"An ambassador is an honest man sent abroad to lie for the good of his country."—attributed to Sir Henry Wotton (1568–1639), British diplomat.
If Sir Henry were around today, he might offer a corollary: a communications director is a man sent to meet with the media to fib for the good of his candidate. In the current campaign, the tactic's most transparent practitioner would seem to be Robert Gibbs, communications director for Barack Obama.
As I noted here, Gibbs recently had the chutzpah [if that's the right word for the man from Auburn, Alabama] to claim that Barack Obama's resignation from his controversial church was "a deeply personal, not a political decision." Rig-h-h-h-t.
Gibbs, the bland face of brazenness, was at it again last night, this time denying the blatantly obvious: that the campaign had tricked the press into flying to Chicago while Obama remained behind in DC to meet with Hillary.
View video here.
Here's the story: Barack Obama wanted to be able to meet with Hillary Clinton in private, without the media on his heels. So the Obama campaign informed the press corps that the candidate, then in the DC area, was flying to Chicago, and the reporters dutifully joined the motorcade to the airport and boarded the plane. It was only when the plane was about to take off that it was disclosed that Obama would not be along for the ride, having stayed back in DC to meet with Hillary.
Today's Morning Joe played the clip of this incredible bit of effrontery by Gibbs in response to a reporter's question on the plane about the deceit:
REPORTER: Is there a reason why we didn't go with him in the motorcade all the way [to the meeting with Hillary? This is what we're out here for, and now we're on this plane, with no candidate.
ROBERT GIBBS: Look, I understand. It was a desire to do these meetings, obviously in private, and, you know, that's what we're doing here tonight. You know, it wasn't an attempt to deceive in any way.
Gibbs' bald-faced, uh, misrepresentation, provoked derisive laughter from the Morning Joe crew.
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Ah, ah, ah, ah, ah. "It wasn't an attempt to deceive in any way"? That's exactly what they were trying to do.
WILLIE GEIST: Of course!
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Why don't you just say it?
SCARBOROUGH: You've got to admit: the first press question was very polite: "Um, is there any reason why we were brought onto this plane and not allowed to follow the motorcade?"
BRZEZINSKI [imagining what a truthful Obama aide would have said]: How about: "Yeah: we wanted to make sure you guys weren't covering the meeting. That we wanted to keep them private."
SCARBOROUGH: But they [the media] were very polite to him. Can you imagine if it had been Hillary's people who had done that? The screaming and yelling and snarling? Oh, my God!
And if a Republican candidate had tried it, an outraged ACLU might have been making accusations of kidnapping and false imprisonment ;-)
Is this what Obama has in mind when he speaks—endlessly—of a "new kind of politics"? Communications directors are the kind of folks that successful presidential candidates make their press secretary. Would this be the standard for truth in an Obama administration?
Update | More Gibbs-erish
Gibbs actually appeared on Morning Joe at the top of the 8 AM EDT hour. But though the panel did rib him about his unsuccessful tangle with the truth, no one asked the simple question of why, having so blatantly deceived the press, he chose to deny it. The show rolled additional tape of Gibbs' smoke-and-dust machine in action on the plane last night. Sounding much like Scott McClellan on a particularly inarticulate day, amidst the multiple hems and haws he did manage to get off this gem of Gibbs-erish:
GIBBS: I don't really remember when I got notified exactly when everything was going to happen.
Of course. If there's one important trait for a communications director, it's bad short-term memory.
View video here.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
A lie is a lie, no matter
June 6, 2008 - 07:42 ET by Pete WilsonA lie is a lie, no matter who says it and for what reason. Mr. Gibbs lied when he said that there was no attempt to deceive. We can expect more and more of this from now on.
The weird thing is, the truth would have saved him.
June 6, 2008 - 08:56 ET by sarcasmoHe could have just said, "Yeah, we deliberately fooled the press into getting on that airplane so we could get rid of 'em for the meeting. And we did it because they're annoying." With the exception of the fooled press, people would have loved it, especially the "because they're annoying" part. There was no reason to blatantly lie when the blatant truth would have been funnier & sold better.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Lying is fine with them, insults would not go over as well
June 6, 2008 - 09:20 ET by general companyThere was no reason to blatantly lie when the blatant truth would have been funnier & sold better.
I doubt that, every story they write is positive for Obama, piss off a few of these guys and you wont know what they will write. As it is, they are used to being lied to, makes them feel.....importaint. I mean they have worked so hard to cover his fanny, this "white lie" is nothing compaired to some of them.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Let's see...they were told
June 6, 2008 - 08:04 ET by motherbeltLet's see...they were told Obama was going to Chicago, were taken to the plane and boarded, when the campaign staff knew that Obama was staying behind.
In what parallel universe is that "no attempt to deceive"???????
I wonder if these guys tell their wives they are working when they are playing golf on Saturday, and then claim that "there was no intent to deceive."
BTW Mark, I forget which story it was, but you got a h/t from Rush yesterday!
In what parallel universe
June 6, 2008 - 08:22 ET by pbanks7In what parallel universe is that "no attempt to deceive"??????? Now you're just being divisive. ;-)
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.
"No attempt" means it wasn't any effort.
June 6, 2008 - 09:23 ET by Ruths husband Ben"No attempt" means that it wasn't any effort. Why tell the truth when a lie will work as well? As I posted yesterday, the truth is not an important issue with liberals. Get used to it, you're going to see a lot of it for the next four years (maybe longer if the Republicans don't get their act together).
"Whatever Michelle Says Is The Message." –
Senator Barack Obama October 1, 2007, Chicago HQ
Robert Gibbs - the Baghdad
June 6, 2008 - 08:09 ET by rimskyRobert Gibbs - the Baghdad Bob of the Obama campaign.
I was just about to say
June 6, 2008 - 14:12 ET by greenfairieI was just about to say that!
the Truth Doesn't Matter!
June 6, 2008 - 08:10 ET by ChasvsHey, These are Marxists we're talking about!
They wouldn't know the truth if it hit them squarely between the eyes!
This is what we can expect from the Obama crew!
When did the Truth ever matter to a Communist?
Get ready Amerika! You want change--this lieing half-wit is going to give you mare than you bargined for and then some!
And if Obama gets POTUS,
June 6, 2008 - 08:49 ET by marpelAnd if Obama gets POTUS, what kinds of charades will be pulled then?
One can only imagine.
Honestly, the reporters were duped because their blind faith in "the chosen One" allowed it to happen.
;o+
GIBBS: I don't really
June 6, 2008 - 08:58 ET by motherbeltGIBBS: I don't really remember when I got notified exactly when everything was going to happen.
Of course. If there's one important trait for a communications director, it's bad short-term memory.
ROFL!!
They are already rolling out the "I don't recall" excuse.
Remember the outrage when Bush didn't notify them and take them along when he went to Baghdad?
It's going to be interesting watching the press grapple with their desire to be in on everything versus their "he can do no wrong" attitude about the Obamessiah.
How many examples of this
June 6, 2008 - 09:08 ET by BuxomAnnieMcGreggorHow many examples of this kind of thing is it going to take before we, as a nation, finally understand that our elected officials have totally decimated the public trust? Hmmm... no wonder "we're" so cinical.
Heilige Scheiße! How do you turn this damned thing off? -J. Robert Oppenheimer
annie, "decimate" means to
June 6, 2008 - 09:18 ET by motherbeltannie, "decimate" means to reduce by 10%. What they have done is much worse. With lies and rationalizations like this and the meaning of "is"...they have pretty much destroyed it.
Frankly, I don't have a problem with them lying to the press so he could go somewhere without them; there is no law that says they have to accompany him everywhere. What ticks me off is that Gibbs hedged about it and didn't just come out and say that.
Secrecy
June 6, 2008 - 09:26 ET by KC MulvilleIt's a ridicluous assumption that the candidate (or the president) is not allowed to have a meeting without the press being fully briefed and included. I can't imagine the presidency where anyone who meets the president must subject themselves to biased media "analysis" or speculation. To say the least, it would discourage people from meeting the president, especially anyone who has something sensitive to tell ... you know, the types of people the president really needs to hear from.
But that's the media's price. If the candidate wants coverage, he has to play ball, all the time, and by the media's self-serving rules. Obama is just beginning to learn the rules. Even though the press may love him now, if he doesn't play their game, they will turn on him. Count on it. If you need proof, just look at how they turned on Hillary. She and Bill were once untouchable darlings, but that day has come and gone.
"Deception"
June 6, 2008 - 09:30 ET by saw the lightIt seems to me that the press was in a complete outrage when Bush did something similar. If I remember correctly, the administration gave misleading information to the press as to an operation in Iraq or Afghanistan to keep the enemy off guard and to protect our troops. They were aghast that they were used for "propaganda."
But when the liberal messiah does it, not so much.
And comments about Bush flying in to Iraq under the "cover of darkness." I seem to remember that they questioned the need for secrecy then, also.
Typical idiots.
I will cut them some slack
June 6, 2008 - 09:52 ET by Cureboy675I will cut them some slack on this one. They just wanted to get a chance to meet together in private. I don't find this particularly offensive. I saw that interview and even Joe Scarborough evenutally said that it was a necessary evil.
Slip in the back Barack
June 6, 2008 - 10:30 ET by acumenFrom the RESTORING TRUST IN GOVERNMENT AND IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY page at Obama's website:
“We’re not going to be able to change America unless we challenge the culture that has dominated Washington for far too long. And that means shining a bright light on how Washington works.”
[Speech in New Hampshire, 9/4/2007]
Great catch, acumen: thanks
June 6, 2008 - 10:32 ET by Mark FinkelsteinGreat catch, acumen: thanks for posting!
Changes in platitudes, Everything remains quite the same
June 6, 2008 - 11:15 ET by acumenThanks Mark, just my small contribution in trying to help Barack (redacted) Obama get his message out.
Gibbs
June 6, 2008 - 12:03 ET by nandrelliSo Gibbs lied about lying.
Sounds just like Bill Clinton to me.
Good thing Obama is a new type of politician, eh?
McClelland
June 6, 2008 - 13:38 ET by okiehawk44Do you think Robert Gibbs will someday be viewed by the media the same way Scott McClelland was?
That's gratitude for ya
June 6, 2008 - 19:12 ET by ToddonCapeCodHow does the Obama campaign payback the media for helping him get the nomination? Lies and deception.
What is this world coming to?
Is our future being decided for us?
June 6, 2008 - 22:30 ET by w0tmI'm really not a conspiracy theory nut or a New World Order (NWO) believer that "they" actually control the world but both Obama and Clinton were seen entering the annual Bilderberg meeting being held in Virginia while, as was reported, the media was lead on a wild goose chase to Chicago. What is going on?