Eleanor Clift: White Male Reagan Dems Are Racist, Sexist

Holt To Huck: Wish You Had a 'Do-over' on Pakistan Comments?

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.
By Mark Finkelstein | December 29, 2007 - 09:53 ET

Could it have been just a couple days ago that Chris Matthews claimed that the media had made a "mascot" out of Mike Huckabee? You wouldn't know it from this morning's Today show.

Weekend host Lester Holt kicked off the show's political segment by implying that among presidential candidates, Huckabee was the big loser in his handling of the Pakistani situation.

LESTER HOLT: The murder of Benazir Bhutto is having a big impact on the presidential race here in this country, where we now stand just five days from the first contest, in Iowa, and it's forcing Republican Mike Huckabee to do a bit of backtracking.

View video here.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Lester tossed it to NBC reporter Lee Cowan in Iowa.

LEE COWAN: Mike Huckabee was actually one of the first candidates to come out and offer a response to the violence in Pakistan, but it's actually what he said about how that relates to the US that's raising some questions.

Cut to clip of Huckabee at an Iowa event. Cowan narrated.

COWAN: It was the second time in two days that Mike Huckabee tried to tie the unrest in Pakistan to illegal immigration, using it as a rationale to build a fence along the US-Mexico border.

MIKE HUCKABEE: There are more Pakistanis who illegally cross the border than of any other nationality, except for those immediately south of our border.

COWAN: Turns out, those numbers aren't quite right. According to the Department of Homeland Security, there were hundreds of Pakistanis who crossed into the US illegally, but they are hardly near the top of the list. In fact, they don't even rank in the top 25.

Holt then interviewed Huckabee.

HOLT: I think some would argue that it was not your finest hour, your comments regarding Pakistan. You said that we should monitor our borders for illegal Pakistani immigrants and you said that Pakistanis make up the second largest group of illegal immigrants in the country. Do you kind of wish you had a do-over on those comments?

HUCKABEE: Well I was quoting from a Denver Post article and pointed out that there were 660 Pakistanis who had been apprehended by Homeland Security. And the point that I was making is still valid, and the fact is that the numbers are over a longer period of time than I had originally thought, but my point is that we don't have control of our borders. And if people go back to a speech that I made in September, it looks almost prophetic [NB: interesting choice of words] when I was spending a lot of time on Pakistan, talking about the danger that exists there. People scoffed at that, they said our issue is Iran, I said you better look at Pakistan. If we have another terrorist attack, it'll be post-marked Pakistan.

HOLT: Are you saying the threat of Pakistani terrorists --

HUCKABEE: Then I looked at the fact though that we have illegals coming into this country and our borders aren't secure, so I think the point is quite valid.

HOLT: Governor, are you saying the main purpose of a border fence is to keep out Pakistani terrorists and not illegal Mexicans?

HUCKABEE: No, no, not at all . . .

HOLT: Governor, as you know, you're in a full-contact sport, presidential politics right now. Critics are quick to pounce on anything perceived as a misstatement or a gaffe. You expressed apologies for what happened in Pakistan, you later said you meant sympathies. You later suggested Pakistan is still under martial law, you went back and clarified that. But can you afford those kind of misstatements when the spotlight is on you and people are looking for credible foreign-policy credentials?

HUCKABEE: What they're looking for is authenticity; they're looking for is honesty. I didn't say "apologies." I said "we need to offer apol-- I mean," then I said. And it was like the reporters pounced on it. Lester, you and I both make mistakes when we make comments. What I don't make a mistake is a mistake of the heart. I know what I believe. I have convictions. People are looking for a president who isn't perfect, but who has at least a sense of direction in his own life and has clear and unmistakable ideas about what's right and what's wrong.

Regarding Huckabee's expression of "apologies" to Pakistan, his claim to Holt of having corrected himself on the fly and not even having pronounced the entire word would seem to be at variance with this CBS News account [emphasis added].

With about 150 supporters crowded around a podium set up on the tarmac of Orlando Executive airport (and about 20 Ron Paul supporters waving signs outside) Mike Huckabee strode out to the strains of “Right Now” by Van Halen and immediately addressed the Bhutto situation, expressing “our sincere concern and apologies for what has happened in Pakistan.”

The Huckabee campaign later clarified the last quote, telling CBS News: "Gov. Huckabee while speaking at a campaign event earlier this morning in Florida intended to extend his deepest sympathies to the people of Pakistan when he used the word 'apologies.' He is outraged and saddened by the attack and the loss of a world leader whose life he believes was a profile in courage."

In any case, as Huckabee establishes himself as a front-runner, it seems that the media-mascot phase has ended. Were he to emerge as the GOP candidate, it's fair to assume yesterday's mascot would soon become an MSM pinata.

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Out of all the Republican

Out of all the Republican candidates, Huckabee had the most asinine statement about the Bhutto assasination. But his response was far from the worst if you include the Democrats responses. Hillary and Bill Richardsons' responses were far more serious and damaging than anything the Huck said. And Obama wasn't too far behind those two bozo's. Hillary stating that "Musharraf has no credibilty" and Richardson calling for him to "step down" are very serious foriegn policy blunders. Then Obama just showing his lack of leadership by blaming Hillary on the murder of Bhutto.

So NBC, when are you going to cover the democrats idiotic responses in depth like you have with Huckabees?

Good question

"So NBC, when are you going to cover the democrats idiotic responses in depth like you have with Huckabees?"

Unfortunately, we know the answer --- they won't. In fact, it would never even occur to them. That's the problem when 90% of the news media vote democrat.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Huckabee

Mike seems like the real nice guy next door. Unfortunately, that doesn't cut it in the race for President of the United States. And yes, the media should have picked up on Hillary's and Richardson's typical liberal knee-jerk reactions. Just kick out anyone with whom you disagree. What ever happened to  "diplomacy"? Is that how they'd run their presidency? Guess its o.k. with the idiots in the MSM. In the world of modern "journalism", ignorance is bliss.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

You Are Correct

You are correct about that. I have been thinking about that for a while. I have a neighbor who is a really nice guy, fun and interesting to talk to. However, when we talk politics, I realize pretty quickly that if he ever ran for office, I wouldn't vote for him for anything above a City Council position. Even then I would have to think about it. I'm sure he feels the same way about me.

That's how I feel about Huckabee. Governor of Arkansas? Sure, whatever. President? No way buddy.

Exactly - It's A Full Contact Sport

And people like Huckabee, Romney, Clinton and Obama are exposed big time when confronted with real life crises such as the Bhutto assassination. Their first inclination is to offer some general gibberish about the circumstances, and then toss in some far fetched solution that won't last longer than snow in Florida. I liked Dodd's take on these kinds of responses, and I'm paraphrasing here. He criticized Hillary and Obama for their comments, but went further by conveying what many are thinking.  It's not "experience" to be watching world events from the side lines, as Hillary is expounding on a daily basis. It's not good enough for us.  He used as an example, Mrs. Bush, though a lovely lady and having similar "experiences" to Mrs. Clinton, would hardly be considered qaulified to be President. He further went on to suggest how ludicrous it would be for someone, such as his own wife, to take credit for some of the key legislation he's authored over the recent years simply because she was at his side.  And this is exactly the point. There are no do overs here, we must be focused on electing proven leaders to lead us. And when you see things as unstable as Pakistan, and other volatile hotspots, do you really want the likes Huckabee, Clinton, or Obama pulling the levers of goverment to find a solution, or would prefer the likes of McCain, Giuliani,  Biden, or Dodd.  For my money, and I'm late to this conclusion, I'm for McCain - he's head and shoulders above anyone else in this dogfight.

Demos

No matter what, any of the three little piggies presently in the Democratic lead will be a disaster for this nation. God help us if one of them gets elected.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

I am pretty much in

I am pretty much in agreement with you but don't think I could support 'Keating 5 McCain'. He was a good airplane driver almost half a century ago but his only expertise since then is to sit in hearings and cast an occasional vote on military matters. His gloom and doom personality is not what I want to see as my leader and his positions on things like illegal immigration and campaign finance are totally out of step with me.

I will support Romney. His morality and executive experience will be critical in dealing with our spiraling problems with image, trade and fiscal problems, and I am confident that he will surround himself with quality advisors in dealing with security matters.

If any of the current dems take over we will quickly and permanently spiral into just another failed socialist state.

 

I Don't Disagree With You Re McCain

To a certain extent, I feel the same way. However, looking at the disatrous Democratic lineup, Giuliani's baggage, Huckabee's "Hope Rope-a-Dope), and Thompson's inexplicable comatose campaign, I'm left w/McCain.  I normally would easily take Romney, however, being in MA and watching him roll into the governorship and effectively bail out in two years, is not sitting well w/me.  Worse yet, he didn't do a damn thing to help his Lt. Governor beat Deval Patrick; so he not only bailed, he sat by and let the Dems takeover without a fight.  As I look at it today, I'm still not convinced that Gore doesn't enter and then it's lights out; he'll win without so much as a whimper simply from his overrated standing with the press, Hollywood, and pity from the first time he ran.

McCAIN WILL APPOINT A LIBERAL SCOTUS FOR MSM PRAISE

Just my feelings on that. Watch the Romney interview posted here and explain how he was exposed. More like he exposed Ann Curry and the MSM.

LIP Huckabee

Huckabee is a typical Liberal In Process as he is Learning In Progress.

I could just hear the liberal press asking Reagan if he wanted "do over" or George Bush if wanted a "do over" and it would make things all better.

Iowans I hope you are getting it through your corn fed souls that Huckabee is not the answer as he can not get it right no more than Hillary or Obama can.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

If Huckabee becomes the GOP

If Huckabee becomes the GOP nominee, the MSM will persecute him because he is an unapologetic believer in Jesus Christ.  I am reading his book "Character is the Issue" and it is fantastic.

That may be true Lily, but

That may be true Lily, but throughout his career he's been surprisingly liberal on many of his other position's. He's a RINO at best at that's putting it conservatively.

I myself would have a hard time voting for a Republican who is also a darling of the left-wing media and also would seem to be a mainstream liberal's choice, if they had to have a Republican as POTUS. Huck to the media and it would seem most lib's, is the lesser of all evil's if they dont' get their Dem in the Whithouse in 08'.

That's not all though. I think the left in promoting Huck actually really believe that he will muck it up and continuously shoot his self in the foot and then put said foot in mouth making all of us conservatives look stupid, promoting a Dem even further. He's doing a good job of it allready.

Just my take, anyway.

.

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Wake Up, Iowa

Wake up, voters in Iowa.

This is not a drill!