Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama issued a pointed warning yesterday to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, saying that as president he would be prepared to order U.S. troops into that country unilaterally if it failed to act on its own against Islamic extremists. -- "Obama Says He Would Take Fight to Pakistan," Washington Post, 8-2-07 [emphasis added]
Much has been made of Sarah Palin's response to Charlie Gibson's question about the Bush Doctrine. Now, Chris Cuomo isn't running for VP. But when the GMA anchor got all exercised by Sarah Palin having put all options on the table when it comes to going after terrorists in Pakistan, he was evidently unaware of what you might call the Obama Doctrine on the matter, as described above. Cuomo went so far as to emote about Palin's position constituting a potential "declaration of war" on Pakistan. Even James Carville was forced to take a break from his condescending shtick about Palin to help talk Chris back down, pointing out that Obama had said something similar.
View video here.
Let's start with the Gibson-Palin exchange:
CHARLES GIBSON: Do we have the right to go across the border, with or without the approval of the Pakistani government?
Palin was polite enough not to point out that Gibson's question made no sense if we were acting "with" the approval of the Pakistanis.
SARAH PALIN: In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists who would seek to destroy America and our allies, we must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink, Charlie, in making those tough decisions of where we go and even who we target.
GIBSON: Let me finish with this. I got lost in a blizzard of words. Was that a "yes," that you think we have a right to go across the border, with or without the approval of the Pakistani government?
What part of "do whatever it takes" did Gibson not understand? Forget a blizzard. If Charlie was lost by what Palin was saying, he could get disoriented by snow flurries in Central Park.
PALIN: I believe America has to exercise all options in order to stop the terrorists who are hell-bent on America and our allies. We have got to have all options out there on the table.
This gave Cuomo the vapors. His first sally was to former McCain press secretary and Bush Assistant Secretary of Defense Torie Clarke.
CHRIS CUOMO: Torie Clarke: crossing the border of an ally when they tell you not to? It's going on since July. Seems to be condoned: is this the McCain policy? Very important!
Clarke actually suggested that Palin probably disappointed some of her fans with her nuanced response, then suggested that Obama, McCain and Biden would give similar answers. An incredulous Cuomo virtually shouted in response.
CUOMO: That they would go into an ally's borders? Even if the ally says no? That's a declaration of war, isn't it?!
Cuomo sought succor from Carville, asking "James, please, weigh in on this." But instead of the support he surely expected to find, the Cajun briefly stopped ragin' and helped bring poor Chris back to earth.
JAMES CARVILLE: You know what? I wish I had the facts right in front of me, but I think Obama has addressed that and said that if there were terrorists there, that he would go after them. I don't know think that constitutes an invasion. He had said something to that effect.
Clarke suggested that Obama since backed down from his statement, though a quick Googling doesn't confirm that.
CARVILLE: I don't think it was an invasion that anybody is talking about. Suppose you knew that Bin Laden is in a cave in Pakistan, and you had a five-minute window to get him. Would you put a Predator missile in there?CUOMO: That's different. That's a big difference from a series of incursions. I think it's a big issue.
Cuomo should really read that WaPo article. Obama was talking about much more than a Predator strike in Pakistan: "as president he would be prepared to order U.S. troops into that country unilaterally."
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.





Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama issued a pointed warning yesterday to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, saying that as president he would be prepared to order U.S. troops into that country unilaterally if it failed to act on its own against Islamic extremists. -- "















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Boy, it sucks to agree with
September 12, 2008 - 09:28 ET by Ruths husband BenBoy, it sucks to agree with Carville. I'm gonna take a break to re-read Fountainhead. Back when I get my head on straight.
“it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.” - Justice Antonin Scalia
Take heart, RhB. It's not
September 12, 2008 - 09:35 ET by MassConservTake heart, RhB. It's not that you agree with Carville, it's just that Carville didn't stick to partisan talking points for a change.
Point that thing somewhere else
September 12, 2008 - 09:52 ET by MillerTimeWarpIs Cuomo pointing his finger ?!?! Didn't CBS do a body language assessment on Palin, this morning ? Cuomo must be "hiding" something. First its what people say, now its body language, whats next ?
I would rather be a Conservative nut job, than a Liberal with no nuts and no job
Obama's accomplishments compiled
September 12, 2008 - 10:02 ET by Rackie(oh, I'm still looking.)
SOCIAL PROMOTION...
September 12, 2008 - 10:11 ET by danybhoyChris Cuomo is the male version of Mika...
A good looking person with a well conected father (in leftist circles) seems to be a new formula for the MSM. Both Chris Cuomo & Mika would be lucky to host the morning news in Sioux Falls without a famous father.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
A couple of points
September 12, 2008 - 10:14 ET by c5then1. If you are pursuing terrorists or members of the Talliban (redundant, I know) and they cross the border of your ally who won't let you pursue...they are not your ally.
2. Sending a special forces contingent or a Marine Recon unit to get terrorists is probably more reliable than blasting a cave with a hellfire from a Predator.
3. Pakistan needs to be told unambiguously that we will pursue the terrorists with no regard for their border. They can either help or stay the hell out of the way.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
metrosexuals stick together
September 12, 2008 - 10:39 ET by MrltavernChris Chomo is simply a metrosexual who is attracted to another metrosexual Obama. they stick together.
Mr.L
MSM never asked about the Clinton doctrine, either..
September 12, 2008 - 11:43 ET by Gary HallMark.. indeed. Funny though - the MSM is too pacifist to agree with that view, as is the far left, so they simply censor it from view. They will only pull it out, if Obama is cornered looking too weak.
Ah the Clinton doctrine. The MSM never asked about the Clinton doctrine, either.. the doctrine of talking big, promising so much, but looking the other way:
The DR Congo. After the horrific 90 day genocide in Rwanda, of which the Clinton administration was more than complacent in, Bill Clinton went to Rwanda, and promised never again (with diamond mining merchant and contributor, Maurice Templesman on his arm). Immediately following that promise (in the 1996 -98 time period), an historic civil war reignited, involving 6 African nations. In the war, the many genocides, the disease and starvation, and the rape war that followed, estimates are that 3 1/2 million - 5 million died by the end of 2000 - more than any other single conflict since WW II.
What did the press do with that Clinton doctrine - ask 2000 presidential candidate about it? Hardly - in fact, the media kept it censored - few would ever know. Years later, however, when 200,000 would die as the Darfur conflicts heated back up, the entire US and world media would hold President Bush's feet to the fire.
One has to wonder if any journalist has ever asked Bill Clinton about why he sit silent during one of the world's greatest tragedies - that is, ask him about his doctrine - that of deflection.
Clinton Doctrine
September 12, 2008 - 11:53 ET by Cool ArrowI forgot about his limpwristed observation of the Congo genocide.
Of course he made his defiant statement within a few months of leaving office, with full knowledge throughout his Presidency of theslaughter.
What a guy!
Cool A. again and again..
September 12, 2008 - 12:09 ET by Gary HallIndeed. But of course, it wasn't just the Democratic Republic of the Congo, that "this hero of the MSM for his work in Africa President" was "shy" over; there was Sierra Leone, the Ivory Coast, Angola. There was the violent radical takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban (60,000+ civilians died). He looked the other way - the MSM protected "his" legacy - for it was more important to the US leftist media, than was the lives of millions in 3rd world countries.
He looked the other way with the 3rd world HIV/Aids pandemic -- got to read the ex-Nation's editor's view of this pathetic man's doctrine; David Corn's, Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa? Corn is now with Mother Jones - moving right up. During the past 10 years each and every time the media has had a shot at Bill Clinton - and the discussion of genocide, civil war, HIV/Aids, and malaria was on the agenda, this MSM hands him a love orgy on all that he does, and then they usually ask him to attack President Bush over what they wish to protray as the lessor of men in their effort to address these tragedies. Of course, the record says differently. gary
I'm sorry, but I really have
September 12, 2008 - 12:44 ET by sembyI'm sorry, but I really have to say this....
What an asshole!
Ditto
September 12, 2008 - 13:14 ET by MillerTimeWarpDitto ! ! !
I would rather be a Conservative nut job, than a Liberal with no nuts and no job