It's about time. I wish they had been mentioning this stuff earlier. Obama got his start at the home of ayers. Hopefully this makes it impossible to ignore and the media will be forced to at least report on his other associations like Rezko, Acorn, and the like.

Harry Smith and his cronies I am sure are furious that they have to talk about this now after doing such a good job of keeping it under wraps all this time with so little time to go before the election.   How dare Sean Hannity and the NYT bring this up!  (I bet the only reason the NYT did the story is because they new Hannity was going to run with it)  Smith and company are seething with contempt that they were forced to talk about this because of Fox News.  My biggest fear is that Hannity waited to late to do the piece becase so many people are under the almighty Obama's spell.

Pfotenhauer makes a great point. If it had been John McCain with Barry's sleazy relationships, it would be front page news every day of the week. Barry is a Chicago thug. He lives in the neighborhood with Ayers and Looie F. He NEVER sees them, of course, but he lives in the neighborhood. He also says he was "influenced" by and had "discussions" with the anti-Isreal PLO professor at Columbia. Oh, and there's that Resko fella. But he can't talk with him now, because he's in jail. And Barry has "severed" his "relationships" with Wright and Pfleger, those wonderful people of God. He's also got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell ya'. Poor Barry, he's such a misunderstood liar.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

"Well, EXCUUUSE me..." 

What can't Harriet just come out and say what's already written all over his sleeve:

All guests must admit The Messiah is the only one fit to lead.

Suppose this NYTimes article had been a "strictly news" report. One wonders, then, why it had a conclusion, since a conclusion is what you give at the end of an argument. On the other hand, if it was an argument (otherwise known as opinion), it should have been labeled so.

You know, it's possible that we look at the same evidence and draw different conclusions. The liberals see the evidence of Obama's association with Ayers and, combined with their desire to see Obama elected, make nothing out of it. The liberals claim that there's no evidence that his association with him means that Obama agrees with the radical. Conservatives sees the same evidence, and wonder why Obama is consorting with radicals at all, never mind how much radicalism rubbed off on him. Given the evidence, that's as likely a conclusion to draw as the other.

Harry Smith, in his brick-quick mind, can't see that distinction. He insists that if you accept the article's evidence, you must agree to the article's conclusion. That's just a lack of distinction, a mental deficit.

My respect for the intelligence of these guys slips every time they speak.

There's no fool like an old fool and Harry Smith certainly qualifies. Any real newsperson could make a radical connection between the Left, Soros, Progressivism, Black Liberation Theology, Marxism, Socialism, other isms, and Barack Obama. You can't be on the Annenberg committee and not have a working relationship with others who receive grants, hold meetings--whatever. You can't see this, you can't report on it, unless you are a deluded Leftist like Harry Smith--worthless as tits on a boar. to any and all of us. What does Harry do except stink up the planet?

 I am sick of the news media and all the crap we have to put up with. As always the media won't actually report but keep attacking John McCain. I am worried that this will be hiden under the rug, unless John McCain  takes action during the debate.

Vote for McCain/Palin 2008 to get the real change and a chance to vote for Palin/whomever 2012.
No way, No how, Nobama 08. Keep your radical agenda to yourself

I love the timing of this.  Enough time to get the word out, but not enough time for Team 0bomba to quell the fire.  Ain't October grand?

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't even have experience as a 'Community Organizer' like Marxist Obama did, she wasn't even taught by Communist Saul Alinsky.

Democrats are saying Palin may have executive experience but Obama has speeches.

Democrats are saying Palin never left her babies to die in a 'Dirty Linen' closet like Obama has fought so hard for - how can she understand the 'Obama Hope'?

Democrats are saying Palin was never 'Mentored' by 'God Damn America' black racist Jeremiah Wright - how can she understand the plight of the ordinary black American?

Democrats are saying Palin never voted present 129 times - how can she bring the political experience Obama has to the White House?

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't understand the 'Bitter Clingers' like Obama - the typical whites who cling to 'God and Guns'.

Democrats are saying Palin doesn't even have 'Cult Followers like Obama, who believe Obama is the messiah and will heal the world.

Democrats are saying Palin has a husband who has always been proud of America, how can she understand those like Michelle Obama who was never proud of America.

Democrats are saying Palin thinks babies are wonderful how could she understand the 'Baby Mistakes' Obama talks about.

Democrats are saying Palin has worked at real jobs, how could she understand the plight of Obama who has never had a 'real job'.

Democrats are saying Palin might bring real values to America not the phony ones they believe in - Democrats are afraid!

Democrats are say Palin doesn't even send an 'Angel of Light' to guide voters like Obama does.

"... a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama" - Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire.
January 7, 2008.

I wish we could do more to get this stuff out there onto the same mainstream channels that most of America watches.  I have been a long time reader but finally registered here.  Of course the meda is in the tank for Obama.  They not only are behind him ideologically, but stand to gain financially as well.

This new site allows for users to vote on videos and the ad revenue allows them to run the winning channel on a national cable network.  Here is their video on liberal bias.  Can you imagine what could be done with Newsbusters users/contributors backing?

http://www.clicktobr...

I wanted to comment on Sean Hanity's "Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism". This was on Hanity's Amerca Sunday night. It was powerful and had information that I din't know and I am a Nobama apostle. Would somebody tell Sean that he should put this on DVD and put it in every newspaper in the country? Also, I would donate for any expenses involved. See it guys. so many questions are brought up with this program.

fbies

The conclusion would be, Harry you're in the deep end of the tank, floating with all the rest of the enlightened ones. All these MSM'ers better hope there isn't a smoking gun waiting somewhere, it would be a major embarrassment. I've heard reported and read that at the time Obama was attending Columbia, Ayers was living in NYC, not far from the jivemeister. Isn't it funny that his time at Columbia is conveniently not documented, no history, no grades, no papers, hmmmm. Could Ayers have been one of Barack's instructors or dope smoking buddies. I know this is all speculation, no proof, yet.
I think about a little ditty I read, I can't take credit for it, but it goes like this----Barack approaches the podium, he begins unbuckling his trousers, drops them to his ankles, squats down and re-leaves himself, buckles-up and gives a speech. Media collectively sighs, "how presidential".