NYT Reporter Aghast Matthews Hadn't Read Her Article

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.
  • Bookmark and Share

Somebody better break it to the New York Times: they might still be the paper of record in their own minds, but to the rest of the world they're just one more dead-tree joint struggling for attention.

The Old Grey Lady's unjustified conceit was on display during this afternoon's Hardball, when one of its columnists was aghast that Chris Matthews had had the audacity not to have read her oeuvre.

Deborah Solomon, who has a weekly column in the NYT Sunday magazine, had interviewed the Rev. John Hagee, a minister who has endorsed McCain and has made a number of controversial statements. I'd mention in passing that while Hagee's critics have accused him of anti-Semitism, he has in fact received numerous awards from Jewish groups for his steadfast support of Israel.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓


Solomon's article will appear in this Sunday's NYT magazine section. While Matthews mentioned that the article is online now, I couldn't find it despite earnest searching.

Be that as it may, let's move to the amusing and telling exchange between Solomon and Matthews. The Hardball host had earlier lauded the newspaper, calling it "the glorious New York Times," but that apparently was insufficient homage in Solomon's book.
DEBORAH SOLOMON: It's interesting that Jeremiah Wright has not given any interviews this week, and I was wondering would he appear with Barack Obama during the now-famous talk on race. He did not; he's hidden away, and Pastor Hagee also was very reluctant to give me the interview. He was worried he would drag Senator McCain down into the mud with him, and um --

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Did he do that with you?

SOLOMON: Well, what do you mean? Did he --

MATTHEWS: In other words, is there stuff in the interview that shows up on Sunday that's gonna hurt McCain?

SOLOMON: You didn't read it yet?

MATTHEWS [visibly annoyed at the question]: No.

SOLOMON [shocked and appalled]: Oh!
Solomon went on to opine that a pastor's words shouldn't hurt a candidate because "we believe in separation of church and state in this country." What? Can it possibly be that a NYT reporter doesn't understand the difference between the constitutional prohibition against the state's establishment of a religion and the right of every citizen to judge a candidate on whatever grounds he deems fit, including, say, having chosen as his "spiritual guide" a pastor who calls on God to damn America?

Solomon, a fellow Cornell alum, seems a perfectly nice person. But deal with it, Deborah: the Old Grey Lady just ain't what she used to be.

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

liberal are contributing to global warming

they are adding to global warming every time they kill a tree to make paper to print crap that nobody reads.

 
lunaticcringeradio

Actually Wasting Paper is Good for the Environment

The more paper you use, the more trees they plant:

Bullshit! - Environmental Hysteria (Video) (29min)

- U.S. Forest land area increased from 747 million acres in 1997 to 749 in 2002. (U.S. Forest Service)
- Since the 1950s, timber growth has consistently exceeded harvest. (U.S. Forest Service)

The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource

I agree, PT...

I agree, PT...

Whenever people talk about "saving trees" I look them right in the face and ask "Can you say RE-NEW-a-ble resource?????"

She is so stupid...

folks this is what an east coast NYT intellectual liberal sounds and looks like!

handy distraction

These libs had never even heard of John Hagee until they needed an example of a "controversial" minister to tie to McCain.

 

This is their moral equivalence. . .

to Jeremiah Wright.  The differences, of course, are ignored.

-Hagee is flamingly anti-Catholic, which is not the same as being racist.  btw, I'm a devout Catholic and think this guy is a loon.  However, Hagee strongly disagrees with Catholic dogma (as is his right as an American).  Giving him the benefit of the doubt, his anti-Catholicism isn't necessarily from malice, but ignorance.  Jeremiah Wright hates White people and especially White Americans.

-McCain has not attended Hagee's church for more than 20 years.

-Hagee is not reflexively anti-American, which, more than being racist or anti-Catholic, should disqualify you and your congregation from being an American President.

-McCain is not trying to make excuses for Hagee's blatant racism, like BHO makes for his buddy.

-Hagee is not McCain's spiritual mentor or likened to his uncle. 

I don't plan on reading this little hit piece in the bird cage liner she works for, but I do wonder, where's the story here?  Or maybe more precisely, what story is she trying to make up?

Oh my...I am ROFL now...I

Oh my...I am ROFL now...I saw this little snippet with her...she was amazed...amazed I tell ya' that he had not read her beautiful prose....I laughed then, I'm laughing now.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Keep a suicide watch

I sure hope this chick doen't see the NYT readership numbers any time soon. Then again... ;>)

Seriously....

Whats the point of this? This is story and global warming have become the new abortion and stem cell for the right... Damn Monkey's!

 JUST LET IT GO!

How much did we make the left sit on for the last 8yrs? Last I checked Pat Robertson ran the D.O.J!

I was all in until it became childish.... ENOUGH ALREADY!

hmm....

So that's what a NYT reporter looks like.......

Hmm, I wonder if Matthews

Hmm, I wonder if Matthews considered asking her to move closer to the camera as he experienced a tingle up his leg?

Times nickname

The NYT is the "gray Lady". It's the "old gray MARE".

Mare?

Try "Whore"

It seemed to me...

That she was more surprised at Chris' lack of professionalism in not doing even a cursory bit of research after inviting her to appear on his show.

Even for MSNBC, it's low-class, dismissive, rude and extremely poor journalistic practice.

Or is that the definition of Matthews and MSNBC?

 

I just watche the video,

I just watched the video, and I agree with you, heldmyw.

She said, You didn't read it yet ?? (emphasis added). Yet.

Everyone knows that if you're going to interview someone about a book they wrote, you read the book first. If you're interviewing them about an article, you read the article.

It's called "preparation." IMO, the look on her face indicated that she was surprised, not insulted.

NYT not as important as you think, Ms. Solomon

Ms. Solomon, I hate to break it to you, but here in rural Iowa I'd probably have to drive 100 miles to buy the paper edition of the NYT.  I have better uses for my gas money. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Maybe, but Chris Matthews

Maybe, but Chris Matthews doesn't have to drive anywhere. It was shoddy preparation and unprofessional on his part to not read the interview he was going to talk to her about.

Can't argue, MB

Can't argue with that, MB.  I guess I was too busy enjoying a NYT reporter being taken down a peg. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

What do you expect?

He's a liberal.  They 'know' everything.  What's the point in actually reading anything?  That's why I say liberals are irreversibly stupid.  They are unable to learn because anything that does not fit into their skewed world view simply doesn't exist.  Most will remain stupid until their deaths.

 

To know and not do, is to not yet know

flashbacks

You're comment is giving me flashbacks to Forest Gump. Do you really think that liberals are irreversibly stupid? If so, then explain why they have out maneuvered the Republicans and Conservatives to retain hold of Congress for a very large majority of the last 60 years and most of the Judiciary for the entire time (my opinion as judiciary is not always noted in political favor).

Simple answer: They Lie

There are two types of liberals.  The 'controllers' and the lemmings.  The lemmings are irreversably stupid just like the 'controllers' want them to be.  The 'controllers' know what they are doing, and have infiltrated the Media and all levels of education to keep the lemmings stupid and dependent upon them.  The long-term results of which end in tyranny and misery for millions of people.  

 

To know and not do, is to not yet know

Well ...

if I were Deborah Solomon I would have had to shrug and remark before my next topic comment that, "Understandable, since nobody watches your show, Chris ..."

 

When you men get home and face an anti-war protestor, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy… ~ Attributed to General Tommy Franks

Did she get goosed?

That look on her face in the screen is the look that they get when they get goosed! Sounds like her story's goose is cooked, just like the New York Not-With-The-Times.