The Los Angeles Times recently created a stir among the Pentagon press corps, running a page one story implying that the Defense Department was cheating wounded warriors out of their disability pay.
The LAT shared the story of a Marine “wounded twice in Iraq -- by a roadside bomb and a land mine” and a soldier who “crushed her back and knees diving for cover during a mortar attack in Iraq.” The LAT indignantly reported: “…in each case, the Pentagon ruled that their disabilities were not combat related.”
A Department of Defense official tells me that a number of prominent MSM Pentagon correspondents were ready to take the Pentagon to task, but all ultimately dropped the story. Why? It turns out that, upon investigation, the LAT’s page-one piece was mostly fiction.
“They’re just flat wrong” said the Pentagon’s Undersecretary for Military Personnel Policy Bill Carr, “we have no such policy, and never have.” Carr clarified that “as for the two wounded warriors described in the article, both were separated under programs giving special, additional and full benefits reserved for the combat wounded.”
Meanwhile, I’m informed that the Florida Times Union—which ran the LAT story on its own front page—promises to correct the record by printing the Pentagon’s side of the story soon.
But while the rest of the media has backed off the story, the LAT has reportedly told the Pentagon it has no plans to correct its report. You might say the LAT stands as . . . a Medium of One.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well ...
December 4, 2008 - 16:38 ET by Dave PierreMaybe a polite e-mail to the LAT's Readers' Representative (Jamie Gold) is in order:
readers.rep@latimes.com
My beef with the Readers Rep. is that she often comes across as the Writers' Rep, and not always the rep for the readers of the Times.
+_+_+_+_+
Frankenlies.com: The truth about the lies of Al Franken ...
Hey Dave
December 4, 2008 - 17:50 ET by Gary HallExactly what happened there with Jamie? A couple of years back they had seemed to be waking up and developing a bit of an interest in being inquisitive, and in the news being, well, the news. (;~> gary
PS - from what I see here, I think that the LA Times should have already posted a note on this news story; that the story was being reviewed for accuracy - something like that.
I hope the Florida Union
December 4, 2008 - 16:39 ET by bigtimerI hope the Florida Union does exactly as they say...the LAT are a replica of Murtha...no accountability, no real sorrow, no outcry from the people in loud voices...
They had and do have an agenda to accomplish, which they did in some ways, they will have to live with the repercussions in the end, no matter how that happens...which it will in the end, I may not be around to see it...but their end days will come.
Despicable...Disgraceful.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Actionable?
December 4, 2008 - 16:50 ET by UtherpendIsn't slander actionable in most courts of the land?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you"
LAT is a loser of a news rag ...
December 4, 2008 - 17:05 ET by SentryDanLAT is a loser of a news rag and will scream "Freedom of the Press" so they don't have to retract or correct their fictional news story.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It is bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Services.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a taste the protected will never know.
Medium?
December 4, 2008 - 21:36 ET by Pilgrim1949I think, super small, microscopic, nano-sized more fittingly describes the scruples and "objectivity" of this rapidly dwindling dead-tree source of leftist propagan--- er, um, "news."