If a hypothetical tabloid owned by, say, Richard Mellon Scaife, had a cover story with scurrilous accusations about Joe Biden, do you think Chris Matthews would be waving it about on camera and Keith Olbermann citing it? Neither do I. But if for some reason they did, would they possibly fail to mention the mag's ownership?
But Matthews saw fit—not once but twice—to display the cover of Us magazine, with its story "Babies, Lies and Scandals" about Sarah Palin. Olbermann alluded to it as well. And who is the owner of Us? Jann Wenner, the founder of Rolling Stone . . . and a big-time donor to Barack Obama. How big a donor? You can view his list of contributions here, with an image after the jump.
Now it's true that Matthews discounted the "lies" allegation. But why give currency to dubious accusations—by a magazine whose stock-in-trade is celebrity gossip—by displaying them repeatedly on a national news show? There was no suggestion that Us, unlike the National Enquirer in John Edwards' case, had done any significant independent reporting. This is apparently scandal-mongering, pure and simple. And of course, neither Matthews nor Olbermann mentioned the Wenner connection.
View edited video here.
During the 5 PM EDT edition of Hardball, Matthews discussed the matter with Newsweek's Howard Fineman and Roger Simon of Politico.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let's take a look at this. This is of course a very popular, well, you see it at the checkout counter at Safeway, that's where I see it all the time, Us Weekly, we've got a cover of this available, a better picture than I can show you, but let's take a look at this cover. This is probably not the kind of PR that John McCain envisioned in winning the regular folk.
Matthews and Fineman went on to challenge the "lies" allegations. Olbermann, chatting later with David Greogry, didn't. The Countdown host began by getting off what could prove to be the evening's biggest laugh line.
KEITH OLBERMANN: As much as we try to steer this away from Governor Palin, I imagine that this is continuing to be a matter of interest and perhaps concern, certainly of interest, to senior Republicans.
Stop, Keith. You're killing me.
And a bit later, after citing McCain campaign manager Rick Davis saying the campaign is about a composite view that people have of the candidate.
OLBERMANN: How does a candidate's first choice—the vice-president, the vice-presidential candidate—winding up on a tabloid magazine with words "scandals" and "pregnancies" and all the rest of it, how does that help that composite picture that Mr. Davis is talking about?
To his credit, Gregory sought to restore some perspective.
DAVID GREGORY: Well because I think there is an assumption and a hope that maybe some of the tabloid aspects of it don't creep into what is the impression that people take away.
Creep, indeed.

Note: Greg Pollowitz of National Review was already reporting the Us/Wenner/Obama connection back in June. If the mag is slamming Sarah now, it was mooning over Michelle then.

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
HA HA HA They are sooo
September 2, 2008 - 21:07 ET by obxrayHA HA HA They are sooo freakin scard
Only the beginning.....
September 2, 2008 - 21:09 ET by Texndoc"Us Magazine"?
This is nothing once "Oprah" and "The View" kick into high gear. I predict backlash from the public not seen since "The Passion" was slammed by every media outlet and grossed 100 million dollars in record time. They're playing the public for idiots.
tabloid trash
September 2, 2008 - 21:24 ET by sawing battaI thought they all felt this stuff was just 'tabloid trash'...i guess that's only when it's a clinton run enterprise.
the power vacuum at msdnc is creating some funny dynamics....too bad the old school NBC folks have been put out to pasture so quickly...it was fun seeing brokaw get pushed around.
what an interesting shift....lefty clintons - out. far left/obama in. old school lefties brokaw, russert, et al, out. new, openly partisan, far left media msdnc, etc in.
Can someone please tell me.... because I forget?
September 2, 2008 - 22:04 ET by superconWas Chris Matthews waving around the National Enquirer when it was John Edwards having a baby out of wedlock?
It is unfortunate for Bristol that the father of her baby isn't John Edwards as the story would not have gotten out until well after the election.
Mark...I believe that when you posted a thread on the Edwards topic you asked about what would happen if a high profile Republican had a similar scandal and queried if the press would be so squeamish about reporting it without having everything sourced.
They didn't seem to have a problem running with the fake pregnancy story. Oh sure they may have said it was just an internet rumor but they ran with it anyway just to embarrass Sarah Palin.
Chris Matthews is a joke.
He should be wearing purple hair and big floppy shoes.
Victory in Iraq.
Liberals suck.
McCain for Preznint.
So they rationalize it by
September 2, 2008 - 22:14 ET by motherbeltSo they rationalize it by saying something along the lines of "We don't believe this garbage, but this is what's being said. And this. And this.
The newest variation of (Not me, of course, but) "Some say...."
This is just plain B as in B, S as in S.
AGENDA
September 2, 2008 - 22:53 ET by TexndocYou have to go to Michelle Malkin's page and see that this copy of the US Magazine with Sarah Palin on the cover was sent to Republicans in St Paul by the communication's director for Wenner Media with a "ha-ha!" note. It's not going to be Sarah's last cover, nor Obama and Michelle's. LORD, let RUSH get wind of this crap.