WaPo Writer: Hoping For an End to American-Style Capitalism

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.
  • Bookmark and Share

Was the current economic situation caused by too little government intervention in the financial markets—or too much?   I'd say the latter.  Washington used Fannie/Freddie as a political piggy bank, causing it dole out loans to people who had no business receiving them.  And because Freddie and Fannie's obligations enjoyed the implicit guarantee of the federal government, they were able to obtain funds at lower rates and become by far the biggest dog on Mortgage Street.  That in turn caused private-sector banks to lower their lending standards in order to be able to compete. Throw in the Community Reinvestment Act—another major bit of government meddling that forced lenders to compromise underwriting standards—and you had a recipe for the current unpleasantness.

But the Washington Post, in the person of Anthony Faiola, sees too much capitalism, not too little, as the problem.  According to his official WaPo bio, he "writes about the forces of globalization" for the paper.  Faiola's article in today's WaPo is entitled The End Of American Capitalism?—and it seems clear he'd love someday soon to be able to remove the question mark.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Faiola attributes none of the current mess to government meddling, placing all the blame on an insufficent degree of government interference in the markets. His opening line reads less as a prediction that as a consummation devoutly to be wished: "The worst financial crisis since the Great Depression is claiming another casualty: American-style capitalism."

According to Faiola:

Given that the United States has held itself up as a global economic model, the change could shift the balance of how governments around the globe conduct free enterprise. Over the past three decades, the United States led the crusade to persuade much of the world, especially developing countries, to lift the heavy hand of government from finance and industry.

But the hands-off brand of capitalism in the United States is now being blamed for the easy credit that sickened the housing market and allowed a freewheeling Wall Street to create a pool of toxic investments that has infected the global financial system.

Nowhere does Faiola lay any of the blame on Fannie/Freddie's government-inspired freewheeling ways.  The only reference to the institutions is to the government's takeover of them, not of the way that "heavy hand of government" pushed them into unsound practices.

Faiola also offers a quote from Joseph Stiglitz, laureate of that same Norwegian institution that awarded Al Gore its peace prize.  Stiglitz, a former Clinton-administration member, is famous for mocking free-market advocates as "fundamentalists."  Says Stiglitz:

The point now is that no one has respect for that kind of [free-market] model anymore given this crisis. And of course it raises questions about our credibility. Everyone feels they are suffering now because of us.

Faiola seems to revel in the markets' difficulties. After predicting that we are heading for "a more restrained model of free enterprise," his closing line is a quote—which reads like a gloat—from a former Carter administration official: "If you look around the world, China is doing pretty good right now, and the U.S. isn't."

An Obama administration would be stocked with economists of the sort favored by Faiola.  Chinese-style "capitalism," here we come?

Note: for a good antidote to Faiola's article, check out this IBD editorial, which suggests that the very prospect of ditching capitalism lies behind much of the current panic.

"Why has the market dropped so much?" everyone asks. What is it about the specter of our first socialist president and the end of capitalism as we know it that they don't understand?

The freeze-up of the financial system — and government's seeming inability to thaw it out — are a main concern, no doubt. But more people are also starting to look across the valley, as they say, at what's in store once this crisis passes.

And right now it looks like the U.S., which built the mightiest, most prosperous economy the world has ever known, is about to turn its back on the free-enterprise system that made it all possible.

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

But the hands-off brand of

But the hands-off brand of capitalism in the United States is now being
blamed for the easy credit that sickened the housing market

Holy Cow!!

Hands off?????

Lets see...how does one describe an agency of government-guaranteed loans and government standards of lending as "hands off"?

<sound of duct tape being ripped off roll>

Take a look

Take a look at healthcare. Government regulation is already strangling it but noone seems to notice just pointing at prices. Why do you think costs are so high?

1 Government  over Regulation

2 Greedy Lawyers who get billions im settlement money

3 Insurance premiums to pay for the above costs

this is insane

We are so screwed.  The media is completely in the tank for communism and not enough people are out there seeking the truth to what is really going on and what really caused the current crisis...

1) We don't have hands off capitalism.  This is absurd.  we have:

* The Federal Reserve controlling the market's interest rate encouraging poor decisions, and printing money to solve problems.

* High tax rates, rebates, loopholes and "bailouts", "temporary tariffs" (Harley for one example)  That really prevent the market from truly advancing.

* The market is forced through affirmative action to meet quotas not based on performance but on the color of one's skin.

The three above are PRIME examples, especially the UNELECTED Central Banking system.  So we have experienced (once again, just like in the 20's) the PRIME problem of statism.  The solution is MORE statism?

2) The best thing to do now is to encourage LESS statism.  Give the market room to expand.  Get rid of the BAD and DANGEROUS Keynesian financial policies.

Neither Obama nor McCain understand this.  But at least McCain plans on keeping the taxes low.  That and his more conservative supreme court choices are the only reasons to vote for him.

We have:

Communist versus Populist (socialist lite).  If we elect the communist we will lose our freedoms.  In all of the past expansions of government (the new deal, the great society, etc) has the government ever redacted policies or contracted in size?  If Obama gets elected we will NEVER get the current size of government back... NEVER.

Republicans in power are not doing enough to stop the steady increase in statism, or REDUCE the statism already in place.

3) Why the stock market is going down?  Because a communist is leading in the polls that plans on increasing the capital gains tax and income tax.

which reads like a

which reads like a gloat—from a former Carter administration official: "If you look around the world, China is doing pretty good right now, and the U.S. isn't."

  OK... but let's let American companies in the US operate under the same laws as are currently in China as regards environmental laws, taxes, consumer protection, labor rules, health and safety of workers, zoning, wage laws, etc, ect.... and then we'll see if American companies are able to compete with China.

good grief

When China becomes a shining light for the world you know that we are screwed.

disturbing trend...

Have a casual friend (and really nice, friendly, generous person)who is an exec. w nbc and was in china for the olympics - working for nbc.

Recently - in the context of how well the olympics was pulled off - several of us heard these scary words used in conversation.... "communism works...it does...we saw it work....and the olympics proved it." 

it was a rare, cocktail inspired glimpse into what some big wigs in ny media think...scary.

for me, this raised the bar from mere liberal bias to something much worse....especially in context of washington taking ownership in many financial firms and mortgages by the truckload. 

The Media's slanted coverage to shape the national conversation, TARP financial services ownership, Obamessiah, and the KELO decision....a very disturbing trend. You can see the stock market pricing in the future impacts by selling, selling, selling.

Stick a fork in it, already

 American style capitalism ended in 1971 with the closing of the gold window. If the best the current crop can come up with is to ban short selling then ignorance has rotted through. All the recent efforts will do is create an atmoshere of corruption unseen since food for oil. Fun times ahead.

WaPo is communist trash

Need I say more?

Left taking advantage of situation.

The left is always alert for opportunities to promote their agenda. The left is using the market drop to establish as many pockets of socialism as it can.

The nationalization of banks is one instance. The many secret provisions of the "bailout bill" is another. 

George Soros is probably looking at the world situation, and gloating, because world socialism has just won a few rounds.

Come on guys.. first we have

Come on guys.. first we have that scary loose skin shot, then Greenhouse, and now this dweeb?  Please, somebody post a shot of Sarah!  I don't care if there's a story, just post her picture!  

Another example of why McCain is about to lose

McCain is letting the left get away with this "Failure of Capitalism" and "This is what we get with deregulated markets" garbage, as if there were anything about Freddie/Fannie that Adam Smith would have approved of.

Unfortunately, I think it's an example of how McCain really doesn't understand economics any more than Obama does.

In every speech and debate between now and the election, McCain MUST point out that it was Congress that was responsible for "regulating" Freddie/Fannie, and instead of doing so they continued to use them as tools to their own ideological ends.  Exactly how well would all of capitalism fare under that kind of self-serving oversight?

You mean on top of

You mean on top of this?

h/t bigtimer in another thread.

Money quote:

in an abrupt switch from raising questions
about Barack Obama's character, he described the Democrat as a "decent
person and a person that you do not have to be scared of as president
of the United States." 

Now, given that, why should anyone vote for McCain? 

He can say Obama is a decent person, but he should be telling people to be very afraid of him as President, and the agenda that he intends to promote!

He just can't stand prosperity!!

 

This shows McCain's lack of judgement

The only good judgement McCain has shown this whole campaign was to make Sarah Palin his VP.  Unfortunately, we have the choice between McCain's POOR judgement and Obama's ABYSMAL judgement.  Obama has gotten away with his judgement because people of equally poor judgement, from Tom Brokaw through Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman, support him.

We can expect at least two years of Socialism/Communism.  (I believe the latter is Obama's approach, not just the former).  Unfortunately, we can also expect two, and maybe three, Supreme Court judges nominated by Obama.  We can also expect rapid appointment and confirmation of Federal court and appelate judges by Obama.  The result will be a judicial system which the Democrats will foist upon us.  This system will have the result of making Ruth Bader Ginsburg look conservative when this guy gets elected.

Am I scared of Obama's race?  Heck, NO!  I voted for Ken Blackwell for Ohio Governor  and was proud of Clarence Thomas' appointment to the Supreme Court by a Republican President.  I am scared of his policies, what he says he will do, and the people he is likely to put into the Cabinet. Remember that Bill Clinton put people like Ron Brown, Henry Cisneros, Janet Reno, and Bill Lann Lee in his administration.   It may make Jimmah Carter look like a Conservative President.

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

Some people are afraid of failure and some fear success.

Some people are afraid of failure and some fear success. These are strong points which affirm the sad fact that McCain is a pitiful candidate. Unfortunately, for many of us , he is our pitiful candidate. I believe that his imprisonment forced him to become so other- directed that he cannot deal with confrontation. Oh, he is full of bluster, but not much more than that.

We should have found a better way to honor him for his long imprisonment and military service than having him lose the Presidency to the Marxist Obama.

Obama, a decent person? Are you kidding me? This is the kind of crap they spread around in the Senate. It's them and us. All of the Senators become members of The Club. the honorable ones. It's all bs. What do they do? NOTHING! Oh, here is the bill $850,000,000,000.

If Socialism works so

If Socialism works so well...why aren't people swimming from Miami to Havana??? I am so tired of hearing the CRAP coming from the Left and how NO ONE but Fox and this site put it out there for general consumption. I just had CNN on they clovered 35 seconds of Sarah Palin in Johnstown, PA. I am sick...also a CNN poll said Obama 49% McCain 41%

Where did they get that number wasn't Obama just 2% over McCain on Zogby?

 

Barack Obama= Half Honkey...ALL Donkey

What did you expect!?

What did you expect. He’s a journalist. Especially a journalist for a fledgling newspaper. He probably doesn’t get paid much, is not entrepreneurial and is just another fucking loser who wants the gov’t to take care of him.

Is there any question

Is there any question now that these folks promoting Obaama are Leftists?

But the hands-off brand of

But the hands-off brand of capitalism in the United States.....

Exactly what rock has this Faiola guy been hiding under? This country hasn't had hands-off capitalism in place since the Civil War.

Faiola is just another freedom-hating Marxist propagandist taking up space at the Washington Post.

I do agree with him about one thing, though not for the reasons he cites:

This will be the end of free-enterprise in America, and it matters not who wins in next month's election. The only difference being that if Obama wins, what is left of our "free market" economic system will be brought down much faster.

-Dave

Barrack Hussein Obama must be defeated.