Fred Thompson today blasted the media for propagating a false rumor about his impending withdrawal, while reinforcing the role he has created for himself as the candidate in this race who does not suffer unwelcome questions gladly.
Back in Iowa, Thompson famously refused to respond to the debate moderator/school marm's demand for a hand-show on global warming. On this morning's Today, he declined to engage in horse-race speculation about his own prospects, then took the media to task for its propagation of that false rumor about his impending withdrawal. Weekend anchor Lester Holt interviewed the former Tennessee senator.
View video here.
LESTER HOLT: We saw on the Democratic side Iowa became kind of a viability test. We saw some of the lower-tier candidates drop out after seeing the results in Iowa. What is your gut check right now in terms of your own viability? will it be South Carolina, will it be Super Tuesday?
FRED THOMPSON: I'm not going to engage in that -- further beating the process issue to death. We're talking about the future of our country here and the fact that our worst enemies are trying to get their hands on nuclear weapons and we're bankrupting the next generation. That's what I'm talking about. The rest is all speculation and I don't engage in it.
HOLT: It's a fair point you make; you don't engage in it. But you were the victim of some rumors on this subject of your viability and questions if you would drop out. How much did that hurt you?
THOMPSON: Well let's think about that. It did hurt me, and the media lapped it up. It was put out by another campaign; made no sense at all.
HOLT: Which campaign?
THOMPSON: A few days before the election and made no sense at all, and I was coming strong, and the media took it up, and spread the rumo, and probably cost me two or three points in Iowa. So the lesson there is not, you know, politicians being politicians. The lesson there is that the news media really ought to check these stories out and come to me, and ask me, and take my word for it.
HOLT: Senator, fair shot against the news media, but what candidate were you mentioning that put that out there?
THOMPSON: I'm not gonna. I owe you nothing, frankly, in that regard and I'm not going to say anything more about it right now.
BONUS COVERAGE -- ABC's Weir: Republican 'Bickering' Gives Barack 'Nice Swagger'
Discussing last night's debate with George Stephanopoulos on today's Good Morning America, Bill Weir broke out his Barack pom-poms.
BILL WEIR: The Republicans spent a good amount of time bickering about how they would run against Barack Obama, which gave him sort of a nice swagger as he walked on the stage.
The Today show actually played a clip of Mike Huckabee discussing Obama. People might disagree with the former Arkansas governor on a variety of issues, but view the video and see if this sounded at all like "bickering," or simply an analysis of Obama's appeal.
View video here.
Allah at Hot Air:
[Fred's] the only candidate on our side who’s not, essentially, a bulls**t artist. Some would say Huck falls into that category too, but he doesn’t really. He’s simply a bulls**t artist who’s exceptionally good at shoveling his bulls**t. Hence the many comparisons between him and the other man from Hope.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
One more reason to choose Fred.
January 6, 2008 - 11:52 ET by ChaitealoverI'm not going to engage in that -- further beating the process issue to death. We're
talking about the future of our country here and the fact that our
worst enemies are trying to get their hands on nuclear weapons and
we're bankrupting the next generation. That's what I'm talking about. The rest is all speculation and I don't engage in it.
Fred won't kowtow to the media's useful idiots. I'd rather hear a candidate say what he really thinks about the matters that are important to the country, than one who just utters talking points and lies down like a rug for some talking head.
Chai
“We must learn to live each day as a unique opportunity to make everything new” - Henri Nouwen
Give em hell, Fred! Every
January 6, 2008 - 12:00 ET by USA4freedomGive em hell, Fred!Every time he talks to the press I love him more and more.I bet that he is the only one that scares the press when they interview him!I love it, the ONLY one that does not take $hit from them.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Fred is Consistent
January 6, 2008 - 12:05 ET by BlondeIn treating the media dolts exactly they way deserve to be treated.
I heard him do a similar slap down on Fox this a.m. When asked why he wasn't making more progress, he pointedly stated that it would be helpful if Fox had reported his success in Iowa, rather than ignoring him completely.
I think I'd vote for Fred based on this alone...that he won't put up with the media b.s., and is the only candidate that has the, um, fortitude to call them on it!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
}}---> Blonde's Crossword puzzle
January 6, 2008 - 12:11 ET by Cool Arrow2. Down.
Five letter word for "um, fortitude".
I asked Paul McCartney's ex, but she's stumped too.
I ♣ My Seal
Cojones, huevos.....
January 6, 2008 - 12:11 ET by OldSailor88stones, nads. No matter what name you use it's refreshing to see.
Faciem durum cacantis habes
I just love it. Can you see
January 6, 2008 - 12:20 ET by USA4freedomI just love it.Can you see him with Helen going on and on..I would vote for him just to hear him say: Helen why in the hell don't you just shut up.OMG that would be priceless.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Blonde...was that on FNS
January 6, 2008 - 13:19 ET by JerBlonde...was that on FNS with Chris Wallace? I watched the last 45 min. of the program, and I don't believe Fred's name was mentioned one single time. It was like he was not even a candidate.
Jer
Jer
January 6, 2008 - 13:23 ET by BlondeIt was early this morning...I think F&F.
But your observation kind of puts a point on Fred's statement that I paraphrased, yes?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Apparently so.
January 6, 2008 - 13:38 ET by JerApparently so.
Jer
Fred Scares Them
January 6, 2008 - 13:36 ET by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrotThe MSM including FOX has gone out of its way to ignore and minimize Fred's viability. They are running as fast as they can away from Conservatism.
-
January 6, 2008 - 12:03 ET by dahliatraversWeir broke out his Barack pom-poms
lol
Give'em Hell Fred!!!
January 6, 2008 - 12:34 ET by c5thenHe's still my second choice, head and shoulders above the other republican candidates.
By the way, the question was posed by the moderator, Charles Gibson, and was not something that the candidtates would have done themselves. They all fell into the trap instead of talking about how they ALL have HUGE differences with ALL the democratic candidates.
Alan Keyes would not have fallen into that trap, thus he was excluded from the event. They never asked the democratic candidates what their differences are from Romney or McCain or Gulianni.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
romney/thompson sounds good
January 7, 2008 - 15:02 ET by TruthMongerromney/thompson sounds good to me
Fred
January 6, 2008 - 13:12 ET by JimmybobThompson is definatly a man of few words. His thoughts are very powerful with just a few of those words. I like his take on the media but I am afraid that most people get most if not all of their news and ideas from that same media. Making them mad might not be the best of plans.
Fred in on CNN with Blitzer right now
January 6, 2008 - 13:18 ET by RJ....and he's coming across very well.
I would consider voting for
January 6, 2008 - 13:16 ET by riff_raffI would consider voting for Fred just for the entertainment value of watching him spend four years slapping around the drooling half-wits in the MSM.
You Go Fred!
January 6, 2008 - 13:23 ET by Pete WilsonI would vote for Fred just to watch him demolish the Washington Press Corps(e)! His slow speaking style will drive the fast talking media types crazy, but the substance of his words will ring true.
Of course, I voted for Haley Barbour for pretty much the same reasons. I wanted to see if the media understood such phrases as " I don't have a dog in that fight.".
Good for Fred! He may not
January 6, 2008 - 13:57 ET by zhombreGood for Fred! He may not win the nomination, but he's growing in my esteem as a plain spoken man who will not suffer media fools gladly. As for les femmes du media Weir and Stephanopoulos, they ought to wear short skirts, lipstick and mascara if they want to act like such whores. Let's show a little candor, girls.
New Hampshire vote Fred Thompson
January 6, 2008 - 13:58 ET by Lame CherryIt is astounding with Fred Thompson doing as well as he did in Iowa that the media is still trying to stop him.
I was looking at polls today and one had the dems in a dead heat and one had Obama trouncing Hillary.........the other had McCain in the lead.
The states of Iowa and New Hampshire are beyond inept. If this was the NFL playoffs they would be choosing the Miami Dolphins to win the Super Bowl. They always pick loosers.
I can only hope that Mr. Thompson continues to pull in support off of Rudy, Romney, McCain and that the confused people who think Ron Paul is their savior come to their sense and vote for Fred as he is the who mirrors their values not Paul. (Paul is anti death penalty, isolationist and simply wants to go to the gold standard without ever coming up with a plan to not make gold either worth a billion dollars an ounce as that is what it would take in a world economy based on a gold standard which would crash everything or finding a economic plan beyond inflation.)
Yeah I get fired up about this, because when the hedge funds screwing up all of this and CONSTRICTING AMERICANS RECESSIVE ECONOMY (no not in recession but CONSTRICTION) everyone is going to suffer as a weakened America means the stage for a world war to test American resolve.
This can be fixed and Thompson is bright enough to hire economists and defense policy advocates to fix it before it causes real problems.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
For the MSM, It's all about
January 6, 2008 - 13:59 ET by IamTinmanColumn inches and air time! For the reporters of the press and TVs talking heads, exposure equals higher salaries and more power. Still celebrating their role in the Vietnam War defeat they have been humiliated by their failure to take down George Bush and are trying to again become kingmakers. That Fred pretty much refuses to spend time discussing the minutia of the campaign, preferring instead to discuss the serious and important issues that a president will be expected to face, rankles them to no end. Hilarys laugh, Edwards hairdo, Romneys religion, those are the subjects the media wants to discuss, not the important issues that this country faces. No wonder the public rates the media somewhere lower than whale poop!
Media looks like little Children talking to an Adult.....
January 6, 2008 - 14:17 ET by Woody BoydI read the transcript, but then watched the video and Thompson makes Holt look like the little weaselly kid who deeply wants the dirt on somebody else so he can run off and try to start a fight between Thompson and whoever Holt could get him to name.
Instead Thompson acts like the adult and says "No I am not giving you a name little boy and I don't owe you a name".
It is definitely refreshing to see someone who can handle the MSM like the little pathetic children they have become over the years.
I have to say that watching this simply re-enforces my decision to support the man.
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
I thought liberals didn't
January 6, 2008 - 14:40 ET by tracheostomyI thought liberals didn't like anyone with a swagger (Re: GWB).
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
The Question about Obama was a trap
January 6, 2008 - 15:09 ET by spacemonkeyWhen they got asked about Obama they should all should have dismissed him and the rest of the Democrats, like Fred did.
But no, they didn't, now it's sound bite city.
I owe you nothing...
January 6, 2008 - 16:30 ET by Clear thinkerThis is just one reason why I support Fred so much, he will never be accused of groveling at the feet of the media.
How can you not love this guy?
Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/
In The Year 2016...
January 6, 2008 - 16:34 ET by Winghunter...we will ask of the next candidates, "but, is he really Thompsonesque??"
Is *she* really Thompsonesque ?
January 6, 2008 - 16:40 ET by Free StinkerActually, in 2016 we'll be asking that about Sarah Palin.
Newsbusters. Log on and find out What the heck is so yummy over here!
Yeah! Im an alaskan who
January 7, 2008 - 00:27 ET by ziplinedownYeah!
Im an alaskan who is pretty happy with what palin is doing
"give me a break!" - John Stossel
I have a prediction.......
January 6, 2008 - 16:59 ET by Woody BoydThat if we go through this year and some guy like McCain, Huckabee, or Romney gets the nomination and loses that we will actually hear some pundits on the right cry and whine about how there are just no REAL conservatives willing to stand up to the media and the Democrats and so that was why the nominee lost.
That because the Republican nominee was unwilling to stand up and fight the MSM during the fall election he was contantly bashed and because of that bashing and the Democrat's constantly fraudulent rhetoric against the Republicans, the election was lost.
Of course nary one of those pundits or spokespeople of the right who profess this theory will ever bother to remember Fred Thompson and how he handled them now. No they are all to invested in their idol worship of who ever they have currently attached theselves to for them to actually look at and intellectually evaluate the candidates.
From stories about "Fred's Dead" to "Fred's Cranky" they all have a common thread and that is to bury Thompson from any real consideration. I can only assume that it means the pundits who have attached themselves to say Huckabee or Romney just can't allow themselves or their audience to effectively compare their chosen candidate to Thompson simply because the comparison would do their chosen candidate nothing but harm.
I do love {sarcasticly} how Thompson's skipping of New Hampshire is now trying to be painted as some sort of major defeat. He even points out how other candidates like Guiliani skipped Iowa and no one seemed to mind that fact.
Just further unequal treatment. I still wonder if Romney loses New Hampshire and then South Carolina, will we hear similar stories about "Romney's Dead"? And if Guiliani tanks in his first chosen race in Florida, will he too get the same treatment? Or instead will we hear how Romney is still viable because he has billions in the bank of his own money to continue? And will we be treated to stories about how Guiliani is still viable because there is New York which he brings into play against say Clinton if she somehow ressurects herself?
I am just amused at how far the fascade has had to be pulled away now because these people can't hide behind some incorrect perceptions of their candidates. It will be fun to watch how this gets twisted later depending on the outcome. I just hope we all don't pay too high a price for some folks idol worship of spin meister candidates !!
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
lol, Woody, the "Romney's dead" stories have already begun
January 6, 2008 - 17:30 ET by RJQuite a few pundits on the Sunday talk shows have already declared Romney dead if he doesn't win New Hampshire.
In fact, it was repeated so often it seemed obvious that the "kill Romney" talking points had gone out.
Romney rocked -- or does he rock?!
January 6, 2008 - 18:03 ET by j17ghsThe media used a "brainswashing" quote from George Romney (Mitt's dad) to undercut his dad's presidential campaign in the '70s. George was an American Motors executive (think Javelin, Hornet et al.) and that likely didn't help him.
Suffice to day, when the media want to "kill Romney" (Mitt, that is), you'll know.
If so, then it changed just this morning....................
January 6, 2008 - 18:47 ET by Woody BoydI realize the pundits on TV could be saying something different, but here are the headlines of Romney stories on which I based my statement;
Stirred, Not Shaken New York Times, United States - 17 hours ago
Romney's New Role: Agent of Change Washington Post, United States - Jan 5, 2008
Romney: 'Washington is broken' MSNBC - Jan 5, 2008
Romney Rolls Out Change Message, Too New York Times, United States - Jan 5, 2008
Romney embraces change Boston Globe, United States - Jan 5, 2008
Mitt rides Obama message Boston Herald, United States - Jan 5, 2008
Romney Finds His Voice With Refocused Message CBS News, NY - Jan 5, 2008
Romney Says He's a Candidate of Change The Associated Press - Jan 5, 2008
Then add in the blog posts today titled or containing these statments;
Romney gets "The Treatment" from Rivals
ABC Debate: It Was Romney's Night
Romney bore the brunt of attacks. We’ll see if there’s a backlash among New Hampshire voters to the negativity soon enough.
Romney's Weekend
Romney: I thought Romney was the clear winner, most of all in demeanor and general impact. I've been critical of Mitt's television communication skills in the past, but last night he was Presidential and effective.
Mitt Romney captured his first win of the Republican presidential race, gaining most of Wyoming's delegates at stake in GOP caucuses on Saturday.
So I guess I missed this morning's punditry where they now are claiming he is dead. I hear one pundit the night of the Iowa vote start to make such a statement, but then stopped himself and declared that Romney would be a viable candidate for the long haul simply because he has the money to see it through to the end.
So I would love it if you have a video link to this latest change in the MSM. I don't think those talking points have gone out just yet simply because they want to continue the drama between Romney, McCain, and Huckabee.
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
Change, change, change...
January 6, 2008 - 18:55 ET by Clear thinkerIf I hear this word one more time I'm going to gouge out my eyeballs!
Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/
Change, Change, Change
January 6, 2008 - 19:16 ET by botgChange of fools
(sing it)
GoHunter08
AMEN Brother......
January 7, 2008 - 00:50 ET by Woody BoydI am curious that with all this talk of change do any of the foolish voters that Luntz was polling and talking to have any idea what this supposed change they crave is or even looks like in terms of issues. It is simply more of the same foolishness as always where they start repeating some meaningless word as if it is a real issue.
All it really is though is a word to make foolish uninformed voters feel good about their emotional choices for this election. They can all run around and profess how they voted for the candidate of "Change". In other words they don't really know what the change is, but hey it sounds good. That is it sounded good until they get the tax bill for all of Hillary's or Obama's Socialist programs some where down the road and then it will be "time for a change" again.....
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
Cotton
January 7, 2008 - 15:17 ET by MassConservCT, just stuff some cotton in your ears. It'll hurt less and you can pull it out after November.
No video, Woody
January 6, 2008 - 20:39 ET by RJJust reporting what I saw this AM.
Last night, Daniel Baker also posted a lot of positive early Romney bites.
But, Woody, saying Romney did well in the debate isn't the same thing as saying he's dead if he doesn't win in New Hampshire.
I would totally agree they aren't the same.....
January 7, 2008 - 00:45 ET by Woody BoydBut the problem is how many pundits or MSM types have written stories or spoken on TV and Radio to say that if Romney doesn't win New Hampshire then he is dead.
I can give quite a few links to stories that even today are saying that Thompson is dead and should withdraw. The point I was making back way above had to do with the fact that if both men share similar circumstances why is it the pundits and MSM have chosen to write obits for one and glowing stories about the other?
If we are being honest and going by real scores (say like Delegate counts) at present like these;
Romney 26 44%
Huckabee 20 34%
Thompson 6 10%
McCain 3 5%
Paul 2 3%
Giuliani 1 2%
Hunter 1 2%
Source: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#val=R
Then I would ask where are the Obituaries for Hunter, Guiliani, Paul, and McCain. I mean even if McCain were to win all 17 of New Hampshire's delegates, if Thompson goes to South Carolina and wins it would be 46 delegates. It would seem highly unlikely that South Carolina folks are going to give it to McCain simply because he wins in New Hampshire.
So again, why is it no Obituary for say Guiliani who is waiting and hoping to do well way down in Florida, but tons of them currently for Thompson?
The whole point I was making to begin with was simply the unequal treatment of the candidates by the pundits and the MSM. I posted those links to show that even though Romney had problems in Iowa there were mostly glowing stories about his chances and the possible outcome for him in New Hampshire. I have yet to see any pundit or MSM story that suggests New Hampshire is make or break for him as they are for Thompson about South Carolina. Additionally some in the MSM are making a big stink about how Thompson is so far down in the polls there even though he has made it quite clear he is waiting for South Carolina and expects nothing from New Hampshire.
All of this would seem to be unequal treatment between the many Republican candidates. Are you suggesting that there isn't such treatment?
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
Maybe you're not paying attention, Woody?
January 7, 2008 - 11:34 ET by RJ(kidding)
All I can do is report on what I've seen and heard quite a few pundits saying.
In fact, Dan Rather talked about the same thing on Morning Joe today.
Or at least not to the same sources.....
January 7, 2008 - 11:55 ET by Woody BoydDan Rather on Morning Joe is the lone example you give.
So what's next? Mary Mapes talking about Guiliani or maybe Huckabee? {Just kidding}
I just don't seem the same type of stories or comments being made about other candidates that for some reason are being made about Thompson. There seems to be a wait and see for all the others, even Paul, but not for him.
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
Wow, Woody,
January 7, 2008 - 12:09 ET by RJ...lighten up, fella. "lone example?" I gave you a general impression of what I heard and where I heard it. You're welcome to disbelieve it if you wish.
Frankly, I don't make a habit of recording every TV conversation I hear, but if it's such a big deal to you, I'm sure the transcripts of the five Sunday talk shows are available.
Go get 'em, tiger.
P.S. Woody
January 7, 2008 - 13:52 ET by RJJust heard Rush talking about the same thing: that certain "Washington insiders" and members of the media are pushing the do-or-die in NH idea about Romney.
No, Rush didn't give names, either, but can we put this to bed, now? :^)
The interview that pryed open my wallet.....
January 6, 2008 - 17:15 ET by Woody BoydOk, I will admit that up until now I had chosen to simply support Thompson with my vote alone. I have never been a big fan of throwing money at politicians.
But then I saw the Fox on-air interview with Thompson just now. The original pundit who posted the link advertised it as "Thompson getting ornerier" and called this and another video "Fred porn for the heads". All I can say is that opinion by that pundit/blogger was definitely colored by an obsession with another candidate that Thompson makes look like a panderer.
So this video interview is killer and was enough to make me cough up some dough for Thompson to continue. Do what you will, but I figure I can now claim this fall if we are stuck with a losing candidate like McCain, Huckabee or Romney that I did what I could to avoid that outcome.
Oh the funny part of all this to me is that I was at one time a Democrat about 25 years ago, then I switched to Independent. I don't support the Republican Party because they have too many in the leadership who have no idea what Conservative means. So I laugh because here I find myself giving money to a candidate from a party to which I wouldn't give money.
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." - A. Einstein
right wth you
January 6, 2008 - 18:06 ET by j17ghsI like Thompson's ability to stand up to media and others. Nearly all other candidates are programmed, kiss-asses.
Your sentiments in the last two paragraphs are mine, too.
Thanks for the link, Woody
January 6, 2008 - 18:07 ET by BlondeThat was the interview I saw this morning (my post is above).
I hope Fred kicks a** tonight.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Leadersip...
January 6, 2008 - 18:48 ET by Clear thinkerLeadership is what it comes down to once you get into the voting booth, and right now the only one showing that quality is FRED.
Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/
My first post on here!
January 6, 2008 - 19:38 ET by true_texanAnd I'm happy to voice my support for Fred! I want to watch him open a can of whoop-a$$ on the stupid schmucks of MSM.
hi tru-tex
January 6, 2008 - 19:40 ET by botgGoHunter08
Howdy Tex!
January 6, 2008 - 20:01 ET by BlondeWelcome...a double welcome, actually.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Of all the Presidential
January 6, 2008 - 22:44 ET by msh1973Of all the Presidential hopefuls, Fred scares the msm the most.
Won't play thier game
January 6, 2008 - 23:09 ET by richb313The main reason the press, both liberal and fox, are trying to minimize Fred is because he won't play thier game, like when his delayed announcement came to pass he dissed a worthless debate and instead went on Leno and reached around 10 times the audience. Now he is trying to prove that the pundits, who are only interested in the horse race, are not only a irrevealant but in these dangerous times should be completely ignored. I do not know whether or not his style of campaigning can suceed, I only hope it can. It would bring real substance back into the electorial process.
Ok, I adore Fred Thompson
January 7, 2008 - 04:52 ET by mostlymoderateOk, I adore Fred Thompson now.
Change Schmange
January 7, 2008 - 06:15 ET by entEspousing change just for the sake of change is dangerous twaddle. It's too bad so many voters seem to fall for this sort of empty rhetoric.
I am hoping against hope that Fred will come through. But with the MSM dead set against him, I'm discouraged. Hell, even Drudge, ostensibly a conservative, rarely links to anything about him.