Today's Unbalanced 'Real-People' Panel

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.

Call it Today's homage to John Lennon: imagine there're no conservatives. The NBC show so much enjoyed the conservative-free citizens panel it hosted back in November that it brought it back this morning.

As I wrote about at the time, two timid Republicans were pitted against two partisan Dems. In November, one of the "Republicans," Susie O'Neil, claimed that the country is in decline due to the war "and because corporations are totally influencing our Members of Congress and the Senate." Call Susie a Michael Moore Republican.

The other Republican on the panel back then, Sarah Hungerford, said she was thinking of voting for . . . a Democrat. The pair were back this morning, again matched against two partisan Dems who both had apparently become Obama supporters.

View video here.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

LESTER HOLT: Sarah, let me begin with you. When we last spoke, you weren't sure anyone among the field we were looking at, could really change the country. It looks like your party's nominee is going to be John McCain. How do you feel about John McCain?

SARAH HUNGERFORD: I actually feel pretty good about that. I did vote for Huckabee in my state's primary, because I do feel that he does have a lot to offer. Maybe as a vice-president at this point, but I think that a McCain-Huckabee ticket would be very appealing to a lot of people in the Republican party, because some people that are concerned about McCain, I think some of their fears would be alleviated, or balanced out, with having Huckabee on the ticket also.

HOLT: Fears he's not conservative.

HUNGERFORD: Yes.

Yes, Huckabee's a social conservative. But "balancing out" McCain? How would McCain's no-tax-cuts-for-the-rich be balanced out by Huckabee's record of raising taxes in Arkansas and employing a populist rhetoric worthy of John Edwards at his most demagogic? McCain the amnesty champion balanced out by Huckabee, who wanted to give college scholarships to illegal aliens? Huckabee might be Holt's idea of a conservative, but far from alleviating concerns, choosing Huckabee for the VP slot would enrage and further alienate many mainstream conservatives.

Then it was on to admittedly moderate Susie.

HOLT: Then you have Susie over here. You describe yourself as a moderate Republican.

SUSIE O'NEIL: I do.

HOLT: So I would think that you would favor John McCain. Are you concerned, though, the sense that he feels he has to also reach out to the right wing of the party?

O'NEIL: I'm concerned that's the direction he'll be reaching out now, because I think he has to reach out to the moderates also, even though the conservative end of the party doesn't think he should reach out to the moderates any more. So he has a job to solidify his party.

Susie can be comforted in knowing that NBC will be there to do its bit: so long as McCain is moving left.

Holt closed by saying he'd like to have the panel back. Would it kill Today to have someone from the base of the GOP: mainstream conservatives?

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oh, good grief. Ms. O'Neil

Oh, good grief. Republican Ms. O'Neil thinks McCain has to reach out to "moderates" to solidify the Republican Party?????

Does she think McCain is too conservative?

Where has this woman been?

All FOUR of them sound like Democrats.

Sheesh.

 

 

 

reaching

Maybe McCain has to reach out to moderates because he is too far left to even see the conservatives let alone reach out to them.

And we are supposed to be

And we are supposed to be suprised because?  Today is nothing but a bunch of bleeding hearts.  The sad thing is that soccer moms watch this garbage, and take it for fact.  It assists in molding the public opinion, and I for one believe that it influences elections.

"I for one believe that it

"I for one believe that it influences elections."

That's a good reason why we watch and report here at NewsBusters.

And please keep it up, all

And please keep it up, all you guys!

And thanks for watching, Mark, so we don't have to! LOL

(It's a lousy job, but someone's gotta do it!)

Will do, MB -- it's my,

Will do, MB -- it's my, twisted, pleasure ;-)

Hats off to you Mark

You are the man!

Come on, tinman, get your

Come on, tinman, get your "street slang" right: it's "you da man!"

LOL

yugo girl

but try:  yuda man

Supreme Court,  National Security,  Borders,  Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.

Media influencing elections

Right...5 out of the last 7 presidents have been Republicans.  Some influence. <sarc>

Jer 

Is a peacock a "foul"?

 It's no wonder that the NBC peacock is looking to its left.

I saw 1 minute of this...

Just before I went to work yesterday. I only needed a minute to tell the future of the story. It never changes. It NEVER changes.

 

"Sickening is the peacock to ail brain of Sean, mmm?"--YODA