Remember how the MSM swooned over Barack Obama's Philly speech on race after the Rev. Wright tapes pushed the story to the front pages? I expected the same kind of rapturous reaction to Obama's press conference of yesterday in which he definitively ditched the conspiracy-mongering minister.
But, surprisingly, that was not the case at all on CBS's Early Show this morning. To the contrary, the tone was set by the opening graphic shown here, which skeptically asked: "too little, too late?" And when Bob Schieffer and Juan Williams appeared a bit later, they were similarly cynical. Then again, there was one bit of perhaps unintentional candor on host Harry Smith's part, of which more later.
Here's how the exchange went down.
View video here.
HARRY SMITH: This is all about distance. Did Barack Obama successfully distance himself from Rev. Wright yesterday?
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, I don't know what else he could say. He basically denounced Rev. Wright, he said he did not represent his views, he put as much separation as he possibly could. But the question now, Harry, is will people believe him? Will they say, "look, if this is how he feels about the man, why didn't he know about all this before? Why did he keep going to the church?" Or they will say "well, he agrees with Rev. Wright, but being a politician, he had to say what he had to say." Rev. Wright dealt a devastating blow, it seems to me. I think he's done about all he could do, but the question is, will that be enough? Will people accept it?
Williams was no more sanguine than Schieffer.
SMITH: Juan, it seems so clear that Obama's campaign has stalled for the last week or so, even longer because of all of this. Can he get any of his momentum back?
JUAN WILLIAMS: Well, it's going to be tough. You know, you've got North Carolina and Indiana coming up next week, so it's immediate, and it's going to be a hard time to try to reclaim the center and reestablish who Barack Obama is in the public mind as we go into that race, because what we see is the polls tightening in North Carolina and the advantage he held in Indiana seems to be melting away especially among so-called Reagan Democrats, sort of middle-of-the-road white voters who may have been saying "I want to jump on Barack Obama's bandwagon: he's exciting, he's fresh, he's idealistic," but now people are saying "do I really know this guy?" because as Bob was saying, if he sat there for 20 years, it's not like the things Rev. Wright said at the press club were new, he's just reiterating them on a broader scale, and so is it a matter of a lack of judgment, was it political expediency that caused Barack Obama to sit there and nod along for all that time?
That's when Smith let the MSM curtain slip.
SMITH: Here's where I want to go. I remember being on the bus with him in Iowa--with Barack Obama--and there was all of this upswelling of support and I said "do we live in a post-racial time? Is it possible we live in this post-racial time?" We've had nothing, it's all been about race for the last two or three weeks now. Bob let me start with you: can Barack Obama get past race as this campaign goes on?
SCHIEFFER: Well if he doesn't, he's not going to succeed here, but I think Juan is exactly right. There are a lot of people who said "I really like this guy, it makes me feel good to hear him say what he's saying," but now there's this uneasiness even among people who really, really liked him. There's this uneasiness about why has this gotten to where it is, and I think we'll find out. We're going to find out in North Carolina and especially in Indiana, but I just don't think we'll know until people have a chance to think about this a little bit. But this has really, really hurt him, I think, Harry.
SMITH: Juan, in the 20 seconds I have left, can Barack Obama get this past the race issue?
WILLIAMS: Well, you know, it's really hard right now because it's all racial and I think he wishes he hadn't got back into that kind of ugly, divisive talk. That's what he said yesterday. But it goes beyond, to the fall election. You can imagine, the Republicans, state parties are already using this to put down Democrats further down the ticket. So the superdelegates have to think: what's the impact, do we just want to have this racial conversation, or do we want to get back to the issues and Democrats versus Republicans? [i.e., should they ditch Obama and choose Hillary?]
All in all, a shockingly downbeat assessment.
But let's back up a bit to Smith talking about being on that bus with Obama in Iowa "and there was all of this upswelling of support." That was presumably a press bus. So who was the "upswelling of support" coming from, Harry? Along similar lines, when Schieffer speaks of a sense of unease even among people who "really, really liked him," you sense he's speaking at least as much about his fellow MSMers as he is the voters.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Obamas chickens are comming
April 30, 2008 - 08:30 ET by bassndudeObamas chickens are comming home to roost! You lie down with dogs, you get fleas! Birds of a feather, ect. ect. ect. This is not going away anytime soon. Obama said the relationship is "damaged". he did not throw Wright under the bus, or even push him out into the street. A damaged relationship? HA! And another thing. If Obama is so upset over what Wright said at the Press club, why is he not addressing what he said at the NAACP the day before?!? And why did he wait untill yesterday to say anything? The answer is Obama is in agreement with Wright, and it took him a while to formulate his response so that is sounded like he did not agree. And his campaign pushing him to say something.
This is the same leadership mentality that has carried Liberia into the 21st century. And we all know how well that worked out.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
"you sense he's speaking at
April 30, 2008 - 08:44 ET by ThisnThat"you sense he's speaking at least as much about his fellow MSMers"
Test: Go find 20 MSM people. Pick your favorites; or pick them at random; whatever. Then, go pick another 20 University professors. Again, at random or however you want. Finally, select 20 Hollywood actors.
Now, line them up. Here's your challenge: Select just 5 of the 60 who would most likely vote Republican. Impossible you say? Unreasonable expectations perhaps?
The reality is, it would be nearly impossible to have selected 5 Republicans out of this sample. Now, translate that into the thousands of words and sentences uttered in public by these institutions each day, and you get a pretty good picture of the enormous bias that we're hit with each and every day of our lives.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Obama may or may not agree with Wright (now)... but...
April 30, 2008 - 09:27 ET by jazbo...you can be sure his ingrate radical wife does. And since she wears the Dockers in that family, she would be making the social policy in a (God forbid) Obama administration.
Those who beleive in nothing will believe anything.
A question for Michelle O
April 30, 2008 - 10:31 ET by CaringwhiteguyDear Michelle O - - After the way your pastor, friend and close confidante Rev. Wright has recently been treated in the media and by certain Presidential candidates, are you still proud to be an American?
His campaign is toast.
April 30, 2008 - 09:33 ET by Free ThinkerHis campaign is toast. Associations like Wright and Ayers will doom him in a general election.
Such friends should doom him
April 30, 2008 - 09:40 ET by NL207Such friends should doom him in Illinois as well, but they did not. This situation, Obama in a US Senate seat, underscores the power of the smear campaigns that have been run by the Democrats under the campaign leadership of Chuck Schumer and Rahm Emmanuel. Until the MSM is willing to expose this tripe for what it is, these amoral and anti-American jerks will continue to be promoted into high office.
NL207, I have a question
April 30, 2008 - 09:56 ET by DelsaJust out of curiosity, I have long thought Rahm Emmanuel is actually running the Congress. I think it was part of a plan hatched during the Clinton days to make sure they had their people in charge.
Maybe a little too conspiratorial but I have always thought Rahm's congressional run was a plan.
Nancy is just too damn stupid.
I don't speculate about
April 30, 2008 - 10:42 ET by NL207I don't speculate about what Emmanuel's back-room role may be in the Democratic Caucus in Congress. I do know this: Officially, he was Chairman of Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He was in charge of the strategy for electing Democrats to the House of Representatives. Schumer was his opposite number in the Senate. All this smear stuff originates with them.
Senate seat
April 30, 2008 - 10:30 ET by ChaitealoverObama is in the Senate because "somehow" it came out that Jack and Jeri Ryan's sealed custody records showed that he wanted her to have sex in public with him. Ryan dropped out of the race and the Repubs brought Alan Keyes from out of state to take his place. Unlike people in NY & RI, apparently the folks in Ill didn't want a carpetbagger representing them.
Chai
“A liberal is a man who will give away everything he doesn’t own.” —Frank Dane
Judgement, not race.
April 30, 2008 - 09:35 ET by Hunter12I get upset that this is portrayed as a race issue. We all know Obama is black. It comes down to someone asking us to believe he sat in a church for 20 years and listened to the sermons and didn't realize this man was spewing anti-American garbage from the pulpit every Sunday. That says something about his judgement, a critical asset to a president. Either he is very slow on the uptake and it took 20 years to sink in, or he has realized in the last few days that this man is hurting his campaign and he thinks we are dumb enough to believe this recent denouncement is sincere. How do you remove twenty years of guidance and mentoring from the makeup of who you are overnight?
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Race is not the issue
April 30, 2008 - 09:52 ET by Pete WilsonI agree with Hunter. This episode of POTUS politics boils down to this, for me: I was told as a youngster, by my parents and teachers that I would be judged by the company I kept. I believe that Mr. Obama will be judged by thinking American voters in the same way.
Mr. Obama joined that particular church for political reasons, in my opinion, and he is now leaving it for the same reasons. Reverend Wright was helpful in the beginning of Mr. Obama's political career, so Mr. Obama sat there and listened to the rantings and ravings of a bitter man stuck in the 1950's and 1960's. It was politically expedient.
He was "friendly" with and served on a board with Mr. Ayers for exactly the same reasons.
Why, now, would we not believe that he is trying to distance himself from these same people for the very same political expediency.
Do I believe that Mr. Obama was influenced by these people? Yes. Does that mean that we do not really know what Mr. Obama really believes? Again, I believe that we do not. My gut tells me that he is at heart, a Marxist.
I do not think the issue of Mr. Obama's race comes into the picture at all. None of my doubts about him have anything whatsover to do with his race. My doubts about him have everything to do with his true beliefs and his very vague plans for his term in the White House.
Pete, Those plans remain
April 30, 2008 - 10:19 ET by Hunter12Pete, Those plans remain vague for a reason, don't you think? I've seen projection for the cost of all these plans ranging from $285 billion, all the way up to $850 billion in the first term alone. Maybe he'll flesh those out in the general and explain how it won't be coming out of our pockets. I keep forgetting all our hesitancy about this man is based on the color of his skin and not the color of our money.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
BO
April 30, 2008 - 10:48 ET by okiehawk44If I were Michelle Obama I would not be too comfortable right now. She is married to a man who has thrown his advisor/mentor/friend of 20+ years under the same bus he has thrown his mother, his (maternal) grandmother and his (maternal)grandfather. MO might be next or it might be his children. BO is a real peice of work.
CBS is the
April 30, 2008 - 09:36 ET by Delsafuel in Hillary's MSM tank.
CBS, in my opinion is all the way in Hillary's corner and has been.
Who do they love?
Clinton, YES.
Obama, NO
Barry is indeed a
April 30, 2008 - 09:44 ET by KillgraveBarry is indeed a lightweight and an empty suit, and it was only a matter of time that his train would stall on the rails.
But mark my words. The leftist media and acadamia will definitely regroup and attribute Obambi's inevitable downfall to racist white America, not to his incompetance and lack of substance. These moments of truthful introspection and criticism (which we see in this CBS clip) will quickly evaporate and be forgotten.
I can see it now... all across the media and in classrooms, they are going to say white America "was not ready" to elect a black president. I'll put money on it.
And Joe Scarborough jumped
April 30, 2008 - 09:41 ET by marpelAnd Joe Scarborough jumped on the Barack Obamawagon this a.m. I guess Joe thinks Barack has redeemed himself. No, he hasn't. He still hasn't explained why he sat in that church and put up with Wright's hate speech all these years. When he says he had never heard him make these comments before, he is insulting the intelligence of the American people...er, most American people. He's won over Mika and Joe. And he never lost Keith O or thrill-up-my-leg Matthews.
The side show here is how the MSM makes fools of themselves every dang day.
Obama is no longer electable
April 30, 2008 - 09:56 ET by Increase MatherIt's over for Barry...the larger question is...do the Dems want to go down with his ship? Will they give him the nomination to keep African-Americans on the Democrat plantation?
It is already being said in the "community", "we can make it rain for McCain"...are the Dems prepared to face down the heart and soul of their party by nominating Hillary?
Shortly before the Civil War, one of America's major partys was the Whigs...they broke up over the issue of slavery.
Are the Dems the new Whigs?
Obama is no longer electable
April 30, 2008 - 09:57 ET by Increase MatherIt's over for Barry...the larger question is...do the Dems want to go down with his ship? Will they give him the nomination to keep African-Americans on the Democrat plantation?
It is already being said in the "community", "we can make it rain for McCain"...are the Dems prepared to face down the heart and soul of their party by nominating Hillary?
Shortly before the Civil War, one of America's major party was the Whigs...they broke up over the issue of slavery.
Are the Dems the new Whigs?
"...are the Dems prepared
April 30, 2008 - 10:56 ET by MikeB"...are the Dems prepared to face down the heart and soul of their party by nominating Hillary?"
This may be an amusing, interesting election. If the Democratics' candidate is Hillary, the Democratics' base is saying they will stay home. The Republican's base is thoroughly annoyed with McCain, and are threatening to a) stay home, or b) vote for every office except President, or c) write in names from Abraham Lincoln to Duncan Hunter to Elmer Fudd.
That would be interesting: an election in which the bases of both the parties refuse to vote for their party's candidate.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Sounds like this would be a
April 30, 2008 - 11:19 ET by taterSounds like this would be a good year to throw your vote away with a third party candidate. I'd actually be more inclined to vote Liberterian this election than any other.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
Reason just put out a guide
April 30, 2008 - 11:23 ET by sarcasmoHere. I'm for Ruwart/Barr in either order, but I also find it interesting that the party attracted diverse candidates like Mike Gravell from the Democrats. In fact, this time's LP convention should be quite good TV, except only C-Span will bother to cover it if things go as they have in the past.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Hillary can't
April 30, 2008 - 10:04 ET by Delsawin either.
McCain is the dem's candidate of last choice. With that in mind, they win either way.
Obama will win the nomination. I continue to say, the Clinton's are as disliked by the Demorats as they are by the rest of the population.
He will be their nominee for that reason alone. Never mind the obvious ones.
Management and experience
April 30, 2008 - 10:11 ET by KC MulvillePresidency is about leadership. You can't just "solve" problems. You have to get other people to help you, and all of them have mixed motives. The trick is to get enough players to run the play that you've called, instead of having each of them do their own thing.
Management is a two step process. You get people excited, but then you get them focused. Obama has been good at the first part, but now we see that he's lousy at the second part.
Don't kid yourself. Experience does matter.
Very succinctly put.
April 30, 2008 - 11:25 ET by WhoIsJohnGalt"Management is a two step process. You get people excited, but then you get them focused." Very well stated.
Experience matters on many levels that most people fail to grasp.
Obama it's all about who is in your dug-out your political camp
April 30, 2008 - 10:16 ET by lareeI am blogging about this topic on the link below. Who benefits the most from Rev J Wright's on air antics? Senator Clinton or McCain? Who knows the American political waters better Obama or Clinton?
http://imustimes.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/james-carvillle-likes-to-rodeo-cajun-style/
So much for MLK Redux
April 30, 2008 - 10:22 ET by CobraManJust a few days ago, a lot of people were equating the Reverend with Martin Luther King Jr., kind of like a MLK Redux, who Obama refused to denounce as long as it was helping his campaign. Today, the Reverend is just another paranoid raciest, a Louis Farrakhan Mark II, and Obama has decided to toss under him the bus, again. One day Obama supports him, the next he doesn’t (there‘s a perfect example of Obama’s loyalty for you). What a difference a day makes, eh?
The Drapes
April 30, 2008 - 10:39 ET by okiehawk44In his 1st renunciation of Wright, BO closed the sheers on the window into his true beliefs about America to obscure the facts, and this time, BO closed the drapes.
BO still hates this country he just hopes we can no longer clearly see his beliefs by listening to Wright's rants.
Renunciation
April 30, 2008 - 12:01 ET by iveseenitallBarry's renunciation of Rev.Wrong is too little, too late. We know who these people are, all of them. Those who don't know them are either blind or ignorant (many are deliberately so).
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"