one, the other was quoted back to me.....regardless its minutia of the greater points at hand. You seemed to think I was talking about the world "self" .... that is not correct.
Have you glanced at the polling data? http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi... Palin down by 15-20 points..... gosh she is so strong.....a real winner.....ummmmm no.
No Tom, we do not debate definitions
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:35am.
Words mean what they mean, regardless of how you choose to use them.
So Tom, when was the last time a national POTUS election was decided by 15-20 points? If your justifying your ridicule and slander of Palin because of polling data., that would make you about as pathetic as they come.
`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:40am.
in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'
Oh yeah, take Rad's advice Tom
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 1:28pm.
Only my friends may call me "Blondie", and you sir, are no friend of mine.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
a troll is a troll*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 1:34pm.
They come here with one line lies, insult, repeat.
To quote Blonde
"We need a better class of troll here"!
No more I before E....... no worries
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:34pm.
Oh my dear! After what you hurled at me, the inclusion of an "i" is so fretful, you should not think of me when you friends call you that word, gosh no. I pronounce the word blonde, as two symbols anyways, with the e, as the common E sound. So its of no matter.
I am not an Australian beaked bird with colorful plumage FWIW.
Above I asked you if you thing that Palin v Obama results in anything but an Obama win, if you would like to respond????
Looks like someone just crapped their pants.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:40pm.
.
SoL...I think tombaker is this guy
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:00pm.
A black male Code Pinky! Seriously, the only thing that's missing is his fingers in his ears and him yodeling "la la la la la la la la". About as coherent as Tom's "arguments" on this thread. Actually, I should have said Tom's incessant repetitive recitation of his opinion and non-facts, all as well put forth as his spelling and grammar [snicker].
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
That was a funny one, B
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:41pm.
BTW, I think this name thing is a misunderstanding. He already stated he "pronounces the word blonde, as two symbols anyways, with the e, as the common E sound". So Blonde is pronounced Blondie.
Just like crude is really crudie, rude is rudie and dude is dudie.
Yo, Dudie!
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:48pm.
Since you're my pal, you may call me either Blondie or Dudette (or Vernette).
Hey man, just give up one of your steaks for education!!!!
More tomism's:
Qualude = Qualudie
Hey Jude = Hey Judie (that kind of changes the meaning of the song, yes?)
Nude = Nudie
Attitude = Attitudie
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
B: he could be dyslexic, too
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:58pm.
Jude, Judie - yes, letters and spelling do have consequences.
If I recall, the Beatles German language version "Achtung Juden" did not go over too well in Berlin.
Speaking of names, I don't
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 4:08pm.
Speaking of names, I don't know if their is a connection between "tombaker" and the British actor of the same name who was my favorite "Doctor Who" (also a very hilarious insane ship's captain in an episode of Black Adder). Maybe this "tombaker" is a fan of the BBC show?
You libtards will probably primary
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:40pm.
Obama, so we wont know. But Palin would win in a landslide. About the only one I think Obama may have a chance against, is Trump.
Boudin, with all sorts of
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:06pm.
Boudin, with all sorts of uncertainties ongoing both domestically and abroad I, for one, really couldn't and won't at this time predict Obama's chances in 2012 against any Republican. There are some Republicans who have been mentioned as possible candidates which I personally believe would not be strong candidates but if some sort of worse-case scenario happens for Obama even third-party candidates could potentially get more votes than Obama.
However I still feel the plausibility exists that Obama may pull an "LBJ" (e.g. -- "I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your President.") opening the door for a Hillary Clinton run at POTUS. IMHO, some things currently happening with Obama and things Obama is doing sort of points to that possibility. At this point I'm not putting high odds on it happening but will say it is plausible (again IMHO).
A whole lot of major events can occur in the upcoming 20 months all of which would influence Obama's popularity with voters. And several current events, such as Libya, could easily stretch out to 20 months or more which IMHO would destroy Obama's chances of winning in 2012 even if a cardboard cutout of Alfred E. Neuman ran against him.
Your right
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 5:59pm.
There is a long way to go, and I for one am not ruling out a dark horse.
Meta-Survey says Obama vs Palin = Obama + 15 points
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:24am.
Look at the numbers, not your silly rally cry. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Running around with you silly notions is against the aggregation of every Pollster in the country.....oh wait, you think you are smarter than every dumb pollster now too.
Not to mention you never took statistics in school either.
Let's go ahead and cancel the elections
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:23pm.
Good enough for me! Let's cancel the elections and declare His Majesty The Shahinshah PFL.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Aw, I've got you crying and whining now
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:08pm.
What precisely do you object to that I've "hurled" at you, tombaker?
Do tell, tom.....how did I hurt your feelings so much that you are weeping openly on NewsBusters?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blondie how old are you?
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:37am.
Blondie how old are you? Never mind who cares. Meanwhile since you are unable to dispute what I have said about the topic.....no need to post.....Its not about me.
Palin quit because she could not do the job effectively, because the MSM and lawyers, so she gave the job to an underling, because they could do a better job than her, Palin's resignation is an embarassment, but she takes off with a book tour, and a reality show, all this because she now has the time.
The polls show that she is 15 points behind Obama in an election. You can see what I have posted on topic above. I unclog my nose at your silly taunts.
Blondie you seem to like to insult to prove a point, I find that pointless, if you had command of the issues you would offer those. Palin failed at helping McCain win, Couric embarrassed her, a sting that still make her look like a buffoon, and Mike Huckabee is twice the potential as Palin.
What part of Palin would only lose and election to Obama don't you get? You want Obama for another 4 years? Can you read http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Well.......
Submitted by NC Cop on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:54am.
McCain lost because he ran a lousy campaign, no doubt. I don't think Sarah Palin hurt his campaign, in fact, I think McCain's loss would have been a lot worse without Palin. As far as the Couric thing, that was blown way out of proportion by a leftist media. Every candidate had embarrassing moments, I dont think its fair to destroy someones political career over one interview.
I do think leaving her job in Alaska was a mistake, but I don't view her as a "quitter". I realize what the polls say, but I would rather vote for Palin as a long shot, then put Huckabee, a worse RINO than McCain, in office.
A lot can happen between now and the election.
"Blondie how old are you?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:49am.
"Blondie how old are you? Never mind who cares. Meanwhile since you are unable to dispute what I have said about the topic.....no need to post.....Its not about me."
First of all (and you've been corrected on this multiple times) it is "BLONDE" not "Blondie" -- there is no "i" in that person's ident. At least have the courtesy to spell it correctly especially after your mistake has been pointed out to you.
Secondly, Blonde has not only disputed your posts (BTW, on an aside, to use the words of the character Inigo Montoya: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.") Blonde has refuted your posts.
I believe the word you meant to use was "refuted" not "disputed."
"Palin quit because she could not do the job effectively"
Once again I request...nay, I now demand, you back up your claim here with sound, documented evidence. I, for one, am quite sick and tired of this trolling method of which you so stupidly and habitually employ.
"Blondie you seem to like to insult to prove a point, I find that pointless"
Pot, meet kettle...I am certain you two will have plenty to discuss.
"What part of Palin would only lose and election to Obama don't you get?"
What part of the election isn't being held now but in November of 2012 confuses and confounds you?
What part of a lot can occur between now and November of 2012 confuses and confounds you?
What part of the word "premature" confuses and confounds you?
As I pointed out to you before, polls taken at approximately the same amount of time before the 1980 election didn't show Reagan having any chance of beating Carter.
And history shows just how accurate those polls were in relationship to the actual election.
You keep throwing that "Blondie" term around, troll...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:02am.
...and you are going to get a boot so far up your arse that even the most sophisticated medical scanners on Earth are going to be unable to find it.
I hate to tell you, troll, but you have picked the wrong person @ NB to start throwing insults at, and around here, trolls have a way of suddenly going poof!.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
How old am I?
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:43am.
Nunya, Tom. But you are a rude little bugger to ask, and to continue to call me "Blondie" when I've asked you, nicely, not to.
Now, let me reconstruct all of your idiocy in one succinct post before I permanently ignore you.
We've seen you talking-point potted plants a thousand times before, Tom. You're not even a very good one, but I have to give you credit for being persistent in your galactic stupidity.
You may go now.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I can feel the shock waves
Submitted by stratman on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 5:38pm.
I can feel the shock waves from Blonde's beatdown of the troll from thousands of miles away.
The scary part - Blonde didn't break a sweat.
How old are you, tom?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 12:25pm.
How old are you, tom?
tombaker
Submitted by bassndude on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:18am.
No where did you see me say anything about being the worlds police. No Where! Sarah herself did not say anything about rushing in with military force. Either your reading comprehension is severely limited, or you have a lot in common with a rock.
If you research my comments on Libya, you will find I am not in favor of involvement of any kind. Quadaffi should be left alone to deal with that situation the best he can. All reports indicate the "rebels" are Al Qaeda backed. Libya produces only 1.6 to 1.8 million barrels of oil a day. For my money, we should back out and let them kill each other off. As far as I am concerned, the fewer Muslims in this world, the better.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
"Palin did hold office,
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:42am.
"Palin did hold office, claims to be some sort of self appointed leader of the Tea Party movement"
I notice that even after several days and also several requests, you've not shown any evidence that Sarah Palin "claims to be some sort of self appointed leader of the Tea Party movement".
How come?
Submitted by Jacksonian Libe... on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:25pm.
If Sarah Palin is so unworthy, stupid, and doesn't have a chance, why do they spend so much time talking about her? The mere fact that she frightens the power structure so much, means they see her as an unstoppable force, that is going to endanger their place at the feed trough.Simple; the libs fear Palin.
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 1:47am.
Simple; the libs fear Palin.unstoppable force? up until she quits.
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:18am.
The MSM spend lots of time on lots of things, that have no benefit to the country as whole, but simply just for ratings. Under you criteria of unstoppable force, so would be Charlie Sheen.Palin was a losing VP of the USA candidate in 2008, and a former Governor, that is trotting around saying she is thinking about running for President. That is a story....regardless.....and you should not put any theory of unstoppable force into it.
Palin is not stupid, but she has not evidenced she has the skills in her previous work. O'Donnell is not a witch, but she is as much of a winner in GENERAL Elections as was Palin, and will be if she runs again.
If your game is to make a point and not win the General Election.....well go figure.
Yes. You are.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:09am.
Oh wait. I thought you said Unstoppable Stooge up there when you said that thing with the, say what is your point anyway? Other than carrying a 36 year grudge because a girl gave you a swirly and made you sing "I got a little lamb" while she was giving said swirly.
Whatever Mary. Shut up and go away.
"Palin is not stupid, but she
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:53am.
"Palin is not stupid, but she has not evidenced she has the skills in her previous work."
Yet another accusation of which you provide not a shred of sound, documented evidence.
tombaker*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:03am.
OK, I have had enough of your dribble. "Palin cant take the pressure" as you repeat over and over...
What the hell would you know about pressure? She lives in the largest geographic state, the most difficult and hostile environment, she has given birth to 5 children, one with Downs Syndrome. She has reared 3 teenagers, let me assure you, that is pressure. Her son served in the military in Iraq. Her husband is a commercial fisherman in an area that is extremely dangerous. She succeeded at being elected to a position long held by corrupt old guard politicians for decades and cleaned up the mess. She has endured countless personal attacks, threats on her life, threats to her children and parents severe enough for law enforcement to be involved.
All of this and she has still managed to make a living, share her love of this country, her strength and convictions when INVITED to do so. All while you sit comfortably on the commuter train to your next poly sci class carrying a very expensive latte'.
Come back after you grow up and experience a little "pressure".
Whoa. Now that's gonna leave a serious mark.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:13am.
.cajun---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:08pm.
that post was every bit as beautiful, as tom "sh*t for brains w/PDS" baker is ugly.
MD
MD*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:20pm.
I have posted several comments today but for some reason they disappeared into the netherwaves. It seems "snarky" replies survive but also seems to have caused an exponential increase in PDS victims . Must be getting close to the start of the race.
cajun---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 5:30pm.
NB's, today (or maybe it's my computer), is the absolute 'squirrel' -iest it has ever been.
Maybe the gremlins are running amok amidst the trolls we have on board.
That tombaker is the biggest one trick pony I have ever seen around here; if I didn't know better, I'd think he had something against Sarah Palin.
MD
She has quite the life and is
Submitted by tombaker on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:09pm.
She has quite the life and is an honorable woman, she simply does not have the skills and demonstrated ability to handle the pressure of national office.
She quit for good reason, and for all those reasons she would fail as POTUS. Nothing has shown she could now handle those pressures.
Her reality show as nicely photographed though.
so, TomB
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 6:47pm.
given the limited choice of voting for Obama or Palin - are you voting Obama?
Given that limited choice, it
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:41pm.
Given that limited choice, it makes no difference what my vote is, the problem is simply the General election would result in an Obama win.
That would be horrific.
Why not give the 4-5 leading Republican Governors a shot at Obama, for example if we could only get New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to run....I think he would very likely win.
Palin is not the best choice, her resignation as Governor, is a character flaw that won't fly as a reason she would have the skills to be POTUS.
So I would write in Chris Christie, in your worse case scenario, but the end result would still be subjugated to another horrific term of Obama.
So now you say, tombaker---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 7:14pm.
that :
"She quit for good reason".
But she still could not handle those POTUS pressures, you say.
Bad mouthing Palin while ignoring the poseur in the Oval Office tells me all I need to know about your particular brand of politics.
MD
Where I come from
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 11:07pm.
We call that stepping on your own XXXX
My link thing aint working
This site is as quirky tonight as I have ever seen?
She quit for good
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:46pm.
She quit for good reason....IE she did not have the skills to continue. If she had the skills there would have been no reason for her to tuck tail and retreat. Fight of flight.....Palin ran for the hills.
Bad mouthing? LOL awwwwwww sniffle sniffle
Palin v Obama = Obama, that is not a good result for the nation
tom, you have yet to prove
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 10:13am.
tom, you have yet to prove Palin resigned because she allegedly couldn't handle the pressure. This remains merely your heavily biased opinion and nothing more.
Why did she resign?
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:50pm.
Because she could be effective?
Because she was effective?
Because she had a hard time dealing with the media?
What do you want me to do, read you what she said in her resignation? You resign when you are not up for the job at hand, politics is high pressure.....she needed to get out of office.
Any excuse or rationale you want.....it does not bode well for a future candiate, can you imagine how the Democrat party would excoriate her?
You cannot answer a question
Submitted by bassndude on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:58pm.
You cannot answer a question with a question. Your reasoning is total personal supposition. You still have not proven your point. Like a dog to vomit, you keep going back to the same thing. Ignorance is curable, you know. Research is at your finger tips. Tell us why she resigned and then show us the evidence.
P.S. I tried to use small words.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
Watch her speech its 18
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:45am.
Watch her speech its 18 minutes, its not really a debate, she resigned because she was not up for the job....the job was bigger than what she had capablity to deal with, she had nothing more to offer, and the Lt Governor was just as capablle as her.
But remove the reason why, and you still have the same result. The general election electorate will look at Palin who resigned as Governor, and conclude she would be far mor incapble to deal with being POTUS..
Sorry but yes the mire fact she Quit as Governor, is a death nail to any future higher office for Palin, don't belive me....fine.... but the polls say the end result is the same....Palin in the General election mean 4 more years for Obama
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
see it now?
tom, your ignorant, bigoted
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:23am.
tom, your ignorant, bigoted and narrow-minded. Misogynistic at heart. That comes through in your replies to Blonde. Always condescending, always insulting. It is obvious that you hate women in general. Your constant reference to a single poll at realpolitics is also demonstrative of your extreme one-sided view of the world.
And I do not believe that anyone here actually gives two hoots what you think. You simply refer to one(1) poll, and your confused reasoning and opinion and call it all facts. When in fact, it is not. Your living proof,
Es gibt kein Heilmittel für dumm.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
My goodness...you really are
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:52am.
My goodness...you really are stupid on top of ignorant.
Any reasonable and honest person who takes the time to watch the speech or read the transcripts of the speech can clearly see you are now intentionally misrepresenting not only the content but the tone as well.
Yes, you are lying, tombaker.
You don't know why she resigned ...
Submitted by NL207 on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 6:50pm.
That's clear from your postings here.
Why don't you do a little research and find out why she resigned. It isn't a state secret.
NL207 she resigned because
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:50am.
NL207 she resigned because the rigor of the office became more than she could deal with, she talked to her family about it, and they joined in, and supported her quitting.
Its not any deeper than this. The reasons do become moot because the result is same regardless, American don't vote for quitters, or resigners....the vote for people who they think can best do the job.
Palin would cave and crumble under the pressure of being President, just like the result of her Governorship of the small population state of Alaska.
I did the research.....why don't you. Palin screwed the pooch.
More vitriolic lies from
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:58am.
More vitriolic lies from tombaker who now has removed all doubt that he is, in fact, is a troll.
Clearly, tom, you haven't done any thorough research. Otherwise you wouldn't have posted so many wrong things.
I see you are clearly misinformed.
Submitted by NL207 on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:24pm.
Let me help you.
Palin's legal fees exceed $500,000
Now, it seems in order to do this job as Governor, with the political blood sport some are playing today, only the independently wealthy or those willing to spend their income on legal fees to defend their official actions in office ... can serve
Legal expenses also came from other ethics complaints that were lodged against Palin, nearly all of which were dismissed by the Alaska Personnel Board
Ethics complaints filed against Palin
The last link details 18 known ethics complaints filed against Palin as of June 22, 2009. there are reported to be even more that. I have seen reports there were 25 of these and several have come from the same plaintiff. Most, if not all came from Democratic activists. Not one of these complaints has thus far resulted in a prosecution or any official sanction. i.e., they are all baseless.
Ordinary citizens like Palin do not have the personal resources to resist an onslaught like that. Resignation effectively halted the deluge. There can be no official misconduct ethics complaints against those who are not public officials.
Where did you do your research? O'Malley's bar?
I reiterate: tom, you have
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:03am.
I reiterate:
tom, you have yet to prove Palin resigned because she allegedly couldn't handle the pressure. This remains merely your heavily biased opinion and nothing more.
And to that I add...
tom, I now can only conclude that either you don't know what proper proof is and of what it consists...
...or...
you have no proof to support your claims so you just repeat it over and over in a vain hope that in repeating it, it may become true. Reality doesn't work that way, tom.
Maybe tom needs...
Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:38am.
This.
Prolly wouldn't help but what the hey.
Awesome Deuce
Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 8:51pm.
Hell, maybe I will vote for her?
The awful Andrea
Submitted by Lynn on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 6:37pm.
That woman's voice is like clacking castanats. Someone please go ahead and kick her off the ledge.Ooooh!
Submitted by Rukus on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 9:37pm.
This thread is infested with a mini-PT! And he has ONE thing to say, awesome! Sooooo, I guess Barry quit doing his job shortly into his first senate term to campaign is just wonderful, huh? You're a one note horn tootin' yerself there bud. And stop calling Blonde Blondie ya jerk! She's asked you twice ya putz! Sheesh.
Poor thing does not like
Submitted by tombaker on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 2:55pm.
Poor thing does not like their true name, no problem, I will refer to the Alias as the Alias, its the internet who knows the gender in reality anyway.
I have given my rationale for why Palin vs Obama = Obama
Do you dispute that outcome. Really? That naive on politics?
Given that, why would anyone want Palin a candidate for POTUS. I don't dislike her, but I don't want to see that horrific outcome.
So many checkers players, heck really tic tac toe, anyone else gonna think a few moves ahead on the political chessboard.
Palin vs. Obama =
Submitted by Rukus on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:33pm.
Palin, easily. Look at the economy, the unemployment, the ridiculous amounts of spending. Palin ran a surplus in AK. She also enjoyed the highest approval of any gov. while there. Palin didn't quit and run like you've said, over, and over, and over, and... ad nauseum. She was being bombarded by frivolous lawsuit after frivolous lawsuit costing the citizens of AK millions upon millions with no end in sight, PERIOD! That was not good for AK so she made the sacrifice to stop it. She left the state to a like minded lieutenant gov. That's the main point.
Secondly, Palin couldn't just bypass the gov't (unlike the knucklehead potus we have now) and just go drilling in ANWR (once again, NOT Anwar) willy nilly. As Beuk has schooled you on several times already it's FEDERAL land! She has to get FEDERAL approval! She tried but the environazi's that control the democrat party said NO!
Don't go on with the lie that you don't hate Palin Mr. PopTech Jr. It's blatantly obvious and we are way too smart for that. We've seen your kind many times before and will see your kind many times more.
Get over your Palin misogyny and put down the roids
You know tombaker,
Submitted by bassndude on Thu, 03/24/2011 - 3:41pm.
Your rationale equates to your opinion. And you seem to arrived at your conclusions without any facts or research. Unless you count DKOS. And they are not the most rational bunch, but they do share your opinion.
How do you figure, that, with only 17 percent of the population viewing Obama as a strong leader, he could be reelected? At this rate, he is the most incompetent person to hold that office to date. And to lead Jimmy Carter in that respect, is going some.
At this point, Bambi's mother would beat him in an election. And we all know she is dead. I shot her and she is in my freezer at this time.
For one that claims to be so politically perspicacious, your not supporting your position.
Ignorance is curable but, Es gibt kein Heilmittel für dumm.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
read
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 8:54am.
read http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi... Karl Rove says Palin is a loser as candidate......vs your theory of a single data point on strong leader.
Palin vs Obama = Obama That is not a result the country or I can be hit with.
You may be a Palin lemming....but other candidates are far better than Palin.
If you read Rove's book, you
Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:49am.
If you read Rove's book, you will find that he has been wrong on a number of occasions. Happens to the best of em. And your reading comprehension disbenefit is showing up again. You cannot point out anywhere, in any of my posts where I have espoused Palin as being a strong leader. You have missed the point entirely, simply by relying on your own preconceived opinions. Why am I not surprised?
Use the gray matter between your ears.
And I am not a Palin lemming, but neither am I a misogynist.
Es gibt kein Heilmittel für dumm.... tombaker.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
You clearly know not of what
Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 10:55am.
You clearly know not of what you write and lie when cornered. Thank you for confirming that you are nothing more than a insipid little troll of no importance. I now recognize that I erred in giving your respect that you didn't ever deserve.
Cancel 'em
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:27pm.
I say that based on this one solitary poll that we should just cancel the elections and declare His Majesty The Shahinshah PFL.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Karl Rove ....
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 8:32am.
Isn't he the Republican political adviser who engineered the defeats of 2006 and 2008?
Some data point you have!.
.
Submitted by NL207 on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 9:36pm.
.
Terminate the tombaker troll---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 11:19pm.
Cancel his connection. Cut off his crap. Alienate his ability to access. Prevent his prevarications. Limit his lies. Bar his balderdash. Banish his bull-roar. Pinch off his unrelenting PDS. Nullify his negativity.
Pop Tech was before my time, but this horse's ass is steve05 on steroids.
Ban his butt.
MD
Let him post.
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 8:34am.
And most of all, all you folks had your fun with him this week. I haven't had any real sport with this nitwit yet.
NL
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 10:34am.
In other words leave the door open to let the flies in so you can swat 'em?
Who said anything about swatting?
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 3:41pm.
I was going to pull his wings off, then feed him to my pet mantis.
NL207---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 03/26/2011 - 7:06pm.
Upon a further moment of consideration:
You be right.
MD
Last I checked, Palin had to
Submitted by tombaker on Fri, 04/29/2011 - 4:55pm.
Last I checked, Palin had to resign the Governorship, she was confident the State would be perfectly fine with an underling do the job. She had that much value add.
Every poll shows Palin being obliterated by a Obama in a hypothetical run in 2012...it foolish to think that the American public does not have a well formed view of Palin....its not going to be changed by finding out more about her, or her Politics.
Palin already had a pretty nice check coming in from her book deal that would pay any legal bills many times over. Not to mention an abundant supply of Pro Bono lawyers to go after those filling frivolous lawsuits against her.
She took a job at Fox News so as to not face Couric or the rest of the MSM again. She did a reality show to....oh who knows.....but she did pull a pay check out of it.
Why would anyone....anyone at all, not think that the pressures of the Oval Office would not cause Palin to resign again.....it does not get any easier being the POTUS, and she bailed out of a simple Governorship of Alaska.
I am sure you can dispute whatever you feel you need....but she resigned, and that is pretty simple.....you should understand that for the GOP, Palin is a turkey, that just won't fly.
Explain how a very public resignation from Governorship....enables her for higher office.....GO
Sarah Palin had to resign, tombaker?---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 04/29/2011 - 7:21pm.
I believe that is an incorrect statement.
But then, your PDS does tend to cause little slip-ups like that.
You know, like using your opinion as though it were a carved in stone fact.
MD
Enough. Put up or shut up.
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 11:09pm.
Every poll shows your divine object of intense, passionate hatred being obliterated by His Majesty The Shahinshah in 2012, but unfortunately for you, polls are meaningless, especially 18 months away. Polls have been meaningless 2 days away. But then, you do not study history nor politics, so you do not know this.
Ever think of citing these phantom polls other than your one from realclearpolitics? Of course you won't: it is much easier for you to be an intellectually lazy vomiting parrot of talking points.
And referring to "the simple governorship of AK" only reveals to me your elitist snobbery, which I suspect is also driving your hatred of this woman.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
I guess she could do what the
Submitted by ant on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 11:44pm.
I guess she could do what the messiah does, not feel any pressure in the Oval office, after-all, elections are all that matters, the country can go to shit, what does he care? He thinks it needs changin' any way, does it matter to him if the change is good or bad or just the same destructive path the derelicts of Washington and the Media party have been leading us to already? Just go play golf, take another vacation, go on ESPN or LateNight, anything but actually think and do the job. Seriously, Sarah Palin could go hunting 67 times in her first year in office and as long as she doesn't implement anything resembling the absentee-"present" policies of King douchebag, the people will fend for themselves.