Nothing is deadlier to a campaign than a rumor that a candidate might be dropping out. But NBC has seen fit to suggest that Rudy Giuliani might be withdrawing from the presidential race based on what it itself calls "speculation" in the blogosphere.
NBC Nightly News weekend anchor Lester Holt interviewed John Harwood on this evening's edition.
LESTER HOLT: Let's turn to Rudy Giuliani. He's had a health scare, he's had a drop in the polls. You've seen it in the blogosphere: a lot of speculation as to whether he'll stay in this race. What do you think?
View video here.
JOHN HARWOOD: The question arises, Lester, because of the way he left that 2000 senate race against Hillary Clinton. But I talked to his aides today. They say that he appears to be fine, he's in it for the long haul. The bigger problem may be with the voters, though. As he falls further behind in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, those early states, his lead in the bigger states to follow like Florida and California is shrinking.
The reference to "the way he left that 2000 senate race against Hillary Clinton" is an allusion to the fact that Rudy chose not to run in 2000 after he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. But if the NBC folks had tuned into ABC World News this evening, they could have viewed a George Stephanopoulos interview with Giuliani in which he said that his doctor "put out a statement that I'm in very good health; every test came back normal."
Yes, Harwood cited Giuliani campaign sources saying Rudy's in it "for the long haul." But simply floating the rumor does the damage. What are the odds NBC would give such credence to the speculation of the pajamahadeen for purposes of floating a rumor harmful to a leading Dem contender?
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Could NBC BE a bigger
December 22, 2007 - 21:54 ET by Gary P JacksonCould NBC BE a bigger cheerleader for the left?
This does of course show how afraid the MSM is of Rudy. They know good and well that if Rudy DOES get the nomination, it's lights out for any dim. (which is why they are are shilling for the Huckster)
sorry, double post.
December 22, 2007 - 21:55 ET by Gary P Jacksonsorry, double post.
LESTER DOLT: Let's turn to
December 22, 2007 - 22:00 ET by Jack BauerLESTER DOLT: Let's turn to Hillary Clinton. She's had a smear scare, she's had a drop in the polls. You've seen it in the blogosphere: a lot of speculation as to whether she'll stay in this race. What do you think?
Jack
December 22, 2007 - 22:18 ET by MrShyYou're totally right, NO MSM outlet would ever "speculate" something like that.
That is the most fast-and-loose, baseless "speculation" imaginable. But they're more than happy to keep on "speculating" on anything Republican-related, or anything that might do damage to the GOP, i.e. recession "speculations" that are thrown at us daily, climate "speculation", direction-of-Iraq "speculation". "Speculating" does plenty of damage, as it simply plants doubt in the viewer's mind, and they're fully aware of this.
We bid a fond farewell to Professor Talking Points & Cheetos
Mr S... does it even rise
December 22, 2007 - 22:32 ET by Jack BauerMr S... does it even rise to the level of speculation?
Sounds more like wishful thinking.
Seems the Dems have spoken again
December 23, 2007 - 00:06 ET by general companyAnd when it does cave in, who will they blame? Not themselves of course. They are very frightened, because their Dems are showing their idiocy daily. This is make up. BTW this garbage should be a campaign contribution.
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Well, Sr. Bauer
December 23, 2007 - 00:38 ET by BlondeDo they speculate in London?
Seriously, I'd love to know what the line on Hillary is...as the next big flame out. I know there are "sporting" sites where you are, Jack....so what gives?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Q&A
December 22, 2007 - 22:02 ET by AndanteQ.) ..."You've seen it in the blogosphere: a lot of speculation as to whether he'll stay in this race. What do you think?...
A.) I think you're an idiot, next question.
"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."... Karl Marx? Nope, it was Hillary Clinton.
I surf quite a bit
December 23, 2007 - 00:11 ET by general companyI havent seen it anywhere, but then again I dont surf where the imbeciles are. No doubt those are the only sites they monitor
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
I think it is baseless and
December 22, 2007 - 22:23 ET by webdrI think it is baseless and stupid.
However he should get out of the race because he is dragging the field down with his liberalism!
Sources cited: "the
December 23, 2007 - 12:03 ET by ziplinedownSources cited: "the blogosphere"