It's amazing how Medved bends over backwards and bends his own principles to ignore the hatred McPain has for conservatives and to excuse away all his anti-Republican votes, left pandering, and media whoring, not to mention McPain's terrorist assistance plan and his open borders apostasies.

Medved has sold his soul for a "win."

Liberals allow personalities and emotions and feelings over issues, substance and policy. And that's what they're doing here.

No ... He's not.

I'll admit.  Limbaugh blows a lot of hot air when voicing his views ... But they ARE based in the facts.  I'm not a cheerleader for the man, but I have only heard him express his concerns based on Sen. McCain's record.  Has he (Limbaugh) gotten "emotional" about it?  I would rather he is passionate about it.  He hasn't forgotten what happened in the 2006 election, and knows what is at stake in this Presidential election.

When I hear the word McCain, I can't help but think of the old George Carlin skit that talks about politicians "that are completely full of $h1t!!!"  McCain takes the prize for being utterly full of $h1T.

 Now that Thompson is out, I think I am going with Romney.  With the choices we have, I think he is our best bet.

..and I doubt it would change the numbers in any of his bank accounts.

Medved's support of McCain suggests he is the liberal here.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

 In that picture Medved look's like he just smoked something. The way thing's are going now, I'm almost tempted to ask him to pass that shit.

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

                               " The Cake is a lie."   

This is a shame. I will listen to Michael Medved when he comes on when I have a chance to listen to the radio - like driving at around 11:00 o'clock at night (when the Spanish language channel isn't bleeding over too badly on the five watt radio station he's on locally). I wish these junior talk show hosts, like Medved and Beck (remember when he had to "clarify" his comment about Rush?), would stay away from criticizing the Big Kahuna. It only makes them look bad.

Did anyone hear the span of time earlier this week-maybe last week in an effort to assuage a listener- that Rush just played Shanklin's parodies of McCain to highlight his positions?  Just curious because for all the heat he has gotten this week, this isn't new. 

Mr. Medved has been wrong before about the North American Union and he is right Rush is pounding McCain from the heart as that is where you are a Conservative, but reason with one's mind.

I though am sounding like a liberal in asking if we as Conservatives can work something out to win. I did not agree with Ronald Reagan when his friend Jim Brady played on his guilt and sympathy to push for more gun control, but I love that old man.

I do not agree with McCain and he has been a big prick at times, but he is our prick or about to be now.

What requires to be done is McCain and Rush for the sake of victory need to get on the main objective of winning. Rush upholds mostly Conservative values. McCain upholds political values which are tempered by his POW experience. We need to slim this down to Reagan issues of defense, economy and security and stop attacking each other on all fronts.

McCain was a jerk in degrading Rush as only an "entertainer". McCain needs to be as big as Arnold and swallow it and give Rush his due as Rush will play nice if one stops poking him in the eye with a pointy stick.
McCain needs Laura, Sean, Bill and Rush as when the MSM get ahold of him they are going to make him crazy Dr. Strangelove.

We need to measure this to win as I know the GOP in Congress is so shiftless like the Democrats that they never will vote for an Amero nor a CanAmMex which McCain is fingering with in his amnesty.

Win the election, stop things up like the Founding Fathers built the system and hope for the day a politician shows up who is a Ronald Reagan cowboy on economics, defense and God.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Medved is dead-on. Look, liberals are destroying their chances in 2008 by turning their rigid partisanship against each other. Liberals refuse to accept anyone having different conclusions than theirs and lash out at those who do.

 I am a conservative in most respects and at, this point, I prefer McCain. Frankly, I am not thrilled about either guy, but what can you do. The most important thing is to defeat whatever liberal is the Dem nominee, because the policy differences between Romney and McCain are mice nuts compared with their differences with the Dems. Latest polls show McCain crushing either Dem and that is why I choose him.

 Lets not blow it by accusing anyone who doesn't choose our candidate as not being a "true conservative". That's what liberals do and that was Medved's point.

I completely disagreed with McCain's immigration plan, but to slam McCain as no different as a lib is not factually accurate.

Pro life, supportive of the war, has not voted for tax increases--ever (FYI--he voted against the tax cuts because they were not accompanied by spending cuts, since both parties seem to spend like drunken sailors, I'm o.k. with this), opposes pork...just a few issues that separate McCain from Ms. Rodham-Clinton. He may not be the whole package, but, neither is Romney. And they are BOTH infinitely better than the alternative!

Wow, I didn't know people still listened to Rush. Somebody needs to call him on the carpet from time to time and Mighty Mouth is right. While we owe Rushallelujah a debt of gratitude we do not owe him fealty.

Does he even know what a "liberal" is?

Has the Newsbusters.org blog been taken over by Liberals
posing as Republicans? These responses
are no better than the group think found on any of the liberal wastelands.

I’ve yet to see an argument that sways me over in Mitt Romney’s direction. He’s been campaigning for over a year and I
still have no feel for who he is and what he represents. How is his conservative track record? What’s his experience in national security? How
good are his chances of winning the national election? Will evangelical Christians, Catholics and
other members of the moral majority vote for a Morman? How’s he doing with Independents?

When it comes to voting conservative, McCain is somewhere in
the middle of the pack of Republican
senators. That ain’t great but it’s a helluva lot better than Clinton and Obama’s
big fat zeros.

Even if Romney turns out to be a true conservative, is he electable. If not, isn’t it better for Republicans to send up a
candidate with a better than average chance of keeping the government’s stinky paws out of our pockets?