Is the MSM deciding that Hillary is irreparably-damaged goods and that it's time to move on to a Dem with a better shot at winning the White House? You might think so after the Today show's dismemberment of the Clinton campaign this morning.
Andrea Mitchell kicked things off with sharp stiletto heel.
View video here.
ANDREA MITCHELL: On top of growing concerns they could not only lose Iowa but lose it big, the Clinton team is now trying to control that growing storm over negative campaigning. But the forced resignation of one top advisor may not be enough. The Clinton campaign is now in damage control, after denying it authorized an attack on Barack Obama for his acknowledged adolescent drug use.
Hours before the candidates were all smiles at this Iowa debate Thursday, Hillary Clinton apologized to Obama. He told her leadership had to come from the stop to stop negative campaigning. Shortly afterward, Clinton's New Hampshire co-chairman Bill Shaheen resigned, saying he regretted telling the Washington Post Republicans could attack Obama for using drugs and he went further, saying Republicans could ask, when was the last time, did you ever gave drugs to anyone, did you sell them to anyone? That is a far cry from what Obama acknowledges, teenage drug use, which he warns children against. Obama said it's been used against him already as he told Tom Brokaw in 2004.
Roll clip.
TOM BROKAW: Aren't the Republicans going to come after you on that?
BARACK OBAMA: You know, they already have. It's important that elected officials like myself don't pretend that we're perfect but simply to say that we progress and as a consequence of that progression maybe can give something back.
Mitchell then drew an invidious comparison between Obama's openness and the slick way Bill Clinton dealt with the drug issue.
MITCHELL: It is very different from the way the first Clinton campaign handled the drug use.
Cut to the infamous Clinton clip.
BILL CLINTON: I experimented with marijuana a time or two and I didn't like it and didn't inhale.
Next, Obama.
BARACK OBAMA: It's not something I'm proud of. It was a mistake as a young man. But, you know, I mean, I'm not going to -- I never understood that line. The point was to inhale.
Ouch.
Andrea was far from finished.
MITCHELL: But even after Hillary Clinton's campaign apologized for bringing up the issue, on MSNBC's Hardball, Clinton's top strategist Mark Penn raised it again.
Cut to clip.
MARK PENN: The issue related to cocaine use is not something that the campaign was in any way raising and I think that's been made clear.
Joe Trippi, John Edwards's advisor, called Penn out.
JOE TRIPPI: He just did it again. He just said it again. Unbelievable. This guy's been filibustering and he just said cocaine again.
Mitchell ended with some acid analysis.
MITCHELL: Despite denials that that attack was deliberate, Clinton allies have been openly frustrated that people are not paying more attention to Obama's teenage drug use. And their problem now is that that is exactly the kind of politics that Iowans say they don't like.
Andrea then tossed the ball [knife] to Matt Lauer, who interviewed Tim Russert. Things didn't improve from the Clinton perspective. Russert sketched a timeline suggesting skepticism about the Clinton campaign claim they hadn't connived with Bill Shaheen.
RUSSERT: The Clinton campaign understands that there is a huge backlash about this kind of behavior. A former Washington Post reporter Tom Edsall on Tuesday, Matt, wrote that Clinton allies were pushing this story. The next day Mr. Shaheen in New Hampshire drops it. So there's a lot of finger pointing going on. In our polling, the Clinton campaign was identified as the most negative campaign in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. So there's a problem here that they have to deal with.
. . .
The fallout is considerable in [New Hampshire]. If you read any of the newspapers and monitor the media, Matt, and it's very negative. People thought it was a dirty trick and they simply don't like it.
The duo closed with a final dagger, emphasizing the moment from yesterday's Dem debate that was simultaneously Barack's best and Hillary's worst.
MATT LAUER: If there was a highlight in that debate, it came during a question to Barack Obama and an exchange, then, between Senator Obama and Senator Clinton. Let's take a listen.
Roll clip of the moderator asking Obama how he can offer change given that he has so many former Clinton administration officials in his own campaign. Hillary can be heard cackling, saying "I want to hear that."
OBAMA: Well, Hillary, I'm looking forward to you advising me as well.LAUER: It's a good line. He got off a very good line, and I think what it shows is he's feeling the momentum. He's dealing with a lot of confidence right now.
RUSSERT: Matt, you're absolutely right. You know Barack Obama has not been the best debater in all these debates. Hillary Clinton has gotten very high marks. But now that he is perceived as the front-runner in Iowa in many polls, he seems to have a greater sense of confidence and he's a very good counter-puncher as we saw there. It was a line that tested extremely well with focus groups monitored after the debate.
The screen-graphic asked "Is Clinton Drug Attack Backfiring?" NBC left no doubt as to its answer. That could be an omen of bad MSM things to come for Hillary.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
It's a beautiful day, people!!
December 14, 2007 - 10:05 ET by OldSailor88Stories like this just make me giddy.
Don't Learn
December 14, 2007 - 10:11 ET by allanfI guess NBC did not learn from Tim Russert's experience. Time for Andrea to be taken to the woodshed. She will soon be Wolf Blitzized.
It will not be long now
December 14, 2007 - 11:27 ET by kgIt will not be long now before the Clinton machine starts bashing reporters that fail to walk the line. We all expect Hillary to covertly try to destroy any and all her opponents. The reporters are jumping on this only because it is silly stuff being released by Clinton. The reporters are scratching their heads thinking WTF, where is the juicy stuff, the kind of stuff that makes headlines. Is this the best she can do?
This is so hysterically
December 14, 2007 - 12:22 ET by LilyPearlThis is so hysterically funny to me that I am trying to not fall out of my chair laughing. Seems like Hill is getting a taste of being on the receiving end.
This Will be Fun.
December 14, 2007 - 10:10 ET by NoMoreClintonsI think that the media smell blood in the water and will now get their "revenge" on Hitlery for the way she has treated them. It's payback time, boys and girls. You can only kick a dog so many times before he turns on you. Expect some further, serious finger shaking from BJ.
"Et tu, Brute"...... I
December 14, 2007 - 10:21 ET by USA4freedom"Et tu, Brute"...... I agree with you, NoMoreClintons.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
I agree with USA.It has
December 14, 2007 - 10:49 ET by well99I agree with USA.It has made my day.
Ouch, ouch...The
December 14, 2007 - 10:20 ET by Senior ChiefOuch, ouch...The democracks campaign a lot on negatives- because that's who they are- and personal destruction. And Hillary tasted her own medicine. Cackle, cackle, cackle... Will Hillary blame GWB or Global Warming on her declining popularity?! We can ask Algore.
miserable hillary
December 14, 2007 - 10:44 ET by ronyou reap what you sow and it may be that hill will have a bumper crop
Cackle
December 14, 2007 - 10:48 ET by FOXFANI don't think anything is more irratating than the fake Hillary laugh(Clinton cackle) after Osama Obama zinged her. I agree SC, personal destruction is a trademark of the Clintons. Does her thighness know GWB will not be running for president again?
She's already laid the foundation.
December 14, 2007 - 10:48 ET by dervishIt's going to be sexist bigots, and of course the VRWC, who get the blame for not being willing to vote for a woman.
We just don't like strong
December 14, 2007 - 11:00 ET by pbanks7We just don't like strong women. ;-)
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
payback can be tough
December 14, 2007 - 10:42 ET by candanceAh, so Queen Hillary is finding out it doesn't pay to make enemies with the press. First Tim Russert, then Joe Scarborough, then embarrassing CNN - who knew they would hold such a grudge? :p
Trying to throw it off as Republican tactics..hee hee...Republicans aren't even doing it.
Fascism in America, thy name is Hillary Clinton.
What's really sad is that
December 14, 2007 - 10:42 ET by DarkseanWhat's really sad is that this is NOT an issue and probably can't be brought up in the general election. What's sadder is that his drug use is a positive point for the Dems. <shakes head>
don't be sad ....
December 14, 2007 - 11:02 ET by mustangsallyDon't be too sad Darksean. Obama's foreign policy inexperience is a far richer and more devastating target than even his admitted Cocaine use.
Osama-bama will look like a wet-behind-the-ears teenager next to McCain, Guliani, Thompson or Romney, and they will call him on it ...
It didn't work against GWB
December 14, 2007 - 16:41 ET by mvfreemanDuring GWB's first run it came out that he had used drugs and alcohol when he was younger. It didn't keep conservatives from voting for him because it was in the past and he was no longer doing it. Same for Obama.
Not to mention that in this day and age most people have at least tried recreational drugs at some point in their lives. At high schools and colleges everywhere there is plenty of drug use going on. Unless it's heroin or IV drug use it just doesn't have the stigma it used to.
The media wants a Democrat to win.....
December 14, 2007 - 10:55 ET by Missouri Conservative...and they don't care who it is. If it looks like Hillary is jeopardizing the Democrat sweep that the drive-by media so desperately craves, they will throw her overboard for a more viable candidate. The media craves.....CRAVES a Democrat sweep next year. They must have a viable candidate. Their love affair with the Clintons notwithstanding, they are Democrats first and foremost, and they will back whomever they think is a "winning horse".
"women and minorities hardest hit"
I wonder though, if Hillary
December 14, 2007 - 11:19 ET by DarkseanI wonder though, if Hillary makes the general and really tanks it, would she take a dem house or senate majority with her? Can the same be said about other dem candidates?
People
December 14, 2007 - 12:25 ET by cvgbuckeyePeople, people, people, tsk, tsk, tsk. Wake up! This MSM is still drunk on the wine of the Clintons and they always will be. This is just a little lovers spat and they will crawl back to the Clintons on their hands and knees drooling for the Clinton's foregiveness.
AND YOU SHOULD REJOICE ABOUT IT! The dems and MSM (whats the difference?) are far to stupid and bull-headed to admit to themselves that THAT WOMAN "is totally flawed and unelectable". They are barely smart enough to understand that Obama is unelectable. The only candidate they have who MIGHT be acceptable to The Great American People, they won't accept (Bill Richardson). THE NOMINEE WILL BE HILLARY!
They greatly underestimate the nuclear war that Republicans are going to unleash on THAT WOMAN. It will get so bad that when the MSM sees that she is mortally wounded, they will continue their suicide march and do anything to get the Clintons back in the White House and die in mortified horror at the thought of ANOTHER REPUBLICAN;;YYYYAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
Continue to pray that their nominee will be Hillary. I can't wait.
Considering that Hillary's
December 14, 2007 - 12:12 ET by FlashmanConsidering that Hillary's brother-in-law is on an FBI tape trying to acquire drugs, saying that her husband has a nose like a vacuum cleaner, the simple thing for Obama would be to say that every candidate and their spouse should be tested for drugs to clear the matter up once and for all.
I am dubious
December 14, 2007 - 12:24 ET by ToddonCapeCodFolks, throughout the 90's there were countless times we thought we had the Clinons' number, only to have them skate away without a scratch, due largely to the MSM. I am just dubious. Perhaps before these stories aired, the network sent Hillary a letter, apologizing profusely, saying, "Sorry, sorry, sorry. We just have to make it appear like we're not as biased towards you as we really are! Please don't hate us! Please continue to grant you interviews! We'll continue to kiss your feet and... whatever else you want us to kiss! Please!"
cvgbuckeye, Dag nab it,
December 14, 2007 - 13:00 ET by pocomococvgbuckeye,
Dag nab it, you stole my thunder.
Hillary is still 'a clear and present danger'.
Over the years the MSM have invested too mush time, effort, ink, and pixels to give up on her.
Their ultimate goal, of course, is to get Bill back into the White House and establish CamelotIII.
I Have a Different Take
December 14, 2007 - 13:33 ET by ELCoreI think that "report" is meant to be advice to the Clinton campaign: you're in trouble, and here's why, so knock if off, okay?
The MSM
December 14, 2007 - 14:08 ET by okiehawk44The MSM gave us the Clintons -- they were captivated by the charm of the then Governor of Arkansas and all but crowned him king back in the '80s -- they protected both of them when all evidence of whatever the "crime du jour" was evident -- i.e. why did Hillary have billing records of a law firm in her closet at the WH? & why did she employ that Livingstone character as her private eye? -- and on-and-on. The MSM in the past, present and future have, do and will LOVE both Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham. Don't let the Russerts or the Mitchells or any other MSM type tell you otherwise.
Hopefully this is a portent
December 14, 2007 - 14:23 ET by mattmHopefully this is a portent of doom for Hitlery, but I wouldn't count on it.
This is just another case
December 14, 2007 - 17:26 ET by BeowulfThis is just another case of the Lefties eating their own. They did it with Leiberman, Pelosi and other avid left-wingers. The potential exists for them to do it to Shrillary.
There's nothing more vicious than ex-lovers, and the Clintonistas and the LSM have been in bed for years. Maybe, just maybe, the love affair is over.
I've actually been waiting for something like this for several months with Her Thighness and her male shrew dictating policy to the media while at the same time giving them biatch-slaps. The LSM consider themselves at least as high and mighty as the Clintonistas, so don't react well to being dictated to. Also, if Shrillary and Shrew stay true to form, they will throw a couple of slaps at the LSM in retribution, which in turn, will generate more animosity. So hopefully, the honeymoon is well and truly over.
I have high hopes that this will be the end of the Clintonistas as a political force, at least for this round. Which will leave Obama and Edwards, whom the repubidiots will handily defeat in the general election. My perspective is who will cause the least damage - Dems or Repubs? I can deal with some corruption and sexual scandals from the republicans, but the Dems will tax us into oblivion, take away every iota of free will, and hand the reins of this nation over to a body such as the UN. We would never recover. Sex and money over liberalism should be a campaign motto...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Sooner than I thought
December 14, 2007 - 14:42 ET by celatorI had guessed that the Clinton campaign would go into melt down at some point, but not this soon. I did not anticipate that the democrats would do her in as badly as they have (the vast LEFT-wing conspiracy? ;+}). And I underestimated the sheer, stupifying incompetence Hillary herself has displayed in her campaign. Amazing.
This is going to be a wonderful Christmas.
It may be a wonderful christmas, But,
December 14, 2007 - 16:35 ET by IamTinmanBad as the thought of a Billery controlled White House, the dems have far worse to offer. Imagine Edwards, Obama or some combination therof and be afraid, be very afraid! The whack jobs we have in congress are bad enough, we don't need them in the White House.
It's true...
December 14, 2007 - 17:20 ET by celatorIt's true, the d's have some very strange and dangerous characters on the bench. Hillary is only one of them.
The nightmare: Having Hillary, Obama or Edwards as commander in chief of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps. Carter and Billy Clinton tried their very best to destroy the military services.The three aformentioned nutcases would try to finish the job.
Comeback Kid II???
December 14, 2007 - 16:40 ET by mustangsallyI think this is a set-up folks. Remember Bill in 1992, when he came in second in NH but declared himself the "victor" and the media dubbed him the "comeback kid".
For the Hillary/MSM lovefest to continue, all she has to do is "exceed expectations" which they've now set so low that even Mike Dukaka could meet them ...
Hillary is not dead yet ... in the tradition of Chicago politicians, she'll bend the laws of physics and morals to make her comeback. And the Press will be there to aid and abet ...
GF
December 15, 2007 - 01:38 ET by WesenGod Forbid. This is the relative kept locked in the basement, not Billdo. If the LSM gets behind her what do they gain?
Backstage pass
December 15, 2007 - 10:28 ET by acumenIf the LSM gets behind her what do they gain?
Other than all things leftist, an up-close view of one of the world's largest asses.
That Cackle seemed to be
December 15, 2007 - 09:28 ET by Lancasters Saved UsThat Cackle seemed to be cued by someone in master control. " LAugh light on, Audio up on Mic 3, Hillary about to laugh spontaneously" It definitely backfired. If it had to be a Dem in charge, great that it is not a Clinton, but I fear that Edwards would manage to get in on the act somewhere. Cue Gag response.