If your child's school were invaded by Columbine-style killers, methodically murdering students in cold blood, would you want teachers to shoot to stop them? Gayle Fallon wouldn't. For that matter, Fallon doesn't think teachers "have it in them" to even try to save their students' lives. Fallon, the president of a teachers union in Houston, TX, made her views known during an Early Show segment this morning conducted by Harry Smith.
The topic was a decision adopted by a rural north Texas school district to permit teachers to carry guns in the classroom. Harrold, TX School Superintendent David Thweatt explained that the decision was prompted by the school's close proximity to an interstate and its remoteness—thirty minutes away from law enforcement—factors presumably making it a tempting target. Thweatt made clear that all guns have to be approved by the school board and teachers have to undergo extensive safety and related training. None of that mattered to Fallon.
HARRY SMITH: Gayle, when you first heard about this, what was your reaction?GAYLE FALLON: Initially I thought it was a joke. However, after a couple of media calls, we realized it wasn't and we were asked whether our district would consider it, and it was absolutely no way would we consider it. One of the things that hit me is, you know, Columbine and the other incidents were generally initiated by students. Now, I've been around teachers a long time. They don't have it in them to aim at a student and kill him. They'll freeze. Nor would I want them to.
View video here.
When a young person takes up arms and starts murdering people, he ceases being a "student" and becomes a killer. For a teachers union prez, Fallon certainly has a low opinion of her colleagues, to think they'd be incapable of acting to save innocent life. As for her notion that mass school murders "were generally initiated by students": so what? If Fallon is right and teachers would freeze in such situations, no harm done beyond that resulting from inaction. But what of cases like that of the Amish school shooting of 2006 in which an armed man murdered five girls aged 6-13? Not to mention the possibility of terrorist incidents, such as the Beslan massacre, in which 334 hostages were ultimately killed.
Smith conducted the segment in reasonably balanced fashion, even suggesting that the rule might have a deterrent effect. But at one point he stated "when looking at this, and I want to be as serious as possible." The inference is that Smith's instinctive reaction, one that he worked to overcome, was to treat the district's decision like Fallon did: as a joke.
Update: MRC News Analyst Kyle Drennen provided a full transcript of the segment:
7:01AM TEASER:
HARRY SMITH: Plus, a controversial decision by a Texas school district. It has decided to allow teachers to carry guns into the classroom. Will this prevent violence? We'll have a debate, coming up.
7:13AM TEASER:
JULIE CHEN: Also, teachers carrying guns into the classroom. Will it prevent the next Columbine or Virginia Tech. The superintendent in Texas thinks so. We'll talk to him.
7:30AM TEASER:
SMITH: Still ahead this morning, a school district in Texas is the first in the nation to let teachers carry guns. We're going to have a debate with the school superintendent and the president of the Houston Federation of Teachers.
7:33AM SEGMENT:
HARRY SMITH: A rural Texas school district has made a decision that appears to be the first of its kind in the country. Teachers are now permitted to carry guns. Harrold, Texas is located near the border with Oklahoma. Joining us is the District Superintendent, David Thweatt, and Gayle Fallon, President of Houston Federation of Teachers is also with us this morning. Good morning to you both.
[GRAPHIC ON SCREEN: School Safety Gone Too Far? Texas District Allows Teachers to Carry Guns In School.]
GAYLE FALLON: Good morning.
DAVID THWEATT: Good morning, Harry.
SMITH: Mr. Thweatt, let me start with you. What made you decide to try and get this passed through your school board and why did you think this was a good idea?
DAVID THWEATT: Well Harry, we're looking at all the issues surrounding school violence, anything, starting with Columbine all the way up to the Pennsylvania shootings. And we started looking at state-of-the-art security, which we installed. And then we found that that was not good enough because we had a problem with being next to a 287 road north of us. And we're right 500 miles -- 500 feet off of that particular road. And then on top of that, we're about 30 minutes from law enforcement. And we started asking hard questions. What's going to happen when we get an active shooter into our school? And that's the reason we decided to go in this direction.
SMITH: Let me ask you this, are the weapons of the teachers, are they concealed, are they holstered? How -- how are they carried in the school?
THWEATT: Yeah, there are several components of this. They are concealed. They do have to be approved by our school board. And then they have to undergo extensive safety training and other training in hostage situations, et cetera, before we've installed this.
SMITH: Okay. Alright, Gayle, when you heard about this, what was your reaction?
FALLON: Initially, I thought it was a joke. However, after a couple of media calls we realized that it wasn't and we were asked would our district consider it. And it was absolutely no way would we consider it. One of the things that hit me is, you know, Columbine and the other incidents were generally initiated by students. Now, I've been around teachers a long time. They don't have it in them to aim at a student and kill them. They'll freeze.
SMITH: And-
FALLON: And nor would I want them to.
SMITH: Right. Mr. Thweatt, I guess when looking at this, and I want to be as serious as possible, what kinds of scenario are you imagining that your teachers might be called into actually using these arms, or do you just think perhaps folks knowing that they have arms in the school may be a preventive measure in and of itself?
THWEATT: I think it would, Harry. And because any time we've looked at these school shootings they've occurred after we've designated schools across the nation as gun-free zones. The people who are going into these situations are evil. I'm not going to be politically correct on this. I don't care what their problems were. They've gone in and killed children. And if they come into our school, they are going to meet resistance. And I think if we did have some resistance in our schools, these crackpots or whoever they are would stop going into them.
SMITH: Alright, Miss. Fallon, real quickly. Just, if someone -- if you woke up tomorrow and found out that Houston were going to allow teachers to carry guns in the schools, what would you do?
FALLON: We would elect a new school board immediately. I think what's going to happen, there is a loophole in the law that's allowed this. But our legislature meets in January. And the legislators I've talked with said they're going to plugging that loophole.
SMITH: Alright, we got to go for now. David Theatt, Gayle Fallon, thanks very much for your time this morning. Do appreciate it.
THWEATT: Thanks, Harry.
SMITH: You bet.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Comments Policy
Teachers
August 19, 2008 - 07:39 ET by Kirk TurnerTeachers are more prolific at molesting children than Catholic priests, so I don't think they are "above" anything.
Is that the best we can do?
August 19, 2008 - 07:43 ET by Mark FinkelsteinIs that the best we can do?
Is that the best we can do?
August 19, 2008 - 13:49 ET by Kirk TurnerI don't know; if you give me more to work with than the old union schtick . . . maybe.
Nice theme we've got going
August 19, 2008 - 07:47 ET by SickofLibsNice theme we've got going here over the last few days.
Harry: "I (don't) got your back, bro"
August 19, 2008 - 07:46 ET by SickofLibsI'd rather have Miley Cyrus backing me in a bar fight than Harry.
If we were talking about, say, New Jersey, her "they'd freeze" comment might have some merit. But rural North Texas? I'm not buying it.
Plus, it would have to be negotiated into the union contract.
People wonder what it would be like if gun were banned.
August 19, 2008 - 07:54 ET by general companyRemind me how many school shootings there were when HS kids and teachers had shotguns and rifles in the back windows of their pickups. They used to teach skeet shooting in Ag class around here, and yes the school owned the guns.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
She ain't no Texan
August 19, 2008 - 07:52 ET by Cool ArrowWe've got losers like her all over Austin. I think they're the cause of all those 200 year old oak trees dying of blight.
Full disclosure, I've got a bleedin' heart liberal sister just like her. She's married to true blue ambulance chaser. She BMW's (B$tch, Moan Whine) because her daughter has to pay back a student loan. Life must be tough on $250k/year.
Back to the topic. I don't think Gov. Rick Perry will stand in the way of this initiative.
I ♣ my seal
thanks for the
August 19, 2008 - 11:03 ET by dmntd1thanks for the laugh.....
My sister is a bleedin' heart liberal ambulance chaser. Ditto for her husband. And they had the gall to tell me that the democrats are for personal responsibility!
Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his imminent relationship with a superior law and with an objective will that transcends the particular individual - Mussolini
haha
August 19, 2008 - 22:00 ET by SRPwrdhaha
Rural Texas Teachers
August 19, 2008 - 07:54 ET by CpickeringI could understand the attitude of the union president if she were from San Francisco, but Texas teachers (particularly those raised in rural Texas) most likely grew up with guns in the household and know how and when to use them.
If she's not from San
August 19, 2008 - 10:54 ET by mattmIf she's not from San Francisco, her mentality is. The way most teachers are educated these days - i.e. P.C. - outcome based, "no worng answers" - "it's prom, here's your condom", discipline is passe'- etc., most of them probably wouldn't have a clue.
Typical
August 19, 2008 - 07:54 ET by GatorgradFallon and Smith are just your typical bed wetting liberals. They believe criminals are to be excused as products of an evil, violent society. And as a result of this evil and violence, self protection only promotes that evil. And therefore, teachers, being as non evil as possible, can't participate in the evil of shooting someone. The critical flaw is that they assume everyone should behave and believe as they do. The libs can't accept that individuals can and do think differently. And some of them are nutbars that have the ability to harm others and want to harm to others. Liberals think criminals should be understood and helped to overcome their violent nature. I agree! I would gladly help someone shooting children overcome their violent nature by taking a long cold dirt nap.
I was having a few beers
August 19, 2008 - 07:56 ET by benrandI was having a few beers with a rep one day and at the hotel were some people from the Michigan Teacher's Union, or more commonly known as the MEA, and we were talking in the line at the bar about the election, 2004, and how we support Bush, and a little weaselly looking guy got into it with us and I just matter-of-factly talked to him about lower taxes, etc. He was having none of it and I could see he was a true lefty by the attitude he was giving me after I trounced on any argument he could put up. He went away after a bit, we got our drinks and went outside.
The next time I was in line, an older matronly looking woman, also obviously a teacher, who was sitting with this guy, came over to us in line and told me that I needed a punch in the head because of what I was saying to the nice little lefty teacher gentleman.
These are our teachers, the people who form education policy.
Ben
August 19, 2008 - 08:04 ET by Cool ArrowShe was probably upset because she had him all lined up for some horizontal matriculation. She was afraid you had troubled him too deeply and he might not be able to serve her purposes.
Teachers convention out of town? Do the math.
I ♣ my seal
She wanted to punch me in
August 19, 2008 - 10:06 ET by benrandShe wanted to punch me in the head because I didn't believe the leftist nonsense that her and her comrades pile drived into my head year after year and that I was going to vote for GWBush.
There are many more like those two.
Bwaaa
August 19, 2008 - 08:06 ET by SickofLibsI hope she at least gave him her hankie.
Her emotions control her brain
August 19, 2008 - 07:58 ET by c5thenShe is obviously so afraid of guns that she is emotionally incapable of using logical thought.
She is saying that her constituents are incapable of making a split second decision in an emergency and that she would prefer inaction that allows innocents to be killed than action that kills the perpitrator. These are the teachers that she would prefer to have in the classroom? Teachers that are incapable of acting in an emergency? Teachers that are timid or afraid to act? I wouldn't want those types of people responsible for teaching my children.
I bet the teachers in the Harold, Texas school disctrict are not like that at all. I bet they are full of brave and responsible teachers who would do almost anything to protect their students in the event of an emergency.
Are Houston teachers that different? I bet they are not. I think they might want to re-concider who they elect to 'represent' them as president of their union.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Any teacher responsible
August 19, 2008 - 08:07 ET by motherbeltAny teacher responsible enough and serious enough to make the very serious decision to have a gun in school....well I would trust that person to be serious enough and courageous enough to use it responsibly in a Columbine-type emergency.
Ms. Fallon is implying that one has to have a "killer instinct" in order to act bravely and take a life to save many lives. Her statement that "nor would I want them to" is just outright irresponsible. She would rather see a student kill 20 or 30 people than have a teacher stop him?
Not just irresponsible; it's outrageous.
Fallon's instinct and
August 19, 2008 - 08:23 ET by SickofLibsFallon's instinct and recommendation for her union members would obviously be to dive under your desk and stay very still.
The average convenience store clerk has more courage than her.
the difference
August 19, 2008 - 08:42 ET by candanceCovenience store clerks take pride in their stores and know how much a robbery will hurt their employer. They are paid to guard the register so they plan on doing just that.
This woman is basically saying that either teachers aren't brave enough to protect our children or they don't care enough to intervene. If I was a teacher I'd be ticked off that this woman is chosen to represent me.
candance, I have to say
August 19, 2008 - 09:11 ET by motherbeltcandance, I wouldn't risk my life as a clerk of a convenience store. I don't see the cash register as worthy of that risk.
I would, however, do it to protect the kids in my care. For this woman to say that she "wouldn't want" teachers to do that is just shameful.
How much you wanta bet she
August 19, 2008 - 10:31 ET by amberHow much you wanta bet she is pro abortion?
This goes to how she values life.
Courage of Clerks
August 19, 2008 - 09:23 ET by nofateSpeaking of the courage of convenience store clerks, check out these NB stories:
Armed Citizen Causes Robbers to Flee in Ohio
Armed Citizen: 'You Are Not Robbing This Bank!'
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
The 'convenience store clerk
August 19, 2008 - 09:40 ET by SickofLibsThe 'convenience store clerk fights back' clips are always my favorites on Cops.
20 or 30? Try the entire
August 19, 2008 - 10:29 ET by amber20 or 30? Try the entire school. I bet the response time is around 20 minutes after the initial shooting (it would take a little time for the school to realize what was going on, call the cops, explain, and the cops to get there.) I can easily fire 200 rounds in that time, 5 minutes a class, 4 classrooms with 25 students each (shoot the teacher first), that is 100. Then the cops get there, assess the situation, and decide if they want to go in (they do not have to, you know, if they feel it is too dangerous they can just wait till it is over, they and their jobs are protected by law in those instances, they never have to protect you) so, now I have another 10 minutes, that is 50 more people.
People do not realize how easy it is to do.
My children attended a school that left all of their doors unlocked up until 2006 when the lady's ex from across the street threated to kill her kindergartener (I can still walk through the front door and all of the school without being asked a question, just sign in and get your name tag). I asked why the doors were locked and a teacher told me (she was not supposed to tell me and was later admonished). My kid's class was next door to that kindergartener and they were not going to tell me to let me decide if it was safe for my son!!!! I asked to see their policy on violent threats to the school. They were so proud of it, it was a great policy (rolling eyes). They turn off the lights in the classrooms, lock the glass doors, and all the kids are supposed to sit as quiet as possible so the invader does not know they are there. They also lock all of the exterior doors.
The kids finished the 2 weeks of school and they never went there again. The stupid school is afraid of me and my gun, either my gun is haunted and just goes off at will, or I am a lunatic to fear. They are so out of touch. It always takes a mass murder to get them to look at policy and even then they never see that having voluntarily armed personel is the solution. They watch too many movies and know nothing about guns and the holsters that people wear on their bodies so grubby fingers can not take the pistol. I have a CQC holster with a belt, I would have to be dead and out of ammo before they would get my pistol.
Amazing!
August 19, 2008 - 10:54 ET by nofateAbsolutely clueless. This is what a group of terrorists would be counting on- unarmed teachers and absolutely no resistance, no response from law enforcement until they had time to establish their position, and, the idiocy of all idiocies, after they are already inside, some do-gooder teacher will
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Wait, are we talking about
August 19, 2008 - 11:01 ET by balboaWait, are we talking about terrorists or crazed gunmen?
if self defense is impossible
August 19, 2008 - 11:09 ET by sarcasmoIs there any relevant difference between the 2??
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I was just responding to
August 19, 2008 - 12:35 ET by balboaI was just responding to this:
This is what a group of terrorists would be counting on
I don't think a crazed gunmen is counting on anything, other than killing people and themselves winding up dead.
And THAT, bal, is the entire point!
August 19, 2008 - 12:46 ET by BlondeI don't think a crazed gunmen is counting on anything, other than killing people and themselves winding up dead.
They wind up dead, faster. Ergo sum, less time to slaughter the innocent. I don't care if its a terrorist (I'd call the VT killer a terrorist) or some loony as in Amber's example.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
I would say a crazed gunman
August 19, 2008 - 11:12 ET by amberI would say a crazed gunman out to kill as many 5 year olds as they can is out to terrorize the children and the surrounding community. We are talking terrorist, not necessarily muslim terrorists, but not excluding either, remember they were gathering information on elementary schools in the US for a terror attack.
Duh!
August 19, 2008 - 11:35 ET by nofateDoes it really make a difference, Bal? Remember the detailed accounts of the Columbine and Va. Tech scenarios? Either way, you lock all the doors, the kids can't get out and the gunman has a shooting gallery.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Tell that to Barry Grunow
August 19, 2008 - 08:25 ET by CobraMan"Nor would I want them to."
Tell that to Barry Grunow, the teacher who was shot in the face after he confronted an armed student even though Mr. Grunow was, himself, unarmed. That's the hallmark of courage and sacrifice and these are the standards that all teachers should follow. Hiding behind a lock classroom door is NOT the answer, as this discourages NOTHING other than self-reliance and a willingness to sacrifice yourself for your fellow man.
Gunnin' for the kids
August 19, 2008 - 08:29 ET by jaywlI understand exactly where the old bit, girl is coming from. This old Marine couldn't possibly draw down on someone's little darling student. I would have to let sweet Sue live. On the other hand , if I was facing a crazy Larry with an AK and the boy is covered with splatter from my students the fact that Larry was also a student would not prevent me from doing what needs to be done. Fallon thinks a teacher is going to pull his gun out and aim it an everyday, normal student that was reading a book, happened to notice she had a gun, and tried to show her teacher what she found in her pantaloons. The lady seems to have absolutely no idea what actually happens in these situations, which is why she should just keep her trap shut and Harry Smith should interview someone who has experienced it.
A thought...
August 19, 2008 - 08:33 ET by unkeeafThe woman from Houston is the poster child for why this nation is on the verge of electing Obombo. These people do not live in reality, they must trick themselves into believing the drivel that comes out of their mouths. Take the VT shootings, if even one armed citizen had been in the first classroom he attacked, we might have been talking about one or two dead instead of 30 something. Instead, they want to focus on the armed citizen shooting up the joint or an accidental discharge of the gun that kills an innocent bystander.
Can't we find an island somewhere to dump these moron's?
MSM = PR firm for the Democrat Party
teachers freezing?
August 19, 2008 - 08:36 ET by candanceUm that's what the training is for - to give you the confidence and the accuracy to know what you're doing.
Yet in typical fashion, she wants to ban it outright for everyone on no more ground than "it's hard."
If I had a child in that school disctrict, I'd hunt down the teachers who knew how to use guns and ask for my child to be in their classes.
I think there's a
August 19, 2008 - 09:16 ET by balboaI think there's a difference between training and actually trying to shoot another person. You can't train for that moment, IMO.
On the other hand, I had many teachers in high school that I thought were perfectly capable of shooting students, without any particular reason. :-)
Training for traumatic situations DOES work
August 19, 2008 - 10:36 ET by CobraMan"You can't train for that moment, IMO."
Yes, you can, as both the police and the military train for that moment all the time. Even though there's no guarantee that someone will not panic when training scenarios becomes reality, the chances of someone acting according to training during a traumatic situation is directly related to the quality and amount of the training that person receives. This is a well known and well understood phenomena and it extends to more than just "pulling the trigger." It also extend into emergency response actions (like entering a burning building to save a victim) and other similar traumatic situations. If this were not true, then that training would not be used, as it would be a waste of time and effort, correct?
there are some excellent
August 19, 2008 - 10:47 ET by amberthere are some excellent classes. I took one and at the end they gave us paint ball guns (mine was the exact same as my pistol) and placed us in some scary situations. It worked, people's blood pressure went up. It was scary. And I shot the poor SWAT guy (a trainer) from 10 feet away about 5 times on the and side (he was turned with his side to me and I was sooting center mass).
Training Works
August 19, 2008 - 11:06 ET by nofateI've never been in the military, but have read plenty of military history, novels (i.e. W.E.B. Griffin, etc.), and historical novels and one of the constant themes is some poor sad sack guy finds himself in a battleground situation and finds himself reacting to the situation without thinking. The overarching theme is "my training just kicked in" and they are often surprised at how well it worked. The people who have written these countless books, for the most part, had lived these experiences they are writing about, or had a similar experience that they could use as a reference. It also works for police, medical workers, firemen, etc.
Training works!
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
I was in the military and
August 19, 2008 - 11:20 ET by amberI was in the military and the training does help. I think being prepared is the other half of the coin. Too many teachers and school districts refuse to even think about something terrible like that happenning. My pistol training was the best, though because it placed you in the situations you would experience as a civilian.....waiting for a bus, being in a store durring an armed robbery, car breaks down.... It also reinforced in us that we actually could and would shoot to defend ourselves.
Training and Response
August 19, 2008 - 11:54 ET by nofateYour comments made me think of a series of articles I read outlining the threat to our schools from terrorists. They know our children are a true weak spot with us. I can't find those articles, but I thought they were on Black Five, so I went there and found the following: Israeli Professor Killed in US Attack :
I found that embedded inside an article by Greyhawk titled Five Seconds. Well worth reading in light of the discussion of training, what the Houston teacher might do in an emergency, etc.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Thanks for the memories
August 19, 2008 - 11:23 ET by CobraManYour anecdote reminds me of what happen to me when I received Stinger missile training in Germany. I did great until the last "fast mover" appeared and I inadvertently shot down a friendly! When the instructor asked me why I shot a friendly, I responded, "He was a collaborator!" That excuse didn't work and I didn’t get an expert rating, which is what I wanted. As a matter of fact, my instructor told me: “Do our pilots a favor and sick to fixing helicopters, OK?”
Follow your training and not your ambitions
August 19, 2008 - 11:49 ET by CobraManBTW, this is a perfect example of what can happen when someone ignores his or her training. The reason I shot a friendly was because I was concentrating on my score and not on properly identifying the target. Had I actually concentrated on identifying that target as I was trained, I would have realized it WAS a friendly and I would not have shot. This would have given me that Expert rating I was coveting. That's not what I did though. I shot as soon as I saw the target in spite of my training, all because I wanted to win top honors. That taught me a very valuable lesson about following your training and not your ambitions.
I shot my drill Sergeant
August 19, 2008 - 15:23 ET by amberI shot my drill Sergeant (laser tag) because he did not know the password. He came running at me and he was yell, don't you shoot me (in sert last name)! I shot him anyways.
He threw a CS grenade in front of me on he last day of the FTX, maybe that's why.
LOL Good for you!
August 19, 2008 - 20:25 ET by CobraManLOL Good for you!
That kicks off yet another memory from my army days. This happened during the second week at my first duty station, Finthen Army Air Field in Germany. I got volunteered for guard duty and I was guarding the back gate to the base. I was told that, under no circumstance, is anyone allowed onto the base without a valid Military ID card. This order came from our base commander, as we were told. "This come straight from the Colonel! I don't care if God himself shows up demanding entry," said the Sergeant of the Guard, "No ID, no entry! Got it?" Yes Sir!
Well, as I was letting a truck out through the back gate, some guy I didn't recognized ran past me out the gate wearing a running suit and yelling "I'll be back in few minutes!" I closed and locked the the gate as usual. After 15 minutes or so, that man came back to the locked gate and said "I'm back, open up!"
Following my special orders, I asked him for his ID. Man, did he get pissed! He started ranting and raving and jumping around while waving his arms all over the place. He yelled at me "Let me in, Damn you! Don’t you know who I am?" I answered "No sir, not without your ID, I don’t!" That just made him even madder!
After I suggest that he run around to the main gate so that THEY could let him in, and after he yelled even more things I didn't quite catch, I called the Sergeant of the Guard and ask HIM to let this guy in as he was really annoying me!
Well, it turned out that this man was, you guessed it, our BASE COMMANDER! He started asking me what my unit was, who my company commander was, all that crap. That’s when I turned to him and said "Sir, are you the same base commander who ordered all the guards to refuse entry to anyone without a valid ID card?" Man, his face turn a shade of purple that I have never seen before (or since!) and I thought he was going to have a heart attack right then and there. I also thought he was going to have me shot on the spot! You have to remember, I was a true newbie as I had only been on base for two weeks. Needless to say, I was scared! But I also knew that I was right!
Well, he talked to the Sergeant of the Guard for a few minutes and settled down. Soon after, he actual admitted that I did the right thing and he even shook my hand! But I could see the anger still burning in his eyes.
That wasn't the end of it though and I know he held a grudge because I didn't receive a promotion to E4 (Spc/4 in my MOS) until the VERY DAY I was shipping out to CONUS, almost 18 months after this incident occurred! This was after I had received TWO Army Achievement medals in the previous 18 months and I received TWO promotions prior to being assigned to my first duty station, first a promotion to E2 as an outstanding graduate of Basic, and then a promotion to E3 as I was top of my class in AIT. I think I deserved a promotion to E4 long before this, don’t you?
Do you think he held up my promotion out of a grudge? I do!
I was supposed to shoot the
August 19, 2008 - 15:18 ET by amberI was supposed to shoot the guy. The class was given by SWAT guys fom our biggest city and the guy was playing the robber and he shot someone. I feel for him, though. He was not wearing protective gear on his arms. I bet those were some welts.
Incidentally, all of the officers who were teaching the class started the classes because they like armed citizens. They said it is the political types in departments who do not.
Yes, you can, as both the
August 19, 2008 - 10:57 ET by balboaYes, you can, as both the police and the military train for that moment all the time.
Well sure they train for that all the time because that's their job. Teachers aren't going to be training for that moment all the time.
Sigh
August 19, 2008 - 11:11 ET by nofateBal, do you really think that a teacher who is going to go through the process of registering his name and all his vital stats with law enforcement, then takes a good training course, follows up with re-certification, etc., then stands in front of a class of kids, is not going to react to his training responsibly? C'mon Bal, turn off the lib knee jerk reflex.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
bal is a bit
August 19, 2008 - 12:50 ET by TruthMongerbal is a bit skeptical
just needs more of that conservative "can-do" spirit:)
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
nofate, it's not a "lib
August 19, 2008 - 16:51 ET by balboanofate, it's not a "lib knee jerk reflex." People react in a number of ways to adverse situations. I don't know that the training would be ingrained enough for all teachers to react well. For some, sure, they'd be fine.
BUT, what is the reaction when a teacher misses, or hits the wrong person? When a teacher reacts to a perceived threat that turns out to be nothing? When a student gets a hold of a teacher's gun?
Just some troubling questions.
That is what the training
August 19, 2008 - 17:33 ET by amberThat is what the training is for. I cound not see a situation where a teacher acted hastily and shot someone, but heck, I actually cary a pistol, as aopposed to the hysterical anti gun people who think guns are haunted. You never even pull the pistol unless you feel threatened. In a one on one, if you have time you tell the person to back away while having your hand on y holstered pistol. If you do not have time, you draw your pistol and aim it and verbally warn them. If they do not back down you shoot, both eyes open, center mass and walk the shots up the body until the threat is past. They are not telling people to cary. People who cary or choose to are comfortable with their pistol, they do not shoot with hunched shoulders and eyes closed, cringing.
If it works, fine. But the
August 19, 2008 - 17:35 ET by balboaIf it works, fine. But the first time an incident occurs...look out.
Well, "works" is likely to look like
August 19, 2008 - 17:56 ET by sarcasmoRelatively fewer dead victim(s) plus a dead perp, at the hands of a private individual who knows he/she may well be subject to a legal & psychological nightmare. Then the question becomes, "how will the news media cover it?" The answer, at least if it's justified, seems to be "not much, especially nationally," yet somehow the NRA is always only barely able to fit all the self defense stories from around the nation in "The Armed Citizen."
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I'm sorry bal
August 19, 2008 - 19:17 ET by candanceBut we have to do something. School shootings have become all too common since Columbine and the government has done exactly zero to protect our kids.
You wanna talk about the first time an incident occurs? Let's talk about the next child who calls his mom on his cellphone saying there's a shooter on his campus and the teacher has everyone hiding in a closet because no one can stop it and the cops are 20 minutes away.
If a teacher feels comfortable and qualified to carry a gun, why not give them the option? Yes there's always a risk of mistakes - but that risk is there for police, hunters, everyone. You seem to be saying that teachers are incapable of being as responsible as everyone else.
You want to ban it for everyone - not because of an actual problem - but because of some teachers being queasy and the assumption that someone will make a mistake.
Here's you an extra straw since you're obviously reaching for some.
Blonde and amber are right. You're coming off with a knee jerk "no way" no matter how much evidence we have.
I'm voicing concern. I don't
August 19, 2008 - 19:28 ET by balboaI'm voicing concern. I don't like school shootings any more than you, but I don't know that more guns is the solution. I will concede that it might be, but I have reservations.
Balboa, more guns in the right hands
August 19, 2008 - 19:54 ET by jefflebowskiOne things that libs never understand is that guns are not sentient beings. They do not decide to shoot people without a human being involved. They are a tool. I have carried a gun for more than 20 years and it has never been pointed at anything other than a target in that time.
Guns in the right hands is the answer. I live in Texas and concealed carry permits are very common here. In fact, my 66 year old mother just got hers and she can shoot the lights out. I would stake my life that she will not go out and go on a shooting rampage. But should she see one, she now will have a fighting chance to end it and save innocent lives.
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
I'm well aware that guns can
August 19, 2008 - 19:59 ET by balboaI'm well aware that guns can be handled well. I'd rather see an actual qualified security force, not teachers, handling these kinds of things. Metal detectors. Responsible parent gun owners. Illegal gun sellers punished severely.
Mr Boa - 10 school
August 19, 2008 - 20:04 ET by TheGingermanMr Boa - 10 school shootings in 200 years certainly demands immediate action. You're acceptance of unarmed teachers around children is entirely inappropriate.
Probabilities be darned, bad decision making is king.
Reminds me of my favorite news story in the past 10 years. After 9/11 everyone starts driving instead of flying despite the fact that your chances of being killed on the road are EXPONENTIALLY higher than your chances of dying on an airplane.
Making decisions based on emotion is definitely a good way to go. Perfectly rational.
Gingerman
August 19, 2008 - 20:15 ET by Cool ArrowI don't see a problem with bal questioning the wisdom of guns in school.
I don't think every teacher is qualified, but I don't think every teacher is unqualified either.
I'll bet money the town of Harold has a specific person in mind in this measure.
Here in Texas, we are proud of our right to carry. If it weren't for the fact my town is big enough to have a full-time police officer at each campus (pop.100,000), I'd be in favor of it here.
I ♣ my seal
Arrow - I'm fine with
August 19, 2008 - 20:28 ET by TheGingermanArrow - I'm fine with people carrying guns. I just don't see any need to drastically alter policy for events that rarely happen.
It's truly a perfect example of terrible decision making. There is no need to bring ANY guns into schools.
I'm sure some teachers are qualified to carry guns but that's irrelevant in my mind. Adding guns to school is not a wise decision. Every year children hurt each other with their parents guns and now we want to bring guns into an environment with a high proportion of children for the sole purpose of defending against an event that has a miniscule possibility of ever occuring?
Increase the risk to fight a non-existent risk? That makes no sense.
Gingerman
August 19, 2008 - 20:36 ET by Cool ArrowHow many sea containers enter American ports every day?
Would you say from the number of terrorist attacks perpetrated from sea containers (0) it's not really necessary to inspect them?
Because according to your logic, the chance of an accidental shooting at an American port is statistically, infinitely greater than a terrorist attack issuing from it.
I ♣ my seal
Cool - not a good example.
August 19, 2008 - 20:45 ET by TheGingermanCool - not a good example. Sea containers have a much higher probability of containg drugs or weapons than a student shooting up a school.
Smugglers routinely utilize sea containers to achieve their illegal ends.
Bad example.
bad example
August 19, 2008 - 20:51 ET by candanceLet's compare how many deaths have been at the hands of school shooters and how many deaths there have been at the hands of sea containers.
Since the historical facts are not on your side, you've now decided to talk about potential. Nice trick.
Everybody hide
August 19, 2008 - 21:01 ET by Cool ArrowThere's a sea container looking menacingly at the building.
I ♣ my seal
Candance - not on point
August 19, 2008 - 21:09 ET by TheGingermanCandance - not on point tonight. I'll pretend that you're just egging me on.
What percentage of hardcore drugs enter America via sea shipment?
What percentage of illegal weapons enter through sea shipment?
What percentage of schools experience a school shooting?
This is simple mathematics. You're clearly being purposefully ignorant. 10 school shootings vs. thousands of pounds of cocaine, heroin, and illegal firearms.
Are you sure you're really trying to make this argument?
nevermind ginger
August 19, 2008 - 21:12 ET by candanceYou and I are just not clicking.
Let's call it a night and try again some other time.
bal, I can almost see your point to a certain extent.
August 19, 2008 - 20:29 ET by R D HelmProblem is, a well-trained security-type person is damned near useless if they are on the other side of the property/campus when it hits the fan.
Timing in these situations is critical. Any delay in the response only benefits the criminal, and will probably result in more dead innocents.
And you are right, some people cannot properly handle guns in a stressful situation. A realistic training program will weed them out rather quickly.
-Dave.
you know Dave
August 19, 2008 - 20:32 ET by candanceThat's been my point here all along. Not forcing teachers to do it against their will, but leaving the option there for those who feel qualified.