Opening paragraph from the item by NYT reporter John Holusha in the paper's house blog The Lede on the eco-terrorists who burned three new homes north of Seattle today [emphasis added]:
For people who are anti-sprawl activists — or have baser motives — a new-built house sitting empty in a previously rural area evidently makes a ripe target for an attack by fire.
Consider also the item's headline: "House Fires With a Message in the Northwest." Yes, think of it as a bonus. Not just a housefire . . . a housefire with a message!
Even the Associated Press manages to say it like it is in its article on the matter. AP headline: "Ecoterror Link Eyed in Wash. Fires."
First paragraph [emphasis added]:
Fires gutted three multimillion-dollar model homes in a Seattle suburb on Monday, and authorities found a sign purportedly left by eco-terrorists that mocks claims that the homes were environmentally friendly.
Holusha can't bring himself to call these people what they are. They're not terrorists, just "activists" sending a "message." Imagine if the "activists" had been promoting a cause the Times abhors. Odds it would have handled matters in the same understanding way?
Photo Credit: Elaine Thompson/Associated Press via NYTimes.com.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Activists are always good
March 3, 2008 - 17:23 ET by Mica the Magnificent"NY Times building burned to ground by activists with a message"
Works for me.
Both Fox News.com and
March 3, 2008 - 17:27 ET by balboaBoth Fox News.com and Cnn.com went with ecoterrorists. Maybe the NYT just wanted to give their thesaurus a work out.
Right, and I'm sure that's
March 3, 2008 - 20:28 ET by motherbeltRight, and I'm sure that's their rationale when they describe Mexicans who sneak over the border and buy illegal Social Security numbers to make fake ID's and get jobs, as "immigrants."
Nah, pay attention man, it's
March 3, 2008 - 22:12 ET by RickTaLifeNah, pay attention man, it's "Undocumented Worker." :-P
A dictum of the left:
March 3, 2008 - 17:27 ET by ahusser"The end justifies the means." The NYT's amelioriation, tolerance and apologist agenda of these acts of terrorism shows their true colors. It can't be an accident when the destruction of property is described as activism.
This kind of NYT's "reporting"
March 3, 2008 - 17:30 ET by FastEdpoints out the agenda that they have when it comes to capitalism and their hypocracy - the nyt's can't keep subscribers, but they insist that they report truth. The truth is hopelessly beyond their grasp, as they call felons "activists" and the killers at peta saviors. Thier blindness to the truth is one of the reasons for their soon to be lack of ANY readers.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Pravda west
March 3, 2008 - 17:41 ET by wizardjrThis rag is so far past its sell-by date. The outright anti American views and rationalizations printed there are no longer shocking, just inexcusable.
And then 70% of the public speaks up and tells them that Lame Stream Media is no long trustworthy, so what do they do? They go out and prove it. Priceless.
criminals: "anti-law
March 3, 2008 - 17:50 ET by Chris Normancriminals: "anti-law activists"
And serial killers and
March 5, 2008 - 21:37 ET by MikeBAnd serial killers and mass-murderers are "population control activists". Hey! This is kinda fun!
Communists are "anti-materialism activists".
I'm sure I can think of other types of activists. Or, I can just wait a while and I'm sure the al-NYT will identify them with each story about some left-wing group committing crimes.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
If I recall correctly
March 3, 2008 - 18:02 ET by UndercoverConservativeas a former Seattle area resident, if my memory serves correctly, the "street of dreams" has been a fixture for over a decade. Most houses are demonstrators, and have been in place for quite a while. When there's a radically new design to be made, they "recycle" the lot and sell off, demolish or move the previous house. Mostly though it's a show for interior decorators, remodelers and high end entertainment/multimedia systems.
Not a lot of "sprawl" here. The ELF terrorists are attacking the "culture of consumerism" or some other jealous claptrap. Going after symbols they decided are wasteful or anti-Gaean. There is little to do with "sprawl" here or they might go after some of the growing shantytowns filled with illegals around here instead.
I wonder how much of their funding comes from overseas or domestic "islamic" charities too...
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
I'm an anti-propaganda
March 3, 2008 - 18:16 ET by ConservativeRexI'm an anti-propaganda activist, that's why I don't like the NYT.
Tilt.
March 3, 2008 - 18:21 ET by allanfTilt!! Apprently some of those liberal wires are crossed at the Times. I suppose the Times will refer to Bin-Laden as just an "urban-renewal expert"
WTF? Anti-Sprawl
March 3, 2008 - 18:27 ET by RickTaLifeWTF? Anti-Sprawl Activists!?!? It's bad enough that we're watering down the label "Terrorist" by adding the Eco prefix to it...Anti-Sprawl!? Thanks NYT...I haven't laughed like that in a long time! :-)
THE NEW YORK SLIMES...
March 3, 2008 - 18:53 ET by danybhoyThe idiots at the NYT don't need to worry about ELF, they can't protest building in NYC, it's already built up as much as can be. Well, if they decided they wanted to build in Central Park, maybe, but other then that...nope.
These punks from ELF need to be treated like the terrorists they are. They are a danger to the American people, their actions go well beyond that of a simple protest. Arrest these twits & send them away for about 30 years. Then, when they get out, they can get sweet university jobs lecturing kids like other radicals from bygone eras, like the Weather Underground types. There is something to look forward to.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
The roots of most of the
March 3, 2008 - 20:31 ET by fitzfongThe roots of most of the problems this country faces are from "environmentalism". "Environmentalists" exhibit the height of ignorance and arrogance and seek to damge human progress. Unfortunately, too many on both sides of the aisle have conceded to their specious arguments. Now the New York Times spreads eco-Nazi propaganda by using dishonest euphemisms to describe the actions of eco-TERRORISTS at ELF. Militant "environmentalism" is a parasite on this world.
"Anti-Tall-Building
March 3, 2008 - 20:38 ET by Jerry"Anti-Tall-Building Activists Damage Twin Towers" - NYT headline 9/12/2001
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
NYT's standard for terrorism
March 3, 2008 - 22:13 ET by nkviking75The only way the NYT would call ELF terrorists is if one of the houses belonged to an abortion clinic owner.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Good point. When asked if
March 3, 2008 - 22:21 ET by JerryGood point.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Bingo!
March 4, 2008 - 15:26 ET by greenfairieBingo!
Green is the new fascism
March 4, 2008 - 07:12 ET by ArchConservativeWell I hope that when these ELF members burn down property belonging to a local newspaper or news organization member that the headlines read "anti-tree cutting activists blamed". I'm sure that they wouldn't mind their homes being destroyed to keep the country 'green'.
And by the way instead of calling them ECOterrorists, just call them what they are: TERRORISTS. Plain and simple. There is no difference betweent them and Islamofascists who kill and maim and destroy. I say if Gitmo is good enough for those who would like to see our country burn, it's good enough for eco-weasles who would seek to do the same.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
From the NYT stylebook
March 4, 2008 - 15:24 ET by greenfairieHamas/Fatah = Palestinian "activists"
ELF/ALF = Anti-sprawl "activists"
Al Qaeda/Hezbollah = Islamic "activists"
Weathermen Underground/Obama's buds = peace "activists"