Joe Conason's column should be as chilling to conservatives as it is meant to be comforting to liberals. His message: don't be distracted by the centrist-seeming appointments Pres.-elect Obama has made to his economic team. He remains as committed as ever to his radical agenda.
Conason's commentary appears this morning at Rasmussen Reports. Key lines [emphasis added]:
[W]hen liberals point to Summers and other members of the Obama team, crying betrayal, they misunderstand the strategy behind those appointments. The most important thing to remember about the president-elect as he prepares to govern is that he takes the long view -- and that he knows how to make a reasonable case for radical change. He has not taken one step back from the commitments he articulated during his campaign.
Conservatives can't say they weren't warned. Thanks, Joe!





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
[W]hen liberals point to
November 27, 2008 - 12:24 ET by MidAmerica[W]hen liberals point to Summers and other members of the Obama team, crying betrayal, they misunderstand the strategy behind those appointments.
Well... are you going to believe what obama says.... or your lying eyes?
Democrats always implied
November 27, 2008 - 12:42 ET by motherbeltDemocrats always implied that the fact that Republicans name blacks to positions of power doesn't mean anything as far as not being racist goes; they are still racist.
Now Conason is saying that Obama's naming supposed "centrists" doesn't mean anything; he's still a radical leftist.
Only in this case, it's a good thing!
Conason's Delusion
November 27, 2008 - 13:48 ET by rammingspeedConason expresses a laughable oxymoron - "make a reasonable case for radical change." Radicals change things through ruthless force, damn what the people think or want. Let Obama try it; it will be his "don't ask don't tell" moment. More to the point, the reaction to any attempted Obama radicalism would be the same as it was to Clinton's bait and switch on tax cuts after his '92 election. The electorate would rebel. And Obama knows it. Conason and his fellow radicals are out to dry.
I really feel bad for you
November 27, 2008 - 14:25 ET by AizlynneI really feel bad for you guys. For vote purposes, you had a choice between a geezer and a loser. Not much choice.
We wonder how you guys are going to pay for it all? As it is, your GDP is only 1/4 of what you owe China. Has anyone asked this guy how he plans to pay for all his new spending programs?
Is he really getting good economic advice, or is it just the choir preaching to each other?
paying for it??
November 27, 2008 - 19:41 ET by nathanbforresthow do we pay for it ??? .. we'll just do like congress .. we'll get china to bail us out with loans we'll have no intention of repaying ..
never look a gift skunk in the tail
Whistling
November 27, 2008 - 14:26 ET by MichiganVetDoes anyone else interpret this as "whistling in the dark" - i.e. the p-e is already showing the implausability of his campaign promises.
Get a cold beet and some popcorn, this promises to get *really* interesting!
I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy
I am predicting that one of
November 27, 2008 - 14:51 ET by ricklailI am predicting that one of his first exectuive orders will be to lift the don't ask don't tell policy in the military thereby weakening our national defense. There will be highly dedicated men and women that will leave because of it. When our forces are weakened then the nation is weakened. But we knew this radcial agenda was coming with a Dem congress, a socialist president, and probably a filabuster proof Senate.
People like Bill Ayers and Rosie ODonnell will be mainstream. It is scary-very scary.
YOU CAN KEEP "THE CHANGE" PALIN 2012
Just another thing he's
November 27, 2008 - 17:09 ET by motherbeltJust another thing he's decided to put on hold.
And the media will cover for every one of his broken promises.
Expect this to be the most frequently heard phrase:
I didn't know at the time how bad things were...or some variation thereof.
Closely followed by
I always said that I reserved the right to change my mind depending on what I found....
That, apparently, is "change he can deliver on."
President-elect,Not
November 27, 2008 - 15:50 ET by Nortonot until 12/6 and there is no such thing as "office of the PE."
He still has to prove he is a "natural born citizen." 12/1 for the proof.
I wonder how closely his
November 29, 2008 - 02:09 ET by NL207I wonder how closely his birth certificate will be examined? There have been persistent reports of a British Colonial Birth certificate for Obama on file in Mombasa, Kenya. If that is true and is produced, even in facsimile form, we will have some interesting discussions.
I have no doubt he still
November 27, 2008 - 18:17 ET by ckc1227I have no doubt he still plans as much radical change as possible. That's what his entire life has been about. It doesn't matter who he appoints, he's the guy in charge. They're there to do what he wants, not what they want.
Obama will be able to make radical changes?
November 27, 2008 - 19:37 ET by TheHistorianThe real problem (for Obama and the uber liberals) is that most of the guys selected by Obama don't share Obama's great change vision. And because they do not share the vision, either Obama will have to make all decisions (al a Carter), sell his program (doubtful because he can't articulate it), or put up with the decisions that others make.
I think that Obama scrapped his program for change when he picked Joe Biden. Biden, and all of his other cabinet and advisers announced so far, will not likely be committed to his program, just like the second term guys Bush picked.
"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."
G. W. F. Hegel
If you didn't already know this, you weren't paying attention
November 27, 2008 - 22:21 ET by L.N. SmitheeIf you didn't already know this, you haven't been paying attention.
Find one instance in which Obama himself -- not his supporters, not his spokesmouths, but the Big B.O. himself -- has said anything that could be reasonably interpreted as "I will govern from the center."
Try, I dare you. You can't, because he's never said it. He's trotted out people to imply it without specifics, and he's sold journalists like Richard "Yeah, liberals are smarter than conservatives" Wolffe of Newsweek into believing it and putting it on the cover of the magazine. When he was finally challenged about how he promised "change" but so far surrounded himself mostly with Clinton retreads, he said, in effect, 'I am the change.'
Observant people realize that he's never been closer to conservatism than in the center on issues have to do with ideology; that's why he voted "present" on hot button bills rather than take a stand, and in those rare occasions when he would, he chose the liberal side (The "Born-Alive" bill, for example). IMHO, Barack Obama is like Hollywood writers like David E. Kelley, who create dim-bulb conservative characters like Boston Legal's Denny Crane. He doesn't know how an authentic conservative thinks, and doesn't seem to want to find out (Lawrence O'Donnell, who wrote for West Wing and created his own short-lived drama Mister Sterling about an indepedent Senator [played by Josh Brolin], also fits this description).
It stretches the imagination to conceive of a way that a guy whose parents were left-wing radicals, whose college friends were left-wing radicals, whose political mentors were left-wing radicals, and who ran for President by appealing to left-wing radicals would suddenly turn on a dime and become the Centrist-in-Chief. That idea is a fantasy created by two types of people: People who want to lull you into a false sense of security by insisting that despite his history, he's not a liberal idealogue, and David Brooks/Christopher Buckley-type Republicans who think so highly of Obama's intelligence that they figured he just couldn't be so stupid as to act as liberal as he might want.
What the latter don't take into account is that Obama is a completely different animal; he will have a greater opportunity to be radical because of the willingness of the MSM to cover for him, and because people generally are willing to take a wait-and-see approach to the sweeping transformation he promised with the economy in such sorry shape.
No such delusions come from me. President Obama may be inevitable, but I refuse to just relax and enjoy him.
"Well, I've got nothing against the press...they wouldn't print it if it wasn't true..." -- Joe Jackson, "Sunday Papers"
I hate to say this
November 28, 2008 - 07:56 ET by ahusserBut a lot of the coming angst maybe even sturm and drang can be laid at the feet of the Republican's themselves. Lack of foresight, vision, leadership, blundering, political saavy, media saavy, strategic planning, arrogance (et cetera, et cetera, et cetera). Have left the 1994 'Revolution' as if it never happened both houses of congress and the presidency lost and the party pretty much in ruins (the Republican Party may go the way of the dodo bird or Whigs even). This power vacuum has been filled with the very liberal wing of the dim party. We now have a government that can do almost anything they want without much opposition. I am a little pessimistic. If Obama doesn't screw up too bad we will have him for 8 not 4 years. After a hyper-regulatory bureaucracy, a few choice SCOTUS and other fed judgeships and I doubt whether these things can be righted. Whatever righting occurs it must be done one Senate or Congressional race at a time.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. (On a Poster)
Why do you hate to say
November 28, 2008 - 08:19 ET by motherbeltWhy do you hate to say it? Everyone here has also been saying it!
You left out the biggest mistake, however: letting themselves be manipulated by the media into choosing McCain as the candidate.
I don't really hate to say it
November 28, 2008 - 08:39 ET by ahusserBut just my cliche ridden intro. :) But that being said I didn't see any conservative candidates that had much going for them to win this particular election. It is not just the medias fault for picking McCain. McCain was the end result of the Republicans unfocused disarray. Afterall he was picked at the GOP convention and he did win in the primaries I don't know what else we could have done. Aside from our image as either rich snobs or superstitious evil cretins and the party of old white folk. We are the party that says 'no'. The Dems always say 'yes' (to everything). Spoiled children used to instant gratification will always vote for the side that says yes and gives them stuff. And that in a nutshell is socialism:)
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. (On a Poster)
Dancing...
November 28, 2008 - 14:05 ET by TellurianPolitical happenings have been a scripted event since 2000 when Bush got into office, all the way to the election of Obama. It is futile to dissect the minutia of Obama. He will hand over our sovereignty to the New World Order in London as scheduled in April when he meets as the US President, with the IMF.
There is no talking
November 29, 2008 - 02:21 ET by bigtimerThere is no talking head/so-called journalist/writer slimier than Joe Conason.
None...
Others may come close to equalling him, but he is the grease-ball deluxe of the world.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh