Since it was just a primary (sort of) , I think Mitt would have done much better if he'd just paid each caucus goer the $10,000 he spent on them individually.

I like Mitt, but the cash flash didn't help him much in Iowa.

I ♣ My Seal

Obama is the Messiah who will bring about world peace and cure cancer using his great oration.

Huckabee is Jesus who will lead the fight against the Baby Killers and Sodomites.

Iowans are simply ignorant, naive and suckers. No wonder they rely on government farm and ethanol subsidies since they would be unable to stay in business through real competition like companies run by those Ivy Leaguers.

Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

That "trust, but verify" is a very good slogan if you're Ronald Reagan, but "fool me twice" fits some candidates more aptly when it comes to paying Illegals to do your landscaping. 

Oh, I'm sorry,  That was Mitt Romney, wasn't it?

I ♣ My Seal

Yeah isn't this no more than equating to scoring the first touchdown in football. Doesn't really mean the game is over yet.

Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns

contrary -- here's a good primer on the Common Law foundation of American citizenship.

Even if everything Leon said were true, which is clearly isn't, I see no reference that says an American born child can be strpped of his citizenship based on their parents actions.

Citizenship in the United States

Matters relating to citizenship have always been of concern in the United States, primarily because it is a nation of immigrants. In the early days of the republic there also was a problem of conflicting federal and state responsibilities in this area.

Native and Naturalized Citizens. American citizenship at birth is gained primarily jure soli, but children born abroad to American parents generally are entitled to American citizenship also. Naturalization requirements have changed frequently. Until the 1920s they generally were designed to encourage large-scale immigration. Thereafter immigration was restricted stringently, both in total numbers and according to national origins. Immigration restrictions and naturalization requirements are closely related, so that permanent entry to the United States generally is limited to those eligible to become citizens.

Naturalized citizens legally are equal in almost all respects to persons who have been Americans from birth. The only constitutional disqualification of naturalized citizens is for the offices of president and vice president of the United States. However, naturalized citizens have been subject to loss of citizenship on grounds not applicable to the native-born.

Naturalized citizens who subsequently were believed to have been members of allegedly subversive organizations were, during the 1940s and 1950s, often charged with falsifying their original applications for citizenship; in these cases they were subjected to possible revocation of citizenship and deportation. American law also provided for denaturalization of naturalized citizens who took up permanent residence abroad within five years after naturalization. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the McCarran-Walter Act) also provided for the loss of U.S. citizenship of any naturalized citizen who later resided abroad for five years or for three years in the country of his or her birth or previous nationality. The purpose of these provisions, which were abandoned in 1990, was to deny U.S. citizenship to aliens who did not transfer their permanent allegiance to the United States in good faith. Federal courts and legislators, however, came to view the laws as unreasonable encroachments on the constitutional rights of citizens.

Loss of Citizenship. Several actions have been legal cause for loss of U.S. citizenship for any American, native or naturalized. These include voluntary naturalization in a foreign state, taking an oath of allegiance to a foreign state, unauthorized service in foreign armed forces, employment by a foreign government under certain circumstances, voting in a foreign election, formal renunciation of American nationality, desertion, treason, and draft avoidance.

The U.S. Supreme Court has held unconstitutional the desertion provision (Trop v. Dulles; 1958) and the foreign elections restriction (Afroyim v. Rusk; 1967) and has cast doubt on the validity of all other provisions withdrawing citizenship except when it is voluntarily relinquished. Naturalization in a foreign state, however, still may be held to constitute such relinquishment. A law proposed in 2003 as a supplement to the USA Patriot Act of 2001, which was passed in response to terrorist attacks that year against the United States, would strip citizenship from any person who knowingly provides material support to an allegedly terrorist organization. The provision, however, remains controversial.

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

You gotta admit though, it is funny as hell. 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

The headline should've been Hucka-doodle-doo (eat chicken) & The Hipster.

Where the hell did they get Shazam?