[Update, 5:45 pm, by Matthew Balan: In the past year, Cafferty has called for the impeachment of Bush administration officials or criticized Democrats for failing to do so on 3 other occasions: August 21, 2007; January 7, 2008; and just over a month ago on June 12, 2008.]
You might call Jack Cafferty the Dennis Kucinich of the media. Actually, the CNN commentator would go the Dem congressman one better. Not content with mere impeachment, Cafferty has condemned Congress for not pursuing the possible prosecution of President Bush—to whom he sneeringly refers as "King George"—for war crimes.
The CNN commentator put war-crime prosecution on the table during his Cafferty File segment on this afternoon's CNN "Situation Room."
View video here.
JACK CAFFERTY: A new Gallup poll shows Congress's approval rating: 14%; the lowest it's been in 30 years. One of the reasons has got to be the legislative branch's refusal to exercise any sort of oversight on the executive branch of government, which they are specifically charged in our Constitution with doing.
. . .
Meanwhile, Congress bowed to King George's demands: passed that new FISA surveillance bill. Patted themselves on the back big-time, too. But they never did anything about the breaking of the law that occurred during the old FISA law. They continue to approve more money for the war in Iraq, most recently another $162 billion, no strings attached, despite promising—remember this?—to cut off funding for the war in 2006.
A new book titled The Dark Side, by New Yorker writer Jane Mayer, suggests top administration officials, including President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Don Rumsfeld and others, may be guilty of war crimes. But Congress has chosen to look the other way. A good lawyer might be able to make the case that Congress has been criminally negligent.
Here's the question: why does Congress continue to allow President Bush to get away with so much? Go to CNN.com/CaffertyFile; you can post a comment on my blog.
It's disgraceful.
Yeah, disgraceful.
Bonus Coverage: Pelosi—Bless Bush's Heart, 'A Total Failure'
During the course of the Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer played a number of excerpts from his recent interview of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, including this morsel.
WOLF BLITZER: Here is what President Bush said on Tuesday about your leadership—not just you personally, but the Democrats leadership in Congress.
Cut to clip of President Bush: "There are just 26 legislative days left before the end of the fiscal year. This means that to get their fundamental job done, Congress would need to pass a spending bill nearly every other day. This is not a record to be proud of, and I think the American people deserve better."
BLITZER: Do you want to respond to the president?
NANCY PELOSI: Well, God bless him, bless his heart, the President of the United States, a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy—you name the subject. And for him to be challenging Congress, when we are trying to sweep up his mess, over and over and over again.
View video here.
And they say the spirit of bi-partisanship is dead!
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Same old tune, Jackass
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:29 ET by SickofLibsGive it up, you old has-been reprobate.
"A good lawyer might be able to make the case that Congress has been criminally negligent."
Just leave out the 'negligent' part, but add the head vampire bat Bella Pelosi to the list, tho.
And since you're a big poll man, if you think any more than 14% of cable viewers can stand your crusty ass, you're wrong.
You're there merely to... wait a minute, I have no idea...
In related news, President
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 17:12 ET by ThisnThatIn related news, President Bush's approval ratings sink even lower.
I wonder why? Where does the American Public get its data to form such opinions? From people like Cafferty, of course.
I'd be willing to bet the ranch that Bush's approval would be over 50% if the MSM was simply even-handed about the news. Iraq, for example, is in great shape -- yet Cafferty spouts his hate-filled opinions. What's even-handed about that?
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Also in the news today, Her
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:45 ET by motherbeltAlso in the news today, Her Speakerness once again showed her lack of class and any sense of decorum and respect, saying of the President, as if he were a doddering old fool:
"You know, God bless him, bless his heart, president of the United
States, a total failure, losing all credibility with the American
people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject,"
Pelosi replied. She then tsk-tsked Bush for "challenging Congress when
we are trying to sweep up after his mess over and over and over again."
And you, Your Speakerness, what have you and Dingy Harry accomplished?
I really can't take much more of this.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
mb... I saw part of her
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:57 ET by bigtimermb...
I saw part of her press briefing today during a house vote...
I tell you, I started cracking up laughing...
she was coughing, choking spurting trying to get water down..cough, pat herself on chest...on and on...
When she could speak to the reporter this is what she finally did get out...
I don't know why (this happens) all day I talk and nothing happens...
then he went on to some BS about reversing global warming and preserving our planet...blah blah blah..
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
so, show us
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:48 ET by wizardjrWill someone please show us at least putative proof of these crimes????
still waiting.....
Some summer reading
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 10:05 ET by blogonatorSomebody in the administration is guilty of war crimes here. But if we don't investigate, we'll never know who.
I saw blogonator robbing a
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 12:38 ET by athoughtor2I saw blogonator robbing a bank. I was interviewed by the cops. But no one can verify my account about Blogonator. The only thing people can say is that they saw him around the bank at the time I said.
So Blogonator should be charged with a crime, right?
Not quite
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:09 ET by blogonatorIf you are the only witness and I have a good alibi, that's where the investigation ends. Your example is hardly analogous to the many claims that our government agents are engaging in torture which prompts my call for a proper investigation. We better do it soon too while there's still evidence left.
And don't confuse being investigated with being charged with a crime. Those are two different things.
As i said, you were seen
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:17 ET by athoughtor2As i said, you were seen around the bank at the same time. So no good alibi....Let's investigate....
Ever think that terrorists who know how our system work would work that system?
Also, the definition of torture is at play here. One man's torutre is another man's interrogation. Standing naked is a far cry from bamboo under the finger nails.
also none of these accounts by the terrorists can be verified. So of all these terrorsits held, according to these report and you they were all done in secret with no one around except the torturer. Hmmmmmmm
You quickly grasp the reason...
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:28 ET by blogonatorwe need a proper investigation. We have a lot of allegations by alleged terrorists. We have all the photos from Abu Ghraib. We have numerous news stories about "enhanced interrogation" techniques, some of which are properly defined as torture. But we don't know who authorized what and how far up the guilt should be assigned.
Ever think our system is well enough constructed to handle terrorists?
It had a fighting chance
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:37 ET by athoughtor2It had a fighting chance before SCOTUS stepped in and f'd it up.
Speaking of system of justice...I glad you adhere to the tenet innocent until proven guilty."But we don't know who authorized what and how far up the guilt should be assigned."
Allegations by terrorists who know how to milk the system...They were trained to know how our system works.
News stories by the MSM who just love this administration, perhaps a clouded judgment or a conflict of interest exist here?.
Maybe nobody authorized it and the said individuals did it on there own? as per Abu Ghraib the soldiers took it upon themselves to put a panties on the terrorists head..."the humanity! the humanity"
The rantings of a Bag-o-Wind
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:50 ET by marpelThe rantings of a Bag-o-Wind HasBeen...
NO one, not a single person
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:52 ET by c5thenWho has ever cried for GWB to be impeached or stand trial for 'war crimes' has ever stated the specific charges that they believe him guilty of.
I would be surprized if Caferty could even define what constitutes a 'war crime' and under what jurisdiction.
Caferty is a hack for the NutRoots contingent and has left journalism so far behind that he probably can't even remember how to spell the word.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
When the next buy outs are
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:56 ET by d1carterWhen the next buy outs are offered to CNN employees, I hope someone talks this guy into to signing up.
What about Clinton The First?
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 17:42 ET by UndercoverConservativeInternational forces also called for Slick Willy Clinton to be brought up on war crimes for bombing civilian targets in Bosnia. Sure it was some podunk w@nkery behind it, and the call for Clinton's head was ignored.
Same level of podunkery here, but for some unknown (yeah, right!) reason these calls are blown all over the media. Front page, even when it comes from a complete proven nutball.
Bias in our media? Say it ain't so!
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"
Slick Willy Clinton
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 04:00 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsInternational forces also called for Slick Willy Clinton to be brought up on war crimes for bombing civilian targets in Bosnia.
True, and he was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Don't hear much about that, do you?? Think you would if it was Bush??
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Is there a reward? He is
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 19:16 ET by RESTLESS 1Is there a reward? He is obviously a fugitive.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Dudes
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 17:38 ET by the strugglerLately,if I get home on time,I'll post on the "on air" Cafferty question.They'll have 180 posts or so.It's almost like a caption contest.There's no way you can be serious.My goal is to get on the air in a "This struggler guy comes online every day and calls us all idiots" manner.It's great sport.
Can
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 18:46 ET by seanrobinsCan somebody...anybody...please explain to me why Jack Cafferty has not been institutionalized yet?
sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com
Sean... I'd say same
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:29 ET by bigtimerSean...
I'd say same reason Olbie isn't yet....
Network bosses are the first that should go...there is the real problem.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Yes, a futile totally
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:18 ET by Chris NormanYes, a futile totally partisanly political pursuit of "war crimes" charges against a president - who will be out of office in six months - will do a hell of a lot of good in lowering energy costs, etc. Way to set priorities, you bitter old codger. BTW, I wasn't in favor of the impeachment of Clinton either (and his crimes were demonstrable), so no charges of hypocricy, please.
McNotObama '08
I'm sure that Cafferty...
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:22 ET by Prester John...also believes, for the sake of bi-partisanship, that all members of Congress who voted for the original authorization to go to war with Iraq as well as all the bills authorizing money to pay for the war should also be removed from office.
Prster John
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:08 ET by Biff McCainBush hoodwinked Congress with his fake "curve ball" intelligence.
The UN inspectors found no WMD months after they voted. Bush said I got the vote in my pocked, UN has no say.
But I would nail Congress for continuing to fund the criminal fake war on terror in Iraq.
"Burn that mother down." -- Jimmy Ellis
Pass the salt
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:12 ET by bigtimerPass the salt Biffy...
Now clean your plate before you can be excused.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt...
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:15 ET by Clear thinkerHigh five!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Biff, with all due
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:13 ET by Clear thinkerBiff, with all due respect... you really are stupid!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Biff,
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:24 ET by RESTLESS 1Then why were the likes of Bill Clinton and Al Gore saying saddam had wmd BEFORE Bush took office?
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
What can you charge Clinton
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:39 ET by Biff McCainWhat can you charge Clinton with? He didn't invade Iraq. We know now
Saddam did have WMD till 98, so Clinton was right, even had details
wrong.
Charge him with having wrong details that threw Bush off. Let Bush walk, it's all Clintoon's fault -- just like 9-11.
→ Biff
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 22:51 ET by Cool ArrowAnd Bill Clinton left office believing Hussein had WMD.
And Bill and Hillary expressed same during the runup to war. Ditto for Nancy Pants, Teddy Kennedy, and Barack H. Obama.
So what's you point?
LYDSEXICS UNTIE
Biff,
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 23:04 ET by RESTLESS 1If it were up to me, I would charge Billy blowjob with about 3,000 counts of negligent homicide. Look up the term if you can't figure out how it applies.
(Why am I engaging this pointless cretin?)
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Oops.... this is for Biff, regarding my post below :p
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 23:12 ET by MrShyOkay, granted, I'm now noticing you wrote "fake war on terror..... IN IRAQ."
But, well, so what. Sue me. :p You hate Bush anyway and you'd be hating him for "messing up Afghanistan" now, even if he never went into Iraq.
But, as many here also see the forest for the trees in the strategy of going into Iraq, it IS part of the global war on terror, and a very effective and successful one at that.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Bubba
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 07:59 ET by ahusseralso bombed Serbia (for no apparent reason), so he wouldn't have to go before the Grand Jury and lie like he had to. I think his excuse was that he couldn't testify because he was commander in chief during wartime.
B. Clinton's own people
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:20 ET by athoughtor2B. Clinton's own people told Hillary that Saddam still had WMD post 98. That's why she voted for it. She went awayt from the intel that the President and others had, including Rockefeller, Kerry and the others.
So all of the WMD's that Saddam had were used up and destroyed in '98?
fake wars vs. "real" ones
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 23:06 ET by MrShy"But I would nail Congress for continuing to fund the criminal fake war on terror in Iraq."
Aaah, I see. So, a war on terrorism -- on TERRORISTS who actually TERRORIZED civilians around the world for the latter half of the 20th century, from the suicide truck rammed into the US barracks in Lebanon in 1982 killing 200-plus marines, to the many airline highjackings, to the rise of TERRORIST groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and rogue/TERRORIZING states with dictators in the middle east, to the rise of Al Queda in the 90's and it's multiple sponsored-suicide TERRORIST bombings of everything from embassies to cafe's to hotels to navy ships to public transportation systems, to the horrible day of 9/11 and the 19 TERRORISTS who perpetrated that grotesque act and the TERRORISTS who plotted it, to more TERRORISM unleashed in Madrid and Bali, and lastly in London........ the war on terror that is finally being waged by the great, gutsy president currently in office is...... "fake" ? Huh??
Meanwhile, I'm sure in your fooled, blinded eyes the war on, oh say, "global warming" and the unproven "theory" that it's primarily man-made..... well, of course, that war is necessary and.... wait....... "real" ???
Hilarious.
That's sarcasm. It's not hilarious at all. It's frightening that people operate on such a backward and utterly irrational level such as yourself.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Biff. Please.
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 23:18 ET by candanceOur good friend Free Stinker has elaborated more than once on all of the actual WMDs that were found in Iraq.
But since you actually think the war in Iraq should be over because "we nailed Hitler in three years" I don't expect anything better from you.
Biffy the ingrate
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 00:39 ET by UnsaneYep. Biffy feels that is was oh-so-easy to nail Hitler in three years...failing to note how much effort that actually took.
And that is to say NOTHING of the occupation of Germany from 1945-1949.
Biffy has zero concept of the cost of freedom as he nuzzles and suckles the tits of democracy, capitalism, and freedom
Whoever casts a vote for Barack Obama is nothing more than a common thief. Whoever fails to vote against him is nothing more than a moral coward.
550
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 00:36 ET by UnsaneNever mind the 550 metric tons of uranium yellowcake that recently departed Iraq, right?
Whoever casts a vote for Barack Obama is nothing more than a common thief. Whoever fails to vote against him is nothing more than a moral coward.
Lying Liars and the Lies they use to Lie
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 08:24 ET by DoktorFranken''Bush Lied'' is a lie. This has been proven yet ignored by the ignorant.
''There were no WMDs'' is a lie. Anyone following Sadam Hussein's history should know that. And the Kurds. And the Canadians who are taking ownership of 550 tons of yellowcake shipped from Sadam's stash.
''There were no terrorists in Iraq before the war'' is a lie. Perhaps Iraq cannot be linked to 9/11 but there were many terrorists in Iraq at one time or another and Sadam himself sponsored terrorism. And where better to fight terrorist but in their own backyard? Shall we fight them in your backyard? I didn't think so.
''Bush can be charged with crimes'' is, (whoda thunk it), a lie. What Goerge W. Bush has done he has done with full (except for, I think, one or two votes against action towards Iraq) approval of U.S. Congressional leaders.
Most everything said against Bush is a lie made up by the Democrats (Pelosi, Boxer, Reid, Kennedy, good gosh - all of them except for Joe Lieberman) and repeated until it is believed as the truth. The truth is that George W. Bush has saved your ass - like it or not - for the past 7 years. He has protected this country and fought terrorists - something no one had the guts to do previously - without regard to his approval rating (created and sustained by the MSM) or his ''legacy'' (which will be formed mostly by who? - Can you say ''MSM''?). He brought this country back from the brink of financial ruin after 9/11. He is a man of honor and a patriot beyond the reckoning of people consumed with BDS.
You have freedom of speech. But you also have the responsibility to stay away from slanderous falsehoods.
I agree with your post
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 09:04 ET by Free ThinkerI agree with your post almost 100% doc. The only thing I would argue is that a President's legacy is not defined by the msm, thankfully. Historians will judge Presidents based on facts, successes, failures, etc. History will judge President Bush quite well and that is a fact that the left knows and is doing everything in its power to deny in the current day. The President I think Bush most resembles is Lincoln who was not well admired in his day, but history has rewraded richly based on his sound judgement and facts that can't be spun.
I certainly hope your
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 09:24 ET by dvdaughtryI certainly hope your comparision with Lincoln and Bush pans out.
The problem I see is "perception is reality".
I hate relativism.
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
Legacy
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 09:26 ET by DoktorFrankenYou are correct, FT. I was talking mostly about the first few years (when they can still try to drag him into court in order to toss him in the gulag) after his Presidency. History, seen later, will show Bush to be one of the most effective Presidents as far as protecting the citizens and economy. Of this I am certain.
Thanks for bringing that point up.
I see your point on the
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 10:13 ET by Free ThinkerI see your point on the trying to drag him into court thing, but I think your original post speaks volumes to their chances. The whole war crimes chant of the fringe is just that and is why it never goes anywhere in Congress. Pelosi/Reid may hate the President and be totally incompetent of running congress, but even they have admitted impeachment or war crimes talk is foolish and would be the death of what they hold so dear - political power. Its kind of funny that we wasted so much time talking about something Jack Cafferty said! Have a great day.
The Day Is Great - I Am Alive
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 10:30 ET by DoktorFrankenWho is Jack Cafferty? (Just part of my Passive Aggressive thingy.)
Since when did the truth or the facts get in the way of a Congressional Hearing or Investigation? Pelosi has flipped both ways (speaking hypothetically) on the impeachment issue - or at least the investigation possibility. And pretty much all of the Democrats that get their talking points and walking orders from Soros and the likes of MoveOn will put on quite a show if needs be. I've heard it and seen it before (Scooter Libby ring a bell?).
Discussing politics is not so much a waste of time as it is a relationship killer. Ask any of the brain-dead, Messiah-following people that used to be my friends.
Borders
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 08:34 ET by cvgbuckeyeBiff; oh international affairs expert and especially with your expertise on Iraq: There are 6 countries that share a common border with Iraq. Can you please tell us who those countries are?
We will wait for your answer. If it takes you more than a few minutes to repond, we will assume that you are about as much of an expert as what your remarks show you to be.
Please don't use the excuse that you were at work or something because I'm not sure who would hire you?
Thats
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 10:29 ET by cvgbuckeyeThats what I thought; all blow and no go.
Lefties are morons
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:52 ET by AsmodeusSeriously, how is that the human enema know as Cafferty is still breathing the same air that I am?
So the President is guilty
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 20:34 ET by BigSky1970So the President is guilty of "war crimes" simply because Dennis Gazoo, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of the Democrat party don't have the guts to cut off the war funding to a war many of them signed off on? It's one thing to make promises you can't keep, it's yet another thing to tap dance, cave in and roll over to a President who is allegedly in their mind, in violation of the law.
Jack Cafferty is an angry, demented, ignorant old Troll.
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 20:40 ET by Free StinkerJack Cafferty is an angry, demented, ignorant old Troll.
But enough about his positive side.
"They're both doofuses!" --Mark Levin
If President George W. Bush
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 20:57 ET by BigSky1970If President George W. Bush is "King George", Jack Cafferty is the Court Jester
Dance knave, dance!
Fussy, fussy Uncle Jack
Thu, 07/17/2008 - 21:55 ET by krendlerWould be funny to actually see someone throw some facts into this drunk's face while he's on one of his afternoon rants, or challenge him on his baseless accusations. Fortunately for Jack, CNN takes precautions to make sure no one with a half-way objective outliook is ever around during that time period. However, I did once see Jeffrey Tobin actually defend Huckabee after Cafferty had called him and "idiot" and that simply caused Cafferty to become even more childish and anrgry. Very awkward for Blitzer, Tobin and the other panelist. Cafferty just sat there scowling and pouting for the rest of the segment.
Would love to see Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham hand Cafferty his ass during or after one of his tantrums and watch Cafferty's head explode.
I would pay to see that.
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 07:58 ET by Free ThinkerI would pay to see that.
Jack Cafferty is the one who is disgraceful.
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 04:27 ET by SupermanHey Jack, you are the one who is disgraceful. You are supposed to be a journalist. But all you are is another partisan hack. Just a biased, hypocritical, water carrying hack.
You want to stop FISA. You want to cut off funding for the war. You think President Bush is a war criminal. Heck, I don't have to watch CNN to get this. I can just go to MoveOn or DailyKos. Or I could watch one of Keith Olbermann's latest unhinged rants.
I would have posted this on your blog over at CNN, but since you have censored all of my other previous posts, I decided to post this here. Unlike you, NewsBusters believes in free speech.
I love how "they" say he
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 06:12 ET by athoughtor2I love how "they" say he broke the law, but provide no proof of it.
It's too early in the AM for me to even start with Pelosi, let's just say she is a horses arse for starters.
Cafferty is a delusional
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 07:55 ET by Free ThinkerCafferty is a delusional crackpot so I can ignore him just like Olbermann. They are cartoons of the fringe left that noone takes seriously.
Pelosi, however, is another case. Did she really try to suggest that the President has been a failure in terms of the war she has tried to cut funding for despite our success, the economy that had grown like no other until she took over congress, and a failed energy policy that she and her fellow democrats are ignoring by trying to pretend that some magical replacement for oil will just appear tomorrow? Gas prices have skyrocketed since the dems took over and they refuse to drill for oil on our own territory. That is a total failure and lack of credibility, bless her heart.
yellowcake
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 08:12 ET by Mulligan22Funny thing is about that little covered yellowcake story. The transport was all done very quietly and secretly so as not to alert any terror groups to its existance or whereabouts. So they would not have the slightest chance of getting some of it. We only learned of it after it was safely in Canada.
But prior to 2003 it was in the hands of one of the biggest state sponsors of terror. The irony is so obvious.
That is one of the many
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 08:59 ET by athoughtor2That is one of the many reasons why we went into Iraq. He had WMD under Billy Boys watch. And Clinton did what? That's right had phone, oral and cigar sex with an intern.Which by definition is sexual harassment, using ones power over an underling for sex, even if consenual. And sent a cruise missle or two to take out a couple of tents. Oh and her ass ment a lot to Bill.
It's OK Jack. Happy Hour's drawing near
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 10:42 ET by MrltavernHave another drink Jack.
Mr.L
This one is for San Fran Nan
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 11:18 ET by MassConservThis one is for San Fran Nan -- "And for him to be challenging Congress, when we are trying to sweep up his mess, over and over and over again."
At what point does a rational person admit that after 1 and a half years they're mucking their own stall? Or put another way, who can we get to rub Nancy's nose in the puppy pad?
It's funny how a
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 13:06 ET by fitzfongIt's funny how a hit-and-run drunk driver like Jack Cafferty, who never really faced any justice for his crimes, would be in the position to demand the prosecution of others...especially for an absolutely silly reach like this one. More bluster than brains, I guess.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Go ahead and try Jack
Fri, 07/18/2008 - 17:00 ET by Jonah JohansenIf from your hard left perspective that makes sense, go
ahead and try Jack.
Just understand that from the perspective of those who love this
country and hate her enemies-
What you and your co-conspirators
have been doing is TREASON and when our time comes and we are put in
charge by an American public, which really understands the threat and the
danger our enemies pose, we will remember your treason. Not only will we
remember it, we will see to it that all of you receive the proper reward for
your treason.
You may think what I am saying is extreme and absurd but I tell
you when the terrorists strike us and kill not thousands but tens maybe
hundreds of thousands there will be no moderates, their will be no reasonable
people, there will be no voices of restraint, there will be no Pelosis,
Rockefellers, Conyers, Reids, Obamas, at the conference table deciding
how America should respond.